noise dept.

★
Keni

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
Show & Tell

Andulka

#extradirty

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Misplaced Lens Cap
Game of Thrones Daily
Three Goblin Art
ojovivo
Stranger Things

izzy's playlists!
Not today Justin
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Morocco

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Portugal

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
@pinkcrescent

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is what colorism in media looks like.
K.C. Undercover: dark skinned men, light skinned women. the one dark skinned girl is portrayed as mean, apathetic, sadistic, and cruel.
The Proud Family: dark skinned men, light skinned women. dijonay, the only dark skinned girl, is portrayed as "ghetto" and "rachet" alongside her entire family. and suga mama, who can be argued is dark skinned, is portrayed as mean, cruel, and abusive. additionally, trudy, the mother, comes from an entire family of dark skinned people. yet she herself is portrayed as very much light skinned.
trudy proud's family (left) vs trudy proud (right).
The Hate U Give: the dark skinned main character starr on the cover of the book (left), vs. in the movie, where she is played by amandla stenberg (right); a light skinned biracial actor.
nina simone (singer, left) vs zoe saldana (actress, right), who played her in the 2016 biopic "nina".
stagecoach mary (right) vs zazi beetz (left), who played her in "the harder they fall".
ororo munroe (storm, center) vs the actresses that played her in the x-men movies (alexandra shipp - left, halle berry - right). and alexandra shipp, herself, is also colorist.
monster high: clawdeen wolf (right), vs. the actress that plays her in the upcoming monster high live action movie (miia harris, left). it also appears that they artificially darkened the actress' skin for the role.
strawberry shortcake franchise: orange blossom, who was lightened between her 2003 design (left) and 2009 design (right).
The problem is there. You see it. This whole "we're all black at the end of the day" bullshit is the exact mindset hollywood uses to justify the erasure of dark skinned women. None of this will EVER be okay. And the fact that y'all consistently find the same goddamn excuses to justify shit like this is exactly why dark skinned people don't fucking trust y'all.
Something that pisses me off about troon logic is that they don’t even just want to be women. They think some pills and wigs are gonna make them the hot, popular girls who model and prance around looking perfect in miniskirts? 😂 Like you think that just comes for free with being “being a woman”?
It’s like a girl who thinks transition will automatically make her into LeBron James or the jacked male athlete.
Like it’s not even about “gender”, they’re after a hyper specific experience and form of social status they’ve fetishized.
How much of “gender identity” is really just chasing social status?
Hey buddy, there’s no procedure to transform you into the hot influencers/models you see at the top of your social media feeds. That doesn’t come for free with “womanhood”. Like the audacity of these guys to think they can just “transition” themselves to pinnacle of feminine beauty and status. Like it’s nothing. These fucking guys…
Transition all you want but just know you’ll still be yourself but with weird tits.
Like Hunter Schafer is your 0.01% best case scenario outcome and even he:
Transes as a prepubescent
Started as a pretty boy
Gets mogged by the wrong angle or when he unfortunately has to stand next to an actual female. And just has clocky days sometimes
It is yet another thing they share with incels. They think being a woman is an easy mode in life because they only acknowledge women who they find attractive. They think all women need to do is to make their tits jiggle on instagram and they want that "privilege" for themselves. Then they get into gender and think it is actually achievable.
overall though, I'm definitely rotating the fact that a lot of US public education emphasizes a method of learning to read that relies heavily on the context of "what it is likely that the text says" rather than looking at what the text does say and then understanding/interpreting it. like.
1. explains so much about written communication especially online, truly, as many have observed, but also
2. LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS. I BET THIS IS WHY PEOPLE THINK LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS ARE NORMAL. I BET THIS IS WHY PEOPLE THINK "MACHINE THAT ANALYZES WHAT IS STATISTICALLY LIKELY TO BE SAID IN THIS SPECIFIC CONTEXT AND THEN SAYS THAT" IS A NORMAL AND NOT SCARY THING. OH MY GOD I FEEL LIKE I UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING NOW
this is the article:
"Female drug use exists in diametrical opposition to male drug use: with different causes, motives for use, experiences, treatments, and pre
