Home to stupid musings of a rookie smut writer

God forbid a parent takes time out of their busy day to maybe talk to kids about the dangers of going online and to have some trust in their judgement about what they're protecting them from.

God forbid a parent, worried a child might still end up getting around said features, actually sit down with said kid and explain there's a lot of things online that's harmful, hurtful and not for them in that makes them listen to the parent and pick up some internet safety lessons.

GOD. FUCKING. FORBID. A parent not just use a fucking screen to baby sit their fucking child these days.

Cause sure fine whatever you banned the titty picks.

...I don't ever remember this in Doctor Posion's MO.

The defense's job is to defend. This involves providing alternate theories to the facts of the case, showing where there is doubt, doing everything they can to make sure the prosecution's case has to be strong.

Context for other users:

On the morning of April 7, 2026, a fire was started at the Kimberly-Clark Distribution Center in Ontario, California. It escalated to a six-alarm fire and took nearly twelve hours to extinguish. The facility was completely destroyed and declared a "total loss". There were no injuries or deaths. An employee who was working in the warehouse is accused of arson.

Authorities stated that the employee had shared videos of himself starting the fire on Facebook, saying "all you had to do was pay us enough to live" and "there goes your inventory" while lighting pallets of toilet paper ablaze.

ALL YOU HAD TO DO WAS PAY US ENOUGH TO LIVE

No injuries. No deaths. This was a protest fire. This is why unions are important, to prevent frustrations like these, to ensure people are paid enough to live.

Do you think the heroic impoverished proletariat is doing better or worse now that their workplace has burned down and they can no longer perform labor in exchange for wages? Was this an effective action to empower the heroic impoverished proletariat, or was it destructive and helped nobody except as it provided masturbation material to communists?

THROUGH NO FAULT OF HIS!

He never told any of the other workers to leave and they were in fact looking for him before they had to evacuate. It is sheer luck that nobody was killed because the arsonist couldn't have cared less if everyone else there had died.

This was a protest fire.

Protest fire. Arson. Sure looks the same to me.

This is why unions are important, to prevent frustrations like these, to ensure people are paid enough to live.

Fandom Problem #15,541:

Cause I feel you could do a 'something something ablist' with it. "OH how you could post this, no one's going to be able to read it, oh woe" or "OH my god what hidden dogwhistle are you HIDING in this you evil person you cause CLEARLY-"

the "I'll teach you everything" meme redraw from twt ehehe

I dunno what else to call it, the one who thinks they're sauve, charming, has swag or rizz, you know the one doing all the work to get the girl... or guy, or partner whatever. And then.....

I think Lois should get to punch Lex whenever she wants, but I'll settle for her getting to punch him every other season. So if we play our cards right, she should get to do it again by season 5.

Sees this car break through. Sees Lois get out. Sees her charging Lex with her hand up

and just lets it happen. There's like probably 5 points he probably could have stopped this(hell he probably could have moved Lex the moment he hard the car from outside). But nah, let him get punched.

However, they tend to bully under the mask of "Look I'm progressive" or "Look I'm a good person". Of COURSE the White Person acts like this, typical. OF COURSE the MAN thinks like this. OF COURSE the Straight would react like this. OH shut up Catholic. And on and on.

But it doesn't seem to actually stop there cause you've probably seen how they treat some Minorities that step out of line. I'm not even saying ones that fully go against them; Lefties do anything from 'shush no I am talking for your struggles' to them or even ripping out old racial labels because clearly they're a 'bad minority' that needs to be bullied back in line(them calling some black politicians/judges uncle toms for example)

And to say nothing about how they do their little oppression judging at times to see which side they should land on.

compilation of a robot-rouge design I put together for a comm client, blastermath, being pretty much a remake of an older mecha rouge I did a long time ago.

> ask the people if it's objects or gambling

> they don't understand

> pull out illustrated diagram explaining what is objects and what is gambling

> they laugh and say "it's a good collectible sir"

> look up how to buy a collectible

Labubus are blind bags but they're also blind bags with some of the most insane dark patterns stacked on top. The online store for them has a thing where they tell you what you got the second you order it online so that you can immediately try again if you didn't get the thing you wanted.

Like when people argue whether warhammer 40k is fascist propaganda that says that fascism is good, or if it's actually a satire of fascist propaganda saying that fascism is bad. When it isn't really either of those things. That's not what it's going for and that's not what it's doing. It's got satirical elements floating around in there in varying degrees depending on era and author, but the point of them isn't to instruct the audience whether fascism is bad - it's for drama, and mood, and weird interestingness, and humour, and all the other reasons why things are in art other than political and moral instruction. It portrays a bunch of fucked up stuff connected by in-setting circumstance and lets you make your own mind about it, or just let yourself think "damn that's fucked up" and leave it at that.

It's not even, like, complex, by almost any literary standard. It's the same thing with them being unable to understand marvel movies, literally the most accessible movies ever made, when they crack out the most basic #101 nuance for teenagers where a villain has a sympathetic motive or a hero makes a mistake, and they can't really understand it, thinking that because the villain has a sympathetic quality then the movie is trying to demonise that sympathetic quality, because they assume that the film is operating at the level of basic propaganda, when it's, like, even slightly above that.

Because if it doesn't support you...., what does it do? That's right it's against you. Which makes it bad.

And why would you, a good person, be interacting with something that's bad. You wouldn't. Unless you were a bad person.