
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
official daine visual archive
The Bowery Presents
hello vonnie
Xuebing Du

@theartofmadeline
YOU ARE THE REASON

#extradirty
occasionally subtle
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
RMH
Keni
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

blake kathryn
The Stonewall Inn
trying on a metaphor
Noah Kahan
cherry valley forever
h

if i look back, i am lost

seen from T1
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Japan

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia
@nerianasims

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The tip of the iceberg...
Evening at Sylvan Lake
(c) riverwindphotography
How many of these movies have you seen that people said “you haven’t seen [blank] yet??” to me about
[ID: Post by Marco Kloos @marcokloos "Don't fret about your Amazon reviews. I just got a three-star review because my novel isn't a 36-count package of Jimmy Dean sausages."
below: thumbnail of the novel's cover over the following three-star Amazon review:
"Jinny Dean not in shop ink cart?
March 20, 2017
Hello why can't I get the 36 pack of Jinny Dean sauceages any more from the amazong? This web sight is sobbroin why isn't any help?? ¿ hello?"]

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Not that I don't think about this sort of thing every time I see an ad, but there's something about trying to follow the murderbot tag specifically during its turn to be targeted by the pornbots du jour that drives home the contempt and casual cruelty of this form of advertising/revenue generation.
I'm allo, and it's almost physically painful to me to open that tag this week. All those pale undulating dead-eyed probably image-generated figures coming at me make me flinch. I have to scroll through flag/blocking and updating the page until I've suppressed the current part of the wave before I can settle down and read my morning's lot of meta, fic recs, art, and ART. It's stupid, it's inconvenient, it's offensive, and it's in the tag for the most asexual-attractive fandom going.
If I react to it this way, what is it doing to the fans out there who are as sex-repulsed as Murderbot is?
Okay, yeah, a lot of those people probably block the Mature Content label; but the Mature Content label isn't even on a lot of these things, and I expect that the complete randomness of the censorbot (which I have found hates parties in T for Teen rated games particularly virulently, and which also randomly deals out labels for bread and craft projects while giving close-ups of genitalia a pass) means that even a lot of sex-repulsed people leave the Mature Content label unblocked because leaving it on makes them miss what they want to see more than it protects them from seeing what they don't want to see.
So I suspect a lot of them are just not going to the tag this week; which would explain why traffic is fairly slow over there right now. In a week, or at most a month, the fire hose will slow to the usual trickle and the bots generating this stuff will move on to the next unsuspecting irrelevant tag, but in the meantime we should not have to put up with this, and I wonder how many people will just not come back? It's harming the fandom on this site, possibly permanently, and there is 100% nothing to be done about it with our current infrastructure.
And it won't even get the people behind the bots the benefit they're hoping for. I guarantee you that nobody in the Murderbot fandom -- not the most OOC smut-writer of us all -- will be remotely tempted by this junk to do whatever it is that makes it profitable. No one will make a penny out of spamming this particular tag with this particular kind of content.
But the bot-generators won't know or care, because the whole point of this form of revenue-generation is that if you assault the entire planet, you'll catch all the suckers, and the number of suckers on the planet who'll fall for your cons, though a miniscule percentage of the population, is enough to repay the cost of generating all the junk if you don't miss any.
It's pollution, plain and simple. A bot-farmer is the spiritual twin of the CEO of a corporation pouring poison into the water supply, because the CEO doesn't drink that water and disposing of the poison properly would cost ten cents a ton and that adds up. The CEO doesn't care how many people he poisons and the bot-farmer doesn't care how many autistic aspecs he sends into meltdown, as long as he makes more money than he spends overall. Why should he undergo the increase the cost in time, attention, or money that skipping unprofitable targets would entail, when it's so cheap and easy to nuke us all and let the horny idiots sort themselves out?
Phone spam, mail spam, pop-up ads, e-mail spam, spyware -- it's all part of the same phenomenon, and it's going to make every single intrinsically useful form of communication impossible to use eventually. Throttle it in one place with regulations and protections, it busts out somewhere else.
I also wonder if the proliferation of pornbots specifically aren't escalating the problem of fandom prudishness. The Murderbot fandom as a whole is a fine one, but there's a small, loud faction that insists on policing the slash tag, treats Murderbot slash as oppressive to asexuals (despite the high percentage of asexuals in the slash tag for fandoms in general and this fandom in particular), and goes out of its way to harass people who write, draw, discuss, or go anywhere near the subject. The rise of purity culture is a problem across fandoms, but the nature of the Murderbot audience concentrates it in a really overt, really self-righteous way.
It's a particularly nasty manifestation of fandom wank, and I wonder whether this virulence is a response to feeling helpless before the barrage of advertising, and particularly porn-based advertising, to which we are all subjected.
