Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
i don't think "being trans has a meaningful impact on your position under patriarchy, and when people talk about systemic misogyny and androcentrism and just say "men" instead of "cis men," it ignores that trans men have quite literally never been included in any of this" should be this goddamn fucking controversial tbh. but now i've got people crawling out the woodwork to um actually me about how "this study shows that trans men in the US full time work earn 10% more than trans women in full time work and also v-coding exists and also afab housing so therefore trans men as a class have male privilege and benefit from patriarchy"
#I genuinely wonder where they got lost if they think âaccess to AFAB housingâ is *male* privilege tbh#yknow. group of people who by are by definition not granted the sex marker of male on their birth certificate#and if our birth certificate and legal sex ID was changed to Male then#maybe. and hear me out here. maybe that would make it difficult. to get into. AFAB housing. whoa.#maybe this is why the term AFAB privilege began to circulate lmao#bc thereâs no way of arguing this as male privilege that doesnât come across as some form of absurdist satire
oh its like talking to a fucking funhouse mirror with these people tbh. its the same with that one guy who was like "checkmate MRA, women in the 19th century were legally property and couldn't wear pants!!" when that. is literally an example of how trans men were also directly systemically affected by misogyny.
these people never stop for one single second to think of trans men who never get to transition. they never think about the countless trans men throughout history who have lived and died as women. who have been subject to child marriage and clitorectomies and been treated as legal property. they don't think about trans men in countries right now who go through all of those things, who legally cannot be outside without a male guardian because they are legally female, who cannot even get their own passport because they are legally female. its so fucking frustrating.
radical feminism has its hooks so deep in some parts of the trans community, and frankly a lot of people have internalized trans separatist talking points. even if they don't realize it they don't seem to think of trans people as a coherent group. all trans people's experiences are seen as just a shadow cast by cis menâs privilege and cis womenâs oppression, and our experiences are reducible to cis men and cis women's experiences but slightly different.
and, i have to say this again: this is literally how TERFs think, but in reverse. TERFs also ignore how trans men are worse off than cis women, and how trans women are worse off than cis men, and insist that all trans experiences are reducible to "men are privileged women are oppressed." its literally just a matter of which trans people you cram into which side of the cis binary. this is not good transfeminism and it never ever will be.
Iâm not trying to play devilâs advocate about the Tolkien and race post, I agree with most of what youâre saying about the denial. But modern non fiction Marxist critics forget one thing that hopefully fandom doesnât, that is to give the author grace instead of immediately deciding that the racial politics of his work is intentional. I accept Tolkien was a conservetive, but I find it hard to believe that he was exposed to anti racist thought like we are today. I think itâs important to acknowledge the biases in his writing, but not decide it as intentional, because heâs a linguist based in a very white part of England, whose background is in European history who did not anticipate a world where migration is the norm. Of course that doesnât make the text less racist but itâs an important thing to consider. Thatâs all, I agree with your other points.Â
Thanks for the question, and please bear with me re asks gang, I was stupid enough to leave inbox on for a while, not realising the post would break containment, so Iâm snowed under atm â ď¸
So thereâs a lot of talk about Tolkien being âof his time and classâ but precious little about what that environment actually looked like other than comparing him to his fellow religious conservative Oxford dons. âOf his timeâ is not a neutral statement and it certainly isnât applicable to Tolkien, but more importantly, ânorms of his timeâ seem to often be, in this fandom, calibrated to âwhat Tolkien saidâ rather than âwhat was actually happening thenâ.
Anyway, I will try to be a little more direct than in that last post. So the âthe fundamentally racist elements of the legendarium are because Tolkien was a man of his timeâ line really annoys me (and others!) because imo it lets Tolkien's own Oxford tea table stand in for the entire twentieth century as if there wasn't an entire world outside the Inkling Orgy arguing furiously about race and empire.
I can give you an example literally from Oxford itself! The Indian Majlis had been meeting at Oxford since 1896! The Majlis, for those who might not be aware, was a full-on political and debating society which produced a fuckton of the people who'd go on to lead independence movements across South Asia. This was not some obscure footnote he would need to trudge to a specialist archive to dig up, and I can confirm that attending debates and discussion groups is, was, and has always been a large part of Oxford University life. Ie this was happening in his university in his lifetime among people of his class group he'd have had every opportunity to meet and engage with, whose existence he absolutely would have been aware of.
Beyond the Oxford ventures, you have things like Moodyâs League of Coloured Peoples, founded in London in 1931 and organising against colour bar practices in Britain itself. The West African Students' Union had been running since 1925, building a public anticolonial intellectual culture that fed directly into multiple independence movements of the following decades. CLR James was in England from 1932! And so on and so forth! And many in these organisations were white British activists or public intellectuals or writers! This was a live political and literary scene running in parallel with Tolkien's and explicitly arguing against the racial categories his fiction sought to preserve. Which is to say, I think whatâs more likely than âthe legendarium is the way it is with regards to race because Tolkien didnât know any such antiracist thought existedâ is that âthe legendarium is the way it is with regards to race specifically because Tolkien did know such antiracist thought existedâ.
can i say i am so glad the guy was not a lazy writer and also that he disliked direct allegory because if one of sharkyâs minion gangs in scouring of the shire were called the hobbiton majlis or something, i would probably start cooking peopleâs cats
Anyway, Iâm so tired of how âof his time" just keeps getting used to mean "the time as understood by conservative Oxford dons," when the actual record shows Black British and colony diasporas and white progressives were producing sustained public counter-discourse in the same space the whole time, in his own country, in his own language, in his literal university. So when people say he was "just a product of his environment," I just always want to know which environment they mean exactly, because the one he was actually in very much did sustain quite a lot of anticolonial thought.Â
Also just to get into the basics again, bro was famously a philologist, ie not exactly a profession where you could plausibly bumble through life without ever encountering race-as-a-formal-category. Philology in this period, and especially in Oxbridge, was literally a primary engine of race science. The Indo-European/Aryan linguistic apparatus that mapped language families onto racial stock was built by people doing Tolkien's exact job, so I really donât think he passively inherited racial categories without noticing, he inherited them deliberately through years of formal study, with copious footnotes and his own academic judgement. Like I always find it so funny when people, even on that post, refer to the racial dynamics of the legendarium as âunconscious biasâ because I just know Tolkien is spinning like a power drill in his grave every single time, because they just implied he was shit at his job đ
Anyway, the entire feudal value system of the legendarium runs on inherited blood as a determinant of worth (even within the Shire, ie the most ânormal people not kings of menâ place, where Sam is placed as a Good Man Friday), and this is a very well known fact within fandom. Aragorn's legitimacy is genealogical-first and earned-second, the blood of NĂşmenor "running true" in some lines and "thinning" in others is outright presented as a real, quasi-biological fact about a person's capacity for greatness, and not to forget Faramirâs entire speech about greater and lesser men, and the âchildless lords sit alone while barbarians bay at the gatesâ bit.
