Apparently double mastectomy is a "terf dogwhistle" now lol

"On the face of it, it may seem fair and equitable to accord male and female public toilets the same amount of floor space – and historically, this is the way it has been done. 50/50 division of floor space has even been formalised in plumbing codes. However, if a male toilet has both cubicles and urinals, the number of people who can relieve themselves at once is far higher per square foot of floor space in the male bathroom than in the female bathroom. Suddenly equal floor space isn’t so equal.

But even if male and female toilets had an equal number of stalls, the issue wouldn’t be resolved, because women take up to 2.3 times as long as men to use the toilet. Women make up the majority of the elderly and disabled, two groups that will tend to need more time in the toilet. Women are also more likely to be accompanied by children, as well as disabled and older people. Then there’s the 20–25% of women of childbearing age who may be on their period at any one time, and therefore needing to change a tampon or a sanitary pad.

Women may also in any case require more trips to the bathroom than men: pregnancy significantly reduces bladder capacity, and women are eight times more likely to suffer from urinary-tract infections than men which again increases the frequency with which a toilet visit is needed. In the face of all these anatomical differences, it would surely take a formal (rather than substantive) equality dogmatist to continue to argue that equal floor space between men and women is fair."

If any of these liberals had bothered to read, they would know that there exists many many communities indigenous to Africa whose languages don't have gendered pronouns, where clothing rules are different. Where men and women dressed the same, where the rules of nudity are different. Where men are effeminate. And in most, if not all of these communities, misogyny will still be rampant.

Here's the table of these similarities. Any thoughts? 🙏

being trans is the urgent state of belief that ones healthy sexed body (or characteristics) is actually the wrong sex. this places it firmly in psychological distress/mental illness category by definition. however, socially speaking, mental illness comes with safety precautions and treatment standards that do not serve the dominant trans-centric social narrative. to be mentally ill means that, on a social safeguarding level, you cannot be fully trusted with your own bodily safety, autonomy, and depending on the level of clinically significant dysfunction, even your ability to make out reality from fiction, or consent to cosmetic procedures, financial management, treatment plans, and keeping your own med schedule/appointments. from a medical standpoint, this would make gender affirmative hormone replacement and surgical interventions ethically disastrous and high-risk for the patient’s long term well being when compared to the significant risks of the treatments. enter: essence theory.

essence theory is a pseudoscientific/theoretical belief that claims that any noun (a person, place, or thing) has a distinct, distilled selfhood that transcends language and function in causing the noun to be what it is. put simply: “essence” refers to a metaphysical “core” of oneself that goes further than language or description can accurately measure or label. using this framework, the dominant trans advocacy narrative uses the psychological distress at healthy body parts as evident “proof” that the dysphoric person’s core “essence” is most correspondent with that of the opposite biological sex.

this explanation (though making no sense and implying that the sexes have fundamentally different “essences”, thus reinforcing rigid gender stereotypes) provides a strategic workaround for the trans advocacy narratives to avoid the clinical and ethical implications of treating a mental illness using invasive surgeries and high-risk hormonal therapies, while also providing a socially strong defense against anyone trying to make meaning of this very rough and incomprehensible personal and social narrative. by tying the psychological distress to innate personal “essence” and core identity rather than taking the distress as a neurodevelopmental complication, it fundamentally ensures three things at once:

1. that any dysphoric person will see no other valid treatment of their distress other than invasive hormonal and surgical interventions — which converts normal logical questioning from others into an existential denial of one’s true self, triggering the person to project their desperation, frustration, and psychological torment onto the questioning party

2. that the assertion of gender dysphoria and/or trans identity as a mechanistic mental disorder that should be treated on the level of error (the psychological level) rather than the physical level is taken as an expression of bigotry, rather than an attempt at finding a logical throughline

3. that anyone denying a trans identified person something they feel existentially owed will be instantly dehumanized, vilified, and face the wrath of an extremely volatile, untreated, unstable mentally ill crowd of people who believe their distress is the very essence of who they are

Everything this guy does to make himself sound better just gets worse and worse.

She didn't want to be touched by a male, he knew she didn't want to be touched by a male, and he somehow thinks clarifying that she was "too tired to argue whether or not [he is] a woman" I.E. too tired to enforce the boundary he KNEW he was violating makes him less of of a molester????