you learn something new everyday. unless you're a historian. then you learn something old
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
sheepfilms
Cosimo Galluzzi

#extradirty

Origami Around
Stranger Things
Today's Document
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
cherry valley forever
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
$LAYYYTER
macklin celebrini has autism
Xuebing Du
Show & Tell
NASA

bliss lane

seen from Japan

seen from Canada

seen from Germany
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Ecuador

seen from Indonesia
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from South Korea

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
@thedeepmiracleperfection
you learn something new everyday. unless you're a historian. then you learn something old

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Stranger Things season 1: beneath the superficial image of “peace and prosperity” in 1980s small-town America, there was the painful legacy of countless atrocities committed by the American government in the name of ‘freedom.’
Stranger Things season 4: evil Russians (not Soviets) have sent our All-American Hero to the gulags which apparently still exist in the 1980s and it’s up to us to save him 🇺🇸🦅🫡
There’s probably a term that already exists for this but if there isn’t I’m gonna call it ‘Rambofication’ in honor of its probably most well known instance: Rambo First Blood was about a soldier, John Rambo (that’s his actual name I’m not doing a bit), returning home from the Vietnam war, so traumatized by war that he brought the war home with him to a small town, unable to adapt to life without strict military discipline and hierarchy. Subsequent Rambo movies were about how John Rambo was the only supersoldier tough enough and patriotic enough to kill faceless hordes of dastardly foreign commies.
Ergo, ‘Rambofication’ is the process of a series starting with a relatively nuanced or subversive narrative before its sequels become a shallow embrace of the very narrative it originally subverted. It happens surprisingly often!
In the sociological sense, recuperation is the process by which politically radical ideas and images are twisted, co-opted, absorbed, defused, incorporated, annexed or commodified within media culture and bourgeois society, and thus become interpreted through a neutralized, innocuous or more socially conventional perspective.
all the rights that come with marriage you should be able to have without marriage btw. you should be able to designate a person who can visit you in the hospital regardless of your relationship to that person.
People in the notes are saying "You can!" referring just to the hospital visitation part, and sure (depending). But people should have access to ALL of the benefits of marriage without needing to be married.
You should be able to add anyone you want on your health insurance plan.
You should be able to sponsor the visa of anyone you choose to move to your home country.
You should be able to name anyone you choose as the legal-from-birth legal coparent of any child you give birth to.
You should be able to apply for student aid on your own at any age.
And yes, yes, ideally healthcare and college should be free, international migration should be unrestricted, and the entire concept of legal parenthood should be rewritten from the ground up. But right now we're talking about marriage benefits.
if you have to rely on specific scripts or turns of phrase to socialise that's totally fine, but you must NOT reveal them to your friends while slightly drunk. it's like showing how the magic trick works, you can't do it in front of them afterwards
i like dogs a lot but i can never remember the differences between breeds (apart from the few types i've actually owned/interacted with). but i know people looove their dogs and love talking about their dogs, so whenever im talking to a dog owner i'll ask what breed it is, and no matter what breed they say i'll say "oh! i've heard they have a really nice nature :D" and they always go YESSS THEY'RE GREAT and start gushing about their dog and we have a nice conversation and i build social credit with this person. anyway i told my friends about this script a few weeks ago when slightly drunk and now every time we're in public together and a dog goes past they turn to me and ask "does that one have a nice nature?" im in a hell of my own making

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
In hindsight, I guess it's obvious that the only way Season 2 was meant to be a bridge was as a bridge from Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, the collaborative effort between Terry Pratchett and NG to Good Omens: The Story of Crowley the Extremely Cool Demon Who Was Also the Best Angel, the story as NG originally envisioned it. And it is equally obvious to me that he did not understand how Crowley had evolved from his original idea and that he resented Aziraphale's inclusion in the story at all. They were never meant to be a couple in his eyes but he was happy to play with the idea as a way to make his self-insert suffering martyr version of Crowley even sadder by turning Aziraphale from a co-main character and equal partner into an unworthy love interest who never really understood him.
And it all just pisses me off because while I can dismiss S3 as a piece of shit written by a piece of shit, part of the legacy it leaves behind is the poisoning of the fandom, now and in the future, against a character I have loved for 30 years.
(I know Crowley was treated very badly by Season 3 too. Please don't @ me to tell me how much worse he had it - that was the intent. They were both done extremely dirty, but you're meant to sympathize with Crowley and to see Aziraphale as cruel.)
What a "tribute" to an alleged friend, completely assassinating the character he created for your shared story just to elevate your own. "For Terry" indeed. 😠
letting family members sit in for dead senators is just monarchy logic im appalled that this has even happened before
Each state gets to decide how their state is represented in Congress
This has been a common method for a long time in some states
The idea is that a Senator's sibling/spouse/parent/child knows their intentions and policies better than a political rival or a random person would. It's a pretty good way to prevent political assassinations tbh
An unelected individual getting grandfathered into a real political position due to their blood or legal relationship with a deceased elected official is not pretty good actually
folk hero really
I haven’t painted anything in months and I feel like I’m quite out of practice, so have a very loose repaint of La Gimblette by Jean-Honoré Fragonard I made today to get me back into painting.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Something really gross about how Agnes Nutter is literally the only titular character and how all of her efforts and relevancy in the narrative is rendered null and void by this 'sequel' when she was the narrative, her prophecies were the throughline that connected everything.
Agnes Nutter thought the world was worth saving, so I'm with the Witch on this one guys.
It’s definitely suspect to me how Agnes and her memory completely dropped out of the narrative after season 1 and then became utterly irrelevant thanks to season 3’s resolution.
Terry Pratchett has gone on the record saying that Agnes Nutter was solely his creation: “By agreement, I am allowed to say that Agnes Nutter, her life and death, was completely and utterly mine.”
In retrospect, it’s probably not too surprising that Neil Gaiman wanted nothing to do with a kooky old witch beyond what Terry had already written for her.
So much for honouring Sir Terry’s legacy.
You’ve heard of the Roaring 20s........
now get ready for the Screaming 20s - coming to a decade near you in 2020
is it too early or can we start screaming now
in retrospect perhaps we should have started sooner
this post is the equivalent of a newspaper from the day of the outbreak being blown past by the wind after you wake up in a post apocalyptic world
if house md were running in 2024 there would be an episode with a patient who identifies as an ‘online content creator’ (cagily) where house agrees to take the case primarily because when he offhandedly refers to her as an onlyfans model both cameron and cuddy get really offended and say it’s a sexist assumption so he doubles down and becomes committed to finding the patient’s onlyfans and proving it. at some point it would be revealed that chase actually is an onlyfans model and started doing it as a stopgap after his dad died and he suddenly got disinherited but he makes so much money off it that now medicine is basically just a hobby. cameron and foreman both disagree with the concept online sex work but it turns out they disagree for different reasons (cameron thinks it’s exploitative and not-feminist, foreman finds it distasteful and thinks people should get ‘real jobs’) and spend most of their scenes together arguing about this while chase gets continually more shifty. they break into the patient’s house and there’s a full ringlight and camera setup which seems to confirm house’s suspicions. while trying to find the patient’s onlyfans house accidentally finds chase’s onlyfans instead and considers publicly embarrassing him about it like he did with wilson’s sex tape but soon realises that most of the staff at the hospital are already subscribed to chase’s onlyfans so makes fun of him for that instead. it then transpires that the reason why the patient is so cagey about being a content creator is that she’s an ASMR artist and all the soap she’s been shaving on camera has irritated her lungs. cuddy is about to make house give her 20 extra hours of clinic duty as recompense but at last minute it’s revealed that the website the patient uses for some of her bonus commissions is, drumroll…onlyfans, because she’s been banned from patreon. how does house know this? wilson is subscribed to her because the soap videos sometimes soothe him to sleep. something by cigarettes after sex plays. roll end credits.
Idk where people are getting this "Good Omens iS sUpPoSEd tO bE a CoMeDY!!!" thing. No it isn't. No one ever said that.
The fact that a story is funny does not make it a comedy. Good Omens the novel has a horror ending for Aziraphale and Crowley (a fact everyone seems to conveniently ignore), and the motifs and themes of the novel are 100% cosmic horror. The show lays out cosmic horror allusions, motifs, and world mechanics from the very 1st episode. It's written by a horror writer. No plot points or story outcomes were revealed after S1 .
"Good Omens is a comedy!" is a bullshit idea the fandom made up instead of paying attention to the material in the novel or the show, and now people are melting down bc reality didn't conform to their baseless belief.
I expected more reasoned responses and a much higher degree of literacy from fans of Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett. Watching the fandom shit itself with entirely unjustified outrage has for me been the most shocking and painful part of Good Omens 3 by far.
Not only did we not make it up, but here’s what I assume is enough proof (although there are many, many other instances of everyone calling it a comedy) since it’s apparently needed:
Good Omens is a fantasy comedy television series - Wikipedia
IMDb (owned by Amazon) classifies it as both “buddy comedy” and “dark comedy”, among other things.
