MAY YOU NEVER LOSE YOUR HYPERFIXATION
art blog(derogatory)

oozey mess
YOU ARE THE REASON
noise dept.
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
cherry valley forever

izzy's playlists!
taylor price
Today's Document

#extradirty
đŞź

bliss lane
The Bowery Presents

ellievsbear

â
hello vonnie
todays bird
official daine visual archive
seen from Malaysia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Japan

seen from Italy

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from T1

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Iceland
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Guatemala

seen from United States
seen from Croatia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from France

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
@allthingswhumpyandangsty
MAY YOU NEVER LOSE YOUR HYPERFIXATION

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
What are your thoughts on real person fiction? I feel like you have a pretty good moral compass and sometimes I have a hard time figuring out how I feel about rpf with all the arguing that happens about it in fandom
Iâve already answered this here
I just saw someone on instagram say that writing smut fic involving real life people is just as bad as creating ai deep fakes of them. Now maybe I'm biased cause I've enjoying rpf fics, but I feel like they're not even close to the same thing. I'm not crazy for thinking that, right?
I believe the main reason why ai deep fake can legally be considered sexual harassment--while rpf cannot be legally considered sexual harassment, unless the person who's being written about wants to take legal action (I don't even know if they can or on what ground, but I believe it won't be for sexual harassment), and that's another story--is because ai deep fake is "that person's hyper realistic face being portrayed in a sexual manner, and it can be difficult to know for sure if the image/the video is real or if it's ai", that's why it's harmful. while rpf is just words on the screen that are clearly portrayed as fanfiction. nobody is going to read a smut rpf on ao3 and think "oh this actually happens."
that's also why bad people hurt other people by creating ai deep fake about them, not by... writing a smut fanfiction about them.
so no, in my opinion, these two are not the same at all. not even close.
I don't know if this has been asked already, but is it okay to write non-con reader inserts? Where the fictional characters abuse/sexually assault the reader? Because technically the reader is not a fictional character? And that applies to everything and anything else too, like any other type of abuse.
itâs literally always okay because itâs fiction. doesnât matter if the reader character gets sexually assaulted or decapitated or cannibalized or yeet to the moon or put in the human centipede au where their mouth is sewed to another characterâs anus and they have to eat their feces. itâs fiction. IF someone chooses to read an x reader fic that is properly tagged as non-con, then they consent to reading a fic where the reader character goes through those things.
the reader character IS a fictional character that an actual real-life reader is supposed to imagine themself as, if said real-life reader wants to imagine themself as this reader character (thatâs why fanfics with reader insert were originally called Imagine â back in the days, reader character gets sold to one direction to be their sex slave all the time in all those one direction x reader imagine, thatâs like the most popular thing back in 2012-2013-ish). the reader character is not actually the reader, theyâre not actually a real person with life or feelings. theyâre words on the screen that people must choose to click on and read on their own free will.
nobody is actually getting harassed because their reader character is harassed in a reader-insert fic. if someone chooses to read it, then they consent to reading it. nobody is forcing them to read a fic where a fictional reader character gets assaulted.
thereâs a huge difference between writing a dark fic where the reader character â that is a fictional character in a fictional story â is violated, and harassing a real person. the latter of which has nothing to do with a reader insert fic, no matter how shockingly fucked up the fic in question is.
you can report harassment and threats if someone harassed and threatened you. but you canât report a fanfiction for harassment or threats just because the whumpee in the fictional story is called Y/N.
huh. didn't even know this was possible
if anyone was wondering apparently the character limit for a single google doc is somewhere around 1,511,052. so yeah I guess I'm gonna have to split this up now

