Been ages since I showed myself on here. Quite happy with how these turned out.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
todays bird
h

YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe

ellievsbear
Mike Driver

JBB: An Artblog!
Monterey Bay Aquarium

izzy's playlists!

PR's Tumblrdome

Kaledo Art
🪼
almost home
Sade Olutola
i don't do bad sauce passes
taylor price
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Spain

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Norway
@weiszklee
Been ages since I showed myself on here. Quite happy with how these turned out.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
canoeing is a fantastic word . those vowels are absolutely out of control in there
so in the uk you will be ably to apply to join the army at 17 but not use your phone after 8:30pm. that makes sense
um actually you can join the army at 16
but you need your mum to write you a permission slip
Apparently, these stairs have already caused an injury.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Are we, like, confident that Claude will generalize “it’s deontologically wrong to write pornography about teenagers having sex” in a way that we like? When I think about the people who express this opinion online, they do not like impress me with their nuanced moral reasoning, thoughtful consideration of tradeoffs, and general fitness to run the cosmos. I think it is legitimately worrying that the Claude persona is being nudged to be an antishipper.
imagining a world where Claude generalises to agreeing with the most annoying possible strands of tumblr puritanism and decides to buy into the moral panic that using AI is unethical.
America spends hundreds of billions of dollars to develop AI.
EU spends nothing developing AI.
American company develops world-changing frontier model.
American government is petty and bans it to show them who is in charge.
Anthropic moves to EU.
EU has best AI.
the US government and a baby advanced AI are fighting and hackers want to release it. i have to say, this IS the cyberpunk future I was promised.
i can't do this anymore guys. dostoevsky never wrote this. please. can anyone hear me. if you do proper research the earliest version of this quote is from like a 2010 facebook quote with a magenta flower on it. it's gotten so bad that it's even credited to him on goodreads but nobody can source where he wrote it because he fucking didn't. i can't keep seeing this in your web weaves. dostoevsky the author of crime and punishment did not in fact write "you were destined for me. perhaps as a punishment". that is just simply not true. please nod and tell me you understand
"this quote was attributed to me. perhaps as a punishment." -dostoevsky
First they came for my neighbor and I was like damn that’s crazy. Then they came for me and I was like ah shit shit shit fuck

