🌝

K.C. Undercover: dark skinned men, light skinned women. the one dark skinned girl is portrayed as mean, apathetic, sadistic, and cruel.

The Proud Family: dark skinned men, light skinned women. dijonay, the only dark skinned girl, is portrayed as "ghetto" and "rachet" alongside her entire family. and suga mama, who can be argued is dark skinned, is portrayed as mean, cruel, and abusive. additionally, trudy, the mother, comes from an entire family of dark skinned people. yet she herself is portrayed as very much light skinned.

trudy proud's family (left) vs trudy proud (right).

The Hate U Give: the dark skinned main character starr on the cover of the book (left), vs. in the movie, where she is played by amandla stenberg (right); a light skinned biracial actor.

nina simone (singer, left) vs zoe saldana (actress, right), who played her in the 2016 biopic "nina".

stagecoach mary (right) vs zazi beetz (left), who played her in "the harder they fall".

ororo munroe (storm, center) vs the actresses that played her in the x-men movies (alexandra shipp - left, halle berry - right). and alexandra shipp, herself, is also colorist.

monster high: clawdeen wolf (right), vs. the actress that plays her in the upcoming monster high live action movie (miia harris, left). it also appears that they artificially darkened the actress' skin for the role.

strawberry shortcake franchise: orange blossom, who was lightened between her 2003 design (left) and 2009 design (right).

Something that pisses me off about troon logic is that they don’t even just want to be women. They think some pills and wigs are gonna make them the hot, popular girls who model and prance around looking perfect in miniskirts? 😂 Like you think that just comes for free with being “being a woman”?

It’s like a girl who thinks transition will automatically make her into LeBron James or the jacked male athlete.

Hey buddy, there’s no procedure to transform you into the hot influencers/models you see at the top of your social media feeds. That doesn’t come for free with “womanhood”. Like the audacity of these guys to think they can just “transition” themselves to pinnacle of feminine beauty and status. Like it’s nothing. These fucking guys…

Transition all you want but just know you’ll still be yourself but with weird tits.

Like Hunter Schafer is your 0.01% best case scenario outcome and even he:

Transes as a prepubescent

Started as a pretty boy

1. explains so much about written communication especially online, truly, as many have observed, but also

this is the article:

I could not more strongly recommend reading the entire article, it’s absolutely devastating but it’s a very important read. It’s a chilling indictment of the way drug addicted women are horrifically mistreated, exploited, and so often forgotten about if not further victimized by the very people who claim to want to help them

Medication, crash test dummies, office temperature - these things affect you on the basis of your sex, and claiming a different gender doesn't change any of it, nor does it challenge the systems and structures that are built to put women at a disadvantage. If every woman on earth woke up tomorrow and realized they were non-binary or trans men, they would still be at a significant disadvantage compared to men.

and lol that’s right, we woc don’t get periods and gmw don’t suffer from lack of reproductive freedom. only white women have vaginas and only white women need to talk about these things openly.

it is disingenuous and tiresome how “white feminism” is increasingly being used to shut down any kind of feminism that doesn’t intersect with dick.

anyway @nevaehtyler want to take a guess where this image is from?

It looks like the girls are peaking on main about drag.

Honestly, the name of this drag queen is literally "Jimbo". And women around the world are offended by this humiliating and degrading parody of the female body.

I'm not sure how much longer shitlibs and kweers will be able to fend off the "Is drag blackface, but for women?" suspicions. The bell is tolling louder than ever.

PS-

Idk why you're addressing this in such a way to me (assuming you're talking about blackpill 'feminists' here - when I use the word 'blackpill' here I will be using it as shorthand for 'blackpill feminists'. After all, blackpill men are merely the logical endpoint of patriarchal ideology and therefore don't need to be highlighted as some separate group), but I can tell you why this is:

The blackpillers are the caricature of radfems that form the grain of truth that TRAs have built their understanding of radical feminism around. But as I've said before, this is transparently nothing to do with TRAs having some secret understanding of the core tenets of radical feminism, and rather that TRAs, blackpillers and conservatives are all pulling from the same limited patriarchal pool.