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I once new a person who got mad at me for using non con fanfic as a coping mec, so she decided to tell some of our friends about my sexual assult story(without my perms) and used it to twist the story of why I write non con.
Like thanks for bringing back the memories and fears of my sa, you anti piece of shit.
Antis dont have the capability nor brain capacity to separate fiction from reality and its doing more harm than any fanfic could ever do.
Iâm sorry you had to go through this, anon.
writing non-con fics does not hurt anybody, because fictional characters are not real and therefore they cannot actually be victims. whereas this personâs vile action caused direct harm to a real person. and they did it for the sake of imaginary people that donât exist. absolutely vile. whatâs even more sickening is that antis usually think theyâre the morally superior ones by doing this.
when I say antis value the nonexistent lives and the nonexistent feelings of fictional characters more than they do the lives of real living and breathing people, this is what I mean.
i know that reader insert and oc are different things but sometimes i think they are similiar bc at the end of the day the reader is also an oc.
I donât read or write reader-insert fics or fics with ocs. but as far as I knowâwhile you can say that the reader is basically an ocâa non-reader oc is usually a character whose backstory, personality, and physical appearance have been decided entirely by its creator. while âthe reader characterâ is supposed to be a blank page, blank role where any reader can step into and feel like this is them. obviously I get that even Reader character has to have at least some personality, they have to make some decisions or say things that are decided and written by the author. but unlike ocs where itâs 100% authorâs influence, a Reader insert is usually about 10-40% authorâs influence.
also by your logic about reader being an oc, which is not untrue, every canon character is also an oc. because canon characters are their original creatorsâ ocs. every single character that has been written about is an oc. but we create different terms for them so that itâs easy for us to know what role of a character weâre looking at.
we donât call canon creators ocs because theyâre not our ocs. we donât call Reader characters ocs because audiences should be able to differentiate between ocs and Reader characters, and choose if they want to read a fic with an oc, or a different fic with a Reader character where they get to feel like theyâre in the story too.
Does Whump have to have a happy ending? Iâm pretty sure you defined it before but I couldnât find the post đ
hereâs the definition of whump.
whump can have any ending you want, happy, sad, bittersweet, hopeful. whatever you want. the term whump only means âcharacter going through bad thingsâ, but the term alone does not affect or dictate how a story ends. itâs the same as âhorror movies can either have a happy ending or a sad endingâ. a movie being a horror movie doesnât say anything about its ending. the same applies to whump.
if you write a whump fic with a sad ending, then you might want to tag it as âwhumpâ, âhurt no comfortâ
but if you write a whump fic with a happy or hopeful ending, then you might want to tag it as âwhumpâ, âhurt/comfortâ
or you can just tag it as whump if you donât want to spoil your readers how it ends.
Occasional, when I am struggling with a particular scene or concept, I will put what I already have written into a fanfic generator to help me come up with concepts. I do not copy/paste anything it spits back out at me and usually delete the generated stuff immediately (once in a blue moon I'll save it into a document to look at later, but 95% of the time it's trashed).
Again I don't post anything I haven't written with my own fingers, and my work is the only stuff I'm putting into the AI. If I like anything it's come up with I will write the scene or concepts from scratch in my own words. To me this is like spitballing ideas when I'm struggling with what to do next in the narrative, but I honestly wonder what other people think of it. I don't tag anything I post as AI because I don't consider what I do AI generated because I rewrite the ideas from scratch if I use one at all. This happens maybe once every 15 to 20 chapters, otherwise everything is my own imagination.
Do you or your followers have any thoughts on the process I described, and do you think any of my works should be tagged as AI?
Iâve already answered similar questions several times before but no, if YOU write the works yourself then your work is human-made and thereâs no need to tag it as ai. Iâd even say that, in my personal opinion, tagging it as ai would be considered mistagging even.
I mean if you think it should be tagged as ai just because you got some inspiration from it, then by this logic every writer who got their inspiration from tumblr prompts should tag their works as âtumblr-generatedâ and that just doesnât make any sense.