Because you can't even find the individuals behind the bot epidemic, but you can take your feelings out on every Murderathin or Mensahbot shipper you see (especially if you don't filter out the slash in your fandom environments, which is much easier to do than blocking botspam and yet these people don't do it) and experience false catharsis, for a little while.
Warming the toebeans. 🥰 Photo from my collection, no date/info.
Medicine Bow National Forest, Wyoming; 7/25/2026
Have you are/are you going to read anything by Edward Said? From what I hear he’s not a total hack, and as an academic I feel like I should read it for completionism (my academic parents already have some of his books, so I wouldn’t even be buying them), but like. I know anything he has to say is gonna be laced with antisemitism
I’ve only read Orientalism, and it was several years ago; I found and revised some of my old notes if you want a brief overview:
- It does not acknowledge that for most of European history, the Eastern Other was represented by the Jews and the Romani, which would be more useful to understanding modern European Othering than reaching back to Aeschylus and trying to impose modern racial concepts on ancient Athens and Persia.
- It invents a new and largely superfluous word for racism; Orientalism is structurally identical to most other forms of racism, and Said is parroting what many black American thinkers had been saying for decades, but presenting it as his own new idea, which gets annoying very quickly.
- Said is a literature professor trying to establish a theory of sociology primarily out of European classic novels. I don’t entirely disagree with this approach — I believe that literature is an important reflection of any society — but it would be stronger if there were a precedent that went beyond literary theory. His scope in the book is (among ten other abstractions) to bring literary theory into the decolonial framework, but I think it would be more useful if there were an actual pre-existing sociological foundation that it drew on, rather than inventing the social theory out of literary criticism. He’s outside of his jurisdiction here, and it hurts his writing.
- This is a personal pet peeve, but he’s very openly an academic disciple of Foucault and mimics his writing style, which I find tedious. Like Foucault, he is addicted to word vomiting every thought and counter-thought in his mind; it takes him pages to say what really ought to be a single paragraph, and Said doesn’t even have the excuse of writing in French.
- He takes issue with Western academia encouraging its scholars to separate their works from the politics of their life — as a professor at Columbia University, he had an enormous impact on the culture of campus activism in the US — and while I don’t entirely disagree with him on the political events of one’s life contributing to their academic work, his approach to this is very frustrating, considering he outright lies about the events of his life to further his political ambitions.
- His focus in writing the book is on the “intellectual, aesthetic, scholarly, and cultural energies” that went into the “making of an imperialist tradition like Orientalism,” including “philology, lexicography, novel writing, and lyric poetry.” I love classic literature, and I have a deep regard for it, but I can’t justify taking a social theory as large and broad as Orientalism and basing a good chunk of it on the poetry of Lord Byron and the first twenty years of Victor Hugo’s work (he uses Hugo as a pillar of Orientalism — which is fair; Hugo renovated his Paris townhouse to look more Japanese, and wrote Notre Dame and Les Orientales with clear contemporary prejudice, so there’s a lot to work with, but I am frustrated that we limit Hugo to the first twenty years of his work and ignore his later writings which would influence many postmodern writers that Said draws from, especially Foucault).
- Said flattens English, French, and American culture into a monolith when it comes to their interactions with and understanding of the Middle East, which I find frustratingly vague and unhelpful, like the rest of this book.
- Large swaths of the book are French quotes without translations. In fairness, much of it is elementary French and fairly easy to parse out if you have a basic French background, but it is a bit of a barrier.
- He tries to create a clear through-line from Aeschylus’ play The Persians, to Shakespeare, to the boom of European interest in the Middle East following the Napoleonic Wars/Greece’s War of Independence, to modern American wars. This is a much bigger task than he is prepared to take on, and it falls apart even before he tries to categorize anti-Turkish sentiment and anti-Indian sentiment as the same social ill. I do sympathize with the trouble of biting off more than you can chew in a thesis statement, but Said only doubles down on the broadness that undermines his argument; his ambitions are much greater than his skill.
- Critique of American culture from an Arab perspective is seen as noble, brave, and righteous, and I do think that American society should be criticized often and well, to make it stronger and better. Critique of Arab culture from an American perspective, however, such as the prevalence of honor killings, social prestige-by-conquest, social shunning of nonconformists, and political inability to admit error, are seen as attacks on the Arab people and a slight upon their honor, which does nothing to disprove the claim. I will say— even accepting the role America has played in wreaking havoc on the Middle East — my greatest frustration with Middle Eastern scholarship is how fiercely its leaders fight against internal critique and introspection.
