will byers stan first human second
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Origami Around

⁂

if i look back, i am lost

izzy's playlists!
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium

★
trying on a metaphor
taylor price

pixel skylines
noise dept.
h
macklin celebrini has autism

#extradirty

seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Pakistan

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@lordascapelion

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A constantly recurring comment about the entire range of right wing or "traditionalist" political positions is the notion that they look to a "idyllic past that never existed".
I think this is very often a misaimed criticism, and one must really consider the question of how often they actually look to:
A past that actually did exist
A reasonably foreseeable development of a modern world from an actual past (i.e. something that never existed but that could be built)
A general 'slice' of tradition through multiple ages, of which more would be captured if they won their political conflicts.
A past that existed among some class, which could be universalized.
A past that existed among upper classes, which could be achieved more broadly with modern wealth.
Of course actual fascists tend to be totally off base, but most of the people who face this accusation are not fascists.
It gets extra rich in cases where the ones levying this accusation are striving (or at least hoping) to create societal states which not only have never existed, but very likely cannot exist on this side of eternity.
It really is particularly remarkable just how many people who believe in this criticism treat an ultra-sexually-liberated Soviet Union or other far left society as if it almost physically existed. To be clear I don't think that a pro-gay version of the Soviet Union is impossible but it's hard to reconcile the sexual ultra-liberation mores of the modern Left with an intensely authoritarian society that is constantly on guard against any sign of "bourgeois decadence" and this is totally contrary to the actual historical existence of far left states.
The concept of a world where people in general do not need to do a significant amount of uninteresting work each week, meanwhile, is definitely well in the land of fantasy or future hope, not history.
@thathopeyetlives Are you talking in an alternate history sense with the USSR? Because while I love the genre precisely because of its nonsensical worlds of total Nazi or Confederate victories, I really don't see that version of the Soviet Union as ever happening. Sexual liberation didn't kick off until after WW2, and it was only ever in the West.
Look. I am very supportive of the goals of the prison abolition movement, and am not worried about what a post-prison society will look like.
But "let's name our project a very deceptive name that sounds extreme and simple, and then condescend to people when they ask what is up with that" is the very definition of a political own goal.
Like no, there is no praxis that benefits from "refuse to explain what your movement is about and patronize people who even ask." It's just emotional self-indulgence and in-group politics.
Idk, I'd be pretty worried about a society where rapists and murderers had free, unfettered access to new victims because said society prioritized their right to be able to kill and rape more innocents over the safety of the rest of said society from being killed or raped.
Almost every study ever done on the subject shows that potential-criminals are not stopped by harsher penalties, but by higher chance of getting caught.
You do not want more prisons, what you want is more cops.
No, I want prisons to keep proven rapists and murderers away from society. You stop someone from committing a crime by making it impossible, and when someone has proven they are so utterly evil as to kill or rape someone that translates to either life in prison or the death penalty, the latter of which is inherently tyrannical and thus leaves lwop as the only option. Punitive justice isn't entirely without merit but you're right in that it's not the magic fix-all for crime, but this isn't punitive justice in the sense of penalties deterring crime, it's preventative justice in the sense of criminals who've been proven to have done these abominable things being directly prevented from doing so again.
Murderers who go to prison murder people there. Guards who staff them murder people. And societies that don't care about criminal's lives convict a lot of innocent people.
You don't want the murder and rape to stop. You want it over there, away from you.
So your logic to why we shouldn't protect society from murderers is that they're literally unstoppable and that all prison guards are also murderers, which is also a problem that can't be solved?
Amazing. Truly incredible. Anyways, instead of massively inflating the problem and then declaring it impossible, I'd much rather reform prisons to have better oversight and guard training rather so that murderers can't reoffend inside rather than toss them all back among helpless randos and hope that the "literally everyone can be re-socialized" idea is 100% accurate and workable. But lemme guess, my idea's bad and stinky because it doesn't involve tearing something down that offends you.
Yes. I indeed want murderers and rapists "over there" and "away from me". Thanks for asking.
Wanna know what happens when you don’t deal with murderers and rapists adequately?
Ken McElroy - Wikipedia
Ask this guy lol
recent bangers from threads
It must be exhausting to live like this.
There was recently a copyright infringement case in YA and I need everyone to know that the following sentence was in the legal decision:
“Hot, sexy, dangerous boys, central to virtually all young adult romance novels, cannot be copyrighted.”
“Regarding setting, the court held that both works taking place in Alaska high schools was not protectable because Alaska is a public place and setting a teen novel in a high school is a common genre convention.”
Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney | Loeb & Loeb LLP
I've read the entire decision (skimming over the purely legal precedent/definitions bit) and here are some of my favorite bits:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The bears are turning into dragons
Preview of a few entities I've made for an upcoming project of mine :)
and what if I told you guys that virtually everyone you ever meet will turn out to be really interesting if you give them a chance
some real miserable fucks in the notes I fear
I'm not even saying you have to talk to every single person you meet. and you're certainly not going to LIKE all of them. but every person does have a rich interior life and complex feelings and unique worldview. sorry.
hey man how's it going
sorry for getting self righteous about uuuuh my belief in the innate wonder of human life and connection I guess
hey man how's it going
wow. made it less than three months in
this is truly one of the most tumblr posts i've ever seen. i know chronically online people exist in all corners of the internet but i feel like this is the only place where someone could say something as uncontroversial as "you will find out that people have personalities when you talk to them" and get responses like "oh so you're making the ABLEIST assertion that i should FORCE MYSELF to push past my SOCIAL ANXIETY to talk to BIGOTS????" amazing work, guys