Or if you prefer a Silm example, (note: the context of the exile and whether or not you think they deserved what they got is irrelevant to this point) but the Doom of Mandos and the Noldorin re-entry ban, when viewed as a mechanism detached from context, is fundamentally just the ontological excision of a âbirthright citizenshipâ as a consequence of a personâs actions. Idk how big this was outside the UK but remember when Shamima Begum was extensively groomed as a child and fucked off to join ISIS and the UK decided to strip her of citizenship and leave her stateless? This is basically just that, ie the legitimisation of an ontologically confirmed birthright citizenship that can be granted to exceptional cases at the behest of the ruling body (see: Hobbits, Peredhels) due to their extraordinary actions, but also can just as easily be taken away by the same ruling body in response to a transgression. Like this is literally just present-day âmigrant criminalityâ discourse, how can you say he didnât anticipate the rise of postcolonial global migration đ
(once again to the reader, please let me reiterate i am simply comparing the mechanism of the exile alone, i am not saying that the FĂŤanorians are fucking ISIS, and i certainly am not saying that the exiled Noldor are the equivalent of stateless refugees, so pls donât jump up my ass đ)
Tolkien wasn't writing this in a vacuum where phrenology was a fringe pseudoscience nobody respectable touched, it was institutionally embedded and state sanctioned British science well into the interwar period, with its own society and journals, and an enormous presence in Oxbridge. Moral and mental character of Great Menâ˘ď¸ being first fixed by descent and the subsequent positive/negative shaping of character by choices and environment being seen as a somewhat effective yet undeniably secondary mechanism, is literally the loadbearing premise of race science. Itâs not a borrowed aesthetic! The entire legendarium runs on this logic!Â
Once again, and this is also re: a few reblogs of my original post that take a similar route, what do you mean âhe did not anticipate a world where migration is the normâ??? đThe legendarium isnât a product of 1937 alone, bro was notoriously still tinkering with its genealogies and societal architecture well into the 1960s and early 70s and pretty much until the day he died, like a fucking dweeb (for once, complimentary), hence why it takes the fragmented form it does. That's a working lifespan that runs through major global decolonisation, Windrush, the 1958 Notting Hill race riots, the 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act, through literally the entire long and convoluted and drawn out process by which Britain had to publicly and unavoidably reckon with the idea that the empire's subjects were now their neighbours. At some point we need to truly engage with what "of his time" means, ie we have to reckon with the fact that âhis timeâ kept moving and the foundational elements of the legendarium didnât.Â
And to bring up the same example from my original post but in a different light, Tolkien was completely capable of precise and deliberate racial argument the second it was framed as being about himself rather than his fiction. In said well known example, in 1938, some German publisher wants confirmation of his "Aryan" descent for translation rights, and Tolkien's (drafted) response is sharp and furiously specific, knowing exactly what's being asked of him by the Nazis and exactly why it's grotesque. Compare that to the total absence of literally any comparable interrogation applied to the Haradrim or orcs, or the entire chronology and geography of Middle-earth where evil consistently arrives from the same two compass directions wearing the same coded features. Man like. Tolkien was honestly a pretty clever guy, and ngl I feel it does him a (very funny) disservice to assume he didnât have the capacity to scrutinise race to the level he does â ď¸
Anyway I think where the fandom focus on âunconscious bias of the era" does not actually originate in a true desire to absolve Tolkien (fair enough, because this is a man who has never once asked to be absolved of the opinions he holds strongly enough to work into his narrative at such depth) the individual, and but rather in the interests of keeping the emotional crutch of loving a beloved childhood text without having to acknowledge that the person who made it was making choices in the same way Rudyard Kipling or Rider Haggard was making choices, and yet very few people offer Haggard this kind of protective custody in present day.
Almost nobody aside from hardcore conservatives sits around saying King Solomon's Mines just "reflected the assumptions of empire" as if Haggard had no hand in shaping said assumptions himself, we read it (correctly) as a deliberately shaped ideological project worth taking seriously as an argument. Tolkien, specifically due to the fandom culture around him both then and now, often gets a pass that even Kipling doesn't, and imo it's not because the textual evidence is thinner but because the fandom loves him more and flinches harder when heâs hit. Which is to say, the insistence on âTolkien was of his time and his time was badâ being the chosen interpretive lens is less a claim about âthe timeâ Tolkien existed in than it is a claim about us as a fandom today.Â
On a vaguely related note, I also think âthis fandom gives grace to the authorâ should not be treated as a complimentary statement, especially because one of the elements of the Tolkien fandom which genuinely baffles me is the general air of author-genuflection across the board regardless of what fandom pocket youâre in (and a towards Christopher LMFAOOO) never have I been in a fandom that consistently deifies the creator to this extent, and itâs doubly baffling considering that he isnât exactly a sensitive up and coming artist but a dude who has enormous mainstream cultural impact and, crucially, has been dead as a doornail for decades.Â
Like it is quite funny but also on a serious note, whilst the sentiment is understandable because yeah the world and its languages are as immense as the work he put into it and it is very important to so many of us, I think a publicly performed culture of âgrateful to the author for this wonderful worldâ is one of the things that preclude a deeper critical understanding of the legendarium itself. Amusingly, this is literally the only thing that makes me miss the bloodsoaked battlefields of anime fandom, because Masashi Kishimoto may have painstakingly drawn 3 billion pages of Naruto, but 95% of the fandom would probably, upon meeting the guy, tie him to a chair and beat him repeatedly on the head with a rubber hammer going âwhy the fuck did you do this? what the fuck is wrong with you? did you hate twelve year old me personally?âÂ
I have a longer post cooking abt the historical elements of Tolkien as a man of his time re ideological genealogies and contemporaries, but in the meanwhile I just want to say by his own letters (letter 83, written in 1944), Tolkien was an avowed supported of General Franco, which a) most writers of his generation were in active and public opposition to Franco and b) Tolkien spends a not inconsiderate part of his letter bitching about how the notoriously conservative C S Lewis himself is opposed to Franco and infected by "Red propaganda" and c) if it comes to fellow Catholics, Graham Greene himself opposed Franco, even if he was unhappy abt murders of priests. And I also think it is very important to note re the stewarding of these conversations that there are exactly two papers on Tolkien's support for Franco, one by an independent scholar and one by the head of the Tolkien Society in Spain, who managed a private interview with Priscilla Tolkien and who cited her godfather having been a Francoist himself - and THAT author is, guess what??? a fucking Francoist himself. The conversations and scholarship about Tolkien are NOT happening in a neutral and "normal" space.
