
tannertan36
wallacepolsom
KIROKAZE

JBB: An Artblog!

Love Begins

blake kathryn

titsay

Kaledo Art
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
RMH
trying on a metaphor
Jules of Nature
Stranger Things
Peter Solarz
ojovivo
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
Show & Tell
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
dirt enthusiast

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Peru
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from Argentina
@wallpaper-admirer

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I don't get seasonal depression, I just get slightly sleepier and more irritable and mopey when I donât get any sunlight, but when I said this to my doctor she was like âyou should still get a lightboxâ and I did and now I have way more energy. The moral of the story is, if you spend time thinking to yourself âwell I donât actually have [diagnosable problem], I have [milder version that I can just ignore]â, you could instead of just ignoring it get the accommodation for the problem and see if it improves your life. I do not expect to remember this next time I âdonât actually have the real problemâ, but maybe eventually I will learn.
We treat accommodations like something that you can only have if youâre really really desperately suffering and cannot function at all without them, but thatâs⌠really really not the case. Or at least it shouldnât be.
Not to uuuhhh highjack this post, but I have some experience with this. Not only does it corroborate the above but I have found that even you donât have any need for whatever accommodation that also shouldnât bar you from getting one if you justâŚ
want it
see years ago my grandmother was diagnosed with cancer, and as happens with progressing cancer her mobility was drastically reduced. To help combat this and allow her to retain independence at home Papa (my grandfather) got a shower chair. This is about as self-descriptive as it can get, it is a chair made of metal and plastic that sits in your shower or bathtub. Iâm sure those with physical disabilities are already quite familiar with them, for those of you that arenât just google it.
Eventually my grandmother passed. A couple years after my dad had to stay at Papaâs house for a couple weeks, for his own medical reasons. While there he discovered that Papa had kept the chair. And while Papa was old he was hardly infirm, he didnât use a cane or have any severe mobility issues. Certainly none that would have affected his ability to stand in the shower. The conversation went more or less as such:
Dad: Why they hell did you keep the shower chair, dad? You donât need it
Papa: Kevin, you wait until you use it. Then youâll know why I kept it.
My dad was disbelieving tbh, to him chairs in showers when you donât need them was a thing that like. Lazy rich people had. wtf could be so great about being able to sit in the shower? Why would an able-bodied person even need to? itâs a fucking shower? wash urself and then get out. Then he used the chair, and according to him it was like heâd had a proper religious revelation. Shortly after his return home (tbh the amount of time it took for him to take a shower sans chair) my dad went out and bought a shower chair.
The ensuing conversation with my mother went as such:
Mom: Kevin why did you buy that? We donât need it!
Dad: Just use it once, this will change your life.
And it did. After using the chair for the first time my mom straight up wanted to know why they had never thought to get a chair for the shower before. Ever since we have had a chair in the shower.
It has proven itself invaluable.
Exhausted but covered in grime from yardwork so you HAVE to wash before doing anything else? shower chair
Donât have the spoons to stand in the shower? shower chair
Leg/hip/back injury slowly getting worse over time making standing for long periods a difficult matter? shower chair
Home from work and just want to shower but your feet are killing you? shower chair
canât keep your balance when masturbating in the shower? shower chair
want to write fic in ur head without your feet starting to hurt because you maybe spent a little too long standing there in spray? shower chair
disassociating? shower chair
gotta shave your legs? shower chair
crying because youâve now realized how much easier being able to sit down and prop up a leg makes shaving while in the shower? shower chair
I have no current mobility issues, and yet if I had to move house tomorrow a shower chair of my own would be one of the first things I purchase for my own home.
Itâs so easy to fall into the trap of âthis could make my life easier but do I really need it?â And yâknow what maybe you donât need it. Maybe you donât need that accommodation, but maybe it would make your life easier anyway. When it comes to things that you keep in your home for personal use does it really matter? Besides there is always the very real chance that buying it now, when you don'tâ need it but can afford it, will save your ass down the line when you suddenly do desperately need it.
I would also like to point out: if able-bodied people start using things that were originally designed as disability accommodations, they become normalised. They become acceptable. And then all of a sudden theyâre widely available, they usually become cheaper, and disabled people donât get shit for needing them.
Buy the damn shower chair. Get a JarKey so you donât need gorilla strength to open the pickled onions. Install soft-touch taps. Revel in your newly comfortable life while also making the world a slightly more disability-friendly place.
