
ellievsbear

Origami Around

if i look back, i am lost
Sade Olutola
YOU ARE THE REASON

𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
tumblr dot com
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
macklin celebrini has autism
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
we're not kids anymore.
hello vonnie
art blog(derogatory)
h

tannertan36
Three Goblin Art
almost home
Peter Solarz
Not today Justin

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Egypt
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Uzbekistan
@transagainstautogynephiles

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hell hath no fury like a man told his input on female liberation isnāt important.
So annoying to me when people think citing the actions of FICTIONAL female characters counts as evidence that femininity doesn't hold women back. "Omg, she can run and fight with heels and a dress! What an icon, I can't even walk in heels." She is not real, and therefore her body doesn't follow the same laws that ours do. She will do whatever the writers want her to, because she is ANIMATED. And even if the actor is a real person, the scene is choreographed, rehearsed and edited with CGI. It's fake!
Not only do these types of outfits make the stunts harder to pull off, they can also make them more dangerous. āI actually was put into a fire sequence in a negligee,ā Donna Keegan, whose credits include āIndependence Dayā and āIndiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,ā told me. āDo you know how flammable negligees are? They just kept dousing flame retardant stuff all over it.ā āOne time, I had to dive through a plate glass window with a spaghetti strap top on and in a miniskirt with Doc Marten boots,ā Keegan recalled. āYou're not getting candy glass for that kind of piece. No matter what they're going to do, there are shards. ... You come out a porcupine, bleeding everywhere.ā Their skin's exposed, and they often donāt have any padding. āTry doing stunts with no pads and no clothing. I have been thrown down marble stairs in a bra and underwear,ā Keegan said, remarking that the first time she saw that set, āI looked at that and went, āYou're kidding me, right?āā
Source: Documentary lauds Hollywood stuntwomen, who do everything men do but in high heels (Sept. 22, 2020)
One of the most sought-after stuntwomen in Hollywood, Ms. [Zoe] Bell crashes through glass, slams into book cases and leaps from tall buildings. She has done stunts on more than 20 films and television series, including "Alias," "Kill Bill" and "Xena: Warrior Princess." Asked if she could accomplish a 22-story spinning fall from a skyscraper for 2004's "Catwoman," Ms. Bell thought for a moment and said, "Yes, I can." To get the chilling fall just right, she did it four times. "It's not until after you've been hit by a car and landed all right that the fear kicks in," she said. Stuntwomen often face greater dangers than their male cohorts. While stuntmen wear pads under their clothing, stuntwomen in action films are often minimally clothed; there is no place to hide padding or protective gear in their bikinis or ball gowns. Doubling for Sharon Stone, Ms. Bell had to do the high fall in "Catwoman" in high heels. "Because that's how women fight and dieāin heels," she said, with a slight roll of her eyes.
Source: Fighting and Falling in High Heels (Updated July 23, 2011)
watching people in trans spaces try to understand the dynamics between male and female trans people without allowing for the existence of bio sex or sex-based oppression is like watching people try to reinvent the wheel by making a series of regular polygons with more and more sides each time. but every time it starts looking too round, they scrap it and start over because it was starting to look suspiciously circular, and circles are TERFy
trans girls are allowed to be annoying and stereotypical and socially inept and hyperactive and hypersexual and various types of animalgirl and there's nothing you can do about it. in fact if you're mean to that skirt go spinny reddit trans girl i'm stealing your entire house
āMen are allowed to be [things men have always been].ā
when oh when will this cruel world allow men to be hypersexual and misogynistic and openly display their fetishes in public??