All rules can be put into two groups; don't touch the hot stove and don't walk on the grass
For the first group the consequences of your actions are real, they're directly related to your action. These rules can be broken only if you accept the risk first, maybe you want a burnt hand idk you do you
For the second group the consequences are imagined and enforced by authority, they aren't directly related to your actions people in power just want you to think they are. You should break these rules as often as you can get away with
"You are the gender you were coercively assigned at birth" is in the second group
Calvin's dad: listening to pirated music? I'll show you something interesting.
All rules can be put into two groups; those that have a real consequence and those that have a manufactured consequence enforced by an authority, right?
Calvin: yeah...
Calvin's dad: don't pirate music? Manufactured. Don't touch the hotplate? Real. Don't walk on the grass? Manufactured. Don't climb into the tigers enclosure? Real.
Despite appearing to have real consequences "don't self harm" is actually manufactured
I spoke to my friend the other day and she said she had "yet to see a swedish film that is good". I told her about some swedish films I enjoy and she mentioned she hadn't seen those. She hasn't seen any Astrid Lindgren film at ALL (nor does she want to; I suggested it once and she said that's where her line goes), she has not seen Fucking Ă mĂĽl and has said she "should watch it someday"... but she claims she just thinks swedish films are dumb because she thinks Swedish is a dumb language and she can't take anything seriously.
And like... this is something I have thought about. You never hear any english speaking person claim movies from their own countries are stupid because of that. Like yeah of course every country has bad movies, but never have I heard the reason being "the language is dumb" for an english speaking film.
But for not only swedish, but also other non-english countries, I've seen a similar trend. People who are overly critical to movies from their own countries cause they find "the language dumb" or just "it looks cheap". And I think that's kinda sad!!! There's SO MANY GOOD MOVIES out there and I feel privileged to have easy access to some of them by the pure reason that I understand the language and it might not have been marketed outside my own country. Too bad for everyone else that they won't enjoy this one! And then it's just sad when people speaking my own language won't even give it a chance cause they cringe hearing their native language.
I think part of it is the acting. It does often take me a little longer to get pulled in when watching Swedish tv/movies and part of that is that the acting feels a little stilted. I also like watching older movies and a lot of the English speaking stuff I watch from the 40's and 50's (before screen acting became a thing) have a very similar feel. My guess is that Swedish actors are more often trained as stage actors, which puts less focus on realism compared to communicating emotions to an audience from a distance and which tends to feel a little more stylised and unnatural. Meaning it might take a little more effort from the watcher to suspend disbelief and engage in the story.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Video summary: Tiktok by @pippabarnes - clips of a person with alopecia applying colourful makeup and other decorations to a bald spot as part of very dramatic looks, narrating now her relationship to her bald spots has developed over time
Hello, tumblr! I saw something on here the other day that worried me, so I decided to Do Science about it. But I can't do it alone: I need your help to build the dataset!
Here's what I need you to do:
If you see a post with a "mature content" label, and it's 2026, DM me a link to the post.
Yes, that's really it.
I am hoping to collect several thousand such posts, so that I have a decent sized dataset. I do not care what the post is about; if it's labeled as "mature content", I want to add it to my dataset.
If I get 10,000 posts in my dataset before August 31st 2026, I will post my preliminary findings then. I won't feel comfortable calling my findings "settled" before 2027, unless I get over 50,000 posts.
It bothers me so much that the healthcare system relies so much on the patient's ability to advocate for themselves, organize their history, and be so persistent against every medical âprofessionalâ who says thereâs nothing wrong/they can do. But so many struggle with fatigue, brain fog, and face such ingrained systemic barriers, that the people who need and deserve help and support canât access it.
I saw something recently that resonated with me: âAccess shouldn't depend on who has the energy to fight for it.â And Iâve never agreed with anything more.
someone keeps arguing with me on a post where I described the state of being a child as functionally disabling (in the context of human rights) and they keep trying to make ridiculous comparisons that no one would ever believe like âyou would never say that women are disabled!â yeah obviously no one would ever argue that women are inherently physically and cognitively unfit for human rights or autonomy. no one would ever say that. itâs so fortunate that we live in a world where no one believes that.
Except, you know, when you do. Say for instance if you are not able to open a bank account or own property or get a job or go to school or wear pants or go out into public alone or or or or or orâŚ
also their other comparison was âyou wouldnât say being gay is like being disabled!â and youâre right I wouldnât but this was a mainstream sentiment in the US within living memory and people got institutionalized and lobotomized and forcibly sterilized for it so like.
and then you look at medical racism and phrenology and it starts looking more and more like all this shitâs more closely related than youâd imagine
So kids are an interesting case because by virtue of being non-adults, their rights are often sharply curtailed. They're restricted in what they can do, often severely restricted. Which is a big problem, because the people responsible for them often either don't have their best interests in mind or have Very Different Ideas about what the kid's best interests are.
sure, and legally on paper being a child looks pretty much exactly like being disabled enough that you're considered to "need" a conservatorship, or being declared "legally incompetent." that's a huge reason why "presume competence" is the rallying cry of a lot of people with disabilities, particularly those with intellectual/developmental disabilities and those with high support needs. similarly the concept of "dignity of risk" exists to argue that autonomy should be prioritized even in cases where society decides someone's decisionmaking process may be "impaired" somehow.
