Previously screwtornadowarningsimsouthern.
I am now in Alaska. Hence the name change.

tannertan36
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

Janaina Medeiros
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
DEAR READER

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Mike Driver
Monterey Bay Aquarium
taylor price
Peter Solarz


if i look back, i am lost

Kaledo Art

oozey mess

pixel skylines
d e v o n

Discoholic đŞŠ

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from China

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
@tornadointhetundra
Previously screwtornadowarningsimsouthern.
I am now in Alaska. Hence the name change.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
somebuggy
i aint the snuggest bug in the bed
love the end of the two towers where gandalf looks into the sunset talking bout "yea frodo had to go it alone it was his destiny and there is no changing it he will be ok đâ¨" and aragorn is like "sam went with him btw" and gandalf is like "oh fuck thank god"
posting this here cause Iâm still not over it. people who write instructions I love you youâre so funny

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Claymation
and the winner of superwholock is officially??? no one. we all lost. congrats team
1958 Pontiac Bonneville Sport Coupe
Bottle rocket under ice
radÂ
Iâm pretty sure that the reason the ice fractured into six slices is the same reason snowflakes are often six sided and it has to do with the shape of a molecule of water and I just think thatâs so freaking cool.
How would it even stay lit though?
!!!!! it IS actually because of the structure of water molecules! Water molecules are fuckin weird, as are lots of other liquid substance molecules, because theyre shaped like fuckin HEXAGONS! hexagons are those weird, six-sided shapes that re very sturdy, but they dont tend to sit very well when stacked together. thats why, when you fill up a glass of water to its full capacity, it can go OVER the brim a little and not spill over. Itâs also why water beads.
anyway, so since water is essentially made up of a gazillion little hexagons, it tends to gather into larger hexagons as it shapes together. this is not visible unless the water is in a solid form, aka ice. when the water is split, it tends to crack around the established hexagons. that bottle rocket exploded in the PERFECT place to show this phenomenon and its geeking me out.
ALSO! the bottle rocket stays lit because the fuse was definitely waterproof and made with magnesium and an oxidizer of some sort. this means that they will burn underwater because they dont need the oxygen from the air to stay lit. thats so fucking weird isnt it. im tipsy and its the 4th of july. sorry for the science haha
Donât you dare apologize for science
Reblogging for science, explosions, and cool hexagons!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âThe writers refuse to take criticism!â
Just because they refuse to listen to you in particular doesnât mean they donât accept criticism, Karen.
Just because they wonât listen to you because you canât say anything without sounding like a complete cunt doesnât mean theyâre not against criticism in general.
When you deal with a lot of bitching haphazardly disguised as âcriticismâ over a prolonged period of time, you tune it out. Youâve realized itâs not worth the trouble, therefore you reserve your energy for legit criticism that has the potential to change things.
I mean who are you going to listen to more? A customer who complains over the smallest of shit? Or a customer who does issue a complaint that specifically points out areas you need to improve on? I let the formerâs bs go in one ear and out the other more times than Iâd care to count back when I used to work retail.
Also, giving criticism well is a skill. You have to learn how to do it. The kind of people who just decide âthis whole premise offends my moral sensibilitiesâ are generally not the kind of people who know how to do it or who feel the need to learn how. If youâre offended by the very idea of my story or want me to change the race of Character X after the damn thing is in print, Iâm⌠not likely to listen to you. If you really enjoyed the story but as a member of Group Y are wondering whether I have any works about Y coming out soon, Iâm much more likely to listen to you. Youâre invested in what Iâm doing, so I have reason to care about your opinion. I might even make the Y a subtle nod to you in some way! Same with âso this book did have a member of Group Y in it, and I really thought they were a neat character! But they had Mannerism Z, which is kind of stereotypical, and that bugged me. Is there a reason you did that, or did you not realize most of us donât do that at all?â I canât fix whatâs already in print, but I can go âOh, wait, no, I meant that very differently! Let me go see if others took it the same way! Oh, they did. How can I revise the sequel a bit so this isnât so bad?â
Yeah, good criticism should be totally pragmatic. You donât necessarily need to hand-hold the person your critiquing through every exact step of what you need, but you should have a clear idea going in what they would have to do to please you, and it that thing is impossible, extremely difficult, or can be summarized as âwrite an entirely different story that suits me betterâ its probably best to keep it to yourself.â
Iâm amazed that my snippy agitated post caused good discussion about critique in general.
Depressing but somewhat plausible theory for any modern zombie apocalypse show that simply refuses to just call them "zombies":
Early on during the pandemic, various media corporations tried their best to cover up what was happening, and anything mentioning the word "zombie" got shadowbanned, so a mountain of euphenisms came up instead because everyone knows what you're talking about when making a post complaining about how you'd really need to go get groceries but your neighbours have ~*forgotten their manners*~ and are blocking the door.
And anyone born after the fall - or who was simply too young to remember at the time - has no knowledge of why every group seems to have a different name for the zeds, walkers, the dead, strangers, infected, visitors, etc.
cant stop thinking about this video its driving me insane. scariest object ever made. looked it up w friends in a discord call and found out its like fucking eight feet tall and made of solid metal
imagine visiting someone's house for a party, it goes late. 1 in the morning. you're drunk and high. you have to go to the bathroom before going home. hallway lights are off, its like a train tunnel. this thing is at the end of the hallway
This is great because a bunch of people are trying to be slick by tagging it as "color of the sky," accidentally outing themselves as not having used this site since 2019.
"Oh stoat don't be silly the children's hospital meme is way older thanâ" no it ain't.
i fucking hated your shoelaces this entire time
for the uninitiated

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Boris "professional idiot" Johnson wanted to build an island airport in the immediate area.
it's fucking visible
This post requires authentication to view.
It is fun to learn.
Hey what the fuck
You weren't kidding they've been trying to get the masts off for 5 years and keep getting foiled because there's probably bombs leaking out of her
Fun fact: Doxing myself but I live in the blast zone if that thing ever goes up! It's even immortalised in a local artwork:
At first I was really happy about the month of June cause itâs my birthday on the 4th
But then it hit me
Itâs also pride month.
A month where many people celebrate sinâŚ.
I will continue to preach to the misguided in hopes God will move through their hearts!
Let me get this straight. Iâm not religious, but I was raised by a preacher who taught me that God does not âhateâ homosexuality.
The one verse that says something about homosexuality? âMan shall not lay with manâ? Itâs misinterpreted, Iâve gotten multiple pastors to admit that, itâs supposed to be âman shall not lay with boyâ. Pedophilia, not homosexuality.
That being said, Gods whole point all the time is love. Love thu neighbor. Embrace sinners. Love. Love is love is love. Why would a God that tells us to love, be against love?
I appreciate your religion, and I appreciate your prayers. But they are unnecessary. I am not going to Hell, and I never was. Love is not, and never will be, a sin.
Thank you.
âThe phrase âmen who have sex with menâ (translated âhomosexualsâ in the NASB) is a translation of the Greek word arsenokoitai. Those who object to this translation say that arsenokoitai does not refer to all homosexual relationships but only to those involving abuse, coercion, or unfaithfulness. They say the word does not refer to âloving, faithfulâ same-sex relationships. Arsenokoitai is a compound word: arseno is the word for âa male,â and koitai is the word for âmatâ or âbed.â Put the two halves together, and the word means âa male bedââthat is, a person who makes use of a âmale-only bedâ or a âbed for males.â And, truthfully, thatâs all the information we need to understand the intent of 1 Corinthians 6:9. The word meaning âbedâ carries a sexual connotation in this contextâthe Greek koitai is the source of our English word coitus (âsexual intercourseâ). The conclusion is that the word arsenokoitai is referring to homosexualsâmen who are in bed with other men, engaging in same-gender sexual activity. The notion that some homosexual relationships are accepted is not even hinted at in this passage. The menâs commitment level or the presence of âloveâ is not addressed. The idea that the condemned same-sex activity is linked to economic exploitation or abuse is also a forced reading with no textual basis. Paulâs reference to âhomosexuals,â together with a reference to âeffeminateâ men in the same verse (in the NASB), effectively covers both active and passive homosexual behavior. Godâs Word is not open to personal interpretation in this matter. Homosexuality is wrong; it always has been, and it always will be. â
https://www.gotquestions.org/arsenokoitai.html
Thank you for informing me! See, another problem is, the Bible was written by man. Not by God. Itâs a product of its time. Regardless of meaning, there are many arbitrary rules in the Bible that no longer apply to todayâs society, this being one of them.
Canât eat shrimp.
Canât wear mixed fabrics.
Canât get a divorce.
Just saying, if youâre gonna be nit picky about following the Bibleâs rules, either follow all of them or let people live their lives. You canât just go through the Bible and pick and choose what to follow and what not to follow. That wasnât the disciplines intention.
Love is love.
you canât claim that the Bible is written by man so that means itâs okay to dismiss things you disagree with, cause then by that logic the parts on salvation and Godâs love can also be dismissed and not true because they were âââwritten by manâââ.
also
âLeviticus says not to eat shellfish (Lev. 11:9-12), use mixed seed or fabrics (Lev. 19:19), harvest the corners of fields (Lev. 19:9), and that homosexuality is wrong (Lev. 18:22; 20:13). Â If homosexuality is wrong because Leviticus says so, then shouldnât we also obey the other laws about shellfish, seed, fabrics, and fields because that is in Leviticus as well? Â If not, then why not? Â Why would Christians pick and choose what parts of the Bible to follow?
First of all, not all of Leviticus is written to everyone.  There were abominations that applied only to the Jews such as eating shellfish, rabbit, and pork, etc., which were things that typologically represented purity before the Lord.  We know this because God says, âSpeak to the sons of Israel sayingâŚâ  He gives instructions to the Israelites, not to the rest of the nations.
