
izzy's playlists!
Show & Tell


YOU ARE THE REASON

ē„ę„ / Permanent Vacation
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

ā
noise dept.
Sade Olutola

Discoholic šŖ©
wallacepolsom
$LAYYYTER
i don't do bad sauce passes
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
we're not kids anymore.

tannertan36
KIROKAZE

PR's Tumblrdome
h

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from Australia

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Türkiye
seen from Jordan
seen from Serbia
@tapdancingmutantboy

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
@nonbinaryjudean you made such a good point here and I just want to add the fun bonus layer of them also simultaneously denying that the tribe they are claiming heritage of is in fact the real tribe. Their argument eats itself. Where pray tell do they think the genetic model to compare against.... came from?
There was recently a post in a Jewish group on Facebook where someone was sharing her disappointment in a 'friend' who was buying into antisemitic propaganda, and her dismay that this 'normal', 'intelligent' and 'not antisemitic' person could be sharing the kinds of things he has been sharing.
Someone responded to say that this is NOT normal and that no normal person believes these things. I responded, and wanted to post it here just so that I have easy access to it:
I agree that it's abhorrent and that people who are buying into these conspiracy theories should be held accountable and we should recognise their thought processes and behaviour as being conspiracy theorist, hateful and bigoted.
But no one is immune to propaganda, so 'normal people' absolutely can be influenced and can buy in to conspiracy theories. That's what makes them so dangerous. To have influence over people, the influencer has to understand how human nature works. It's easier and quicker to work WITH human nature than against it. Conspiracy theories DO rely on pre-existing prejudices much of the time (and if you read any book on conspiracy theories it will be noted that Jews have always been the perfect 'Other' for people to distrust) so most of these people were prejudiced even if they didn't recognise it and even if it only showed in ways that seemed fairly innocuous and easy to let go of ('Jews are tight with money. No, I'm not antisemitic! I LIKE Jews! It's not a bad thing! Being tight with money is one of the reasons they're so successful!')...
BUT there's also lots of other influence involved which is creating this perfect storm for antisemitism to grow and spread and also to silence anyone who recognises it and is uncomfortable with it (but too scared to speak up). You just need to know what things influence people/what things people use to make those shortcuts instead of thinking it out for themselves.
Appeal to emotions via rage bait and upsetting content and claims. Conspiracy theories are based on intuitive/emotional thinking rather than logical.
Authority. Get the right kind of people to say the right kinds of things (professors, well liked celebrities, political figures, news outlets) and people who trust them and/or are usually aligned with those peoples/organisations stance will believe them.
People tend to go with the majority: get others parroting the propaganda and others will take the mental shortcut into thinking, 'Well if everyone else thinks it, it must be true, so I should think that, too!' Creating a majority or the illusion of a majority thinking/saying/doing something often persuades others to think/say/do the same things.
Create an 'Other' to blame everything on (typical cult/conspiracy theorist tactic) and create an 'us vs them' to prevent the indoctrinated from doubting and to convince people who haven't taken a side that they need to (because we do like to take sides and pick teams, and even when it's something as ultimately meaningless as 'cats vs dogs' or 'coke vs pepsi' people tend to become very tribal and passionate about it).
Weaponise language by introducing new language or changing the meanings of words to control communication, obfuscate situations, and shut down discussions with 'non-believers' (to prevent people accessing the truth or even just a different perspective in good faith).
Use chants and mottos and introduce a uniform of sorts and unifying imagery to create a feeling of belonging amongst the indoctrinated.
All these things make people feel good about themselves and make them feel more committed to and trusting of other people who use the same language and the same symbols (and distrustful of those that don't).