*banging fist on table* CURB CUTTER EFFECT
Audio description:
[Sound of typing]
Person 1: Morning, Jill!
Jill: Morning, Stacey!
Stacey: What'd'ja get up to this weekend?
Jill: Oh, I had a lovely little breakdown.
Stacey: Did you?
Jill: I did, yeah. Really treated myself. I felt on the brink all week so I decided to stalk my ex just to push myself over the edge.
Stacey: Johnathon?
Jill: That's the one.
Stacey: Oh, he's got a gorgeous new girlfriend.
Jill: I know.
Stacey: Nice.
Jill: And he's just landed himself his dream job.
Stacey: Oh. [pause]. And you're here. [pause]. Ideal!
Jill: That only had me tearing up so I pushed it a little bit further. I tried on a dress from five years ago.
Stacey: [gasp] You bugger.
Jill: Then I grabbed a bottle of wine, box of McVities, whacked on the news, accidentally opened up my phone on selfie mode, and [blows a kiss French chef style] sobbing.
Stacey: Ahh, that sounds good.
Jill: Felt amazing, nothing like a good cry.
Stacey: You must have felt reborn.
Jill: Oh, I certainly felt like I was being birthed by that dress afterwards.
Stacey: [hums in a satisfied way]
Jill: [hums in a satisfied way]
[Pause while Stacey blows on her drink]
Jill: How 'bout you?
Stacey: Oh, I just saw some family.
Jill: Oh.
[pause while both nod]
Jill: Oh! So massive breakdown.
Stacey: Huge.
[End description]
You're doing God's work
People will say âI donât dream of laborâ like that is nice but I just want to shelve books and generate curricula for information access and youth literacy and just because I am opposed to the fact that labor is an obligation to survival under capitalism does not mean that I donât aspire to labor for the benefit and maintenance of society. I dream of labor that is meaningful and life-giving to my community. I know capitalist alienation has convinced you that existence is ineffectual but itâs not a revolutionary belief. Itâs an outgrowth of individualism.
This is hands down the best tik tok ever made.
mAM dOES yOUR hUSBAND HAVE NIPPLES
A universal experience.
[Transcription: all speech in the video is auto-tuned]
Story time: Iâm a vet tech and one time I was [???] this lady for an appointment with her little dog who was covered in bugs
I searched this dog high and low for bugs, couldnât find a single one
I said maâam can you please point out these bugs to me
She said oh my gosh canât you see them theyâre right on his belly
She showed me her dogâs nipples and proceeded to try to rip them off
I said maâam no stop
Those are his nipples
She said
Thereâs no way, heâs a boy
I said maâam that doesnât mean he doesnât have nipples
Those are definitely his nipples, notice how theyâre so symmetrical
She said no way, heâs a boy I said
Maâam doesnât your husband have nipples
I add vet tech storytimeâŚ.lady brings in a kitten, terribly concerned heâs got a cold or asthma or somethingâŚheâs always making this alarming sound in his chest but heâs so active and affectionate and loves to snuggle. Neither her or her husband have ever had a cat before, so she just wants to make sure they get everything right and take good care of their newest family member.
I pet the kitten as I give this lady pamphlets and a personalized Cat Owner 101 lesson.
The kitten is leaving a great time, nearly comatose with happy in my lapm
She goes âThatâs it!! Thatâs the sound!! Whatâs wrong with him?! If thereâs anything we can do, weâll do it! Heâs my sonâs best friend, we love him!â
I stare at her helplessly, fighting every impulse because this woman is so genuine in her love and concern for this, the first cat her family has ever experienced.
âMa'am,â I say, so, SO gently.
âMa'am, heâs purring. It means youâre making him happy.â
the video was sO FUNNY and then the last reply melted my entire heart

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
UNMUTE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD
the lip syncing has me shook to absolute death
YOU CANâT WATCH ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER HALF!!!
THE ENDING NOOOOOO
Idk who needs to hear this, but saying you're shaving for yourself doesn't change the fact that if you were a man, the idea of shaving all your body hair to have a soft leg would sound crazy to you.
Your body hair eventually softens. You get uses to seeing it. You get used to your body.
I can attest! My leg hair has been growing free for 3 years.
I think Iâm on year two? At first it was really prickly and itchy and awful (like for a month, my hair grows slowly, but shaving was also awful) and now my hair is very soft
I'm on year 5. Not like a solid 5 years of no shaving, but I could probably count the number of times I've shaved in the past 5 years on my hands.