I have never seen a clearer argument for female drug addiction as an intentionally weaponized gateway to being sex trafficked
I could not more strongly recommend reading the entire article, it’s absolutely devastating but it’s a very important read. It’s a chilling indictment of the way drug addicted women are horrifically mistreated, exploited, and so often forgotten about if not further victimized by the very people who claim to want to help them
Some of you are too young to remember this, but Amy Winehouse's husband/ex husband would habitually film himself shooting her up and then share the videos online. There was one circling before her death of Blake and another man injecting Amy while she was passed out. They were laughing.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
all the algorithms that impact your life are biased in favor of men. the ones that scan your cv and reject your job application, voice recognition, image recognition, translation, loan decisions, web searches and more are all biased against women.
the cultural stereotypes we have railed so hard against are being imbedded in the code of the future by male coders who, like most men, don't give a damn about fixing the mess. due to the nature of the training the algorithms get, these biases are also amplified. so if you as a woman ever feel like the world is against you for some reason, rejoice! it's true, the male world is against you and there is no female world for you to go to.
My biggest takeaway from Invisible Women is you cannot read it and maintain the delusion that women are oppressed on the basis of gender rather than sex.
Medication, crash test dummies, office temperature - these things affect you on the basis of your sex, and claiming a different gender doesn't change any of it, nor does it challenge the systems and structures that are built to put women at a disadvantage. If every woman on earth woke up tomorrow and realized they were non-binary or trans men, they would still be at a significant disadvantage compared to men.
We have to fight female oppression on the basis of sex, or all we'll do is change the label for which half of the population is default and which is afterthought without any actual change.
This is precisely what white feminism is about - wasting sanitary pads that could have been donated to shelters when there are so many homeless women who can’t afford to buy them + excluding transgender women from their feminism by writing “No pussy no power” on a pad. This is wrong and disgusting. If your feminism doesn’t include trans women, then your feminism is rubbish.
Exactly
Uh they didn’t steal those pads out of a homeless woman’s charity bin, those are their pads from home. That they paid for. The point of their protest is not to exclude transwomen, which is inevitable because transwomen don’t have uteruses and don’t get periods. The point, that you totally missed, is to combat period stigma, tampon tax, and fair access to period products. Which is still a huge problem worldwide. Which actually affects the homeless women you used to prop up your argument. So who’s really doing more for those women hm?
As long as little girls are missing school and dying in menstrual huts because of their periods, it is a feminist issue. The menstrual cycle is not transphobic. Also..“white feminism” really? Women of color don’t get periods now?
i’ve thought about the point about the waste of potential donatable necessities before but this complaint would only make sense if there were literally hundreds or thousands of them being used up for every protest. is that the case here? genuine question. in every menstrual pad-based protest i’ve known, as @parttimepup said it was women pulling one out from their personal stash, for a small project.
and lol that’s right, we woc don’t get periods and gmw don’t suffer from lack of reproductive freedom. only white women have vaginas and only white women need to talk about these things openly.
it is disingenuous and tiresome how “white feminism” is increasingly being used to shut down any kind of feminism that doesn’t intersect with dick.
anyway @nevaehtyler want to take a guess where this image is from?
lmao did op delete
op did not delete, they were terminated by staff for being a russian chaos agent
WHAT
“if abolishing period stigma doesn’t include trans women, it’s rubbish”
bro NATURE excludes trans women from periods, hence activism that involves tackling period stigma will exclude them too
it’s so fucking sickening that these people see women doing ANYTHING for themselves and immediately need to say shit about it
so a literal russian agent was on tumblr shitting on feminism because it doesnt include males? TRA talking points are being used in Russian psyops and these people still dare to call themselves feminists
it was not a joke
This early 2010s tweet is an eternal mood
saying shit like "no hope for women" while living in the first few generations some of us are like legally regarded as people is actually insane. after 20k years