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Misogynist CLOCKED in Parismwenda's comment section. Satisfying.
It's something that TRA do often, though, bring up tims when women, women's rights, or feminism is discussed.
āFormer menā sheās getting so close to peaking. Come on, you can do it.
It's always the "you're including trans women, right?" and "I'm a trans girl, am I included?"
If you have to ask, you already know you're not a woman. So, no, you're not included. Bye, Brandon.
this is from a real diary by a 13-year-old girl in 1870. teenage girls are awesome and theyāve always been that way.
Read this - oh my goodness, this girl was wonderful.
Where can I read this in full?
Itās fromĀ Real American Girls Tell Their Own Stories, and that particular section is byĀ Martha Carey Thomas who grew up to be a suffragist, linguist and renowned educator, as well as a badass lesbian.
I really truly love historical sources like this, because they are absolutely invaluable in tackling the meninist argument that womens these days have gotten all uppity and forgotten their god-assigned role of being the good-lady-woman (bangmaid). that whole rhetoric lies on the (false) assertion that some magic, golden period of the past exists in which women enjoyed their oppression, or, better yet, were unaware that they were oppressed at all, and the ānatural stateā of things (patriarchy) functioned harmoniously.
we need more accounts like this that show rhat women have always been People and have always been aware that how theyāre treated is unfair and wrong. women have always craved freedom, intellectual fulfillment, the right to self-determination; we have never been ok with just being mindless servants.
that video of the straight girl asking why lesbians donāt just date men if they like masculine women has almost 500,000 likes. and there seems to be thousands of comments saying they agree and they were wondering the same thing and saying that lesbians even buy strap ons which makes it more confusingā¦.ughhgggghhgggughhhgghh I fucking hate everyone
it has over a million LIKES now btw. not views. LIKES. fml
This is an unfortunate lesson as to why the term āhomosexualityā matters. Itās about biological sex. But because of recent social developments, people think itās purely about gender representation, excluding the part of sex.
A man can identify as a lesbian now. Theyāre supported when it comes to dating femmes or butches. But when an actual lesbian dates one or the other, it has a stigma of questions āwell why not date a manā āwhy not transitionāā because it doesnāt fucking work that way and it never has.
A female is a female regardless of physical representation. Homosexuality will always be about sex.
TIMs: ummm you know the penis isnāt an evil organ itās actually a completely neutral body part that is no more likely to cause harm than any other body part and by acting like thereās some kind of inherent violence associated with penises youāre being super gross and bio-essentialist and transmisogynistic !!!!!!!
TIMs the second a woman angers them: suck my dick, gargle my balls, Iām gonna rape you with my girldick, you deserve to die choking on a transfemās cock, etc etc
TIMs when they see any posts about uteruses, vaginas, or other female anatomy: āTHIS IS A TERF DOGWHISTLE!ā
Lesbophobia repackaged
Istg all of these people must be virgins if they think genitalia doesnāt matter at all in a relationship. Most couples want to have sex and be intimate, and itās insane and borderline rape-y to tell a lesbian she should be okay with having sex with someone with genitals she isnāt attracted to.
And itās not ātransphobicā to say that. Itās simply the truth. Lesbians and gay men are same-sex attracted. You can cry about your hurt feelings all you want, but it wonāt change that fact.
A vagina isn't the ONLY thing a lesbian is attracted to in a woman, but a vagina is a must. The same way a gay man isn't exclusively attracted to the penis on another man, but a penis is a must.
Yes exactly.
Isnāt so strange that they never go after straight men for being āpussysexualā? Just lesbians. Iām sure itās just a coincidence and not at all because theyāre homophobic

