Brainiac Madwoman

i'm talking about people who declare their frustrations about their average lives disabilities. this morning i couldn't get out of bed (because i was glued to my phone) but you wouldn't catch me calling that disabled, even if it happened repeatedly.

why does this concern you?

these people are taking limited resources away from people who genuinely need them

and they also make disability look like a joke

Here are just some conclusions on the physical effects happening in the brain of someone with depression though I will link the full study.

"In major depression, there is a hyperactivity of the white matter in the territories related to the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Major depression involves altering the reward–punishment system. HF-rTMS produces metabolic changes in the ACG. Post-mortem in major depression, a reduced number of glial cells was found in the PFC; here there is also a dysfunctional junctional intercellular communication, which consists in a visible decrease in the transmission of the signal between astrocytes. Depression involves hyperactivity in the limbic areas where emotions are processed, with inhibition of the prefrontal areas. Hyperactivity is found especially in the amygdala, correlating directly with ruminant tendencies, intrusiveness, and adjacent anxiety. The amygdala is a key point in modulating affectivity,"

Another example would be schizophrenic which also has plenty of effects on the brain itself. "Johns Hopkins Medicine researchers say they found new evidence that schizophrenia can be marked by the buildup of abnormal proteins similar to those found in the brains of people with such neurodegenerative disorders as Alzheimer’s or Huntington’s diseases,". So is Alzheimer’s or Huntington’s diseases considered disabilities to you? Why is schizophrenia not? Is it because you believe it is less severe? How are the neurodegenerative issues of schizophrenic people not a disability that deserves accommodation?

So if mental illness is a physical process working incorrectly within the brain do tell me how that is not a disability? Why do they not deserve support for their brain but I do? If they are a joke then why am I not one?

you are confusing cause and effect. animals that think they are close to death become lethargic waste away and refuse food until they pass away

what if the brain (as in the actual processes going on inside the brain) were working as intended but the environment was not conducive to anything but pain, fear and boredom?

There are hundred percent cases where people are depressed because they are living in poverty but this is a different situation than clinical depression. Sometimes situations can be fixed but sometimes that does not matter because there is something wrong with the brain. In these cases that is a disability. Autism, schizophrenia, and depression are all disabling and cannot always be fixed by environmental changes. When it comes to Autism and conditions like ADHD these can never be fixed by environmental changes they are physical differences to the brain. A lot of mental illnesses are life long conditions.

Can you explain why women are twice as likely as men to have a diagnosis of depression? You can’t, because there are MANY known risk factors for depression, including environmental nuances.

When you said “sometimes that does not matter because something is wrong with the brain”, you’re oversimplifying the interplay between nature & nature, which is the environment’s role in altering brain chemistry. Theres a significant pathological difference between SCZ and MDD.

Is it a separatist action to work for a man? No. But most of us don't have the option to make good money under a fully woman-owned/staffed company.

Is it a separatist action to spend spare energy to prioritize developing relationships and skills with your female coworkers over male ones? Yes, that's a good compromise. That's a degree of separatism that doesn't involve retreating from the benefits of current society.

Concerning boyfriends and husbands -

Men don't get into relationships with women for love but for real tangible benefits.

Even if you don't know what he gets out of you, he knows. If he wants something out of you he will try to force or coerce, or trick you into giving it to him. If he had no benefit from you he would dump you.

A woman who’s seemingly aware of the dangers men pose, of how violent and strong they are, of how much they lie and manipulate to get what they want, to have such a woman still think she’s special enough to pick well? It’s naive and arrogant all at once. It’s not mentally sound either. The man is the predator, the oppressor.

Most women who have been murdered by their male partners, whether it be romantic or solely sexual ones, also thought they picked well. They did not pick these men knowing or even imagining that their end would one day be at his hands.

An oppressor using the class placed under them in society will never be comparable to the seemingly aware oppressed person still refusing to part ways, as much what is in their control, with the person with power over them.

Saying all that and I hadn’t even gotten into the difference in female and male promiscuity. Women sleeping around is not and never will be the same as men doing so. Not only are you perceived much differently for doing so, the risks are also higher once again physically even if he is not turning violent one day. Some STDs hit women more severely and then there’s also the fact that pregnancy can potentially happen, unless the woman or man in question is sterile(though that still doesn’t remove all the previously mentioned risks).

I think women can do what they want, if they wanna make stupid choices, that’s on them. But it does make it basically impossible for me to feel bad because ‘misandrists’ are usually pretty well educated in statistics, general dangers and male depravity and to then still choose to put themselves at risk the way some of them do? Well..

