I am returned

Remember, they don't attack people because they're fascists, they call people fascists so they have an excuse to attack them.

Also notice how they use "you are adjacent to Bad People so therefore you approve of them and are complicit in their evil" all the time but completely ignore how many fucking groomers and child molesters and sex pests are in their camp.

... Can someone explain the joke to me? Because I don't even know what the joke is.

'Charlie hates Jesus'? But why?

'Lol, Hazbin Hotel BAD!' Ok. ... And?

But the bigger punchline is that he's stealing her thunder.

And as someone pointed out on Twitter..

https://x.com/toffee_32/status/1953463705343021144?t=sGHFFKY_1P7MfaC00i3Wzw&s=33

https://x.com/toffee_32/status/1953467017467433390?t=sGHFFKY_1P7MfaC00i3Wzw&s=19

"I love that he probably actually went through the effort of watching the show to draw this because he got the premise and characters right. A simple effortless hater wouldn't have gotten it on point. I know what you are (a furry)"

>wonders why that same half of the species wants nothing to do with them

antisemitismtoday

op blocked me but

i am not forming the conclusions you want me too. i am not reading this and thinking "dang the US should expand its welfare"

This dynamic is depression-inducing.

Now, it’s possible to find a better corner of the internet, or leave social media altogether. It’s also possible to mature out of it, find some measured middle ground where you’re still basically a progressive, take the hate in stride etc. But depressed people are not necessarily the best at making good decisions for themselves.

Any path out of it necessarily involves not submitting to other people’s resentment, but it’s not easy to do that with the drumbeat of “you are terrible” in lefty spaces. Meanwhile, the alt-right offers a readymade path out of that sad-sack life–even if into another sort of shitty life, but at least one where you don’t make yourself into a doormat. It probably does improve their depression.

It’s really simple. The left has NOTHING to offer men. There is no masculinity allowed. If you express a desire to be a family man, you’re patriarchal and that’s toxic. If you want to be strong, to be capable of fighting and defending yourself (or others), that’s patronizing and toxic. If you want to build yourself up and make yourself famous for your contributions, you’re in the way of women’s success and that’s toxic.

Young men can’t get jobs, can’t get houses, and they can’t get women who are anything above a 5 who think they’re an 11 because of hoeflation gassing up extremely basic bitches covered in tattoos and a good deal overweight. They feel like they have been strategically denied of even the most basic life goals of success, at a systematic level, and the proof for this massively outweighs the proof against. They feel like they grew up into a world that openly hates them and wants them to fail. That despises them for the crime of being born a man, and yet demands that they make themselves onto slaves to support this sytem that hates them. The left is this, and it is incapable of welcoming men. We saw this during and after the election, as the DNC scrambled to field anyone even partially masculine to appeal to men. What did they come up with? Tim Walz, a yuppie loony who couldn’t even pretend very well how to handle a hunting shotgun, David Hogg, a sneering and effeminate stolen valor “school shooting survivor” ((He wasn’t there that day and his parents are feds. All that needs to be said)), and Hasanabi, an insane commie fuck who is not capable of expressing even a single positive thing about young men or their country of origin.

You don’t fucking have a man.

You wanna know why the right keeps winning men? Cause you fucking shoved them into their awaiting arms. The side that believes men are contributors, protectors, that they can be wise, dependable, and beloved fathers, the side that encourages men to be productive, responsible, and strong. The side that likes sports and pubs and the military and cool cars and shooting the shit and challenging video games. The side that says all the woke nonsense about hating your own gender is wrong, and it doesn’t have to be this way.

It isn’t surprising at all. In fact it’s abundantly simple. You want to know why Andrew Tate gained popularity? Because you tried to tear down Jordan Peterson (back in his prime). It goes as far back as Warriormale, the epitome of wholesome masculinity, who was derided as Toxic Masculinity.

Men want to be men, just as women want to be women. No amount of progressive propaganda and indoctrination is capable of surgically altering thousands of years and dozens of generations of masculine and feminine coding, and now you have a revolt of young men flocking to the hardest of hard right so they can be men and not feel ashamed of being masculine, and women saying fuck the feminist girlboss sisterhood, I want to be my husband’s pretty princess and the domestic goddess and get pregnant with 4 children.

Men are naturally inclined to want to be masculine. And you went out of your way to tear down most of the figures that defined manliness as being “strong, noble, and responsible. Like a chivalrous knight.” Did you think they would stop wanting to be men? They just sulked until Andrew Tate and others came about. The guys who defined manliness as “aggressive conquerers who take what they want, and dominate and control money, bitches, and power. Like Genghis Khan.”

Men will NEVER look up to weak, spineless, mewling sycophants like Walz, Hogg, or Hasan, because they know it won’t get them laid, it won’t get them respect, and it won’t get them money. You attacked masculinity at its best, and it’s not gonna disappear, so I hope you like it coming back in a far less noble demeanor. You could have had gallant gentlemen who treat all women as queens. And you ran them off. So now you get the thugs who treat all women as stupid bitches who deserve to be exploited.

