He started off like you see above, just your average male anti-feminist:

Then of course he delved into defending BDSM, age play, and other extreme kinks:

Obviously porn addicted, he defends porn too:

Likely from his porn consumption becoming progressively weirder, he decides he’s actually a trans woman:

From here he begins to defend gender ideology because it now will benefit him as a trans woman. He switches from “anti-feminist” to “anti-terf”:

Isn’t it fascinating how quickly he did a 180 once he realized he could use liberal feminism to his advantage? Just look how he jumped on the bandwagon as soon as it became useful to him. This dude has obviously always wanted to shut down real feminist conversation, and now he’s found a socially acceptable way to go about it! Plus, he’s now granted immunity from criticism with his Trans status. Very clever!

She can consent, even enthusiastically, say yes or no, like a binary code, but she did not design, propose, initiate or orchestrate it, nor can she fully control the outcome in the society she lives in. And this is true on a mass scale. When have you ever heard of sex being described as men consenting to a woman's sexual advances? Or discussions that you shouldn't upload men's explicit pictures without their consent?

Male consent is not considered an important factor because their desires are assumed inevitable, like a force of nature, a neutral, unquestioned starting point, and women can only exist relative to that, to either accept or deny. They can't have active desires of their own. Men are considered actors fundamentally and women are the ones acted upon.

just putting this out there again. rapist-fantasizers are acknowledged to be sexual sadists, and the attempted definition of this as a paraphilia has been criticized because there is no reliable way to discern between them and rapists who act on their desires.

Do I agree that female bodies are dirty? Absolutely not. Do I agree a woman is basically naked if her hair is uncovered? Absolutely not.

But I recognize women raised under oppressive faiths are conditioned from birth to view themselves that way. Forcing a woman who has internalized those kinds of beliefs (or any woman, honestly) to expose herself to men is immensely psychologically damaging. In her mind it’s like being raped which she equates with damnation.

This is Rachel Dolezal, who legally changed her name to Nkechi Amare Diallo. Dolezal is a white woman who identifies as black and insists that she is transracial. Growing up, her religious white parents adopted four black babies, claiming that they "saved them from being aborted", and routinely delivered strict punishments to their kids including Dolezal. Dolezal does not seem to have a good relationship with her parents and, based on interviews, wanted to distance herself from them and distance herself from rural white culture.

"I've never questioned being a girl or woman, for example, but whiteness has always felt foreign to me, for as long as I can remember. I didn't choose to feel this way or be this way, I just am. What other choice is there than to be exactly who we are?"

She apparently "passed as black" for several years before her parents came out and said that she was white and is identifying as a black woman, and she was asked in a TV interview if she was African American and responded with "I don't understand the question". She taught Africana Studies at Eastern Washington University. She crafted a fake story in growing up as black and has argued that she experiences race-based related hate crimes. She darkens her skin and gets perms and started using hair products she observed her adopted black sibling to use. She lied about her father being black and lied that her black adopted brother was her son.

I hope that as details of Dolezal's story is read about, we are able to understand that tanning white skin does not make someone a black person, that blackface is wrong and racist. I hope we recognize that what makes someone black isn't a collection of racial stereotypes, isn't based on feeling a kinship with black people over white people, and isn't based on not feeling a connection with white culture. I hope we understand that a black person cannot identify out of racial oppression, and that a white person cannot identify out of white privilege.

Jewel Shuping, age 38 now, was born healthy but dreamed of being blind since age 13. She stated her mother would tell stories about finding her walking down dark hallways at age 3, and mentioned that by age 6 the thought of being blind comforted her. When she was a teenager, Shuping bought a white cane and learned to read braille, becoming fluent in it by age 20.

She claims to have asked a psychologist to pour bleach in her eyes so she could fulfill her lifelong dream of being blind, and that the psychologist "understood her" and agreed to do so after giving her numbing eye drops to help with the pain. She waited to seek medical attention so doctors were unable to save her eyesight.

What Shuping has is considered a real mental health condition called Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), a rare condition in which people who are born without disabilities believe with conviction that the should be disabled. There is another name for this in political circles, termed "transableism".

"I went blind on purpose, but I don't feel it was a choice."

Several other people with BIID are pretending to be paralyzed to use wheelchairs, with many not being driven to the point of causing harm to themselves to become disabled but instead living full lives faking being disabled.

I hope that as details of the stories of people pretending to be disabled are read about, we are able to understand that feeling like oneself should be disabled is an incredibly serious mental health condition and does not really mean that a person is "disabled inside". I hope we recognize that identifying as disabled does not make someone disabled, and that feeling a kinship with disabled people or a comfort in the thought of being disabled does not mean a person truly is or should become disabled.

Paul Wolscht, who changed his name to Stefonknee Wolscht, was married to a woman for over 20 years and fathered 7 children before deciding to live life identifying as a six year old little girl. Living as a six year old little girl allows Wolscht to escape depression and suicidal thoughts because Wolscht gets to now play - even when in jail in solitary confinement for nine days for an undisclosed reason.

“If I’m six-years-old, I don’t have to think about adult stuff.”

Wolscht still drives and drinks coffee, but does so feeling and identifying as a six year old.

Emile Ratelband, age 69, petitioned the courts to allow him to change his age to 20 years younger because he "does not feel" 69 years old. Ratelband has argued that he did not feel comfortable with his date of birth, that age 69 did not accurately reflect his mental state, and that at age 69 he experiences limits.

“When I’m 69, I am limited. If I’m 49, then I can buy a new house, drive a different car,” he said. “I can take up more work. When I’m on Tinder and it says I’m 69, I don’t get an answer. When I’m 49, with the face I have, I will be in a luxurious position.”