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
It looks like the girls are peaking on main about drag.
Honestly, the name of this drag queen is literally "Jimbo". And women around the world are offended by this humiliating and degrading parody of the female body.
I'm not sure how much longer shitlibs and kweers will be able to fend off the "Is drag blackface, but for women?" suspicions. The bell is tolling louder than ever.
PS-
I tried to post about this yesterday but it got instantly censored because the drag queen in this photo has on giant prosthetic breasts. Ironic that women are supposed to chill about these portrayls when even the idea of female breats is auto flagged as obscene. Meta.
Radfems talk about blackpillers the way tras talk about terfs
Idk why you're addressing this in such a way to me (assuming you're talking about blackpill 'feminists' here - when I use the word 'blackpill' here I will be using it as shorthand for 'blackpill feminists'. After all, blackpill men are merely the logical endpoint of patriarchal ideology and therefore don't need to be highlighted as some separate group), but I can tell you why this is:
The blackpillers are the caricature of radfems that form the grain of truth that TRAs have built their understanding of radical feminism around. But as I've said before, this is transparently nothing to do with TRAs having some secret understanding of the core tenets of radical feminism, and rather that TRAs, blackpillers and conservatives are all pulling from the same limited patriarchal pool.
The fundamental belief of patriarchy is that the neutral biological realities of 'male' and 'female' are representative of some greater truth: the male body and existence becomes imbued with some inherent 'essence' of maleness, in order to venerate it above the denigrated female body. Maleness is associated with culture, which masters nature as represented by the female body. Of course, this is a chicken-and-egg scenario here but it just so happens that when women and our bodies are devalued to the sub-spiritual, we are then placed into the same category 'resources that can be exploited', lumped in with the rest of nature - our reproductive capacity can be used, we can be raped and forcibly impregnated, to bring about more males, and the rest is - quite literally - history.
With this idea of male and female essences being embedded into our perception of the neutral sexed body, it's very hard to truly ever deprogram yourself from that narrative. After all, it benefits men to perpetuate this idea so that apart from feeling entitled to women's reproductive labour, he can also project every part of himself with which he feels uncomfortable onto his female counterpart, scapegoating her on a subconscious level. And furthermore, as humans are social creatures designed to seek meaning, to make narrative, and to connect with each other, if feeling 'normal' means buying into these male and female essences, then the vast, vast majority of people will take the easy road.
So, we have our 4 camps:
Conservatives/Patriarchy: Gender exists and is inexorably linked to the sexed body, and that is good
Blackpills: Gender exists and is inexorably linked to the sexed body, and that is bad
TRAs: Gender is not linked to the sexed body, but gender exists, and that's good
Radfems: Gender is not linked to the sexed body, and nor does gender exist - instead, what we call 'gender' is sexed roles that have been valorised into male and female 'essences', and thus it's bad
Note how there are three primary conditions here: conservatives/patriarchy believes in all three, whereas blackpills and TRAs will believe in 2 out of the three, and radical feminism is the only one to truly reject all conditions.
When people believe something, it is hard for them to comprehend the idea that other people don't - this is why Christians famously claim that atheists 'reject God'. After all, it makes sense that a component of belief is, well, believing it - I (rightfully, I hope) believe the sky is blue, so if someone told me it was orange, I'd think think they were either lying, had some problem with their vision, or they had some internal reasoning that made them want to deny the very evident fact that the sky is blue.
So we have TRAs who are out here believing that gender exists, and so unable to comprehend that others do not - so it makes sense to them that anyone complaining to deny gender's existence must actually secretly believe in it. So the only real option here is to assume that as we believe in gender, an instead we deny its inherent essence, instead assuming that it must have something to do with biology. In the TRA mind, that is the ultimate evil - because they have venerated gender as something that is no longer even represented by the body but instead surpasses it entirely. To reject gender is to reject its inherent spiritual essence and instead to assume that it must have something to do with the base and animalistic - radfems are accused regularly of degrading women by relating our femaleness with our bodies.