Here is a list of instances when the occurrence of the phrase âSpeak to the Sons of Israel sayingâŚâ is found in Leviticus, the book under consideration.
Lev. 4:2, atonement for unintentional sins
Lev. 7:23, donât eat fat from ox, sheep, or goat
Lev. 7:29, procedures for peace offering to the Lord
Lev. 11:2, list of animals the Israelites may eat
Lev. 12:2, uncleanness after giving birth
Lev. 23:24, rest on 1st day of 7th month
Lev. 23:34, Feast of Booths on 15th day of 7th month
Lev. 24:15, the one cursing God will bear his sin
So, we can see a host of things that dealt only with Israel.
However, there are abominations that did not apply only to Israel, but to everyone else also. Â Again, letâs look at Leviticus.
Lev. 18:22-30, âYou shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. 23 Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion. 24 Do not defile yourselves by any of these things; for by all these the nations which I am casting out before you have become defiled 25 âFor the land has become defiled, therefore I have visited its punishment upon it, so the land has spewed out its inhabitants. 26 But as for you, you are to keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not do any of these abominations, neither the native, nor the alien who sojourns among you 27 (for the men of the land who have been before you have done all these abominations, and the land has become defiled); 28 so that the land may not spew you out, should you defile it, as it has spewed out the nation which has been before you. 29 âFor whoever does any of these abominations, those persons who do so shall be cut off from among their people. 30 âThus you are to keep My charge, that you do not practice any of the abominable customs which have been practiced before you, so as not to defile yourselves with them; I am the Lord your God.ââ
What abominations is Lev. 18:22-30 speaking of? Â Contextually, chapter 17 is about blood atonement procedures, so that is for Israel, not for everyone. Â In Chapter 18 God says to Israel, âYou shall not do what is done in the land of Egypt where you lived, nor are you to do what is done in the land of Canaan where I am bringing you,â (Lev. 18:3). Â So, now instead of it applying only to Israel, God mentions things that are done by Egypt and the land of Canaan. Â What were the things those nations did? Â The chapter contains the following.
Lev. 18:6-18, donât uncover the nakedness of various relatives.
Lev. 18:19, donât have sexual relations with woman on her period
Lev. 18:20, donât have intercourse with your neighborâs wife
Lev. 18:21, donât offer children to Molech
Lev. 18:22, donât lie with a male as with a female
Lev. 18:23 donât have intercourse with animals.
So, we see there are requirements in Leviticus only for the Israelites, and there are lists of abominations spoken of that were for the non-Israelites as well. Â It is in the latter group that homosexuality is listed. Â It is a mistake for people to mix topics intended only for Israel with topics that included the non-Israelites. Â Furthermore, when we see that the New Testament condemns the idea of homosexuality in Romans 1:26-27, we could see the continuity between Old Testament moral law and New Testament moral law.
Three divisions of the Law in Leviticus
A common mistake made by homosexual proponents when discussing the Old Testament, in particular, Leviticus, is the failure to understand the three main divisions of the Law: Â civil, ceremonial, and moral. Â This is important because the civil and ceremonial law are not in effect now, but the moral law is. Â Letâs take a look at these divisions within the book of Leviticus since it is the book under examination.
Civil - Expired with the demise of the Jewish civil government
Ceremonial - Expired with the fulfillment of priestly work of Christ (Matt. 3:15)
Moral - No Expiration because it is based on Godâs character. Â "You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy,â (Lev. 19:2)
Justice practices (Lev. 24:17-23)
Law of property redemption (Lev. 25)
Be just with the poor, (Lev. 19:15)
Do not hate in your heart (Lev. 19:17)
Retain just scales in commerce (Lev. 19:35f)
Robbery, extortion, false witness, and restitution (Lev. 6:1-7)
Various sacrificial offerings for sin (Lev. 1,2,3,4,5,6)
Priestly duties (Lev. 7:1-37)
Laws on animals for food (Lev. 11:1-47)
Cleaning house of leper (Lev. 14:33-57)
Law of Atonement (Lev. 16:1-28;17:1-16)
Regulations for Priests (Lev. 21,22)
Festivals (Lev. 23:1-25)
Do not steal or lie (Lev. 19:11)
Do not oppress your neighbor (Lev. 19:13)
No idolatry (Lev. 26:1-13)
Donât sacrifice children to Molech (Lev. 20:1-5)
Donât commit adultery, incest, bestiality, homosexuality, etc. (Lev. 20:9-21)
You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Lev. 19:18)