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Crunchy 😀😋🐱
My Dad is Dracula (and an After School Special) “Wait a bit after that potato chip before you take a dip, Son.” 📺 patreon.com/mydadisdracula
She's being so big and brave.
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you can’t not have servants in those times but many modern readers think “but I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servants” and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldn’t it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing you’ll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc he’s not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Is there a “teacher shortage,” or a shortage of jobs that treat educators with the dignity, support, and pay they deserve?
Yeah , it can be laid at the feet of Conservative Republicans , like almost everything else involving the public population ! Republicans hate education , because intelligent people can think for themselves .
So you think 94% of teachers in America are in Red states?
Because if that was true, I'd say the critical lack of teachers in blue states is a much bigger problem.
In the US, across the entire country, we spend 981 BILLION dollars on education from the kindergarten to grade 12 level.
When you break down the numbers, and the scandals, it's often VERY easy to find how administration and the unions work in concert to divert funds into things that get Administration kickbacks, and to keep employed teachers and staff that would not just be fired, but probably jailed in many cases if their situations came to light.
But nobody can fix it, because education's value as a political football (and how many politicians are in the pockets of related PAC's) make any real changes impossible to enact.
After all, admitting that X program is an issue would mean admitting those darn conservatives are right! Just as admitting that Y benefit would help kids would mean admitting those damn leftists are right!
so if there is so much push and pull how do funds get allocated? Is it just towards administration? Does funding change drastically by the year or do funds tend to sit in limbo because the money is there but no one can agree on where to put it?
Oh but that's the best part!
The administration (which, as mentioned, is as corrupt as anything) always gets a hold of the money! And they get to allocate how it's spent, because it's their job to do exactly that!
the money is not being held in storage and not being paid. The money is paid, and complaining about what it's used for is treated as being against education. Bad teachers keep their jobs because if you're against that, you're against education.
Education bleeds because if you oppose that bleeding, you're the bad guy! Isn't that great?
The only path treated as acceptable is giving the people who are already squandering money even MORE money!
Also the teachers' union is now majority-bureaucrat instead of majority-teacher. Also also if you try to choke off their funds they'll cut off the classrooms before they shave a hair off the bureaucratic budget. Also also also negative outcomes give a pretext for demanding more resources and positive outcomes don't.
Still thinking about this mobile game ad I got. You will f**k increasingly large creatures.