Imagine you're dropped suddenly into an unfamiliar landscape, stark naked. Take a minute to think of everything you would wish you had in that situation. Clothes, a blanket, a way of contacting someone you knew? A knife, a fishing net, a fire starter, knowledge of local plants and animals? Prepared food? Glasses, shoes? Medications? All of those things are assistive technologies. They are tools that help you survive and thrive in the world, in ways you would struggle with alone and naked. Some are physical technologies, some are social technologies, some are things you could make for yourself and some are not - but all of them are things you rely on to get by.
As a society we've set an expectation about the set of assistive technologies it is "normal" to need. The fact of needing these things is glossed over, unexamined.
Disability is defined by being unable to perform key functions of your own life or participation in society - but it is defined this way in the context of assumptions about assistive technology access.
Some disabilities can be near-completely ameliorated by specific assistive devices (like glasses.) For others, the assistive technology needed includes more complex social support technologies. But broadly, an approach is possible that says, what would you need, in order to live your life fully? Does it exist, and if not, can we create it? Assistive technologies are by no means a solved problem, but the outlook is to improve life and capacity as much as possible by exploring support options. Anyone who has an unmet need can be benefited by this approach - a total expansion of social support.
In practice, what we mostly see is the inverse of that. The normal level of social support becomes a benchmark. Medicalization of disability often says, "what would it take to make you into someone who only needed 'normal' levels of support?"
Worse, the normal level of social support becomes a reward. A reward for what? Why, for being able to function in society without any more support than that! If you can't accomplish that, do you even deserve this much support? Key pieces of social technology for living in the world are withheld from some people - on the basis of their supposed unfitness to be fully independent members of society. This is what's discussed above - in the context of women being barred from property ownership or independent bank accounts, children being barred from decision making about almost every aspect of their lives, and disabled adults deemed "legally incompetent" facing both.
Lacking access to technologies that would make you able to participate in the physical and social world is disabling. Disability is a status of lacking what you need to function, which can arrise from many causes. Health can be disabling. Poverty can be disabling. Abusive relationships can be disabling. Criminalization and discriminated legal status can be disabling.
Very often, the people withholding key social technologies make the argument that they are withheld *because* you lack capacity - deflecting the impacts of what is withheld ON your capacity and re-naturalizing the source of the problem as inherent to you. This can be done to anyone, by anyone with enough social power over them. The fact that it often occurs to people who are Also struggling because of other unmet needs that would be unmet even if they did receive the full allocation of "normal" support, should not obscure that both of these dynamics are rooted in denial of needed support and blame for needing support at all.
It is because of this deflection that I think disability analysis can't afford to center on what disabilities are "inherent" to a person, versus situational due to discrimination and lack of resources. I don't think those are seperable factors, and even if they were I wouldn't trust people to seperate them accurately, due to the nature of discrimination itself.
Likewise, I think it's crucial to challenge the unexamined status of what is a "normal" level of assistive technology to have access to - including examining things like "autonomy" and "being taken seriously" AS assistive technologies - in the sense that they are social technologies that critically impair quality of life if denied. Perhaps if people who don't think of themselves as disabled, learned to view things they absolutely rely on as assistive technologies, they would be less careless about treating other people's assistive technologies as if they were optional.
(I think one reason for pushback on this framing is the fear that it trivializes disability. That by putting disability on a continuum with experiences had by people who face much less profound social struggles, people will feel they are granted liscence to focus on their own problems. I can't say that's not a real concern! We've all seen versions of that happen, I think. I DO think this type of reframing of disability is useful to understanding why people face the struggles they do, and what other approaches are possible. But it does always bear reiterating that some people are having an EXTREMELY bad time and that their struggles need to be prioritized.)
I get in theory why people complain about het ships or whatever, I get wanting to watch queer media I really do, but I guess where yâall lose me is like. I saw some asshole on a post about Sinners complaining it was âhetslopââthis person was specifically doing so while also claiming Remmick was a queer character and thus they were justified in caring more about him than the Black protagonists. which is a whole other disgusting can of worms that has been well addressed by others at this point. but even in the absence of that part of the argument, like, no, i actually donât think that a hunger for queer stories is an especially good excuse to deride and dismiss a piece of landmark Black filmmaking, especially as a non-Black person. I have a post thatâs been going around encouraging folks to engage with more Native stories and characters, and I had someone come onto that post saying in the tags that theyâd need these stories to be queer in order to care. and I just think that, you know, sucks! like obviously as a queer Native I also want to see more of those stories too. but idk how else to put it other than to say that Black people and people of color shouldnât have to be like you in order for you to care about our narratives and experiences. and I think some of yâall are using this disdain for heterosexuality as a cover for your unexamined racial biases. itâs not okay to be racist to people just because those people happen to be straight, and you continue to be white before you are queer.
on an even more basic level than that, also, I simply just think some of yâall NEED to learn how to interact with media and storytelling without ships and fandom in mind. like if not being able to write fic about two men kissing is genuinely going to be a dealbreaker for you I think thatâs actually something you need to work on within yourself because at that point I think youâre no longer really interacting with art and themes and narrative so much as just kind of playing with toys. which is, like, fine I guess. have fun. but it wouldnât kill you to disengage from that from time to time. especially if would allow you to actually appreciate rich and deeply moving cultural stories from communities of color that you desperately need to learn how to see as human
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Dragons are fireless until they undergo the Hroom, the traditional draconic ceremony where a fledgling dragon will go out into the world and make a bargain with a spirit of elemental fire to live in their soul in a state of mutual symbiosis. The spirit receives shelter and nourishment, while the dragon receives a source of elemental fire, which it can only now use to defend itself.