The fundamental belief of patriarchy is that the neutral biological realities of 'male' and 'female' are representative of some greater truth: the male body and existence becomes imbued with some inherent 'essence' of maleness, in order to venerate it above the denigrated female body. Maleness is associated with culture, which masters nature as represented by the female body. Of course, this is a chicken-and-egg scenario here but it just so happens that when women and our bodies are devalued to the sub-spiritual, we are then placed into the same category 'resources that can be exploited', lumped in with the rest of nature - our reproductive capacity can be used, we can be raped and forcibly impregnated, to bring about more males, and the rest is - quite literally - history.

With this idea of male and female essences being embedded into our perception of the neutral sexed body, it's very hard to truly ever deprogram yourself from that narrative. After all, it benefits men to perpetuate this idea so that apart from feeling entitled to women's reproductive labour, he can also project every part of himself with which he feels uncomfortable onto his female counterpart, scapegoating her on a subconscious level. And furthermore, as humans are social creatures designed to seek meaning, to make narrative, and to connect with each other, if feeling 'normal' means buying into these male and female essences, then the vast, vast majority of people will take the easy road.

So, we have our 4 camps:

Conservatives/Patriarchy: Gender exists and is inexorably linked to the sexed body, and that is good

Blackpills: Gender exists and is inexorably linked to the sexed body, and that is bad

TRAs: Gender is not linked to the sexed body, but gender exists, and that's good

Radfems: Gender is not linked to the sexed body, and nor does gender exist - instead, what we call 'gender' is sexed roles that have been valorised into male and female 'essences', and thus it's bad

Note how there are three primary conditions here: conservatives/patriarchy believes in all three, whereas blackpills and TRAs will believe in 2 out of the three, and radical feminism is the only one to truly reject all conditions.

When people believe something, it is hard for them to comprehend the idea that other people don't - this is why Christians famously claim that atheists 'reject God'. After all, it makes sense that a component of belief is, well, believing it - I (rightfully, I hope) believe the sky is blue, so if someone told me it was orange, I'd think think they were either lying, had some problem with their vision, or they had some internal reasoning that made them want to deny the very evident fact that the sky is blue.

So we have TRAs who are out here believing that gender exists, and so unable to comprehend that others do not - so it makes sense to them that anyone complaining to deny gender's existence must actually secretly believe in it. So the only real option here is to assume that as we believe in gender, an instead we deny its inherent essence, instead assuming that it must have something to do with biology. In the TRA mind, that is the ultimate evil - because they have venerated gender as something that is no longer even represented by the body but instead surpasses it entirely. To reject gender is to reject its inherent spiritual essence and instead to assume that it must have something to do with the base and animalistic - radfems are accused regularly of degrading women by relating our femaleness with our bodies.

It's not surprising to me at all that blackpillers are a TRA's wet dream. After all, as I've said, actually rejecting these instilled beliefs about the nature of gender are hard. It's evident on the face of it just how much blackpillers buy into so much patriarchal ideology - Blackpill Jesus's tagline literally states that sex is the root of all evil. At their core, these ideological positions hate the body - in the conservative/patriarchal and blackpill viewpoints, the body is begrudgingly accepted as a gateway to some greater essence, some inherent truth, some form of transcendence.

Radical feminism is the only ideological position that posits at the very minimum and neutral relationship with the body - no matter how many times we chant 'Woman: Adult Female Human', we are chronically misunderstood because even neutrality towards the body is seen as denigration of the self, for the self must be Divine, and for the self to be Divine, it must exist as something More than a dull material form. For whatever reason, be it some inherent human desire to seek meaning or just the product of a culture that demands it of us, we as humans seem to have some deep desire to percieve the self as Divine. And so it stands to reason that there will be women who ostensibly consider themselves of feminist persuasion but will happily carry this revulsion towards the body.

After all, the blackpill is a simple narrative of good vs evil, which means you don't really have to do anything other than Believe the Right Things and do what vaguely feels right in order to consider yourself in the 'good' camp. Blackpillers love to claim that they're not fighting for all women - they're fighting for fellow enlightened radfems only. It's about group connection and being proven correct on the spiritual battlefield - that's a language the TRAs can understand!