Homosexuality is under the moral law category.  In addition, as stated earlier, it is an abomination practiced by all people (Egypt and Canaan), not just the Israelites.  Therefore, we see that the moral aspects of the Law are still in effect, but not the civil or ceremonial.  Again, there were things addressed to Israel only where God said: âspeak to the sons of Israel sayingâŚâ  These things included atonement for unintentional sins, eating habits, uncleanness, feast days, rest days, etc., which do not apply to us today.
Should we also dismiss the commands not to lie, steal, or commit adultery?
If, as some argue, we are not under the Law and therefore we can dismiss Leviticus along with its clear condemnation of homosexuality, then shouldnât we also dismiss Levitical teachings that warn against lying (Lev. 19:11), theft (Lev. 19:13), bearing false witness (Lev. 19:16), hating your fellow man (Lev. 19:17), exacting vengeance (Lev. 19:18), avoiding unjust balances (Lev. 19:36), sacrificing children (Lev. 20:1-5), committing adultery (Lev. 20:10), committing incest (Lev. 20:11-14), and the practice of bestiality (Lev. 20:15-16)? Â Of course not.
Furthermore, if we are to basically dump the book of Leviticus because it is Old Testament law, then why are parts of Leviticus quoted in the New Testament as still being valid?
     LeviticusNew Testament
Lev. 19:2, âSpeak to all the congregation of the sons of Israel and say to them, âYou shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy.â
1 Pet. 1:16, âbecause it is written, âYou shall be holy, for I am holy.ââ
Lev. 19:18, ââYou shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the Lord.â
Matt. 22:39, âThe second is like it, âYou shall love your neighbor as yourself.ââ
Lev. 26:12, âI will also walk among you and be your God, and you shall be My people.â
2 Cor. 6:16, âOr what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; just as God said, âI will dwell in them and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.ââ
Are we to dismiss Leviticus along with the idea of being holy, of loving our neighbor, and that God will walk among us in the person of Jesus? Â Of course not. Â To do so by saying we are not under the Law displays deep theological ignorance and exegetical prejudice. There are certainly aspects of Leviticus which are no longer applicable to us today (civil and ceremonial), but there are other parts that still are, as is stated above in the moral aspect of the Law that was intended as admonitions not just against Israel but the other nations as well.
Finally, when we see that the New Testament also condemns homosexuality, it is clear that we cannot just dismiss Leviticus as a whole along with its moral regulations on sexual activity. Â Homosexuality is clearly condemned in Leviticus and its condemnation cannot be dismissed by saying we are no longer under Old Testament Law.â
https://carm.org/leviticus-homosexuality-old-testament-law
@starrtoon You are a champ for this fantastic summary
I think itâs also important to take a look at the role of marriage and sexual relations in the Bible as a whole.
Marriage is an image of Godâs relationship with the Church. The husband is to love and protect his wife as an image of how God loves and protects His church, and the wife is to love and submit to her husband as the church loves and submits to God. This is not a picture that can function in the same way in a homosexual relationship.
Genesis says man and woman should leave their families and become one fleshâsexual relations are for a married couple only. A number of the verses above touch on that, it was considered adultery for someone to sleep with anyone other than their spouse. Paul in 1 Corinthians said that if one was consumed with passion then it was better to marry so he doesnât sin.
Looking at the Bible as a whole, it paints a pretty clear picture of the role of sex and marriage. Sex is a gift to a married couple to strength their marriage and to produce children. And a married couple is a man and a woman who point towards the union between God and the church. Anything else is not Godâs design, and thus a sin.
And yes, this includes causal sex outside of marriage. This includes things such as divorce (though there are situations like unfaithfulness and abuse that have grounds for this). This includes things such as homosexual relationships.
And one last note: as Christians we cannot expect unbelievers to behave in a God-honouring way. We cannot force non-believers to conform to Godâs moral code without a heart change. Sinful actions are not the main problemâthey are a symptom of a deeper heart problem. The answer is not angry condemnation of anyone who disagrees with us and who lives a different lifestyleâthe answer is loving friendship and lovingly sharing the gospel.