I'm on year 7, same conditions as @sapphos-witch-gf , but those were probably in the first couple of years too. It's very soft and I love the look on men/boys faces when they question me and I'm completely unabashed and confident on my stance. Womanhood is so confining that the tiniest of things can feel like a power play to men. It's wonderful telling them that I don't shave for the same reason they don't, as I know how difficult it is for the average man to relate himself to a woman, and they get a delightful look on their faces when they see I've put us on the same level, even if only for the conversation.
Fr. Men always think it's some intentionally feminist thing they can argue. But it's not. For me it's just "cause why would I?" It's an hour of my week (I didn't regularly shave long enough to get to the point where I need to do daily shaving) for my legs to not be that different and then the hair just starts growing again!
5 years of zero shaving. Haven't been asked to justify myself yet. Then again I avoid men lol but I think despite the fact that I'm pretty hairy with dark hair people just don't notice. To think I used to be so self conscious as a teenager. What a waste of my time.
Straight up so much time wasted on self hatred, insecurities, and self consciousness. We had it beat into us that if we didn't look perfect, we were worth less. And it doesn't serve us to be thinking about leg hair.
basically, i think the general rule of thumb is: if someone REALLY wants the blood thatâs inside of your body, and theyâre like⌠a vampire, or a dracula, or some sort of mansquito, then thatâs probably okay. a dracula and a mansquito are made for removing things like blood and swords from inside your body. thatâs basically fine.
if something wants to get at your blood, and theyâre, say, some kind of murdersaurus, or maybe a really big frog, thatâs where the problems start to arise. a really frog is not made for removing blood, and your blood knows this, which is why it is so vehement about wanting to stay IN your body instead of coming out.Â
unfortunately this will not deter a really big frog, because a really big frog is full of things like prizes, and value, and quite a lot of hatred, and it would REALLY rather like to replace any and all of those things with your blood, and basically by any means possible.
These words scan with a fantastic degree of confidence considering that together they make no sense at all
sometimes if you squint hard enough there are individual coherent sentences
i sent this to my philosophy teacher, and this was his reply:Â
 This is a very interesting question.
There are a few ways to go about answering it that come to mind.
Considering Intent. This is kind of like the Kantian way of doing things: as long as youâre doing something for good reasons, it is OK. Conversely, doing something for bad reasons is wrong.
Dracula has arguably good reasons for sucking blood - that is how he sustains himself. He would die otherwise (or whatever the equivalent of death is for those that are undead), and we generally think that when having to choose between survival and death, it is almost never wrong to choose survival (even at the expense of anotherâs life - think of self-defense killing).
The mansquito likewise has arguably good reasons, assuming they need the blood for the same reasons that a Mosquito needs blood.
It is worth pointing out here how when it comes to common pests like Mosquitos, Black Flies, Deer Flies, etc., no matter how annoying they may be to us, and how much we may hate them, we do not really think that they are evil. Yeah, we wish they were wiped off the face of the Earth forever, but we donât think that they are bad. Theyâre just doing what nature has programmed them to do. For the same reasons we do not say that a Tornado is evil, even if it destroys whole towns.Â
So this moves us towards considering something like the âNatureâ of these beings. In Philosophy this is sometimes called âNatural Lawâ theory. A Natural Law theory is one that proposes that there are certain natural laws, and breaking those laws is unethical. (Natural Law theory often goes hand in hand with Christian philosophy, and things like homosexuality used to be (still are, even) argued against purely from a standpoint of Natural Law - âItâs not natural!â (whatever that means).)
So again, Dracula and mansquitos are just following their natures. We canât really fault them for it. We can be annoyed or angry, but we canât really say that what theyâre doing is bad in any real sense. The same, of course, would probably go for the Murdersaurus, whose basic nature is to murder. Again, just doing its natural duty.
The Really Big Frog is different. Assuming that a Really Big Frog is like a typical Frog except Really Big, sucking blood would be âdeviant behaviour.â This is not what normal frogs do. Moreover, it is harmful to others. Itâs Evil. The problem with Natural Law theory is that it assumes usually one kind of normal behaviour, and anything that doesnât fit that is âdeviant,â wrong, weird, etc. Maybe it works when youâre talking about rocks, plants, and bumble bees, but it seems to be grossly over-reductive and restrictive when it comes to describing people and other things.
