Its Actually Remarkably Complex And Sophisticated

No, you're not special because you have Autism.

My brother and nephew also have autism.

It doesn't mean they can't also be assholes, just like evetybody else on this planet.

And you were being an unmitigated, pobresito yo, act-before-you-thought, boohoo.

I don't give two shits you're mad ("mad") at those dudes.

You even said it yourself you never actually watched the video that upset you.

I wish they still taught critical thinking & analysis in school, because tiktok is evidently your most influential educator.

Please refrain from actually taking me seriously; you're too stupidly blinkered to actually understand anything that takes effort.

BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK sorry i couldn’t hear you over the sound of me putting a fictional man in a slutty apron and calling him mommy. sorry. i was too busy hand-feeding him strawberries and then writing 12k of emotional devastation and domestic porn. sorry i gendered him like a little fucked up doll in a victorian nursery.

YES. HE’S A WOMAN TO ME. HE’S A HOUSEWIFE. HE’S A HIGH-FEM BRAT. HE’S A PRETTY LITTLE THING WHO GETS RAWED IN THE MOONLIGHT AND MAKES SOFT WHIMPERS AND BAKES BREAD TO COPE. AND I DO NOT CARE IF IT MAKES SENSE.

HE IS MADE OF TROPES. HE IS MADE OF VIBES. HE IS MADE OF GLITTER AND TEARS AND POST-WAR PTSD. HE IS WHATEVER THE FUCK I WANT. HE IS NOT A MAN. HE IS NOT A WOMAN. HE IS A TRAGEDY IN LACE.

you’re talking about “misogyny” like i didn’t just write a fic where he gets folded in half by a feral beast of a love interest and then cries because he’s “too used to not being touched gently.” BABE. THERE IS NO DIGNITY HERE. ONLY CATHARSIS.

your academic thinkpiece cannot survive the heat of my horny little monkey brain. you want to talk about gender roles?? I WANT TO PUT HIM IN A COLLAR. I WANT TO GIVE HIM A GENDERCRISIS VIA DICK. I WANT TO MAKE HIM THE MAID AND THE MUSE AND THE MADONNA.

and also? sometimes i call him a manwhore for getting railed twice in one chapter and still being emotionally unavailable. because HE DESERVES IT. because I SAID SO. because it’s FUNNY and UNHINGED and that’s the POINT.

ok here we go. recipe/original post here:

FROM A GOAT OR OF ITS ILK

SURPRISINGLY IT'S REALLY GOOD

“Kids shouldn’t make “big” decisions because they haven’t developed decision making skills yet.“

six months later i re-read the essay prior to the final exam, went 'ohhhh yeah i remember this', got a question on that topic, and aced it.

The reason OP could bullshit a decent essay in a 30 minute bus ride is because OP knew how to write and craft a well-reasoned analysis thanks to a childhood full of writing and critical thinking practice.

How it actually works:

Second: My man, you are asking the hallucination robot to not only give you sources, but to give you proofs to a conclusion you have drawn before the research. Classic texas sharp-shooter. No bias correction can save you there. Perhaps you are using this old disingenuous debate style where you argue for points that you do not believe as is common in the anglosphere, but even in that case this will not protect you from blind spots since alternate viewpoints will be excluded from your research so you can't even steel-man your arguments.

Third: Google Scholar gives you hundreds of sources and alternative search terms at your finger tips and you haven't even asked wikipedia, a librarian or an expert in the field yet so there would many more sources you could yet find. You clearly want to put in the work. Your imagination can find so many different angles of attack to any problem if you allow yourself to use it.

Second, this isn't meant to be an exhaustive example, nor is it a tutorial. It was just a basic demonstration of how it could be used in an honest way. Are there other tools? Sure. But they also have their disadvantages. For example, at least four of those titles are almost identical. if you keep checking the next pages there's probably 300 more. Google Scholar depends on you knowing the right keywords to look up, which depending on your research might not always be helpful. For an actual example, whenever I want to read something about Mayan languages I have to constantly dodge stuff about Maya the programming language, as well as people who just happen to be named Maya. Which if I have a deadline coming is just frustratingly wasting my time.

My point is not that AI is an objective improvement over what previously existed. My point is that it's just another tool: it's not a "plagiarism machine", it's not a superintelligence that has all the answers, it's just a program, and whatever you do with that program is on the human who uses it, not on the tool itself. A hammer can build a house or break a skull. It has strong points and weak points, and just as there are people who use it for laziness and theft there are people who use it for productivity and alternative perspectives that they may not initially consider. It's not a replacement, it's a complement. Google Scholar is incredibly powerful but it's not infallible, and so is this. I just want to make it clear that being against a hammer is not morally virtuous inherently; you need to know what you believe in, why you believe it, and constantly challenge those assertions to make sure you have it right. If you really hate the bot so much, at the very least you should be able to understand it and explain in detail why it's the spawn of satan.

Now you can ask a plagiarism machine to make up sources for you that don't exist, and call that a paper.

Detailed map of the Paris Catacombs in English [7000x7000 px]

heres a blog post from 2012 with pictures:

apparently gizmodo and wired both found the group behind the cinema, 'les UX', but the articles linked are now error 404 pages.