It's not surprising to me at all that blackpillers are a TRA's wet dream. After all, as I've said, actually rejecting these instilled beliefs about the nature of gender are hard. It's evident on the face of it just how much blackpillers buy into so much patriarchal ideology - Blackpill Jesus's tagline literally states that sex is the root of all evil. At their core, these ideological positions hate the body - in the conservative/patriarchal and blackpill viewpoints, the body is begrudgingly accepted as a gateway to some greater essence, some inherent truth, some form of transcendence.
Radical feminism is the only ideological position that posits at the very minimum and neutral relationship with the body - no matter how many times we chant 'Woman: Adult Female Human', we are chronically misunderstood because even neutrality towards the body is seen as denigration of the self, for the self must be Divine, and for the self to be Divine, it must exist as something More than a dull material form. For whatever reason, be it some inherent human desire to seek meaning or just the product of a culture that demands it of us, we as humans seem to have some deep desire to percieve the self as Divine. And so it stands to reason that there will be women who ostensibly consider themselves of feminist persuasion but will happily carry this revulsion towards the body.
After all, the blackpill is a simple narrative of good vs evil, which means you don't really have to do anything other than Believe the Right Things and do what vaguely feels right in order to consider yourself in the 'good' camp. Blackpillers love to claim that they're not fighting for all women - they're fighting for fellow enlightened radfems only. It's about group connection and being proven correct on the spiritual battlefield - that's a language the TRAs can understand!
And so no, radfems do not talk about blackpillers the way TRAs talk about radfems, because I dare you to find a TRA willing to dissect these ideological positions in the same way I do. The similarities in criticisms are ostensibly similar because when you're part of one group making a whole-cloth assessment of another group, there is always going to be people who claim you Just Don't Get It. You may as well be saying that people who criticise, idk, Game Of Thrones, are just like people who criticise the existence of climate change. Turns out that the english language is limited, and we tend to default to certain ways of phrasing things when criticising - so there is always going to be crossover in how it sounds! You have to be willing to look past superficialities and instead look for gaps in explanations, defensiveness, obvious cognitive dissonance, logical fallacies, etc. etc. and make up your own mind if what someone is saying is 'valid' or not.
Within a day of posting this I happen upon this:
The thought doesn’t even occur to them that ‘womanhood’ isn’t some pseudo-spiritual essence to be chosen, and that you can have immutable sex categories without male supremacy.
Wow, I totally can't imagine why the people who say the same thing as incels would be disliked by feminists. Even the name they call themselves comes from incel forums, but the dislike from feminists is so baseless. I'm shocked, really
i'm gonna be honest the tras have lost me at "terf". the fact that their biggest most heinous insult automatically includes feminists as the primary target of hatred is so telling, and it makes it so difficult to take them seriously. "oh no this feminist woman wants bathrooms for women only. how horrible and cruel. let's all write gory fantasies about her." do they hear themselves speak. how is any feminist woman supposed to take them seriously.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is a men's rights movement, this a movement whose sole purpose is to make hurting woman normal and 'morally good'
has anyone else noticed that these people only ever seem to protest ‘terfs’, rather than actually protesting things like male supremacy, male violence, the pay gap, the pink tax, the injustices of the legal system, restrictions on reproductive rights or anything literally else that actually harms women? they are literally claiming to be feminists while only ever protesting a type of feminism just because they don’t like it. if they put even half of this effort into actually helping women imagine how much of a difference they could make
If they even put this effort into actually helping the men they claim to care about: trans housing, trans employment lawyers, trans shelters, trans sports leagues, it would do more for people than this shit. But it was never about actually helping vulnerable men either. Just like how MRAs will go on and on about male rape victims and male circumcision but then actually mock men who talk about these things; very few of these activists give two shits about making the world a better place. Keeping women down is the point. Taking things away from women is the point.