Ratelband even asserted that doctors have told him he has the body of a man 20 years younger, and he said that he was willing to renounce his right to a pension. He argues that if people are able to legally change their sex on documents, there is no reason why he should not be able to change his age.

The origin of the word 'witchcraft' means 'Craft of the Wise' and there never was anything supernatural about it, only women being smart and knowing everything about nature. They were forbidding women to be smart, to practice their own knowledge of medicine, herbology and healing. If a woman chooses to be wise thats her deal and nobody should stand between her and her skills. But they did that, and that's not all they did.

The practice od burning witches wasn't 'insanity' or 'everyone suddenly believing magic is real', it was strategic takedown of female social and economic standing. Women in that age would inherit property and wealth from their deceased husbands, they could hold their own and practice their own trades and say no to men and men didn't like that.

So they simply made it legal to kill women.

All of the land women owned, was now back in male hands, all of our crafts, knowledge and trades, lost to future generations, all the economic value changed hands back to male via torture and murder. It became incredibly easy to threaten women again; if she said no to a man, he would simply accuse her of witchcraft and have her tortured and killed, if she talked back, threat of burning, if she misbehaved, threat of torture. It was legal. They could kill women and force them into slavery, legally.

This is talked about as if it was very long ago. On the land I stand on, witches were burned 250 years ago. That is only 3 lifespans. There are books women wrote about it, that I read as a child. It left a mark on my life; it left damage on all collective female land ownership, economic power, female knowledge of medicine, nature and plants. I can't imagine where we'd be if it all kept being passed down, I bet far from trying to convince male doctors that our pain is real, far from endless female-specific chronic and debilitating illnesess, far from having to appeal to males or work all our life in order to have land to live on.

Like…the job description is literally “I am so hot that you could never get me in real life so you’re going to have to pay me to dance for you.”

The majority of your money comes from private dances and from tips. If you are in the industry you know that the best way to ensure your income is to gather regular clients. There are two ways to do this: you can either give them sexual favors or you can play along with their fantasy that you are their girlfriend/will meet them outside the club. Both are objectifying and degrading, not fun. Not sexy.

Aside from having to deal with regular clients, stripping means swimming in a sea of misogynistic assholes. Some men get off on hurting women physically, some men get off on making women cry. You could be a 10/10 and you will still be subjected to abusive treatment by men. No matter how hot you are, there is always some man who feels entitled to list all the “flaws” he sees in your body to put you in your place. Stripping means existing every day in an atmosphere of violence and sexual aggression and having to constantly fend off men who repeatedly try to violate your boundaries.

As rude and entitled as the customers might be, they are nowhere near as bad as club owners/managers can be. Coerced sex is as ubiquitous as you’d expect it to be. Managers can force you to work back to back shifts until you drop or develop a coke habit (so you can buy from them), they can force you to give dances to men that smell like piss and they can retaliate against you if you piss off the wrong client by refusing to fuck. I’ve been called a cunt, a bitch, a whore, literally any insult you can think of - and I was Top Earner for almost a year straight. And I put up with it because I couldn’t afford to stand up for myself and lose my job.

And when i’m saying this, keep in mind I worked in the most expensive, “high-end” club in a major metropolitan city for years. I was one of the hot, “lucky” ones. This is the high end. On the low end you’ve got clubs that are actual no-bones-about-it-lube-in-the-goddamn-sanitizer-bottles brothels filled with trafficked women from Eastern Europe and Asia.

I’m sure some strippers are gonna say it’s not degrading yadda yadda, “I’m empowered!” But I’ve never met a stripper who hasn’t had some sort of emotional breakdown on a shift at least once, and that kind of says something.

The privileged sex worker tourists looking to gain some sort of dangerous mystique/male validation/”self-discovery”/whatever the fuck supplemental identity might never experience this, but who cares about them anyway, they are a joke to the rest of us.

I assure you, everything she said above is true. The owner/manager is an abusive pimp, the girls are doped up just to get through the night, men try to take advantage of you at every turn, it’s a nightmare.

You know what my appeal was? That I had just turned 18 and was a virgin (I wasn’t a virgin, but that was my gimmick). You know who all of my regular clients were? Men old enough to be my dad or, more often, grandfather, trying to get me to suck their dick for extra cash. They’d try to get my drunk enough to do it, but all my “rum and coke"s were just soda.

Girls who needed more cash or drugs could fuck the boss for it. He would pay us to get a tattoo of the club’s name and logo. There all still girls out there with it permanently on them even though now the club is gone, always reminding them of what went on in there.

You are absolutely disgusting. Women just lost the most basic bodily autonomy in the US, and you have to make this shit about yourselves somehow. No, this isn’t comparable to being denied access to cosmetic surgeries.

Being forced to incubate an entire human against your will at serious risk to your own health is a horror only women will know, and if you have any respect for us at all you would sit down, shut the fuck up, and acknowledge the oppression we’ve faced for millennia on the basis of sex.

“This is also true of people with penises—” Stopping you right there. Literally go to fucking hell. If you have a penis your voice literally is irrelevant to this conversation. This does not affect you. You have the privilege of never being affected by this issue, and the fact you wish you were just proves your complete lack of empathy.

Also what the fuck are you on about? Forced sterilization? You mean… cross sex hormones and sex reassignment surgeries that you are demanding leaving you infertile? How fucking braindead can you be. You literally whine all the time about how radfems are “obsessed with reproduction” for pointing out that “gender affirming care” often leaves people sterile. Now suddenly the consequences of the “medicine” you’re demanding are a form of oppression?

I urge radfems to encourage female trans/nb/queer people to read this book.

It's an anthology addressing the abuse of female people by male trans/queer people within the queer & transgender community. It contains 43 anonymous works of art and writing.

It's avaible on interenet archive, you can read it here: