26|Autistic|Christian|Dog Lover|Posts and Reblogs a Variety of Things|Die-Hard Charlastor Shipper since 2020|I Stand with Israel 🇮🇱|All Gaza scam bots will be blocked on sight
When I say I'm not a right winger, I mean that my political beliefs would be equivalent to the average Democrat maybe 20 or 30 years ago (aside from not supporting gay marriage, since I support gay marriage,) but the average leftist sees no difference between me and Hitler so this is why I don't bother sharing anything deeper than surface level with anyone offline.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey everyone. There's a new youtube feature that rolled out just yesterday that's raising some privacy concerns.
People in the U.S., U.K., Brazil, and Singapore can now share videos and chat with friends directly within the YouTube app. The update bring
This post talks about a new DM feature in youtube. What it fails to mention is that as part of this new feature is that when you send someone a link to a video, and they open it in the youtube app, they will see who sent them the link. Specifically, your channel name.
If your google account name is your real name, so is your channel name by default.
This means the new default behavior is that everyone you send a youtube link to will see your full name if they open it in the mobile app.
To turn this off:
Go to your youtube app settings
Go to Privacy
Turn off "Channel visibility for shared links"
Trimming the source id (the stuff after the '?' in links) will also prevent this from happening.
Black pilot, West Point graduate, and combat veteran Wesley Hunt delivered a masterclass response:
“Hey Jasmine… Black pilot here.
I graduated from West Point. I went through Army flight school. I learned to fly the AH-64 Apache. I deployed to combat and flew 55 combat missions over Baghdad.
Nobody handed me a cockpit because of my skin color. Nobody lowered the standards for me.
Suggesting that Black pilots, engineers, doctors, or leaders need special preferences to succeed is not empowering, it’s insulting.
I didn’t want a different standard. I wanted the same standard.”
He ended with a powerful line:
“Merit isn’t racist. Excellence isn’t discriminatory. And reducing every achievement to skin color says far more about your worldview than it does about mine.”
This is the kind of clarity and backbone America needs right now.
Why would that be embarrassing? It just means you have a mind of your own and can form your own opinions outside the popular opinion. If you enjoyed it, good.
Also the rotten tomatoes thing has two ratings. From critics and from actual humans (audience score). They usually show the critics thing at the forefront, and those people get bought and bribed to trash other projects and lift others up more often than you think.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"I'm so pro-female empowerment that I refuse to believe a woman who has made a different choice than me did so of her own free will and with her own intelligence, she must be doing it because she's too stupid to know she's being oppressed. I'm so pro-woman that I actively despise any woman who finds value in something other than radfem misery. I'm so feminist that I think all women everywhere are automatically doomed to be perpetual helpless victims to the extent that I think it's wrong to even bring little girls into this world because their lives won't be worth living. I'm so pro-humanity and well-adjusted I will project my own real or imagined bad experiences with men onto literal infant boys because having a penis makes them oppress me."
If there's something all the controversies around Glitch Productions and their works seem to have reinforced, it's that "indie" animation fans, most of whom are thankfully blessed to not have serious problems in their lives like worrying about where their next meal is coming from, will allow for success...to a point. The ceiling is "First generation internet reviewer," where you are allowed to be internet famous, popular at smaller conventions, and able to work on animation full-time.
Anything more than that constitutes "selling out" and being "THE MAN." Which is where it becomes time to take the artists down a peg with leaking videos, accusations of ____isms, and in general making any attempt at monetization a betrayal of those "indie" roots, and justifying any and all attempts at sabotage.
I think part of that is just how the animation fandom (for lack of a better term) reacts to merchandise and how it's a lot different from other media that might have "indie" movements. Back in the 90s, when the famous cabal of artists left to form Image Comics, one of said artists was Todd McFarlane, who in 1994, unable to come to a deal to make Spawn toys, founded McFarlane Toys (after Mattel threatened litigation at the name "Todd Toys"), where he immediately got to work making high-quality figures not just for the Image Comics characters, but a lot of comics and shows that otherwise wouldn't have gotten them.
Yup, the Spawn guy made a line of Tenchi Muyo action figures (helped by the show airing on Toonami way back when). And McFarlane Toys was rather successful as a company. To the indie comic crowd, who have always had a love/hate relationship with advertising (look no further than Flex Mentallo, Grant Morrison's affectionate ode to the old Charles Atlas ads), this was viewed as validating. "Yeah, we got this idea across the finish line, and now there are toys and games and crap! We win!"
Animation fandom and creatives, meanwhile, and I've described it before, have a lot of their roots in the cartoonist revolution of the 80s and early 90s, where merchandising (and the toyetic shows that dominated the airwaves in the 80s and 90s) was seen as the enemy of creative thought. People like John K (serial abuser, sex pest, and hypocrite, considering the sheer amount of Ren and Stimpy merch that existed), Ralph Bakshi, Mark Evanier (who also made the long-running comic Groo the Wanderer, which was published by Marvel for a while under the Epic imprint) and others made their disdain for these kinds of toy selling shows pretty damn clear whenever they got the OK to do so.
And since they were often viewed as the champions of creativity in animation, their philosophies became dominant. So when a company like Glitch tries to merchandise, it immediately labels them as THE ENEMY and that they must be taken down a peg.
