existential female despair

Males in 1920: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 1960: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 1963: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 1973: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 1974: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 1994: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

Males in 2017: women’s rights have gone too far and it’s just sexism against men now

"if he wants xyz/if he wants to act like abc, why doesn't he hire a sex worker? just hire a sex worker!"

has been my biggest pet peeve for years, even before being staunchly anti-sex trade

It implies that the "sex workers" in question are an acceptable target. that there exists this even lower class of women who should absorb the shock of the worst men in the place of 'more dignified' women...

- France abolished the Code Noir 2 months ago. That law project that said hey you can enslave, mutilate, kill, cross breed, etc. black people at will bc they're not people they're property ? Yeah. Abolished 2 months ago. We are in July 2026.

- the last human zoo closed its doors in 1994 in France due to social pressure. Not bc they were running out of business, no. Ppl still visited that place until it closed its doors. No, it was bc (black) French people were fed up. That human zoo was specialized in displaying black (presumed Congolese) people in fake huts in enclosures, for white entertainment.

- now while this might no longer be the case, when I was growing up, I went to a French school (as in. It was an international French School w the French flag n all) and the way we were taught French geography was that France has the biggest and largest access to the sea in the world. And they'd show us a map of France and its colonies around the world. It's all occupied indigenous lands. I don't know if they still teach that. I hope not. But they absolutely did until I graduated high school in 2017. Again, I write this on July 21st 2026, for the record.

let's call it what it is: creating easy victims. women have gotten too vigilant in recent decades, and males must do whatever they can to increase their supply of vulnerable women. so what do they do? they use manipulation to claim that women not wanting to be around strange men is actually a bad thing for women. they weaponize female empathy by arguing that vigilance is a result of bigotry.

men are human, too. not every man is out to get you, and having that fear means you're unhealthily paranoid. women attack and rape other women all the time, but nobody says anything about that. oh, you don't want to see a stranger's penis? go to therapy and deal with your rape trauma, you puritan. penises are not dangerous, and saying otherwise makes you a bioessentialist transphobe. genitals do not rape people, people do.

they all speak the same way: buzzwords, blame, loaded accusations. in order for these arguments to make sense, they must ignore the very real statistics, personal experiences, and trauma that women suffer. they will not care if women are more frequently victimized, because that's the entire goal.

Saw this on Pinterest and I just think some women will invent new excuses to perform femininity because it’s really just indulgence where they themselves associate living life to the fullest and reaching their peak potential as a women by “looking the part”. The “self-care” buzzword with the rest of the pro-beauty description was a give away on what these womens’ philosophy about beauty standards (they they won’t call it that lol) is linked to, a type of imaginary livelihood that can only be achieved if they look pretty.