So this could move us away from this whole style of thinking, and towards something that is more individual-based. Iâm thinking now of Nietzsche, and what we call in philosophy Perspectivism. This idea is like relativism, in that each person has their own perspective, which grants them their own, unique, individual style of flourishing in the world. Some people like Cats, others like Dogs, others have Ant Farms - itâs all good. So long as my own style doesnât interfere with yours, itâs all good. And even if it does, thatâs isnât necessarily a bad thing.Â
Nietzsche emphasized that it was very important that there were people in society who acted oddly, pushed at the boundaries, and generally make the majority feel uncomfortable or downright scared. This, according to Nietzsche, is the only way society can progress - by being challenged like this. So, is Dracula a Nietzschean free spirit, challenging me by asserting that sucking blood may be a worthwhile thing to do, and that I ought to expand my horizons? Perhaps. Certainly moreso than the murdersaurus, who will probably just murder me. The Really Big Frog could be OK too. Or not, but it kind of depends on how forcefully the RBF attacks.
this changes everything oh my god
do you understand why it trips me out that people can drive 45 minutes and be in aNOTHER COUNTRY? I drive for 45 minutes and im like
a city overÂ
I live in âItalyâ and took a day trip to go to âAustriaâ and âGermanyâ
 #it is literally impossible to leave texas #you will be in texas #FOREVER
Chums, thatâs sweet, and all, but Australia just ate Texas for breakfast.Â
If you drive for 45 minutes in Australia you arenât a city over, youâre just 45 minutes away from the city.
If you drive for 45 minutes in Australia you may not even leave the cattle station.
If you drive for 45 minutes in Canada you may not even leave your driveway.
If I drive 45 minutes in the us Iâm just at another mcdonalds
If I drive for 45 minutes in Northern Ireland Iâm 10 minutes into the sea.
I canât drive.Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Bro (talking about a girl heâs interested in): Sheâs pretty cool. But kinda intimidating. She hatesâwell she doesnât hate men but she hates theâŚman thing. Me: âŚpenis?
Bro: No. Theâthe thing. The bad cultural thing. The paternal thing.Â
Me: Ohhh. The Patriarchy?
Bro: Thatâs the bitch.
Me: I feel like we should probably not call the patriarchy âbitch.â All things considered.
Bro: You right. See? This is why Iâm stressed! What if I say something dumb like that in front of her!? Anyway. Weâre going out again on Friday, I just gotta make sure Iâm not patriarch-ing. Can you help me pick out what Iâm going to wear? Feminists like flannel, right?
If youâve ever wondered why Egyptian mummies are so rare, itâs because wealthy Europeans ate them. Between the 12th and 17th centuries, while pilfering the continent for goods, resources, artifacts, and Africans themselves, colonizers also looted and exoticized Egyptian tombs. Mummies were ground up into medicines and consumed by the elite, believed to be a remedy for various ailments and an infusion of life-energy from the spirits of the dead. When Egyptian mummies became scarce after hundreds of years of eating them, corpses from other parts of North Africa and Guanche mummies from the Canary Islands were instead exported and sold to European apothecaries. But even as they engaged in cannibalism for their own selfish indulgences, one of the primary ways that Europeans demonized Indigenous peoples was by naming them all as savages and cannibals.
Colonizers have not limited their use of racial cannibalism to the medicinal. They have also used it punitively and vindictively. During the genocidal King Leopold IIâs occupation of the Congo (1885-1908), Belgians massacred more than 10 million Africans. Most were forced to work for the Anglo-Belgian India Rubber Company, and were severely punished if they did not meet their rubber quota. In Donât Call Me Lady: The Journey of Lady Alice Seeley Harris, there is a black and white photo of a Congolese man named Nsala, seated at the edge of a porch. His eyes are fixed on the severed hand and foot of his 5 year-old daughter, Boali. The Belgian militia had cut them from her body before killing her and her mother. To further exact their cruelty, they ate Nsalaâs wife and child. They did this because he had failed to meet his rubber quota for the day.
The thing about white supremacy is that it does not merely subsist through the consumption of the Other; it whitewashes by de-emphasizing and lessening these misdeeds and others. History looks very different when white people are not the protagonists in its retelling. A significant instance: the accepted and well-known white feminist narrative about the Salem Witch Trials of the 1600s is that it was a hysteria driven by rampant misogyny and a pointed persecution of white women, the survival of which they harken to as evidence of their historical resilience. I prefer to think of it, more accurately, as a community of racist, religiously-intolerant enslavers and colonizers of stolen Native land cannibalizing itselfâand I wish it had finished its meal instead of begetting centuries of white people who would gorge on the lives and cultures of Black and Indigenous folks.