Some of this is admittedly pattern recognition following the dissolution of a previous company, namely Rooster Teeth. Yes, small indie company, completely lost the plot after being bought out by Warner Bros, engaged in outright money laundering of sponsor money by sending it to products that weren't earmarked for it (a bit from the old Cannon Films playbook) and was eventually dissolved due to the fact that it never made a dime despite all the merchandise and constant framing of the place as "Poor, poor pitiful me!" Pattern recognition being what it is, and the decline of Rooster Teeth's own creative efforts in quality has left many concerned that Glitch will become the same, and that they must be stopped.
So remember, kids, if you're in the indie animation space, you can be successful. But not TOO successful, or the fandom that was cultivated will demand your destruction.
Somehow, the animated pilot Planetronkia avoided this. Was this because it was more of a comedy-focused short than the heavy lore of TADC and Gameoverse, or did the one girl clearly being designed for sex appeal scare off the people who would have interrogated the creators?
So when it comes to conversations about economics, there's a tug of war over what "capitalism" means, and the pro-capitalists seem to be struggling to assert their definition because the anti-capitalist definitions are very entrenched.
Which is a bad thing because anti-capitalist definitions of "capitalism" tend to be biased garbage. "Capitalism is when bad things" is a phrase that alludes to this, but I see there's some need for a breakdown.
1; Capitalism amirite?:
A lot of people are casual anticapitalists, and don't really have a definition. They're operating on a socially infectious habit of blaming everything bad on capitalism. Rich getting richer? Capitalism. Small business struggling? Capitalism. The snack you like getting discontinued? Capitalism.
To these people "capitalism" doesn't have a real meaning, it's just a convenient scapegoat and bogeyman for everything they don't like.
2; Capitalism is this list of bad things:
It can be greed and corruption, corporations, a "system defined by exploitation," whatever the specifics, "capitalism" is defined this way is synonymous with evil.
Not much to say about it, it's just blatant with bias.
3; Capitalism is basically everything (but actually just the bad things.)
This one is a bit more convoluted. This is a case where someone starts with a definition of "capitalism" so broad and all-encompassing that it doesn't have any meaning.
From there, "capitalism" can conveniently be blamed for every negative outcome in a system. (While any positive outcomes are ignored, disqualified, or otherwise not credited to capitalism.)
In summary: "Capitalism is when bad things" is an apt summary of how critics of "capitalism" describe it.
For your typical critic of capitalism, "capitalism" isn't a clearly defined system or set of principles that lead to bad outcomes, by their biased definition, it is the bad outcomes. (See also the logic underpinning "not real communism" where a bad outcome isn't communism, "communism" is the utopian outcome they want, so any failures automatically don't count.)
“Capitalism” is a term made up by Marx, which is why I don’t like using it, but the inertia is a bit overwhelming at this point.
The libertarian right has a few ding-dongs in this area, too. Like people who say “Capitalism = Freedom”, which is kinda stupid, even if you like capitalism a lot. More commonly it tends to be equivalent to “free enterprise”, which is fine, but I’ve heard it defined in a particular way:
That is, when someone raises money (said “capital”) in order to buy machinery and industrial space, then hires workers to work on those machines to produce goods for a wage. There are other implications, like a financial system that allows people to pool their resources into corporations to facilitate such a framework.
I’ve seen one anarchist type hunger for a world where everything is decentralized, yet practical enough to allow for a functional industrial economy to work without corporations. Though does that mean they’re going to prevent people from voluntarily pooling their resources? Or will there be no concept of an LLC and you’ll just be open to lawsuits if your company fucks up? Hmm
Honestly, given that people have been trying to appropriate and redefine "capitalism" longer than I've been alive with no real success. Only pro-capitalists recognize the pro-capitalism definition. Maybe it's past time to change that.
Perhaps people who believe in free markets and economic freedom should come up with our own term with an accompanying manifesto instead of continuing the failed attempt to appropriate Marxist terminology.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If Platner had gotten a cover-up or removed his tattoo long ago and had also talked about how he had changed his ways long before getting involved in politics I might take his renunciation of all that more seriously.
You don't just go around with an unaltered Nazi tattoo for years and years if you've turned your back on those ideas. Or at least you shouldn't. Especially if you plan to run for office!
Elon symbolically grabs his heart and throws it out to the audience, and everyone calls him a Nazi for years.
This guy has a totenkopf tattoo, a literal Nazi symbol with no other possible interpretations, and we're told that we can't pass judgment, because we don't know or understand the full context.
My favorite headcanon is that Charlie and Alastor are insufferable to be around once they get together.
They don't kiss much in public and seldom do they call each other pet names (Alastor at most calls her my dearest or darling but even then there isn't an emphasis put on the name and Charlie herself really only sticks to Al. )
But they're always breaking out into songs--something people were already accustomed to with Charlie, and admittedly people thought there would be less of it seeing as her partner was the actual radio demon who wasn't a person you'd associate with the word 'fun'--
But nope.
Now she has a duet and he turns it into a whole production just for her and for himself too, he likes to show off and then he even gets her to start dancing more as well,
He didn't snuff out her fire like people had anticipated he fanned it. Enthusiastically.
She didn't melt his thorns she just navigated around them. Effortlessly.
Always singing and always dancing, always entranced with each other and always so clearly disgustingly in love
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Leftwing politics is mostly about the abdication of personal responsibility.
They want other people to give them healthcare, they need a system to educate them, they want someone to provide food stamps to them, someone else is responsible for providing a comfortable living standard.