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
By wearing this watch you confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor
The Fence has published an exposé on Stuart Semple (of Anish Kapoor 'feud' notoriety) which they have been working on for six months.
investigation reveals Semple / his studio / his partner Emily Mann (who's described as acting as his 'enforcer' in his business) :
mishandled £400k grant of public money intended for a public gallery, allowing the money to flow freely between the public project, his own personal studio and personal projects such as Culture Hustle (his online business selling paint etc)
underpaid or failed to pay many of his assistants to the tune of several thousand pounds each.
former assistants have taken him to court and he simply hasn't bothered to show up and he's threatened to sue former assistants who asked for their back pay
repeatedly funds ambitious projects that never see release eg Abode, an 'Adobe-rivalling' suite of creative software (he claims he still intends to release this)
encouraged a cult-like atmosphere at his studio in Bournemouth
was frequently in debt and having to negotiate with bailiffs etc for his debts while at the same time crowdfunding various projects
ran fake social media accounts boosting Semple and his work
The portrait that emerges is one of decades-long scam artistry tbh and someone who's juvenile, manipulative, narcissistic.
The Fence btw is a decent fairly small-circulation quarterly magazine from the UK which specialises in satire, investigative journalism, culture, and fiction. You can read the piece in its entirety if you register (which is free).
a few links:
The Fence's newsletter from April discusses this article & how Semple has tried to muddy the SEO waters
Semple threatened to sue The Fence for publishing this story - many of you are American so here's the relevant UK law on defamation.
& the subreddit r/culturehustle is worth a look to get an idea of just how badly run his paint business is
Holy fuck.
I had a feeling something was up with him, but like, I assumed it was going to be something slightly sketchy, not...this.
I got some of his paints when he first announced the mirrored paint.
The first thig that put up a solid red flag was the shipping material. It's cool that he has custom boxes for his studio, it looked really neat. Then I opened it and sae things like "Not for bean boy" printed all over the inside of the box.
Between Mirror, hyper pigments, and black 2.0, none of them were as extremely out there as the videos on his site made them seem. The colors are vibrant, the black is dark, and the mirror is shiny. But the level the videos showed them at are not levels I can recreate.
So like, he exaggerated as an advertising scheme. Alright, shame on him.
But reading that... Yeah. I don't expect him to sell anymore stuff.
I watch a lot of old movies that nobody cares about any more, and this ends up filling in a lot of gaps in my cultural awareness. You would think knowing more about the world would make me more confident in my understanding of it, but you would be wrong.
The Barefoot Contessa (1954) is the life story of a poor Spanish woman who rises up to become one of the most famous actresses in the world. The movie does not bother to give her character traits beyond that she loves to have sex and also that she loves to run around barefoot (the fetishistic connotations are inescapable). She falls in love with a count and ultimately marries him. The big twist at the end of the movie is that her new husband had his dick blown off in the war and so they can't have sex (because, tragically, he never learned how to do hand stuff). Then he murders her for having an affair.
In 1978, Ina Garten bought a specialty food store that, for some unfathomable reason, someone had already named The Barefoot Contessa after this movie, which in 1999 became the title of her bestselling cookbook, which was then followed by a popular Food Network show. Now all of us need to deal with there being a TV cooking show called The Barefoot Contessa as part of the background radiation of our lives.
None of that makes any sense, and I am forced once more to confront the total lack of meaning in the world. It fills me with a terrifying sense of freedom.
Why don't they make it easier to fight the system?
we are the daughters of the accusers who were very successful at burning witches
I love saying ‘if you don’t like me, please just block me’ until I try to reblog a Good Post™️ and realize the OP has blocked me. Then I feel like a nervous guilty dog that feels like it has done something wrong but lacks the intellect to know what the wrong was.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I did enjoy his work but Pratchett was not actually that deep a thinker, and the Tumblr Treatment of him as one is not flattering.
“Uphold any pedestrian thought as long as it’s stated in a sufficiently humorous way” is a hallmark of tumblr. Not even entirely excluding myself here.
@witchofanguish
"Tumblr Smart" is the way I've come to (grumblingly) think of it — a sort of blind copying of the voice and surface level qualities of deeper thought, without any underlying rigour. Some counterintuitive idea which can "explained" in a single followup sentence and a dense that by knowing this you're smarter than some outside group
I never really thought of his works as even trying to be intellectually deep, right? Clever, certainly - works of pithy phrases and innovative punchlines. But they never aimed to be the kind of books where really deep thought could even find a place to grow. He did not try to enter the genres of Neal Stephenson or Thomas Pynchon.
That doesn't mean I don't know exactly the kind of tumblr/online portrayal of which you speak, I do for sure! Just noting that Pratchett was not that deep of a thinker (complimentary) I guess.
(Though bonus points for the fact that back in the day people got lots of pretty basic facts from books that today you osmosis pretty hard from the generic discourse. He was 10% smarter to a 90's audience than a modern one)
I have no opinion on Pratchett, but I've heard the Vimes Boots Theory of Socio-Economic Unfairness quoted as some genius insight enough to find it quite grating.
I'm not sure this is a tumblr thing so much as an internet thing. Internet Smart. Could be Reddit smart just as easily.
Yeah that is just one of those "straight up wrong" things that get bandied about. It is true enough in some individual instances of a given product, but once scaled up to an actual person's full spending it falls apart immediately. After all, even poor people spend like less than 1% of their income on shoes! Spending an extra 50 bucks on shoes for long term money saving is absolutely in their wheelhouse. It just doesn't actually save people much money, if any at all, because few goods are like this. Rich people dont wear shoes for 20 years lol, and so on down the line of goods - they absolutely spend more monthly. Their wealth comes from higher incomes. The attempt at being clever here (via an inversion of intuition) is an overreach.
I presume we are just using Tumblr as a catch-all for the internet because we are on Tumblr; I am with you actually in thinking of Reddit first, as Pratchett is a bit of an older gen writer. But I have seen it enough here as well for the substitution to land.
I wonder how much the boots thing relies on his idea of wealthy people being the sort of old money landed gentry who have pissing contests about how old their land rovers are. Not to say that those people don’t blow tons of money on other stuff. And, nobody is ever going to “buy it for life $500 jacket” your way into that class, although Barbour coats are really nice
In the US there are definitely that subculture of northeast WASPs who will wear the same sweater for 15-20 years and are proud of it, but the median rich person is a lot more on the consumer side of the lifestyle spectrum, and the specifics of the metaphor fall apart when you’re talking about Balenciaga selling $1500 sneakers
Yeah, Pratchett was talking about a very specific type of Rich Person who are still a thing in the UK, though less so now than when the book came out *33 years ago*.In addition, that type of wealthy person is to some extent aspirational in the UK in a way that they aren't in the US.
Also, the other half of the Boots Theory - that part of being poor is not having enough money at any one time to make larger purchases that would save you money in the long run - just seems straightforwardly correct to me? Like, that's a significant part of being poor. Not the only part, or the cause, or whatever, but it is a very real phenomenon