In many draconic cultures, the Hroom marks a dragonâs coming of age, a time to recognize that a dragon is now of a proper age to hold a weapon and defend itself. Some dragons believe that it is only by bonding with an elemental spirit that a dragon has a soul, and that a dragon is only a whole dragon when it has both the mortal shell and the inner spark.
There has been a backlash to this in recent centuries, of course. Fledglings these days are going out and making bargains with all kinds of things. This is usually spirits of elemental lightning and ice, but more than one dragon has come back to their clutch with a fairly bewildered witch.
#Does the witch live inside the dragon's soul after...?
Metaphorically, yes. One dragon had married the witch she brought back to her clutch, and she said that meant their two souls had become one, which was basically the same thing.
The other dragons in her brood said it didnât work that way, but she was able to breathe pure magic afterwards, so it at least worked that way for her.
I thought I grew up in a good neighborhood, surrounded by good people. Everyone said good morning to each other in the morning, my mom was friends with our neighbors, and we all went to church together. In my young mind, that made us very good people.
Then Daffodil came to town and turned my world upside down.
I first met Daffodil when he knocked on our door. Mom was absorbed in a book she was reading so I went to go answer the door. I thought I was mature enough to do so at six years old, and plus, I had Bear- a dog mixed with a million different breeds but was big and looked pretty intimidating. Dad got him for us before he shipped out overseas, for his own peace of mind. Someone to keep us safe while he was off keeping the country safe.
I didnât expect to see a skinny rail of a guy standing on the porch, bouncing on his heels as he waited for someone to answer the door. His cheeks were bright red, he had a short beard and curly blond hair, a guitar that had seen better days was slung over his back, but what really got my attention was that he wasnât wearing any shoes.
âHello!â He knelt down to my level, grinning broadly. âIs there any chores or work I could do for your family to earn my bread?â Â
I glanced at Bear to see his reaction to this bizarre fellow. Normally my dog would at least be a little apprehensive around a stranger, but much to my surprise Bear was happily panting away. The man looked at Bear and actually squealed. âOh, a good boy!â He gave Bearâs ears a scratch and Bear licked his hand.
I craned my neck in and yelled for my mom, âMom, thereâs a man here who wants to do work for bread. Can I have him help clean my room?â Â
âSure, sweetie!â Â
Of course, my mom was distracted. She loved her books. But since she said it was okay, I let the man in. He bowed his head politely. âThank you, thank you so much. Sun was about to burn me alive. My friends call me Daffodil, whatâs yours?â
âIâm Will. Come on, letâs go clean my room.â Mom said I had to, after all, before I went to go play, and if all Daffodil wanted was bread then what was the harm?
Daffodil was a very efficient cleaner, and I learned quickly he was a complete weirdo but he was nice. He asked the names of all my stuffed animals, asked about my favorite games to play, my favorite color. When he wasnât asking about me, he was humming tunes to songs I didnât know. Â
We just got done when Mom popped in to ask who I was talking to and screamed when she saw a strange man in her sonâs bedroom. âWho- Will, who is that?!â She grabbed me by the back of the shirt and yanked me away. Â
âMom, itâs the man I told you wants to work for bread! You said it was okay!â I complained.
Daffodil politely bowed his head. âNot to be argumentative, maâam, but heâs right,â He said.
My mom was pretty embarrassed, but in the end Daffodil did end up staying for dinner. She came to the same conclusions I did- weird, but absolutely harmless. He was a traveler, just planning on cooling his heels in town for a while.
How long was a while?
âMaybe a week, maybe a century. Iâll make up my mind later.â Â
As he left, he gave me a dried out flower. âThank you for dinner,â He said before tipping his head once more and skipping down the street. Â
I still have that flower on my desk. Â
Daffodil did end up staying a while, several years in fact. Heâd typically go door to door, asking for work in exchange for something to eat or a place to sleep. If he wasnât doing that, youâd find him in the park playing guitar for tips or selling pressed wildflowers. His songs told stories of home, of gardens that went for miles and a wife named Rose and another named Dahlia and their dozen children inbetween them. I rather liked his songs, even though apparently he had some raunchier ones that my mom told me about when I was older. He never sung them around the kids though.
My mom gave him a pair of my dadâs old boots during winter, and I swear he did a little dance and promised to dedicate a song to her. When my dad got home, he was also a little hesitant about Daffodil (Iâm pretty sure I heard him ask mom if Daffodil was a queer), but I thought it was impossible not to warm up to such a charming fellow. Â
I learned better when I got older.
See, Daffodil never minced his words. Never pulled any punches. He got into several heated arguments with one of the neighbors, Mr. Robert Miller, about why he wouldnât go to church. Miller was a quite devout Christian, always trying to convince the âlost sheepâ of God to join the flock. Most people knew better than to try to argue with him about it. Â
Daffodil was not most people.
I was about nine when I overheard one argument between the two.
âMr. Miller, I am well aware youâll put a roof over my head and food in my mouth if I go to church, but again I donât think itâs very Christ like to blackmail me like that.â
âItâs not blackmail. Iâm just trying to help you-â
âNo, no, youâre helping yourself feel good.â
âHow dare you!â
I enjoying a good amount of eavesdropping as a kid, so I kept myself hidden behind the fence dividing our two yards as I continued to listen in on this bickering.
âIâve been around the block a few times, Mr. Miller, I know how it works. The moment weâre done here, youâre going to run to all your other little church friends and talk about the heathen that wonât hear God, you will pray together and pat yourselves on the back for doing a job well done.â Â
âWhat is wrong with you?!â
âNothing. Or a lot of things, depends who you ask. I found my version of god in song and in nature. Iâm at peace with that.â
âYouâre one of those, arenât you? Is that why you wonât go to church?â
There was a pause before I heard Daffodil sigh.
âI am not inclined to share my sexual past with anyone, Mr. Miller. Good day.â
âYou are then! Youâll burn in hell, faggot!â
Iâd never heard that word before. But the way he spat it out so venomously almost frightened me. I almost asked my mom what it meant, but I lost my nerve, given it sounded like a bad word and I didnât want to get in trouble.