And! It's easier to create a majority if your 'Other' is a minority and Jews are a particularly tiny minority! If people are taking sides and your side is already bigger, you have an advantage! It's also less likely that people will know Jews or understand Jewish culture to be able to see through the libels. Interestingly, having already been struck by the similarity between anti-Jewish propaganda and anti-trans propaganda, just today I saw someone I know had shared a post that said anti-trans reporting in the media has been grossly disproportionate considering how tiny a demographic trans people are, which is EXACTLY the situation with Israel which has a disproportionate amount of coverage (even before October 7th, a journalist described how the news outlet he worked for had a hugely disproportionate number of staff dedicated to covering Israel compared to other countries, and the news was also disproportionately negative because they weren't allowed to report anything that might seem positive).
Introduce consequences for outsiders (or any indoctrinated who start to doubt the doctrine). For social creatures, just being excommunicated or thought poorly of by the group is enough to alter our behaviour much of the time. If voicing any dissent will get you labelled a genocide supporter and will mean your community will excommunicate you, it's easier to just continue to go along with it (or to at the very least to be silent - so all those people who haven't parroted propaganda but have been suspiciously silent about violence against Jews (when they're the kind of people you'd have expected to speak up) are likely aware that any support for Jews would cause some backlash from their professional or social crowd - and instead of deciding to do the right thing anyway, they're complicit through omission to speak out against it.
The reason I think it's important to recognise that ordinary people can be influenced in this way, and can even be brainwashed into thinking and behaving in ways that they ordinarily wouldn't, is that recognising we are all vulnerable to influence does go some way to protecting us. Whereas believing ourselves immune (whether we think we're too intelligent to be suckered in, or too empathetic to ever become hateful towards a minority) makes us even more vulnerable. If more people were able to recognise this, perhaps they would be better at reflecting and recognising how they've been influenced and would work on finding ways to de-programme themselves.
I also wonder whether understanding influence could also help us turn the tide/redress the balance. For example, we tend to spend a lot of time bemoaning the fact that so many leftists who should be allies aren't speaking up. And that's fair! Of course we're angry and we want to make it clear that we aren't happy with how let down we've been by our friends and non-Jewish communities. But actually, because most people are influenced by the popular stance and don't want to stand out or do anything that goes against the crowd, that reinforces that they *shouldn't* speak up, because no one else is. There are of course people who do the right thing regardless, but they're far less common (because that goes against human nature in a way - those are the people who can better grapple with cognitive dissonance, nuance, and value truth over group acceptance).
God promised me 3000 years ago that my enemies would be morons
When leftists talk about putting Zionists in internment camps and castrate them (for being pedophiles), I think we're playing the same word substitution game as the far-right. It doesn't matter if they don't identify as Nazis, because the essence is the same. It doesn't matter if they don't think Zionists equate to Jews, because the essence is the same. It doesn't matter if the castration is, on paper, an anti-pedophile effort, because the essence is the same as Nazis castrating imprisoned Polish men to make better slaves. Exact wording gets in the way of meaning. We're about to King Lear ourselves into a second Holocaust.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Comments: Always means always.
"I'm not an antisemite but" - you are
"Its not antisemitic to" - it is
"Israelis made antisemitism into" - we didn't, it's what it is
Let me help you. Like any other form of racism and bigotry, if you need to clarify whether the bullshit you spew is antisemitic or not, it is, and you're an antisemite.
This is kinda a follow up to your previously answered anon. I also found your blog a couple months or so ago now and have read through several of your posts. While you (and others) have made me reconsider previous stances and have changed my mind on several key factors about the I/P conflict, admittedly there is a lot that i still wrestle with and somewhat disagree with. That being said, I do respect and appreciate your throughness and moral consistency which i find incredibly refreshing. So to continue with this wrestling of thoughts, I'd like to ask what resources you use in your own research. I have followed a few links of your more academic/historcal sources and have found them behind paywalls or to just be snippets of a larger text (as in the case with book previews). I know the most basic thing is to start with a history textbook but those tend to be vauge and lack nuance. Additionally, what online news sources do you use/trust since the MSM is untrustworthy. I find myself lost often in a maze of confusion and contradiction. Again, thanks for what you've done on this page, there are a lot of people out there who could stand to read through it and learn something.
While you (and others) have made me reconsider previous stances and have changed my mind on several key factors about the I/P conflict, admittedly there is a lot that i still wrestle with and somewhat disagree with.
Good!
You should be skeptical. You should wrestle with things that don't sit right with you. You should disagree - and you should do so with facts and reasoning! You're Doing It Right, Anon!
(Please consider sharing some of your disagreements, okay? There's nothing I like better than constructive disagreement.)
I'd like to ask what resources you use in your own research.
I was, decades ago, a librarian.
Librarians are trained to take what may seem like an odd position on information: it's all information.
It might be accurate, it might be sloppy, it might be biased, and it might be dishonest...
...but even dishonest propaganda can tell you important things about the time/place/person who produced it.
I don't rule out any source. Al Jazeera English, even while lying, tells you a great deal about what Qataar wants anglophonic people to think. Ha'aretz tells you a great deal about what the international left wants to hear.
All sources have some value - the work of understanding the context and intent of each is on you.
I have followed a few links of your more academic/historcal sources and have found them behind paywalls or to just be snippets of a larger text (as in the case with book previews).
When I wrote for academic publications, I'd produce the citation and move on - that's how academic publishing works. The reader can verify with or without a librarian's help, and the burden is on them to confirm the cited work actually supports the assertion - but most readers were in my field and were familiar with the works I cited.
Writing for non-academics on social media on topics most readers have barely studied is a different thing entirely.
I don't want to assert something and ask readers to trust that the citation supports it, or require them to go hunting for it if another option is available.
We've all seen the dishonest tactic (on Wikipedia and elsewhere) where the writer makes a claim the cited source doesn't actually support. So I try to find sources I can link to with the explicit supporting text visible.
Sometimes it'll be excerpted in a book review. Sometimes I manage to link a pirated copy. Sometimes I'll snag a screencap or snap a photo of a source. When I can, I post links that bypass paywalls. Sometimes a DOI link is the best I can do.
It's all imperfect, but it's better than "trust me, bro" ...which is appallingly the norm right now.
We all need to be more skeptical. Read the links. Check the citations. Require sources for factual assertions. Linking things that are immediately checkable helps builds trust - and if I want readers to see me as credible, nothing matters more than that.
That being said, I do respect and appreciate your throughness and moral consistency which i find incredibly refreshing.
That's more important to me than agreement - thank you. I'm not always right, but I'd like to always be trustworthy.
...what online news sources do you use/trust since the MSM is untrustworthy.
I use all of them. I trust none of them.
Bias is inescapable. I think humans learn from and are driven primarily by narrative - and narrative will always have a perspective. Bias isn't a bug, it's a feature - and it isn't your enemy.
From a previous post on Bias:
You don't need to trust a source completely to learn something from it. In fact, the most valuable sources are often obviously biased. 1. Identify the Bias Before even reading, know what kind of outlet you're dealing with. Look at its about page, ownership, funding/revenue model, recurring columnists, and core audience. Does it lean left? Right? Is it globalist? Nationalist? Religious? Secular? Knowing this lets you anticipate the angle and spot distortions more easily. The more you do it, the easier it gets. After a little practice, you'll see clearly (for example) the huge right wing bias of the Jerusalem Post, the huge left wing bias of Ha'aretz, and how The Times of Israel is mostly pretty disciplined (in their news gathering and framing) about minimizing left/right political biases. None of these three is perfect, but seeing their usual, institutional biases lets you read them against each other. 2. Use It for Contrast Biased outlets often highlight stories others avoid or ignore. Fox News may underplay climate change but overplay immigration crime. Al Jazeera will underplay Hamas human rights abuses but spotlight in depth the most embarrassing moments in Israeli politics. The Jerusalem Post will underplay corruption charges against Netanyahu and spotlight the most depraved behaviors committed in the name of Hamas. Use this to your advantage. Compare coverage across ideological lines. The contrast tells you volumes about outfit AND audience. 