Just wanted to inform you all that the Wikipedia page about gender critical feminism has been renamed to "Trans-exclusionary radical feminism." The proposing party said using "gender-critical" was like calling Nazism "Jewish-critical socialism" and another called it akin to calling Scientific Racism "Race Realism."
This is just a small example of what happens when we let scrotes control the narrative; they change terms, definitions, quietly erase facts, and eventually they slowly rewrite history. These small changes (including within academic work and on websites such as Wikipedia) add up and can ultimately influence or change people's opinion. I HIGHLY encourage radfems on this website to join Wikipedia, learn its policies and guidelines, and start making good faith edits so we can restructure the biased cesspit it currently is.
If you are interested in editing and want tips or help, reach out to me! I would also love if another person could collaborate with me!
Tried it once. On the page about the woman who pretended to be a man so she could be a doctor. She was rewritten as a trans man. They kept re-editing the page after I corrected it and then banned me very quickly.
Can you DM who it was if you remember? If the sources use the term âtrans manâ then the wiki page will have to say that but otherwise they cant use that label.
"James Barry", presented as a man on wikipedia, was actually a woman who pretended to be a man so she could study and become a doctor. Women were forbidden from doing so at the time. The wikipedia editors say they use "he/him" pronouns because they were the pronouns used at the time of her death. By whom? When? How's that a justification?
Then there's also "Amelio Robles". The article starts by saying she was "assigned female at birth", a concept that did not exist at the time and calls her "he". She was a mexican woman named Amelia who pretended to be a man for unknown reasons and joined the armed revolution. She is called "transgender" in the article. To infer that she was not a woman, the article explains early on: "From a young age, Robles showed an interest in activities that were considered masculine, learning to tame horses and handling weapons, and becoming an excellent marksman and rider." She was buried under her real name, Amelia, so what happened to the justification about using the pronouns used at the time of her death?
And Angela Jimanez, another mexican woman who dressed as a man to be a soldier during the revolution. The entire article refers to her as "Angel" and calls her "he" and a "son". There's no indication that she's a woman at all, except at the very end to say she's dead, and suddenly her real name pops up. But all the sources in the footnotes talk about "mujeres"/women of the revolution, not men. So why is wikipedia calling her a man?
Petra Herrera was also a woman who dressed as a man to join the armed revolution, only she was found out and expelled: "She eventually reached the rank of captain and led a brigade of 200 men. Although she had some victories, Pancho Villa refused to give military credit to a woman and would not permit Petra Herrea to serve as a General. As a result of being removed from Villa's forces, Herrera formed her own brigade, exclusively for women. Her all-woman army was dissolved by superior orders."
Would you look at that? It's almost like to be able to lead a revolution, you had to pretend to be a man...
So it seems to me that Wikipedia refers to women who pretend to be men as "she" or "he" depending on how successfully they fooled people, instead of what motivated their disguise, such as misogyny.