As the Donner Party traveled across the U.S. as part of a violent westward expansion in 1847, a small group that broke off from the larger party became stranded without food in a grueling wintery hellscape. So, they conspired to murder their two Native American guides, Salvador and Luis, for food. The two men ran away, but were found a few days later and were swiftly eaten, the only members of the party to be hunted and murdered before they were cannibalized. Salvador and Luis are rarely spoken of when the story is told to relay the suffering and survival of the people who ate them. In the version of the story that tells the truth about colonialism and the violence it requires, the Donner Party are the monsters, not the damsels.
The Transatlantic Slave Trade was a monstrosity of boundless proportions. Its enormity altered the world in a multitude of ways and none were/are more changed by it than Africans and their descendants. Many Africans believedâor, rather, knewâthat white people were cannibals and feared that they would be taken away and consumed, like the others who had disappeared and not returned once white people began to arrive on African shores. Fear of white cannibalism on the ships carrying Africans to other lands was indeed palpable, and often led to attempted mutiny and escape or suicide by jumping into the waters below. â Sherronda J. Brown, THE HISTORY OF CONSUMPTION AND THE CANNIBALISTIC NATURE OF WHITENESS
mummy remains were also used starting in the 16th-17th centuries to make a popular pigment for paintings, cosmetics, and dyes called mummy brown or egyptian brown and it was used most frequently in pre-raphaelite works. they used remains of other north african peoples as well. a significant number of these âfine artâ paintings by old european âmastersâ of art literally contain human remains, and many of these paintings depict indigenous peoples across the globe as savages and subhuman. they used the bodies of racialized people to dehumanize and cannibalize racialized and particularly african bodies in their art. itâs beyond horrifying.
(link to the full article)
i remember in second grade i got a new purple sharpener and this girl who i was âfriendsâ with asked me to have it and I was like ???? no my mom just bought this for me yesterday and she said âif you dont give me the sharpener weâre not friends anymoreâ and i just said âokayâ and she was like âSo youâre giving me the sharpener??â and i was like âwhy are you talking to me? weâre not friendsâ and i wish i was still as savage as i was back then
the best memory i have of middle school is when i was on the bus ride to go home and i had a seat all to myself. i was saving the area next to me for my then-best friend and a little girl came up to me and asked to sit next to me. i said âno, im saving it for my friend sorryâ, and she got all fussy and said âits against the rules to save seats! you canât do that!â and i sat back and said âwatch meâ and every night i wonder where that confidence went
Ok but storytime.
In middle school we had assigned seats on the bus for some reason, and the kid behind me loved snapping my bra strap and calling me crazy. Naturally, the authorities did nothing. I finally had enough and spent a week letting my nails grow long, and sharpened them to pointed claws with a file.
Snapper reached over the seat and quick as a whip I sank my claws into his hand, and I mean IN his HAND. I could feel his flesh as they went and I think the fact that they were still in the wound is the only reason they werenât bleeding. âYou have a choice now,â I said. âPull your hand away and turn this into something worse that you get to explain, or keep it there and let the driver catch you in the act.â
He didnât say anything but pulled his hand away, and the stabs turned into hardcore scratches. There was blood. He did not snap my bra again.
Throwback to all these Jesus comics I drew in 2012âŚ
Good post OP
Good post, OP, and if you ever decide to do another may I please suggest âNOT IN HEBREW IT DOESNâTâ as a punchline? So much of the Old Testament is HORRIFICALLY translated from the Tanakh, it drives me batty.
WAIT WAIT WHAT DOES IT SAY?????? I NEED TO LIKE,, DESTROY MI MUM FOR BEING REALLY HOMOPHOBIC
Okay, so, strictly speaking, the infamous Leviticus 18:22 does say âforbidden.â Hereâs the thing:
1) The word translated as âforbiddenâ is âtoevah.â While that translation isnât ⌠wrong, itâs sort of like saying âMcMansionâ means âreally big house.â There are a lot of connotations in that word. The specific issue with toevah is that we ⌠sort of ⌠donât know anymore exactly what it meant. Based on context, it seems likely that the word referred to something ritually forbidden. This part of Torah was written not only as a guide for future generations, but also to say âso, look around, see your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT.â Thus, if we interpret âtoevahâ to mean something thatâs forbidden to do as a ritual before G-d, then the verse says nothing whatsoever about Adam and Steve and their two kids and their dogâitâs saying you shouldnât have sex with another man in the Temple as a sacrifice.