or if you ask a human beta reader to edit your works for you, you still donât tag your works as âwritten by my beta readerâ, because you as the author write them yourself, and your human beta reader just helps edit them. your works wonât automatically shift to something-written-by-your-human-beta-reader just because your human beta reader touches them.
if youâre a human and if you write it then itâs human-made and itâs something YOU made in my opinion.
an ai-generated fic to me is a fic that is actually generated from start to finish by ai. itâs pretty self explanatory.
most people who say âyou should be honest and tag it as aiâ donât really see this type of work as ai, but they want to remain morally pure by staying away from anything that ai has ever touched. so itâs more about them believing theyâre no longer morally pure if they unknowingly read a human-made fic where the author is not as morally perfect as they want them to be. but tbh I believe this mindset is exhausting. if they want to stay morally pure by only engaging with works written by morally pure authors, then what about authors who have never used ai once in their lives but have done something else thatâs unrelated to ai that they disagree with? what if the authors donât share their political views then? these things have nothing to do with their fics, of course, but I bet these people will feel like theyâre no longer morally pure if they read their fics. so what now? should fanfics writers start disclosing their political views and every wrongdoings theyâve ever done in their lives to ensure readers who want to stay morally pure stay morally pure even if what the authors do in their personal lives have absolutely nothing to do with the fics? it just doesnât make any sense.
so no matter what anybody else says, it doesnât take away the fact that your fics are human-made, even if they or I donât agree with how you choose to do it.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
AO3 DOESNâT HAVE AN APP. AO3 DOESNâT NEED AN APP. YOUâRE GIVING YOUR LOGIN INFO TO SOME SHADY THIRD-PARTY APP THATâS FULL OF ADS AND GOD KNOWS WHAT
It's not wrong tbf
Also hiiii!! :>
heehee :3 hiiiiii
man literally about 99% of restaurants, including local and small businesses, in my country use ai-generated photos for their menus. most of the times I donât even know what my orders will look like because the photos they use are all ai đ
Hi I need a reality check. I am in a fandom. It has a lot of incest. Fandom is used to it and it is a meme outside the fandom. nobody tags their incest ships with a trigger. Many of the popular incest is same sex or between middle aged adults so its not power abuse or risking pregnancy (but there is omegaverse too ifyyk).
But am I wrong for asking artists to tag their shit anyway? Itâs uncomfortable even if itâs normal for the fandom. I donât want to leave the fandom because I like the normal ships, but even normal artist sometimes do incest because itâs so popular, so I canât block every artist because I want to see their normal works.
A friend told me if I wasnât in the fandom I wouldnât even know its incest from art because itâs just two adults but I am in the fandom and I know!!
Iâm not gonna guess if this is about supernatural. but in all seriousness you can politely ask them. that said, whether or not they will tag it as incest is entirely up to them. also if they post their stuff on tumblr then the bad news is that I believe tumblr banned the incest tag, so if a post is tagged as incest, it will not show up on any other tags at all and basically tumblr will âshadowbanâ the post or in some cases the entire blog. which is why most artists on tumblr avoid banned tags, even if they are supposed to be used as trigger warnings. in my opinion, the best thing you can do is filter out their ship name.
also anon, you are on tumblr. we donât do normal here. I was hoping the incest ship had power abuse, that would have been so hot. power abuse is the key to get me obsessed with any ship and Iâm not even into incest. but thatâs another story.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
A recent thread on ao3 reddit got locked because one user complained that there were far less fics for black characters than there are fics on white characters.(The fandom was Sinners)
They found it very disheartening and "racist" of people.
Some people agreed with the op and some people said fandom is not an activism - maybe people are racists that's why they're writing white specific fics but you can't do anything because fics are people's hobby and they give for free to others. They are not a Hollywood movie to attract each demography. And said they should write the fics themselves.
The thread eventually got locked.
What are your views on this?
Iâve already talked about this topic here.
fanfic writing is a hobby. not an act of activism. also you canât just guess strangersâ intention and real-life moral compass based on the fanfiction they write. so the opinions of people who say âthis person is xyz because they write fanfics about (___) / because they donât write fanfics about (___) â automatically donât matter to me. if you (general you) want more fics about something, you write them yourself instead of blaming and accusing other people who are just minding their business and enjoying their hobbies.