Penis Creatures DNI

The study found that LGB women were more likely to be victimized by abuse than men, which most people took to mean that lesbians were more likely to abuse each other, but if you read the study you’ll find that the majority of the perpetrators of abuse of these LGB women were men, not fellow women.

And here’s a helpful article that breaks down the rumors/misinformation that have spread as a result of people purposefully misinterpreting this original study and other similar studies: DEBUNKING THE LESBIAN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DATA. Useful to help understand the statistics and scientific language of the studies and provides a lot of sources and further reading.

They want a woman who

- cooks and cleans

- isn't a gold digger

- doesn't care about looks

But then they never ask: how do you impress a woman like that?

She's not a gold digger, so your money won't impress her. She doesn't care about looks, so you can't impress her with that either. And if you don't want to cook or clean, or she can do that herself, then you're not gonna wow her there either.

Genuinely: what do you do that would appeal to her?

andrew tate types arent trying to impress women theyre trying to impress each other with status

but now that a handful of women have gained enough natural rights to be sexually selective themselves, and an even smaller number of them actually have a preference when it comes to something like male height, men think they are about to go extinct or some shit. like women by any metric or measurement still AREN'T particularly strict with their preferences (and they would have all the right to be, even out of mere spite!), but men are still becoming school shooters, incels and MRAs about it.

like you have all your rights, dude. you have everything you could ever need, and then some. women are not taking anything away from you by deciding that you are not their type because you were never entitled to their company in the first place.

women themselves understand this principle perfectly well, even when your sexual expectations toward them have been downright impossible to satisfy. like yeah, some of you dudes are going to be too short for some women, that's sad, but try being told that you need to look like an anime character that has a waist so tiny it cannot physically exist in real life, tits the sizes of gym balls and a sexually mature body of a 12-year-old, and then we can talk. because even after all that ridiculousness, women still manage to understand that there's no point in trying to chase after a dude who just doesn't like the way they look, no matter why he thinks that. women understand that the actual focus should be on how they get treated otherwise, not whether a random dude invites them to his bed or not.

and to be perfectly honest, i don't even believe in this whole idea that women collectively reject short men. like it's not even a real preference. many women might like the idea of dating men that are taller than them, but that's almost always going to be the case anyway. most women are way shorter than most men, and if there is a particularly short man somewhere, then he only has to find a woman who's even shorter, and that's far from being difficult. like. this is not a real issue in the first place.

every time you see someone saying not to talk about an issue your group is facing because "what if people that hate us see it" it is a sign that you should be louder. being committed solely to optics at the cost of victims of abuse is something that happens in quite literally every group and movement because victims (whom are majority women and therefore seen as disposable) are not seen as important and addressing abusers' wrongdoings is seen as a great risk to The Cause. and you wouldn't want The Cause to fail and the people who hate you to win, would you? (for a recently exposed and relevant example of this, see Cesar Chavez)

(X)

““The first time I was ever raped,” she (Maggie Mayhem) starts, her throat tightening around her words, “it was actually on a date with somebody from my local S/M community.”

The 27-year-old sex educator and fetish model has never before publicly shared the story of her sexual assault, but the purpose of this evening’s event, a “consent culture” fundraiser, is so that she can start telling it, again and again. Her mission, along with fellow activist and sex worker Kitty Stryker, is to raise awareness about what they say is widespread abuse within the BDSM community and a tendency for players to either turn a blind eye or actively cover it up. They’ve developed a workshop meant to combat the problem and want to take it on the road.

We’re talking about real abuse here, not the “consensual non-consent” that the scene is built around, as Mayhem’s story of her first assault makes clear. As an 18-year-old member of a kinky student club at the University of California, Berkeley, Mayhem helped raise money to bring a prominent BDSM educator to campus for a workshop. Afterward, he singled her out for a private “play date” and she was flattered. “I thought this was the best person I could start to learn from,” she says.

The scene that they negotiated was “fantastic,” Mayhem says, but then things took a turn. “I found myself tied up and unable to get away when that individual decided that he was going to have sex with me,” she says, tears welling in her eyes, “even though we’d specifically negotiated against it, even though I was saying that it needed to stop, and even though he was not wearing a condom at the time.”

For the most part, she kept the experience to herself, but on the rare occasions when she did tell people in the community about it, she says, “I got one response … which was people saying [things like], ‘I don’t do drama. This is a respected person in the community. I’m very sorry that you had a miscommunication during your scene that made it not very fun for you, but I don’t want to hear about it.’”