- Most criticism I’ve seen of this book says that Said is a good writer without many original ideas. I found some of the ideas intriguing, especially regarding Europe’s racialization of the Eastern Other, but the gaps, omissions, and misrepresentations in Said’s history were maddening, and I found his writing style to be tedious. He’s known for his later efforts to replace Jewish suffering in the Western consciousness with Palestinian suffering, but I was surprised that he mostly omits the Jews in this book; his audience is Christian, and he caters to a Christian understanding of history. I suspect that Orientalism would not have gained the importance that it currently holds if Said were not a Palestinian Arab. I also find it frustratingly bioessentialist; while Said is right to criticize the armchair anthropology that runs rampant throughout much of 1800s European literature, he doesn’t ever give a counterexample of a person from the West engaging honestly and respectfully with Eastern cultures, and even modern attempts to do so are read with the worst possible faith. His argument seems to be that Eastern people and Western people are fundamentally incapable of understanding each other, which seems very reactionary to me. It’s an interesting read, but not enough to justify its place in the Postmodern Canon. As literary criticism, it has merit, but as a theory of sociology it falls flat.
There are a lot of great points here. I'm gonna add two more:
1. I tried to read his "The Question of Palestine." I really tried. I honestly couldn't get past the intro.
Because it was an anniversary edition, with a new added intro where he brings the reader up to date on every significant Palestinian event since the book was published.
Every significant Palestinian event, except one:
Palestine declaring independence in 1988.
The book was published in 1992.
He even mentions the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference.
He just chooses not to mention that from 1991 on, Israel and Palestine were specifically negotiating how Palestine would become an independent country at peace with Israel.
Or that Jordan had held claim to the West Bank until 1988, something I think is pretty fucking important and relevant here. (Not to mention that it had specifically renounced that claim in 1988 because Palestine declared independence.)
Like. If you don't know that the entire reason Palestine is "the West Bank and the Gaza Strip" is that those are the areas Egypt and Jordan claimed, after they and every other Arab League country invaded in 1948 to retake the land for the Arab world...
Then you're not going to have the context for anything that's happened since then.
Which is the precise trick that most academic information about Palestine uses. It plays a game of careful omission that gives you about a quarter of the story.
Anyway, as a historian, this omission threw me so hard that I spent the next half-hour trying to think of any legitimate reason to avoid mentioning the fact that Palestine had declared independence and - unlike any other country I can think of that has ever declared independence - skipped over the whole "oh no you don't" violent invasion stage, in favor of the "peace talks" stage.
To this day, the only reason I can think of is that it contradicts his position and his narrative.
He was already insisting in 1993, and presumably much earlier, that Israel had outright expelled 800,000 Palestinians and conquered their lands and property.
No Arab League invasion. No 350,000 people leaving its "soft invasion" of volunteer armies before the war even started. No Egypt and Jordan snatching up land with another 300,000ish internally displaced people on it, who then automatically became "refugees" in those foreign countries.
He made that statement in the context of criticizing the preliminary version of the Oslo Accords that the two countries had signed at that point. So he definitely knew all this was happening. It's not like he was just uninformed.
He built his entire career out of the big, broad, easy falsehoods that "everybody knows" today.
Which brings me to my other point:
2. Edward Said is a fucking liar.
He was Egyptian-American. Born to Egyptian-American parents. Given a rich kid childhood in Egypt, until he went to rich kid boarding school in America.
He was not Palestinian.
He was born in Jerusalem. That's the entire part of his story that's true.
He was not a citizen of Palestine. He didn't grow up there. His parents didn't live there when he was born; they were visiting relatives. They didn't own the home he claimed to have grown up in.
Every sad story he's ever told about being dispossessed was an outright lie.
In a way, he even admitted this: his 1999 autobiography contradicts tons of the claims he'd made about his life. He just glosses over that, acting as though it doesn't.
An Israeli lawyer who specializes in Palestinian rights discovered this in 1999.
Among spokesmen for the Palestinian cause in our day, surely none is so articulate, or so well-known, as Edward W. Said. The holder of an en
Here's the de-paywalled version.
Ironically, the guy specifically specializes in helping Palestinians through the legal process of reclaiming, or getting compensation for, property they lost in 1948 or 1967.
This article is how I found out there was even a process for that. Much less an entire industry of lawyers and NGOs to help people do it.
Talk about things that are deliberately never mentioned.
I'm just going to quote a few things. This is a long-form essay, and it's gripping.
As a living embodiment of the Palestinian cause, [Edward Said] has made much in print and on film of his birth, childhood, and schooling in Palestine, telling a story of idyllic beginnings and violent disruption—of a paradise lost—that resonates with personal pain while also serving as a powerfully compelling metaphor for the larger Palestinian condition.
Said's father Wadie did grow up in Jerusalem, under the Ottoman Empire, before moving to America in 1911, and later, to Egypt. He married a Lebanese woman named Hilda, in Egypt, in 1932.
