Every so often someone comes along and tries to convince a blog called "greater than the sword" with "stubborn idealism" in their tagline that free speech isn't worth it and the only effective way to deal with ideological malefactors in society is kill them
The left understand force doctrine better. We need to stop being so polite.
The gun is greater than the pen
Violence is the final recourse of the Just and the first choice of the depraved branny boy. You don't kill every dog because one is rabid, and even putting down the rabid dog is more an act of mercy than of punishment.
These people who never fought a day in their lives are forgetting why people aren’t constantly pushing to violence whenever they don’t get their way:
It is, in fact, possible to fucking lose.
And when you initiate violence and lose, the consequences you will face will be a million times worse than the state you were in before you initiated violence.
The sentiment of “our opponents are a bunch of cowards who will fold like origami the second we pull our guns out” is pretty common among people who were brainrotted by politics. It never occurs to them that their opponents will actually shoot back.
Yeah. the dipshits (on all sides) who are not-so-quietly gloating over the possibility of an actual, honest-to-God, hot shooting civil war are fools and idiots, one and all. While it is possible to recognize that current events suggest that an actual violent conflict is possible, nobody with any sense *wants* it to happen.
I've seen that aggressively, abysmally, arrogantly stupid view (that our enemies are cowards who will fold like origami the second we pull our guns out) from both left and right. And they are ALL wrong. You don't know how your enemy will react when the balloon goes up. Hell, most people don't know how THEY will react when faced with violence.
All we know for sure is that violence is sudden, brutal, messy and scary as hell. And when it's not just two guys fighting, or a couple of street gangs duking it out, but anywhere between hundred and millions of citizens trying to murder one another, it's going to be horrific.
Yes, there are lots of people who are prepared (to various degrees of reality) for civil unrest. And they exist on both sides, and in the most surprising places. And one of the foremost principles in military theory is that "no plan survives contact with the enemy." You may think you know how a civil war will play out, but the enemy gets a vote, too, and he wants to win (and crush you, his enemy) just as much as you do.
A civil war would kill millions, and not just from first-order violence. Power failures, starvation, thirst, disease, wildfires...take your pick. Civilization depends on a lot of delicate systems working near perfectly ALL THE TIME to keep everyone warm/cool, fed, etc. Widespread violence and warfare tends to disrupt those delicate systems even when they're not trying to do so--and both sides WILL be trying to do so...to their enemies. It will be ugly, destructive, and the consequences will last long after the conflict ends.
"When was the last time you went without food for a day and how did that feel?" is a question these keyboard revolutionaries never answer.




