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
āI wasnāt gender socialized because I was bullied for being gnc as a childā itās almost as if thatās one of the most direct examples of gendered socialization
Its amazing that the ONLY time I showed any sort of 'gender dysphoria' it was when I hit kindergarten and got into 'society' as a little girl. My mum raised me and my siblings as gender neutral. Games, toys, and behaviours weren't gendered. We could do whatever we wanted and it didn't matter.
So when I hit kindergarten and teachers and people started telling me I wasn't allowed to rough house with the boys because I was a girl. That I should wear dresses because they made me look 'cute' and then when I did, they told me I wasn't allowed to run around and play because I was wearing a dress and it wasn't 'proper' as a girl. That I needed to be less rambunctious, that I wasn't allowed because I was a girl.
Yah, no fucking shit I told my mum I wanted to be a boy. I wasn't 'allowed' to do the things I wanted to do and had fun doing because everyone said I was a girl. She told me that my body was what it was and being a tomboy was perfectly fine. So I became a tomboy and everytime someone told me I couldn't do something because I was a girl I responded with 'Im a TOMBOY so I can!'.
EVERYTHING in society is designed to reinforce the gender binary. Its inescapable.
an obvious man uses the restroom not intended for him: so stunning and brave, their cock and balls belong there even though they make no effort to conceal their maleness from women who might be uncomfortable! trans women are women and they need to pee!!
women begin to use disabled toilet because they are uncomfortable with the male in their restrooms: those evil bigoted, transphobic cis bitches are taking up a space not meant for them!! they shouldnāt be using the disabled toilet, itās not for them!!!
that idiot truly is so far up in the ass of that trans-identified male that theyād rather just talk to HR behind the backs of all those women than talk to them directly about what could possibly make them behave like that - that maybe, just maybe, thereās a reason they feel uncomfortable about a male waltzing into their private spaces. that maybe, just maybe that man is not at all as āsweetā as the writer of this post assumes.
Trans women (read: men) force their way into womenās spaces and then complain when women stop going to those spaces. Iām not sure everyone understands how seriously deranged and dangerous this attitude is.
Theyāve literally evolved from āI am entitled to use womenās spacesā to āI am entitled to share spaces with vulnerable, highly uncomfortable women and if they refuse or avoid the spaces that Iāve now overtaken then they are TERFs and, as the woke mob rules, deserve to die.ā There is a small but not insignificant difference here.
Like, itās no longer about wanting to be in womenās spaces. Itās literally about wanting to force women to be around you; vulnerable, uncomfortable women. They feel entitled to an entire sex (women) like all misogynists. And letās be real: this is and always has been the end goal of TRA.
A world where men are entitled to womenās company, to make them uncomfortable, to scare them into compliance (twaw), to force women to date them or be sent rape and death threats which the world has decided they deserve, to take advantage of the fact that women cannot avoid men without being burned at the stake, whilst women are forced to do as they say, forced to use the same spaces as men, to suffer injuries and loss after loss because womenās sports now include men, forced to pretend the bearded man who spouts misogyny on the daily is now a woman just like them, forced to be ogled in changing rooms, to be forced to open up their same-sex attraction to men who identify as women lest they be called a bigot and fetishist, to lose a much needed promotion to a TiM, to be told that pregnancy and menstruation are not āwomenās issuesā but āpeopleās issuesā or worse ābleeding bodiesā issues,ā women who speak up will be cancelled, the voices of men and TRAs will be sure to drown them out, to erase them from history. They already try to. Men will be able to opt into womenās spaces, steal their opportunities, rob them of their own words and unique experiences, and women will not be able to opt out, they wonāt be able to start their own female-only sports teams since theyāll get shut down, or avoid the changing room because it hurts Brianā no, Briannaās, feefees, or get promoted because why would you NOT pick the woman who doesnāt get periods and canāt get pregnant? They wonāt be allowed to warn their lesbian daughters about the dangers of puberty blockers and surgery because truth, knowledge, and honesty have been deemed transphobic. This is why TRA ideology is so dangerous, because it impacts ALL women and we cannot opt out of it like they can opt in. This is not purely an entitlement to womenās spaces and language, this is entitlement to women, plain and simple.
I kind of went into a full-on rant, but I just wanted to get this all out here. It worries me to see just how sick and twisted trans ideology has become over the years.
oh my god queen GO OFF
"What if we find a way to keep fetuses alive outside the womb" that already exists, it's called the NICU and it took decades of advancements in medical science and technology. it takes an entire team equipped with state of the art technology to keep a fetus alive outside the womb. because it cannot perform basic life-supporting functions like breathing on its own. this isn't an anti-NICU post tbc. I'm actually considering the nicu as an option after going back to school because I really like fetuses and babies, I think they're neat. but the fact remains that it takes an entire team of doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists, and more to keep a micropreemie alive. and most abortions occur even before the point that it becomes possible at all. "viable" doesn't mean ready to be born. it means it is possible to keep it alive thanks to medical science developed by the same "abortionists" whose executions you're always calling for.
also, it's not an "after birth abortion" when they "let" micropreemies die, it's fucking hospice care.
absolutely. and to add onto this, i was a nicu baby, and i was a late term abortion. when i was still in the womb i was dying inside my mother, so they had to induce her extremely prematurely to save our lives. there was a very high chance of me dying because they took me outside of the womb before they knew if i could survive on my own, but the chances of me and my mother dying if i stayed inside her were 100%.
the procedure to remove me is medically and legally a late term abortion. i was aborted, and it saved my life. if they hadnāt aborted me, my mother and i would both be dead, my siblings would have been left with a dead mother, and i would have never even gotten a chance to live a single day. and now, people are being denied this procedure and dying because itās literally an abortion!! mothers and their babies are being killed because their doctors are not allowed to perform life-saving abortions.
on the same note, my sister was recently denied an abortion. which is to say, cleaning out the already dead fetus after she had a miscarriage from a wanted pregnancy. they refused treatment unless the DEAD fetus was actively killing her, because the procedure to remove it is medically and legally an abortion. they basically said to her ācome back when youāre dying of an infection or sepsis or something, until then you just have to bleed out.ā my sister could have died from this, people HAVE died from being denied abortions after having a miscarriage. if she was one of these people, my sister would have been dead, my mother would have to live the rest of her life without her daughter, and my nephew would have had to live the rest of his life without a mother.