Wadie's brother Boulos still lived in Jerusalem, with his own wife and kids.
To this branch of the family, as to other destinations, the affluent Cairo-based Saids made periodic visits. In November 1935, during one of those visits, Edward Said was born.
On his birth certificate, prepared by the ministry of health of the British Mandate, his parents specified their permanent address as Cairo, and, indicating that they maintained no residence in Palestine, left blank the space for a local address.
Similarly blank is the entry for a local address in the church record of Edward Said’s baptism, an event that likewise took place in Jerusalem two years later.
Of the 29 telephone and commercial directories for Jerusalem and Palestine from 1931 through 1948 that I was able to locate, more than half carry business and/or residential listings for Boulos Said and his wife. There are no listings for Edward Said’s parents in any of the directories, whether in English, Hebrew, or Arabic.
As for the house in Talbieh (Talbiya), that is a story unto itself.
In his article in Harper’s, as in the much longer version of the same piece that he published in the (London) Observer, and as in other iterations of this theme elsewhere, Said has wrenchingly recounted the nostalgic visit he paid in early 1992 to his childhood roots in Jerusalem and in particular to this house at 10 Brenner Street....
In the ledgers kept at the Land Registry Office in Jerusalem during the Mandatory period, the earliest entry for the house in question is dated February 14, 1941. It records a transfer of fractional interests in the property from its registered owner, Yusef Said (Edward Said’s grandfather), to Mrs. Boulos Yusef Said (Edward Said’s aunt) and her five children.
And that is all. There is no record of Edward Said’s parents owning either the house or any interest in it.
If his nuclear family had no ownership interest in the house at 10 Brenner Street, neither did he or they ever permanently reside in it. (Nor, apparently, did his aunt and cousins until 1942.)
OMFG. I'd forgotten that part. He couldn't even have been born in that specific house, or had childhood memories in it! Because his relatives didn't live there yet! The building was a duplex until 1942:
From 1938 to 1946 (that is, from the time Edward Said was roughly three to the time he was eleven), the upstairs level was rented out to the Kingdom of Yugoslavia as its consulate general, and then from 1946 to 1952 to the successor government of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
...As for the downstairs, main-entrance level of the house, it was rented from about 1936 to 1938 by the Iranian consulate.
Then, after 1938, this and the basement level were leased to the illustrious German-Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, his wife, and his two teenage granddaughters, all of them recent refugees from Nazi Germany.
The Buber family was forced out of the house in early 1942 (when Edward Said would have been about seven) in a dispute with the owners—that is, Nabiha (Mrs. Boulos Yusef) Said—who broke the lease and reclaimed the premises for their personal use, winning a judge’s ruling in favor of eviction.
Buber’s granddaughters, from whom I heard this account, also accurately remember the names of Nabiha Said and two of her boys, Yusef and Robert. Another tenant of the house during the latter Mandate period remembers George, still another son of the family. None remembers Edward or any of his four sisters.
In fact, Edward Said has actively claimed something I've repeatedly been told: that Martin Buber lived there after 1948, and "didn’t mind living in an Arab house whose inhabitants had been displaced."
There's so much more in that article. I'm gonna go reread it.
But first, one little thing I learned today:
In 1966, before hitting on the gold mine of selling outrage porn to would-be white saviors, Edward Said published his very first book.
It was called, "Joseph Conrad and the Fiction of Autobiography."
You have to hand it to the guy. He sure was consistent.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i can understand the trials but were the tribulations really necessary
shooting as many people as possible
5001 being divisible by 3 doesnt feel right
Shortcuts to determine if an integer is divisible by:
This is a given.
If the last digit is divisible by 2 (a.k.a. even), then so is the whole number.
If the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, then so is the whole number. The recursivity of this means that if the sum has multiple digits, you can add them up again until you get a single digit and see if it's 3, 6, or 9.
Like the rule for 2, but check if the last two digits are divisible by 4.
If it ends in 5 or 0.
If the rules for both 2 and 3 apply.
No shortcut. Alas.
Like the rules for 2 and 4, but check if the last three digits are divisible by 8. (Yes, this pattern keeps going for 16, 32, etc.)
Like the rule for 3, but the sum of the digits (or the sum of the sum of the digits, etc.) must be 9.
If it ends in 0.
Relatedly, if you are adding up a set of numbers, and it doesnt match the expected total, and the amount of the difference is a multiple of 9/can be summed down to 9, then you've transposed two digits in your input somewhere.
25+30+65=120
52+30+65=147
147-120=27
27/9 is 3 or 2+7 is 9
Flowers out front this morning
Bliss! 💫 Photo from my collection, no date/info.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
friendly reminder that if you’re going to donate to palestinians you should do it through a good organization and not a scammer on tumblr
Families Facing War and Displacement Need Your Help Donate Now Your support today can help provide food, clean water, hygiene kits, healthca
you learn something new everyday. unless you're a historian. then you learn something old