Didnât lose my nerve to ask Daffodil though, next day while he raked leaves for old Ms. Reed.
âWhatâs a faggot, Daffodil?â
He didnât even miss a beat as he twirled the rake in the air. âA bundle of sticks,â He responded. Â
âThatâs all? Like a bitch is a female dog?â I couldnât say these words around my mom. But I could ask Daffodil anything and heâd tell me the truth.
âSorta.â
I remember him laughing and performing another twirl of the rake. âWill boy, just know that Mr. Miller meant it in a way to cut me down. Itâs a nasty word, so donât use it. You can use some of the other bad words when you get old enough, but thatâs just one of the words you canât.â
âWhy?â I asked.
Daffodil never got mad when I asked why, but this time he looked a little sad as he reached over and ruffled my hair. Â
âYouâll understand one day.â
And I did understand one day. I suppose Daffodil wasnât exactly hypermasculine, he put flowers in his hair, danced down the street to no music, cried when he was emotional and was not afraid to get excited over things like baby bunnies or dogs. To be totally transparent though, I donât think Daffodil was gay. He was too much of a flirt with any women close to his age. Â
Didnât matter though. He was a piece of pyrite surrounded by the asphalt on the cul de sac and people didnât like that too much. Â
It really came to a head when I was twelve. Daffodil was one of my friends, my parents loved having him for dinner and it wasnât often that he wasnât crashing on our couch, snoring like a freight train and his oversized legs hanging over the couch arm. I felt like he was a cool uncle, the guy I could turn to whenever I had a problem or question.
I was doing dishes while my mom was enjoying a glass of wine with Mrs. Miller in the living room. I still hadnât learned not to eavesdrop, so I took a break from the suds to listen in.
â-And I just donât know if itâs a good idea to have him hanging around Will all the time.â
I heard my mom laugh. âAnna, Daffodilâs harmless. Weird, definitely, but harmless.â
âWell, you know heâs⌠you know⌠like that. What if Will turns out like that too?â Â
âAnna, you canât seriously believe Daffodil is homosexual. Really, I think youâre making a mountain out of a molehill.â
âI just care about you and your son! And god knows what he might have if he is a homo, what if he gives Will AIDS?â
âAnna!â My mom sounded horrified, and I felt the same. I did not like the implication that Mrs. Miller was throwing out there. Â
âIâm being serious!â
âAnd Iâm being serious when I say, again, Daffodil isnât gay and he doesnât have AIDS. Besides, I think the neighborhoodâs done well with him around. You know we havenât had anything really bad happen since he started staying around here? No oneâs lost their job, everyone has a good looking yard, no oneâs gotten badly sick or diedâŚâ
âWhat, are you saying heâs had something to do with that?â
âWell, maybe heâs a good luck charm. Letâs change the subject. Howâs Levi, has his grades improved?â
I went back to the kitchen after the subject changed. I genuinely hoped it was just the Millers with such nasty thoughts, that their venom was contained in the family.
I was wrong. Mr. Miller was a deacon at the church at this time and had the respect of a lot of parishioners. His nasty thoughts had taken root in many peopleâs minds.
I donât know why I was out late that night. It was hot, maybe I couldnât sleep, but I wasnât really the kind of kid to wander the streets after dark. This is the only night I remember doing it. I heard a commotion and followed the sound, curiosity killed the cat but satisfaction brought it back, Daffodil taught me.
I found a mob of twelve men and all of them had surrounded Daffodil. For the first time in my life I saw Daffodil look afraid. Â
âYou donât have to do this,â He said, hands raised in the air. He wasnât armed. He was defenseless.
I saw Mr. Miller lift up a baseball bat. âWe told you to leave, Daffodil. You wouldnât listen. You forced us to do this,â I swear I heard pure evil in his voice that night.
Daffodil looked down and then he looked straight at me. I heard him mutter âstay putâ before he looked back at Mr. Miller. âThen I suppose Iâll cease to speak. My words have fallen on deaf ears for long enough. Do what you came to do.â
They descended on him like a pack of wild dogs, and he never fought back, not once. Â
I watched them beat him into the ground with bats or golf clubs or whatever the hell they brought. They beat him while he howled in pain, they beat him until he only whimpered, and they beat him until he was still and quiet. When they left, all clearly proud of what theyâd done, thatâs when I crawled out of my hiding spot and hurried to Daffodilâs side.
He didnât even look like a human anymore, he looked like fresh roadkill. That friendly face that I never saw without a smile before tonight was swollen and broken, the flowers in his hair were squashed on the ground⌠Â
âDaffodil?â
Somehow, Daffodil turned his head towards the sound of my voice. â⌠Will. Good⌠good boy, for not leaving your hiding spotâŚâ
âWhy wouldnât you let me help you?â My eyes overflowed with tears, they landed on my friendâs face.
âBecause⌠I couldnât stand the thought of you getting hurt for me, my little friend.â
A shaky hand, one with fingers bent in horrifying angles, reached up and touched my face, smearing blood across my cheek.
âThank you for listening to me. Thank you⌠for being my friend.â
I waited until he seemed to stop breathing before I dragged him off the road and into the nearby woods. He was far too heavy for me to consider doing this in a sane state of mind, but I was on autopilot at this point. All I could think of was how they might further desecrate Daffodilâs body in the morning. How theyâll say he deserved it, and then put him in a grave that didnât have a proper headstone and not even a name. Â
I folded his arms over his chest, like he was just sleeping. I covered him in leaves and flowers. I took one and put it in his hair, tucked behind his ear.
This was the grave he deserved. The best a twelve year old boy could do. Â
I didnât eat for two days after Daffodilâs death. I didnât leave my room. My mom was confused as to what was wrong until she realized Daffodil hadnât shown up. Miller claimed he just left town but mom knew he wouldnât have left without saying goodbye.