2) Following the same âthis is ritually forbiddenâ logic of toevah, this verse may also be interpreted as âdonât do sex magic,â which was a thing in. Like. A lot of fucking cultures at the time.
3) Hebrew is a highly gendered language, and the grammatical gender in this verse is really really weird. One of the âmenâ in this verse is given female grammar. Why? Who fucking knows, man, this isnât the only grammatical oddity in Torah. (There are also places where G-d is referred to as plural, and also as female.) One suggestion is that this is a way of creating a diminutiveâthat is, that the verse should be read as âa man should not lie with a boy.â Now, itâs worth noting that modern secular scholarship has concluded the written Torah was written down around the 6th century BCE, and most non-Orthodox Jewish scholars are like âyeah, all things considered, that sounds pretty legit.â
Do you know what else was happening around the 6th century BCE? What laypeople tend to mean when they say âancient Greeceâ was happening.
Do you know what happened a lot in that time period in Greece? Dudes forming relationships with younger boys, like ages 10-15, and using them for sex in exchange for financial gifts, mentorship, etc. While we donât know just how young some of these younger boys may have been, we do know some were prepubescent. In light of this, and also something I mentioned under the first pointââsee your neighbors? DONâT DO THAT,â if this verse is interpreted to say âa man should not lie with a boy,â then itâs pretty clearly âmy dudes, my fellows, my lads, donât be fucking pedophiles.â
4) Because of the grammar I mentioned in #3, itâs also possible that âshould not lie with a man as with a womanâ is actually referring to a place, not an abstract personhood: a man shouldnât have sex with another man in a womanâs bed. In the time period, a womanâs bed was sort of likeâthat was her place, her safe sanctuary. It was also a ritually holy place where babies were made. By having sex in her bed, youâre violating her safe space (and also introducing a man who may not be a male relative, thus forcing her into breaking the laws of modesty). If this verse is read this way, then it should be taken to mean âdonât sexually violate a womanâs safety and modesty.â 5) And as an offshoot of #4, this may be a second verse relating to infidelity. Which womanâs bed is any random dude in 600 BCE most likely to have access to? His wifeâs. But laws were administered differently based on whether the person they pertained to was slave or free, male or female, and so onâthus, a man committing adultery with a woman would be treated differently than man committing adultery with a man (especially because the latter would carry no chance of an illegitimate pregnancy).
So youâll note, there are a lot of ways to read this verse, and only a one-to-one translation with no cultural awareness produces âbeing gay is wrong, all of the timeâ. (Youâll also notice the word âabominationâ is nowhere to be found. Thatâs like ⌠a straight-up fiction created for who only knows what reason.)
Apparently tumblr mobile doesnât want to show @prismatic-bell âs long and in-depth essay, so hereâs the screenshots, because it still shows up on mobile browsers:
Much appreciated.
I love when scholarship and history debunks bullshit
âŚI sadly have more bullshit to report.
âremoved for violating guidelinesâ, EVERY screenshot.
âŚgoddamnit
Letâs try this again
I am horrified that @prismatic-bell keeps getting censored + this info is gold.
Many thanks, @pulmonary-poultry. This isnât the only Jewish post of mine thatâs mysteriously stopped showing up in searches and/or vanished from my blog entirely, but it is the one I get the most requests to repost, so this saves me from having to rewrite the whole damned essay. @the-invisible-self, thanks for bringing it to my attention that someone was able to preserve the post!
what the FUCK??? WHICH community guidelines would an analysis of the Old Testament violate??
unless tumblr staff is just removing images that get reported a bunch of times
Never not gonna reblog
@prismatic-bell RESPECT đ
I mean Iâm not Christian, so I donât completely understand everything going on here, but⌠proving the fact that all these ___phobes twist religious literature and religion into something they can use to manipulate people into doing and believing what they think is ârightâ and exposing all their asses is worth the confusion. So⌠HECK YEAH REBLOGGGGG!!!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
WHY is this TikTok still on my mind three days later
"YOU CAN BARELY PARALLEL PARK KELLY AND YOU THINK YOU CAN BLOODBEND?"
I am living for these quality avatar tiktoks
This is the worst tiktok video Iâve ever seenÂ
the cursed image
They did surgery on an orange
this brave mother just gave birth and all you guys can do is make japes and jokes about it. smh
They did a vitamin c-section