sick and tired of people saying to me āyeah, but thatās different. you canāt really call those procedures an abortion, theyāre not really an abortion.ā yes it is. itās an abortion. any procedure that entails unnaturally removing a fetus and/or baby from the womb before theyāre sure it can survive outside of it is an abortion. if it wasnāt, people wouldnāt be being told that, sorry! we canāt do that! youāll have to come back when youāre already dead. i was aborted, my mother had an abortion when she was pregnant with me, my sister needed an abortion after she had a miscarriage. all of these things are ABORTIONS! and now mothers and babies are being killed, murdered by these anti-abortionist fuckers and the laws they put in place to āsave and protect poor, innocent lives!ā
the procedure to remove me is medically and legally a late term abortion
read it, now read it again.
this procedure is an abortion from a legal and medical standpoint. laws that target "abortion" include this and more.
miscarriages are abortions ffs
and Shirley Exemptions are no way to protect anything
abortion is healthcare
thank you for bringing up the Shirley exceptions because i think people don't realize when they say "surely that would be an exception" what they're really saying is "surely the doctor would put their ass on the line and risk life in prison for me" which is a pretty bold thing to just assume
if there are going to be exceptions, the legislation needs to clearly lay them out, say which specific procedures are permissible in which specific circumstance. but that would require actually understanding the medical science related to pregnancy so we all know that's not happening
My cousin had a miscarriage and had sepsis. They wouldn't do shit for her in Texas, so she had to cross the board to get it done in Mexico so she yknow, wouldn't die.
They straight up do not care that people have, will, and continue to die. Especially the 'wrong' kinds of people.
And keep in mind the people signing these bills, rich mfs that they are? They'll always ALWAYS have access to getting their mistresses, daughters, anybody THEY want, to get an abortion.
Sickening.
One of my best friends works in an ER in a state where there hasn't been a ruling on abortion in almost 100 years, but because that law is anti-abortion unless the life of the mother is under *eminent threat* they cannot perform ANY abortion procedures until you are actively going under.
They had a woman come in maybe 2 months after Roe v Wade was overturned. She was a day or so post-miscarriage. It was her 2nd miscarriage. She and her husband had been trying for YEARS. They were paying THOUSANDS for fertility treatments and thought it would work this time. She was sobbing. Her husband was sobbing.
But more importantly... they came in because she had just collapsed and was having bouts of dizziness.
An ultrasound my friend performed confirmed 2 things:
She had had an incomplete natural evacuation. There was still a fair amount of tissue in her uterus, which would definitely be decomposing by that point (the uterus is not a sterile environment).
There was no heartbeat. None. Not a single contracting cell.
They called Legal, because they knew exactly what was going to happen. This woman, unless given an artificial evacuation (aka... an abortion), would become septic. Legal said, "You can't until her vitals drop. In the eyes of the law, if she could technically pass the tissue naturally until the moment before you intervene, you have performed a medically unnecessary abortion. Anyone who assists will be stripped of their medical credentials and put on trial for murder, and the hospital cannot defend you and will not be held responsible."
There was nothing the woman or the family could sign. There was no loophole. My friend went over the vitals collected by her nurse all night, but she hadn't crashed yet. Just slowly became more and more delirious from the infection spreading from the dead tissue. The only medications they could even give to ease her suffering were meds/doses approved for actively pregnant women.
Her husband could only sit there and watch.
When the woman's blood pressure suddenly dropped, they rushed her into the OR for the evacuation/abortion, which they'd had prepped for her. At that point, my friend's line of care was over. The doctors who took over the case said she was being recommended to internal surgery because her uterine tissue has started going necrotic as well, and would need to be removed.
This meant her chance to have her own baby would drop to almost nothing.
Before Roe v Wade was overturned, this would have been an upsetting in-and-out trip to the ER after a terrible, terrible day. My friend barely would have batted an eye after the 5 minutes of sympathy she could have afforded before moving to the next patient.
But because it happened after, this woman lost her baby, nearly lost her life, and permanently lost any ability to carry a child to term in one long, shitty, horrific weekend. Infections like that are extremely damaging to the body as well; she may have permanent side effects.
FOR DEAD TISSUE. Dead. The baby was dead already. It was already gone. It was so dead and gone that it was ROTTING inside her.
While much less damaging, my friend and her team were permanently scarred by this event. She'd been in this small town ER for almost a decade by that point, she went through the COVID shutdown in that hospital, she's seen UGLY, haunting things and told me the HIPPA versions with a completely straight face.
She could barely get the words out on this story. She choked on the guilt. She cried, and she'd never cried over a medical story to me before.
I told a Pro-Life woman this story once. I told her, "If your daughter has complications with her pregnancy, you have to get her to [state where abortion is legal] immediately, no matter what it costs. This is what is happening here."
She cried. She cried just hearing about it, third-hand. Because of course she did. It's horrifying. It's undeniably WRONG.
And when she claimed that this must have been some cruel twist of a law taken too far, some unfortunate, unforeseen side effect... I reminded her that this is what was happening before Roe v. Wade, and in living memory of the Supreme Court and sitting members of congress. Because Roe v Wade was ruled on in 1973. And those old fucks all remember 1972.
They just don't care about making exceptions, because exceptions mean loopholes to them, and what's the trauma of a few unknown nobodies to politicians when they have their pearls to clutch and votes to secure?
I think I changed her mind that day, but it's difficult to care when people are still dying for and/or having their lives turned upside-down over dead tissue.
"it's difficult to care when people are still dying''
women. women are still dying. it helps nobody to pretend that this isn't a gendered issue just because 0.000001% of the individuals who give birth identify as transmen. only female people can give birth, and it is crucial to be perfectly clear about that because that is literally why this is happening. if abortion was a men's issue, it never would have been outlawed in the first place. all this "inclusive" language does is obfuscate and make it incredibly difficult to talk about issues that solely affect female people in a realistic way.
abortion bans are a product of misogyny. and women are the ones dying as a result of them
Arrest everyone involved.
Money saved: maybe a couple million dollars.
People killed: around three quarters of a million.
worldās most evil man and Iām not being hyperbolic
the idea that kink is somehow safe from critique and prejudice or harm is so fucking funny. ah yes bodies, desire, and power, three things that have famously never been utilized in harmful ways. great news everyone yes we are all existing in complex systems of oppression and violence BUT!!!!!! itās on pause when we are horny