It won an award from comedy.co.uk for Best TV Comedy Drama and Best Comedy of the Year in 2019 and the former again in 2023. That ^ link is from TP’s website.
It was nominated for a GLAAD award for Outstanding Comedy Series in 2024.
David Tennant was nominated for a BAFTA TV award for Male Performance in a Comedy in 2024.
David and Michael were both nominated for an Astra award for Best Actor in a Streaming Comedy Series in 2024.
People on tumblr created at least two polls asking if it was a comedy after season 2 aired and NG (🤬) confirmed it was a comedy. CW: there’s a video of NG accepting the award at the top of the post linked above ^^ There are screenshots below the cut for anyone who wants to see the relevant parts without his face. They still show two extremely short (6 words or fewer) posts from NG.
Uh...where exactly is that "horror ending" supposed to be in the book? That post is NUTS! No one would ever have debated whether GO was a comedy after the book and s1.
Ykes a lot of masks keep falling off as more and more finale enjoyers show their true colors. Anyways no, I've never found Good Omens or any other Terry Pratchett books in the horror section, so I don't even know where you people wanna come at us calling us idiots and media illiterate while trying to gaslight us into any kind of wild headcanon, from "the finale is good writing" to "good omens is not a comedy". Anyways if it helps, on imdb the closest thing is "dark comedy". There's not a trace of "horror" anywhere. On good reads the horror category doesn't even make it to the first 100 tags. Only 136 ppl out of of 46,297 shelved it as horror. What else can I tell you... You're wrong.
Literary genre and "section of the bookstore where the book is kept" are not the same thing. Genre and "category people put things in on goodreads" are not the same thing. Genre and "marketing category for Prime Video" are not the same thing. Genre is determined by what happens in the story, not how imdb or the BAFTAs classify the show. And only genre, not external classification, predicts outcome for the main characters.
And even genre isn't necessarily reliable! Show!Omens technically fits the genre of romantic comedy as well as the genres of cosmic horror, dystopian fiction, and romantic tragedy, but it doesn't fit in the romantic comedy genre in a typical way, and certainly not in a way that feels like romantic comedy.
"I don't even know where you people want to come at us calling us idiots and media illiterate while trying to gaslight us into any kind of wild headcanon from 'the finale is good writing' to "good omens is not a comedy."
There are a number of problems with this statement. I don't represent any group, I'm not speaking for anyone else, and I can't answer for things other people have said, so I can't claim to be a "you people." It's just me.
My op is not intended to "come for" anybody. It's definitely venting, but it's not targeted at amyone or any post specifically, and I made it on a different platform than the one where I saw the latest "Good Omens is supposed to be a comedy" statement that inspired it.
I did not call anybody an idiot. This is something you made up. I didn't even imply anything about anyone being an idiot. I do not think that.
Also--and you're the 3rd person I've seen misuse this term today, so you're not alone--media literacy and literacy are not the same thing. I didn't say anything at all about media literacy.
Media literacy is awareness of the sources and biases in media as part of distinguishing reliable information from unreliable information. Literacy is the ability to glean information from a text and analyze that information in order to reach conclusions about it.
"The finale is good writing," which I also did not say, and "Good Omens is not a comedy," which I did, are not examples of "gaslighting." They're just opinions--subjective statements. People having different opinions--even bad ones--doesn't mean they're trying to gaslight you. That's not what gaslighting is.
Gaslighting is denying events in physical reality to make the victim feel crazy. "There were never any cookies" spoken around a mouthful of cookies is an example of gaslighting.
Opinions also aren't "headcanons." Headcanons are beliefs about in-universe events. "Neo cuts his own hair with nail scissors" would be a headcanon. "The Matrix is religious allegory" would be an opinion.
I acknowledge that there's plenty in my original post to disagree with, even to take offense at, but I want to be clear on what I said and didn't say and what the terms I used mean.
Actual book dealer here! Here's the record on Ingram showing Good omens BISAC categories. BISAC is the system used by most publishers, distributors, and bookstores in North America for determining what category books belong in.
Individual bookstores may vary on which of the potential categories they physically stick it in for purposes of customers finding it, but the computer inventory likely still puts it in all of them when they start filtering or searching.
That Christian/ Biblical category mostly includes a lot of historical fiction but has a few other oddball things that probably would now be assigned to a more specific category that didn't exist previously.
Larger Fiction/Christian category includes things like the Love Inspired romances, Left Behind, and all the historical spec fic about "what if Pope Something was actually a woman!" It's a broad category.
I don't think most booksellers would shelve Good Omens with their historical fiction about Abraham, but that's why there's multiple options. Nor would they put it in general humor fiction next to Garrison Keillor's Lake Wobegon series.
Which then lands it in either fantasy or scifi. If they have the space for it, they might pull out an additional subgenre but it's still likely located next to the main category.
Okay, now let's look at some other versions of Good Omens and their BISAC categories!
I just hope that in my life I can be imbued with the same sense of timing about extracting myself from situations as Douglas Mackinnon did with getting the fuck out of Good Omens

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Sometimes you just need to let go of the bitter end, and go back to the beginning.
Same here
One of the many downsides of the Hail Mary being a suicide mission is that Armando is likely only equipped to keep astronauts alive for as long as they're useful to the mission.
Obviously this is going to be reflected in the amount of painkillers and general medicines he's been supplied with— enough for three astronauts to last several months to a few years max— but also… there's really no point in keeping any of those astronauts alive after they stop being useful to the mission.
Grace finds this out when he gets to a certain point in his starvation on the journey to Erid and, instead of offering medical advice, Armando announces that Doctor Grace is far too sick to continue being of use and so it’s recommended that his fellow crew members euthanise him to save on resources.
That is. Not a good day for shipboard morale.