I used to not get lesbians until I realized they aren’t just horny sex freaks, but also feel romantic attraction! 🥺🥺🥺🥺✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻#ally

if anything, blackpiller feminists have an optimistic perspective, which is the crux of the argument, that people (and for once that includes women) are doing these frankly baffling things Because They Want To. like that's genuinely the whole point. all of this everywhere is happening because People Fucking Want It, and of course the inverse statement, that People Want To Fuck. that's the scary boogeyman argument everyone is so afraid of, that, according to our detractors, we as blackpill feminists must have been each individually spited or traumatized into realizing. because obviously there's no other way to come to that conclusion.

Woman sentenced to 50 years in prison for killing the man who had groomed her since she was 14, raped her, and financially coerced her into multiple cosmetic surgeries.

50-year-old Hal Sasko invited 17-year-old Sarah Brooke Gonzales-McLinn to move in with him after she graduated high school. Three years earlier, Sarah worked for Sasko at the pizza shop he owned. When she left that job, Sasko continued to contact her. Sarah confided in him about her complicated relationship with her parents, her neighbor molesting her as a child, and her experience being raped by a man that burned her with his cigarette.

“Sasko promised to take care of her.”

Sasko charged Sarah rent and provided her with “unlimited access to marijuana and alcohol” while increasingly demanding more money for gas, her phone, and other bills. 

When Sasko shared that he was attracted to Sarah, she “shut him down.” When she discussed moving out, Sasko threatened to sue her and told her he could wreck her credit so that she could never get an apartment or buy a car. Eventually, Sasko started demanding sex alongside rent.

After this, Sasko bragged to his friends about having a “young” but “unattractive” girlfriend and started pushing Sarah to have cosmetic surgery.

He paid for her to get a nose job, then added the $6,000 cost to the bill she would have to repay before she could stop having sex with him. He told her that men don’t like flat-chested women. She needed a curvier body. He wanted her to have breast augmentation surgery, but the doctor said she was too young. He arranged for her to have buttocks implants instead. She objected but felt she had no choice. He added the $10,000 cost to her bill. She estimated that he raped her two to three times per week for 10 months.

On Janary 14, 2014, Sasko texted Sarah to apologize for trying to rape her earlier that week. But at 5:15 pm, he sent a text asking her to put beer in the refrigerator. Sarah said she knew if Sasko was drinking, he would try to rape her again. When he lost consciousness that night, Sarah reportedly made the decision to slit his throat.

Lawrence police questioned her after she was found 11 days later in Everglades National Park. Detective Jamie Lawson wanted to know why she used Sasko’s blood to write “FREEDOM” on the wall. “What were you trying to express when you did that?” Lawson asked. “That’s how I felt,” she replied. Later, [Sarah] told Hutchinson that killing Sasko felt like standing in the sun for the first time.

During her 2015 trial, prosecutor Charles Branson argued that it would be “inappropriate” for the jury to hear about Sasko’s abuse because it might cause them to “feel sympathy” for her. The jury never learned that Sasko was a rapist or of his constant use of pornography that featured children, bestiality, and videos of men raping women who appeared to be sleeping.

On September 4, 2015, a judge sentenced Sarah to a minimum of 50 years in prison. In May 2021, Sarah’s defense attorney successfully argued for reducing her prison sentence to a minimum of 25 years, after which she would be legally allowed to seek parole.

In a column for the Kansas Reflector, Sarah’s prosecutor and defense attorney co-wrote an article claiming, “battered woman syndrome defense wouldn’t be a Get Out of Jail Free card.”

Prison staff continue to taunt and objectify Sarah.

[Sarah] said her unwanted buttocks implants are a constant reminder of the physical and emotional pain Sasko inflicted on her. Shortly after she arrived at prison, she asked to have them removed. “They were all just curious,” [Sarah] said. “I remember one nurse went and called another nurse in and they both touched me.” The state denied her the medical procedure. “Yeah, it would be ideal if all of the nurses would, you know, follow HIPAA and keep your medical stuff private, but they don’t,” [Sarah] said. “And they told a lot of people — a lot of officers, a lot of inmates. That was just very traumatic.”

Sasko was attempting to groom two 16-year-old girls before Sarah stepped in. Her reported actions likely saved these girls years of similar torture.

"Confidential police reports revealed Sasko was grooming 16-year-old twin girls before his death. Their mother was furious at the attention and gifts he provided them, including cash, gas, clothes, subwoofers for their car, and an unsolicited envelope of marijuana. When the mother blocked his number on their phones, he bought them new phones. If they ever wanted to run away, he told the girls, they could move in with him" (x).

Send funds to to Sarah Gonzales-McLinn's commissary account through accesscorrections.com/send-money: