sitting on my blogās porch with a cigarette and a shotgun

NASA

Discoholic šŖ©
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Fieri Frames

Jimmy Eat World
Not today Justin

PR's Tumblrdome
The Stonewall Inn
almost home
occasionally subtle
šŖ¼

@theartofmadeline

Love Begins
Fai_Ryy

bliss lane
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Venezuela
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Ecuador
seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from Austria

seen from Czechia

seen from Belgium
seen from Russia
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
@boudicasdaughter
sitting on my blogās porch with a cigarette and a shotgun

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This was probably my favorite thing I read yesterday thanks to the serendipity of what my friends share.
It is infuriating in so many ways, showing the misogyny in medicine, but it's also written in a delightful, funny way. Plus, it was truly educational, which I love. And I've studied these things pretty deeply.
Renee Stonebraker
Jul 02, 2026
"Adult women should not still be debating on what orgasms do or do not exist in the year 2026. In a time where science is trying to create artificial wombs, the fact that the bodies of over half the population are still considered medical mysteries has continued to disappoint me.
Unfortunately, I have to start with a horrific fact I stumbled upon.
If Youāve Had an Episiotomy, I Regret to Inform You
Theyāve been cutting blind. I hate to go in dry, but there is no other way to break this news. The first complete 3D map of the nerves inside the clitoral glans, which, yes, extends down and around to where they like to slice women open during childbirth, was not completed until March of 2026. As in, about four months ago at the time of this publication. Yeah.
In March 2026, a team of researchers at Amsterdam University Medical Center published the first complete 3D map of the nerves inside the clitoral glans.[1] They used a synchrotron, a machine that generates X-rays ten trillion times stronger than a conventional CT scanner, to image donated female pelvises at a resolution of 0.001 millimeters.[2] The map corrected multiple errors in existing medical literature. It revealed that the main sensory nerve of the clitoris doesnāt taper as it reaches the glans as previously believed. Instead it branches like a tree throughout the glans and extends further into the clitoral hood than anyone had documented.[3] It confirmed that the clitoris contains over 10,000 nerve fibers, with a nerve density up to 15 times greater than the penis.[4]
That last figure had previously been estimated using data from a cow. From 1976.[4]

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
who else is following this WNBA drama? No lie I barely care about sports like at all but this shit is getting a little funny
It'd be nice if the "sex positivity" was about like...women demanding orgasms and pleasurable sex with their partners with the threat of kicking them to the curb if the don't deliver. Instead it shames women to accept whatever kink their partner has in the name of being "open-minded" and that they shouldn't prioritize having an orgasm anyway because "sex isn't all about orgasms". A woman wanting to have "vanilla" sex with her partner and still climax is viewed as boring. Like, if your male partner consistently gets off each time and you never do, why would you stay with that person if you're "sex positive"? Sure seems unfair to the woman in that situation, almost like it's just another way to get women to do only what men want in bed š¤.
This is specifically about that post that's been circulating radblr about the woman who broke her neck getting her hair pulled. She described their relationship sensually, called his penis a goddamn treasure, and then concluded the post saying he never made her cum once. So she was letting a man roughhouse her body for no pleasure in return and nobody seems to find that weird. Why was she with him at all? Why is her only comment on this situation to pull hair "safely"? He was hurting her and she admitted that she didn't even enjoy sex with him and nobody cares because they're "sex-positive". The sex positivity movement is fucking cancer.
I'm bringing this back because it still pisses me off and I feel it's relevant. This is how she starts out talking about sex with this guy:
One part that I didn't include was how she talked about greeting him at the door and he pretty much instantly initiated sex. The whole story makes her sound like a MRA's dream girl: she greets him in her own home wearing high heels and stylish clothes and makeup, has sex with him immediately without complaint, lets him do whatever he wants to get off, and barely even complains about the grievous injury she receives at his hands or the fact that she didn't orgasm once during her entire relationship with him. She mentions that he never thought of her pleasure like it was an afterthought to her, an additional strike against him but not enough on its own to be brought up. And despite that, despite her being a "cool girl" who he apparently said was "marriage material", he still drops her like she's nothing to him the moment she was injured because he obviously couldn't be bothered.
Even to the very end of her story, she doesn't think he did anything wrong by pulling her hair like that nor does she denounce "rough sex". All she talks about is how to pull hair "safely". Like....this is fucked up. How could you read this and not see that man as anything but a self-obsessed, misogynistic, abusive asshole despite all her attempts to paint him to the contrary? He literally fucked her when he felt like it, broke her neck, then left like it was none of his business.
This is what porn culture does to women: it makes them rationalize their own abuse because they and everyone around them continually justify it as normal and any serious incidents that occur because of "rough sex"/BDSM/etc are waved off as "dumb, badly-executed moves". This isn't healthy, you shouldn't wave off this kind of shit as just a mistake. I doubt this man was unaware of the amount of force he was pulling her hair with. Acting like it was completely unintentional is disingenuous. If it was really a mistake, if this dude had felt any remorse for what he did, he wouldn't have left her immediately after. This was a man who used a woman and then threw her away and he should be villified for that.
Male traditions of thievery are found among many peoples. In some South American tribes, the men describe suddenly raiding the women's part of a village and stealing "their things," including string and a flattened stick with which the men made a noisy instrument, a bull-roarer, which they then used to frighten the women. A global mythic tradition of men or boys stealing women's clothing, especially the clothing women leave on the river bank while they bathe, has been suggested by folklorist Martha Beckwith as the theft of menstrual garments. Unless the women gave some of theirs, menstrual blood for sorcery, healing, or magic could be acquired only by stealing. In the West, we might see a fragment of this tradition in college dormitory panty raids!
The male theft of fire, and the sun, is another theme common to myths across a variety of cultures. In a northern Asiatic tradition, Old Grandmother's grandson stole fire from her and burned down the world. Prometheus stole fire from the sun in Greeceāfrom the protomoon, men got the red fire, like blood. In one African myth, the culture hero Mokele "steals" the sun when he goes up a river and discovers the place where the sun lives in a cave. This act of differentiation of the sun surely means he "stole" it from the original protomoon of the female tradition. . . .
Raiding and stealing, always under specific rules, have primarily been men's work, part of men's story. In myths from China to South America, some male characters are thieves who take, not only the paraphernalia of women, but women themselves, queens renowned for their beauty and slaves from other tribes. In addition, they make off with fire, the sun, livestock, treasures, technologies. One effect of this was the accumulation of materials and ideas from many different places, combining and recombining to form mechanical arts and complex trades. Another was the dispersal of "women's stuff" and tribal arts, scattered out from the sacred huts into the secular world. Men, more often than women, have widely dispersed and recombined knowledge, craft, trade, and story.
-Judy Grahn, Blood, Bread, and Roses: How Menstruation Created the World
Hey, could I ask you for advice?
I'm a teenager and AFAB, and have been identifying as non binary and going by a different name for a few years now. However, I've never considered medical transition of any sort, I feel pretty confident in my body and no desire to change the way I express myself. I feel little to no gender dysphoria. I also have been telling people I go by any pronouns, I don't feel the need to correct anyone if they call me she.
I feel pretty secure in my gender nonconformity, but I have been wondering if I'm unintentionally pedaling gender stereotypes by identifying as non binary? I don't want to do harm or imply that a woman must be non-binary to excuse her gender nonconformity. I don't want to consider myself detrans, since I never *really* transitioned in the first place? š
My struggle is in regards to my name, I really prefer the new name that I've picked for myself since I began to identify differently. I feel disconnected from my given name, though I think that is more related to childhood trauma because of my parents rather than my gender. Would it be wrong of me to continue to use my chosen name as opposed to my given one?
I also am worried since A few of my closest friends are FTM trans, they seem remarkably secure in their identities, and I don't want to offend them or anything. Does this mean I should cut these people off or view them differently? I am distressed since my views on being transgender have changed drastically, though I truly respect these friends of mine and don't believe their identities are causing any harm.
I apologize if this is random, but I am seeking advice on what to do from people who are more open minded on the subject. I appreciate any guidance, and want to thank you for amplifying detrans voices!
Hi! I think it's great you're questioning things around you and asking for input from various places. That's always a good place to be at, imo.
To my mind, the short answer is yes, a nonbinary identity identifies under gender roles, thus endorsing them.
It's an attempt to separate oneself from what women find foisted upon ourselves, which is understandable, but saying 'I am not feminine therefore not a woman' logically implies 'women are feminine'.
I could ramble plenty here, about identifying outside the binary, identities, language, etc, but I think searching my blog for things like "language pronoun" or "nonbinary identity" will serve you (and ye lurkers) even better. I've collected so many amazing posts from so many amazing women writing about this stuff. (ex: x, x, x, x)
That being said, you can always pick a new name for yourself. You definitely don't need a gender identity or any reason at all to do that. I have a few; my given name with my family, a nickname certain friends have for me, a chosen name some other friends use, my stage name that people in my music life call me... this has been done since time immemorial. It's not unusual!
Oh and before I forget, the word for people who never meant to transition (or who did but never started) is "desisted" and detrans spaces often welcome them into their discussions and spaces :) the detrans subreddit even has user flairs for it.
As for your friends, only you can decide whether someone is a person you want in your life or not. I still have friends with gender identities, just like I have friends who are theists and atheists while I am agnostic. Some of them I have had to spend less time with as they get more and more into identifying with gender, which I've written about on here before, and some of them I've become closer with as we both defy expected gender roles, just in different ways. Friends come and go in life and I've found that true friendships have more to do with temperament, humor, choices, what stage of life you are in... who puts in the effort. I'm going through a hard time right now, and the friends who checked in on me are not the ones I would have expected. Time just sort of hammers that out for you as you go. Be kind, be there for your loved ones, and set good boundaries... and the rest will work itself out.
It can be really stressful to abolish or change how you think of yourself, but as you keep thinking and living intentionally you will discern some clarity on everything. Then hopefully some peace comes with it, and you can make space to think of new things and grow in new ways.
I hope my ramblings prove helpful. Wishing you well on your journey!
hairy women that aren't marooned ,disabled or homeless show the world how little they respect the feelings of people around them and so are naturally treated with less respect which is what these goofballs want anyway it makes them feel unique
why would someone have feelings about my body hair 𤨠control yourself?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Marcela and Elisa, married in 1901
Ever since gay marriage became legal in Spain in 2005, thousands of lesbian couples have tied the knot. But this law has an interesting precedent; Marcela and Elisa were married in 1901. In a church wedding!
Wedding photo of Marcela (left) and Elisa, dressed as a man.
Of course, same-sex marriage was not legal in Spain at the time, so the two school teachers had to come up with a delicate scheme. One day, Elisa and Marcela simulated a fight in the house they shared in the tiny village of DumbrĆa, and Elisa moved to A CoruƱa. While there, Elisa cut her hair, started wearing menās clothes, and took up smoking. She found a priest desperate to gain parishioners, and he baptized her as a man. She adopted the name āMarioā and returned to DumbrĆa. Marcela then introduced Elisa to her family and neighbors as āMarioā, Elisaās cousin, and said they were going to get married. Indeed, people were amazed at how much this āMarioā looked like Elisa; same height, same voice, same mannerisms and temper. The wedding was held on the 8th of June, 1901, in the Church of St. Jorge in A CoruƱa. After the ceremony, the happy couple was photographed at JosĆ© Sellierās studio. The next day, the newlyweds returned to DumbrĆa in a horse carriage.
Eventually, Marcela and āMarioā were outed by their suspecting neighbors to local authorities. A huge scandal broke out, with both national and international newspapers writing about the ādisgracefulā marriage which did not include a man. Both women were fired from their jobs, excommunicated, and an arrest warrant was issued for both of them. The couple fled to many Spanish cities, until finally boarding a ship to the Americas, presumably to Argentina. It should be noted that Marcela and Elisaās wedding is still valid to this day, since it was never annulled by neither The Catholic Church nor the Civil Registry. Therefore, Marcela and Elisaās union is the first officially registered same-sex marriage in Spain, 104 years before it became legal for Spanish lesbian couples to marry.
Sources: x x x x
Hats off to this old-old-old school butch and her wife!
by Ramize Erer
@gendiebrainrotreceipts

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The following article contains discussions of adult-oriented media, CSEM, CSA, and other troubling subject matter pertaining to fictional an
for anyone interested in the history of "lolicon" as a term, and especially those interested in the "lolicon has nothing to do with real children" defence (complete cope), I highly recommend giving this a read. some excerpts:
In Japan, this debate first formed around shoujo-ai photography collections. The first photobook of this nature was published in 1969, depicting a 12-year-old girl photographed by Kenmochi Katsuo. These early photographs were largely naturalist (or, nudist) portraits, but later ones had specific theming. At the time, Japanese society regarded nude children with the same attitude held by the Victorian English: inherently sexless and with a sense of holy purity, and this innocence could symbolically ācounteractā vulgarity. (Takatsuki 53) However, shoujo-ai media took advantage of this openness, deceptively presenting nude children out in the open by relying on onlookers to believe that this imagery was not intended to be sexual. One manās disinterest in a weird magazine of naked kids running around in a field was another manās coveted pornography.
...
This is perhaps why so many hobbyists look back on the Lolicon Boom with a sense of wonderment. If one does not know about the āotherā side of the Lolicon Boom, it seems as if the entire Boom was a period of artistic flourishment, wherein hobbyists united to produce their own magazines, animation, and even venues of commerce. However, the same thing was happening elsewhere with real children.
...
It is important to note creepshot photography is not exclusive to the Japanese entertainment industry. There have been ample instances where Western publications have used voyeuristic photography (of celebrities and civilians alike) as for-profit content, but Japan had the unique problem of a closely-guarded, extremely specific loophole: āyou can publish naked children without obscuring their genitalia because they donāt have public hairā. For most people, this is an absurd scenario they would never, ever normally encounter during their magazine reading experience. Unfortunately, some publications realized this loophole made them a lot of money ā some of these magazines were even being mailed overseas. These magazines soon began covertly circulating child exploitation, right alongside graphic photos of adult models and other exploited creepshot victims. Most shockingly, some readers of the time later admitted they tolerated the presence of child genitalia because of the novelty of actually getting to see an unobscured vagina. As photo magazines were traded internationally, non-Japanese readers were often shocked to see children in these publications, leading to an ongoing Western stereotype that pedophilia is mainstream and tolerated in Japanese culture. These magazines were not representative of the entire population ā rather, they came to be after multiple phases of the industryās creatives gave photographers too great a benefit of a doubt.
...
Two of the worst offenders among these menās photo magazines were both published by Byakuya Shobo. The deceptively cutely-named Billy and Hey! Buddy contained so much illegal content that most online marketplaces will not allow copies of these magazines to be listed for sale. Readers and contributors competed with each other to get the most graphic photos possible: according to witnesses of these magazines, some photos seemed to suggest they were taken in public places; girls sometimes looked nervous or impatient, implying they had been pulled aside for the photograph. Upskirt photography was often introduced as a āprankā, as if the presence of a minorās underwear was intended merely as a punchline. Some girls didnāt even know they were being photographed; they may have been captured strolling on the beach, or standing across the street. As if the rampant non-consensual photography wasnāt enough, these girlsā faces were rarely obscured.
oh how the mighty have fallen