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
many people clearly believe that for the benefit of the community, women must simply absorb male violence. that it's their role in the community. that men are the community, and his violence needs to go somewhere acceptable. and the acceptable place is at her.
this is why a lot of prison abolitionists aren't very motivated by the existence of domestic violence. to many of them, it's worth women taking on the violence. or, if it's women outside of whichever community they're interested in, then it's a big "who cares." That's not our business. Wallstreet guys can beat their wives, policemen can beat their wives, mailmen can beat their wives, drug dealers can beat their wives, artists can beat their wives, teachers can beat their wives, disabled men can beat their wives, clergymen can beat their wives, war vets can beat their wives, and it's all the same. Wives are inherently beatable.
do wife beaters usually end up in prison?
I'm sure you think this is a gotcha. Sometimes they do. In any case, the reason why they don't when they don't is related to the same reason why many people want women to simply absorb male violence. Which is that, in their mind, wives are inherently beatable. I'm not interested in talking to you if you don't really care about domestic violence, only "winning" a debate with me, so consider any response carefully. I'm happy to ignore you.
I think they occasionally end up in prison for actually murdering their wife. Whom they previously beat for years but weren't arrested for it.
I despise when men try the "perfect world" argument with me.
"What if we were in a perfect world, would prostitution be okay then? What if we were in a perfect world, would you be okay with surrogacy? If there's no financial gain, then it should be okay, right?" š
No, I'm not playing your games. I'm never going to say that female exploitation is okay in a "perfect" world, and you can't make me. Obviously it's not a perfect world if people are still using women for parts, not that that ever occurs to them. It's just them trying to wheedle you into loosening your grip on your morals. If they can get you to agree that there's nothing "inherently" wrong with these things, then you can bet their next step is going to be normalizing it in other scenarios.
also like... if it was a "perfect world" why would women feel the need to sell their bodies? what kind of "perfect world" would it be if women still felt the need to have to have sex with men they otherwise would not have sex with if financial incentive wasn't involved?