This dynamic is depression-inducing.

Now, it’s possible to find a better corner of the internet, or leave social media altogether. It’s also possible to mature out of it, find some measured middle ground where you’re still basically a progressive, take the hate in stride etc. But depressed people are not necessarily the best at making good decisions for themselves.

Any path out of it necessarily involves not submitting to other people’s resentment, but it’s not easy to do that with the drumbeat of “you are terrible” in lefty spaces. Meanwhile, the alt-right offers a readymade path out of that sad-sack life–even if into another sort of shitty life, but at least one where you don’t make yourself into a doormat. It probably does improve their depression.

It's really simple. The left has NOTHING to offer men. There is no masculinity allowed. If you express a desire to be a family man, you're patriarchal and that's toxic. If you want to be strong, to be capable of fighting and defending yourself (or others), that's patronizing and toxic. If you want to build yourself up and make yourself famous for your contributions, you're in the way of women's success and that's toxic.

Young men can't get jobs, can't get houses, and they can't get women who are anything above a 5 who think they're an 11 because of hoeflation gassing up extremely basic bitches covered in tattoos and a good deal overweight. They feel like they have been strategically denied of even the most basic life goals of success, at a systematic level, and the proof for this massively outweighs the proof against. They feel like they grew up into a world that openly hates them and wants them to fail. That despises them for the crime of being born a man, and yet demands that they make themselves onto slaves to support this sytem that hates them. The left is this, and it is incapable of welcoming men. We saw this during and after the election, as the DNC scrambled to field anyone even partially masculine to appeal to men. What did they come up with? Tim Walz, a yuppie loony who couldn't even pretend very well how to handle a hunting shotgun, David Hogg, a sneering and effeminate stolen valor "school shooting survivor" ((He wasn't there that day and his parents are feds. All that needs to be said)), and Hasanabi, an insane commie fuck who is not capable of expressing even a single positive thing about young men or their country of origin.

You don't fucking have a man.

You wanna know why the right keeps winning men? Cause you fucking shoved them into their awaiting arms. The side that believes men are contributors, protectors, that they can be wise, dependable, and beloved fathers, the side that encourages men to be productive, responsible, and strong. The side that likes sports and pubs and the military and cool cars and shooting the shit and challenging video games. The side that says all the woke nonsense about hating your own gender is wrong, and it doesn't have to be this way.

It isn't surprising at all. In fact it's abundantly simple. You want to know why Andrew Tate gained popularity? Because you tried to tear down Jordan Peterson (back in his prime). It goes as far back as Warriormale, the epitome of wholesome masculinity, who was derided as Toxic Masculinity.

Men want to be men, just as women want to be women. No amount of progressive propaganda and indoctrination is capable of surgically altering thousands of years and dozens of generations of masculine and feminine coding, and now you have a revolt of young men flocking to the hardest of hard right so they can be men and not feel ashamed of being masculine, and women saying fuck the feminist girlboss sisterhood, I want to be my husband's pretty princess and the domestic goddess and get pregnant with 4 children.

Men are naturally inclined to want to be masculine. And you went out of your way to tear down most of the figures that defined manliness as being "strong, noble, and responsible. Like a chivalrous knight." Did you think they would stop wanting to be men? They just sulked until Andrew Tate and others came about. The guys who defined manliness as "aggressive conquerers who take what they want, and dominate and control money, bitches, and power. Like Genghis Khan."

Men will NEVER look up to weak, spineless, mewling sycophants like Walz, Hogg, or Hasan, because they know it won't get them laid, it won't get them respect, and it won't get them money. You attacked masculinity at its best, and it's not gonna disappear, so I hope you like it coming back in a far less noble demeanor. You could have had gallant gentlemen who treat all women as queens. And you ran them off. So now you get the thugs who treat all women as stupid bitches who deserve to be exploited.

And now we have a near full on gender war. The divide is worse than ever.

By the way, gender wars are extremely rare in history, but the only times they ever happened, one side won decisively and no surprise its the side that is mentally and physically designed for war, combat, and standing their ground mentally and physically.

So, when you see a man go "repeal the 19th!" And wonder how the fuck it got this way, try your hardest to scroll back in time to when a woman made up a rape accusation and dragged a mattress around a campus, destroying a man's life so thoroughly he killed himself.

You may now fast forward to wondering why young men nowadays are openly declaring women should have their rights taken away.

I know this will piss you off. Too bad. It's right. Look how many fandoms are utter dogs hit because they became inclusive to literally everyone. Look how many timeless mediums became grey blobs because they rinsed off all its identity for mass market appeal. Look at how many niche interests have been completely overtaken.