the mutual that reblogged 30 pictures of Angkor

no one said sex favorable asexuals would have sex with “literally anybody”

is sex not fun for you? is sexual attraction the only reason you can think of to have sex?

i didn’t create the “sex favorable” label

it doesn’t require a million questions. it requires one single google search. you’re the one who decided to interrogate a stranger on the internet about why they have sex

sex positivity and sex favorability are different

it is not my responsibility to educate you. no one owes it to you to explain anything. if you want to learn, go learn.

2. I can't "have fun" with a person whom i don't find safe, appealing and generally likeable. Can you?

3. And?

4. There's 15 million kool aid bottles up my ass right now. Google it. "Google" is not a source. Neither are Tumblr users from 2016 inventing new labels they expect everyone to accept immediately

5. Do YOU know the difference between sex positivity and "sex favourability"? Where did i say anything about sex positivity?

6. If it wasn't your goal to "educate" you wouldn't make this post ("educate" read as "show everyone my condescending yankoid neologism ridden opinion piece and demand it to be accepted as a dogma, because since asexuals can be oppressed for not wanting sex (evidence? Women being abused by men for rejecting them. An experience common to all sexualities) they're a part of LGBT. So now self proclaimed asexuals who actually have and enioy sex (people who would not be oppressed for their identity under any fucking regime) can tell these lowly persecuted second/third world "genital fetishists" how to gently fondle their balls and whisper pointless neologisms in their ear for "validation". In the meantime, sex-hating sex-having sex-favourable sex-bearable sex-is-terrible asexuals will tell us fucking people you can't stand is actually awesome and not rape rhetoric that's been sold to women (and sometimes men) forced into heterosexual marriages for centuries")

see above.

and nothing. simply having the label does not mean that i’m forcing it on anyone or that i am obligated to walk you through its intricacies.

where did i say google was a source? there are several resources for learning more about queer and aspec labels. have at them.

yes, actually, i do. sex positivity is the view that sex is not inherently a bad thing or something to be ashamed of, nor should it be discounted as sinful or low. sex favorability is an individual’s inclination towards having sex. and you did mention sex positivity; was it not you who mentioned “sex positive asexuals”?

can you point out where at any point i used any of those words in that order? frankly, i don’t think i could come up with such sentences even if i were hammered and high off my ass. also, “if you didn’t intend to spend hours holding someone’s hand through fairly simple explanations of sex and sexuality, you wouldn’t ever be annoyed at the erasure you and your community face”? what kind of argument is that? the two clauses aren’t even related.

2. You would have sex with a person you find repulsive just to get off? That's your sexuallity? Several hours in you still won't answer this, because if you say no, your bullshit label falls apart

4. Like what? Blogs and small American online magazines with heavy leftist bias? Very credible

5. You know exactly what i meant when i said that. Quit sophistics. Another evidence on how western leftism is obsessed with having labels and sexualities for every tiny ephemeral variation of human sexual experience that have zero relation to politics of human rights or lack thereof among worldwide lgbt community

6. Why the fuck are all egalitarians so obsessed with you perceiving them the way they perceive themselves? "Well I didn't explicitly say any of this therefore you can't say my behaviour can be described this way. Checkmate!" You're not a videogame character. You can't control your perceived identity outside of your head

Yes if you can't even explain what your sexuality is, you can't complain that people don't understand it. There are types of oppression that are very subtle and require research to understand context like eg. what whitewashing is and why it's bad, how gender roles change each century etc.

Not a single damned community requires an essay to be read to explain who they are and how they're oppressed

The entirety of problems of sex having asexuals come from them putting on a label they weren't meant to fit into, stretching it until it lost any meaning and oversharing the details of their sex life online. "Hey folx i don't think my girlfriend is even cute and i need long foreplay before my dick even gets hard, that's why i am also asexual, don't you forget that" what? And you are "queer"? You belong in LGBT community because....? What rights do you lack? "Representation"? God i wish that was my problem and not being thrown into jail for a decade or dying on my way to a bomb shelter. What a privileged mindset

1. stranger things

2. heated rivalry

3. Shaving The Bush

4. People seeing tofu as only a meat substitute and not its own very versatile thing

no one said sex favorable asexuals would have sex with “literally anybody”

is sex not fun for you? is sexual attraction the only reason you can think of to have sex?

i didn’t create the “sex favorable” label

it doesn’t require a million questions. it requires one single google search. you’re the one who decided to interrogate a stranger on the internet about why they have sex

sex positivity and sex favorability are different

it is not my responsibility to educate you. no one owes it to you to explain anything. if you want to learn, go learn.

2. I can't "have fun" with a person whom i don't find safe, appealing and generally likeable. Can you?

3. And?

4. There's 15 million kool aid bottles up my ass right now. Google it. "Google" is not a source. Neither are Tumblr users from 2016 inventing new labels they expect everyone to accept immediately

5. Do YOU know the difference between sex positivity and "sex favourability"? Where did i say anything about sex positivity?

6. If it wasn't your goal to "educate" you wouldn't make this post ("educate" read as "show everyone my condescending yankoid neologism ridden opinion piece and demand it to be accepted as a dogma, because since asexuals can be oppressed for not wanting sex (evidence? Women being abused by men for rejecting them. An experience common to all sexualities) they're a part of LGBT. So now self proclaimed asexuals who actually have and enioy sex (people who would not be oppressed for their identity under any fucking regime) can tell these lowly persecuted second/third world "genital fetishists" how to gently fondle their balls and whisper pointless neologisms in their ear for "validation". In the meantime, sex-hating sex-having sex-favourable sex-bearable sex-is-terrible asexuals will tell us fucking people you can't stand is actually awesome and not rape rhetoric that's been sold to women (and sometimes men) forced into heterosexual marriages for centuries")