She managed to pry the real story from me and then she called the police. Â
Hereâs the kicker though- the body was gone. They found the grave I made for him, the piles of leaves and flowers, but there was no Daffodil. My mom told me that maybe Daffodil was okay, that he got up and just chose to quietly leave, but I knew I saw him stop breathing. Â
You know how my mom said Daffodil was a good luck charm, right? I think she was right. Well, half right. Daffodil was good luck to the people that did him good, and their neighbors prospered because of that. But Daffodil wasnât going to give that kindness any longer to the people that beat him and left him for dead.
The week after Daffodilâs death, I saw him. Â
I couldnât sleep. I hadnât been able to sleep well since the incident. I was staring out the window when I saw a familiar head of golden hair walk into the space between ours and the Millers. I couldnât believe it. I rubbed my eyes a dozen times before I got up and pulled the window up, ready to call out to my friend to see if it was really him or if it was just a dream.
The word froze in my mouth when I realized I wasnât sure if this was really Daffodil. Sure, he had the golden hair and the beard, but he was⌠different. Taller, which was quite a feat given he was already a giant. There was this unnatural glow about him, and he wore strange clothes. If this had been a few years later, Iâd say he looked dressed to be in a ren fair. Â
One look confirmed though that he wasnât wearing shoes. It was still Daffodil.
He turned to look at me and now he smiled, but there was an unfamiliar mischievousness to it. He put a finger to his lips to shush me before he opened the window and reached inside. Out he pulled the Millerâs infant daughter, Rebecca. He cradled her for a brief moment before he turned his head behind him and whistled.
Two women walked out from the bushes. I didnât recognize them. Both were also quite tall, one with hair almost silver in the moonlight wearing a white gown and the other with midnight black hair cut short to her jaw and a sword hanging from her waist. Daffodil handed Rebecca to the swordswoman who bounced her up and down a few times before walking away. I saw the silver haired woman slip in through the window and a few minutes later left the front door with the Millerâs two sons, four year old Micah and seven year old Asher. Both were still in their pajamas but clung to the womanâs hands and looked at peace with her. She walked down the street and vanished in the dark.
Now it was just Daffodil again. He looked at me, still smirking, before he rubbed his hands together before lifting them up to his mouth and blowing on them. I saw sparks fly out from his palms and dance in the air before going black.
The next thing I remember is waking up the next morning to police all over the street. The three youngest Miller children were gone. And the eldest, seventeen year old Levi, was dead. Autopsy would later reveal he had gone undiagnosed with brain cancer, even though heâd just had a physical a few months prior and he was healthy as a horse. Â
Sure, I was asked if Iâd seen anything, since my window was closest to the Millerâs, but I just remembered Daffodil putting his finger to his lips and told them nothing. Â
Only one child of the Millers would be found, baby Rebecca, returned to her crib. But a week in and Mrs. Miller looked ready to have a meltdown. A teatime with mom and she confided all about how Rebecca never slept, only cried, and how she swore she heard her daughter giggling whenever she wasnât in the room. Â
That child was certainly not Rebecca, but once again I kept my mouth shut. Â
Things went downhill for the Millers the fastest, but they werenât alone. Several other households faced their own bizarre and sudden catastrophes. The Petersons were in a terrible car accident that cost Mr. Peterson his legs and Mrs. Peterson her memory. To her death, she believed every morning was July 21, strangely not the day of the accident but the day of Daffodilâs disappearance. The Caldwells had a nasty divorce after Mrs. Caldwell got mysteriously pregnant, even though Mr. Caldwell had a vasectomy. Itâd later come out she was approached by a young handsome man and they had a moment of passion in the backseat of Mr. Caldwellâs car. Â
The Andersonâs house burned down. The Rivers were infertile. The Wardâs prize garden wilted and died while Mr. Ward wasted away with an illness no doctor could diagnose. The Reeves lost their jobs. I could go on. But Iâm sure you guessed by now what each of the families had in common.
Each of those families had someone directly involved with Daffodilâs beating.
While everyone elseâs family was suffering disaster after disaster, ours only prospered. Bearâs health held strong until he was nearly sixteen, long time for a big dog. My parents thought they were out of luck when it came to having another kid, but mom became pregnant with twins. I insisted one be named Daffodil. They compromised and Marieâs middle name is Daffodil. They were also approved to adopt and thatâs when I got a brother just a few months younger than me, Brian. We became thick as thieves the day he came into our lives and weâre still quite close. My dad got an amazing job when he was discharged from the army, mom got some serious promotions so we got to go on amazing vacations and make amazing memories. Â
I was eighteen when Mr. Miller finally cracked and hung himself. Heâd lost everything- his job after he failed a drug test that he shouldâve passed with flying colors, his position as a deacon after said failed drug test made common knowledge, his wife after she was just done with his bullshit, he just had to give up the car because of the debt he was in and was about to lose the house. In his suicide note he did confess to Daffodilâs murder and named the other conspirators as well. A few of them were already dead from various means, but the others got in pretty deep shit, even though they couldnât be officially charged without a body apparently. Â
Sometimes I wondered if I dreamed that night I saw Daffodil outside. Sometime I even believed it.
But itâs been a long time since then. I have a family of my own now, married the love of my life and we have a six year old daughter, Iris. I actually own the Millerâs house, I got it for a steal because of the suicide. My wife thinks it serves for great inspiration, sheâs a horror novelist, so that works out.
Maybe I wouldâve forgotten Daffodil one day if my daughter hadnât run to get the door before I could stop her. Girl has no fear, probably like I did when I was her size.
I almost reached the living room when I heard her yell back, âDaaaaadddyyyy, thereâs a man asking if we have bread!â
âErm, not quite, if you have work so I can have bread. Close enough though.â
I never forgot that voice. I ran for the door, nearly tripping over the dog in the process. I whipped open the door the rest of the way, nearly bowling over Iris in the process.
He looks exactly the same as he did back then. Same beard, same guitar slung over his back, same lack of shoes. He stared at me for a few moments before his eyes widened and he grinned.
âHello, Will! Itâs so good to see you again. Mind if I help around the house? I like to work for my bread.â
extremely underrated subgenre of tumblr post: when someone makes a general statement about something, and another person offers a counter-statement that's just completely nonsensical, and the OP just agrees instantly even if it makes no sense at all
It's pride month so I'll allow myself to express one opinion on the internet :
There are no "exact color" of pride flags.
