If anything, this is a repudiation of the electoral college. The presidential votes of Republican New Englanders are not counted because they happen to live in a state that is 60-80% blue.
And term limits will not solve this issue. The districts are all blue, so if a blue congressman gets term-limited, they will simply be replaced by another blue congressman. Banning gerrymandering won't fully solve the issue, either, since sometimes red voters in blue states (or even vice versa) are not geographically clustered enough to get their own district, even if the lines were drawn impartially.
I believe the way to give Republican New Englanders a voice in the poll booth is to do away with districts altogether and make it so that a coalition with X% of the votes will always win roughly X% of the seats.
I think there may also be a conversation to be had about whether or not voting is the best way to do democracy, or whether or not democracy is even a good thing, but I'm not exactly sure what side of that conversation I'd land on.