I see more and more sites and posts talking about the exact hex codes for the lesbian flag, or the right purple for the ace one, and how it should be more or less saturated and I just want to say: pride flags were meant to be sewn in your kitchen. To be spraypainted and to be recognised.
There are no "exact colors" of pride flags because you should do them with what you have ! Nobody should care if you use a crimson red instead of a cherry red or whatever ! Be free ! wave your colors ! The colors you have !
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The thing about the gods is this: they made the world, but they don't really know how.
That's a simplification, of course, but it's a good one. It's a tollbridge fiction â you pay the price and it takes you somewhere interesting.
The toll is believing something that's technically a lie.
But once the tollâs paid, you begin to cross the river. And, before you know it, you find youâre walking shoulder-to-shoulder with the divine.
Take it from me: that's a good thing.
I remember when the lines were less blurry. When we kept the gods imprisoned in temples and palaces and heavens.
I was a shrine cat, in those days. On bright sunny days when the wind is heavy with pollen-laced memory, I can still taste the blood on my tongue.
There was blood everywhere in those days, so it was a good time to be a shrine cat. You just had to loiter by the channels cut into the sides of the altar and you'd never go hungry or without fusses.
The priests would try to fuss me, sometimes. Some of them thought they were cat people.
âOh sweet Suki,â they'd say, reaching out with their perfectly trimmed nails, âyou are so pretty with your soft fur and the gore on your whiskers. Wouldn't you like a pet beneath your blood-stained chin?â
But I knew they were not cat people. They were god people.
Now and again, I would let them think they were safe and accept their touch. Then, thinking they were safe, I would sctratch and bite them. Catching them unawares, I could get a really good grip on their flesh.
That is where the real treats of the shrines were kept, of course.
I had learned this from the ghosts of the sacrifices. Some of those ghosts were cat people, so I let them pet me and tell me their stories. I would lick up their lifeblood and â with the taste of their heartâs milk on my tongue â I would guide them through the tricky currents and rocks of the river.
This left plenty of time for stories.
This is how I learned the gods were prisoners, even though they did not know it.
This is how I learned the priests kept the godsâ secrets hidden on the insides of their skin, inscribed in moonlight and blossoms where none could see.
Oh, I'm sorry, I was telling you about how the gods made the world, wasn't I?
Well, that's the thing. In those days, the gods knew how they'd done it.
And, so long as the priests kept them walled up in cathedrals or sacred springs or afterlives, the priests were the only ones they could tell the secrets of creation.
It would have remained that way, were it not for the ghosts and the shrine cats.
The ghosts, you see, were not too happy about being sacrificed to keep the god-walls up.
But the shrine cats were the only ones they could talk to, and most of us were happy as we were. Happy to keep sleeping on the warm red-stained stone of the altars. Happy to keep supping on the streams of gravestone-blessed viscera as they joined the river.
However, some of the priests kept trying to pet me. Even though they were not cat people.
So I, clever Suki, listened to the ghosts and stole the secrets from the priestsâ illuminated skins.
I carried those secrets to the orchard fields and spat them up in the roots of the apple trees.
When the blossoms bloomed on the trees, the breeze carried dreams of injustice.
When the fruit fell upon the earth, they held inside them visions of a future celestial.
When the priests found out what I'd done, they cursed me⌠because of course they did. They called me ungrateful and wicked and flighty (all true). They bid the earth always echo my footfall. They bid the wind always carry my scent.
With that curse, and with the bloody channels from the shrines all dried up, I died hungry.
But the ghosts and the gods were grateful. So the ghosts taught me how to dig my claws into the flank of life. Then the gods gave me all their old standing stones and chapels and hells to haunt.
What had I been telling you?
Oh, right. So⌠living amongst the mortals as they do, the gods find it hard to explain how they do their godly things. Y'know, like making the world.
Maybe it's because the words for that sort of thing only exist in the godly places, and they won't live there anymore. Or maybe it's because they gave too many of their secrets to the priests and now they're lost.
You might say: but Suki! You haunt those godly places now! And you stole those secrets from the priests with your sharp teeth! Surely, you can tell us what the gods cannot?
And to that I say: maybe I could or maybe I couldn't. But if I do hold onto those knowings, they are mine and mine alone.
You live in a world celestial. The gods walk among you, close enough to clasp your hand or pick your pocket.
Just try to enjoy it, will you?
---
This story was based on the prompt 'Suki - cat, ancient, vindictive, distractable' by one of my Ko-Fi supporters.
Want to submit your own prompts to be turned into puns and fiction? Consider supporting me on Ko-Fi https://ko-fi.com/strangelittlestories
I'm so tired of straight sized people, especially straight sized white women, trying to "heal" themselves at the expense of fat people.
Until you smash the fat hating bigot in your head, until you fight back against the horrible way we think about and treat people who are unambiguously fat, you'll remain haunted and unhealed.
Your inner child or teenager or whatever doesn't need to hear "oh, you weren't really fat at all, sweetie". Your inner teenager needs to hear, "your weight should never have mattered and nobody should've been saying shit about it to you and making you think there was a size limit on your value as a human being. You deserved a world where you could be a size 4 or 24 or 34 and it was all good."
Right now, all you're doing is reinforcing that yeah, of course being fat is horrible and bad, but people were just being too harsh in what they counted as being fat. Congrats, you're a step closer to becoming the mean girl you never got to be in high school.
The fat hating fucker in your head will never let you think of yourself as being truly on the right side of that line, not for long. That wound will always open back up.
You should never have grown up in a world where people pointed to the bodies of other women and said, "See those women? If you look anything like those women, we'll treat you like shit, just like we do them. But if you join us in treating these women like shit and saying they deserve it, we'll let you feel okay about yourself for half an hour and sit next to the cool kids' table".
I can't stop you making vertical videos and posts about how you're going on a journey of healing by proving that you were never "that big" and that the problem is mislabeling someone as fat, but I don't have to listen to you or support you or give you views.
I'm too busy fighting the battles that you're making harder by the day.