3. Look for Hard Facts Don't quote the adjectives. Quote the data. What happened? When? Where? Who said it? What did the video actually show? Stop taking an analyst's word as truth - see it as a lens to try on at look at the facts through. If the lens helps it make sense, put it in your back pocket for later use. Strip away the spin, extract the structure. 4. Cross-Reference Across Angles Treat each biased source as one side of a triangle. To understand the shape of a thing, you need multiple sides. Balance a left-wing story with a right-wing one. Add an international perspective. Compare them. Over time, you start seeing the shape of the event instead of the biases of each outfit.
It's time consuming and it's hard work - but it's worth doing.
If you like, you can check out the Signal > Noise tag for bite-size lessons in media literacy.
...since the MSM is untrustworthy.
"Mainstream Media," is too broad a term to be meaningful.
There are charlatans and truth-tellers everywhere. We should trust people based on their records of intellectual honesty and responsible journalistic behavior.
I think the NYT has become a sloppy, lazy, ideologically bent advocacy operation instead of a source of journalism, but there are still things to learn from the NYT and there are still people working there whose voices are worth hearing.
I'm not going to assume everything in its pages is shit.
The world just isn't that simple.
Embrace complexity. Read and listen to smart, honest people with whom you disagree. It's time consuming, challenging, and often annoying - but it'll let you see the world far more clearly than splitting all information sources into a false binary of "trustworthy" and "deceptive."
Read everything - skeptically and critically.
There really aren't any shortcuts.
I often have people asking me about reliable sources for factual information. This post captures why I have such a difficult time answering that question. Because the skill that people need to learn is not, "who / what is always trustworthy?" but rather "how can I learn to separate factual information from non-factual information regardless of a sources general trustworthiness?" Because, let's face it, no one is trustworthy 100% of the time, if by trustworthy you mean "factual and unbiased." I'm not, you are not, and our most hated and beloved media sources are not. That's part of being human. Even when we're well intentioned, we have limited perspectives. The key is learning to identify limitations in our own perspectives and limitations in the perspectives of others. That tells us what information we might be missing and can guide us in finding it.
YES.
@wowbright makes me realize how prolix my writing is
On This Day ā May 19, 1940
Nazis preferred to expel Jews ā but in a way that would kill them without Germans pulling the trigger.
This day, the Warsaw Ghetto was sealed (trapping nearly 400,000 Jews behind walls & barbed wire); and Hitler personally approved the Madagascar Plan: forcibly deport every Jew in Europe to the remote island of Madagascar, where they would be abandoned with nothing and left to die from disease, starvation, and the brutal climate.
This was extermination by deliberate abandonment.
Before the industrialized āFinal Solution,ā the Nazis tried repeatedly to get rid of their Jews: robbing them, stripping citizenship, forcing emigration, and floating deadly relocation schemes like Madagascar. But no country would take them.
The U.S. had its racist quota laws. Britain enforced the cruel and illegal 1939 White Paper shutting Mandate Palestine to Jewish refugees. Most nations slammed their doors completely. The world, quite simply, looked away.
The Madagascar Plan collapsed because Germany failed to defeat Britain in the Battle of Britain and lost control of the seas needed to ship millions of people. Once expulsion became impossible, the Nazis shifted from āget them outā to ākill them all.ā
Six weeks later they invaded the Soviet Union and launched the āHolocaust by Bulletsā ā the Einsatzgruppen mass shootings that murdered ~1.5 million Jews. By early 1942 the gas chambers were operating at full scale.
The Holocaust was not inevitable from day one. The Nazis and their collaborators are the only ones who carried out the genocide, but that does not mean we forget that the civilized world refused to let Jews escape.
May 19, 1940, is a brutal reminder: when Jews have nowhere to run, the killers always find another way.
Only Israel ensures āNever Againā is a promise, not just a slogan.
@CptAllenHistory
When antizionists go āIsrael needs antisemitism to legitimise its settler colonial apartheid genocide state blah blah blah,ā - if you really, truly, honestly believe that, then why the fuck are you doing its job for it? If you really, truly, honestly believe that, then why arenāt you bending over backwards to make sure everywhere else is the safest, most welcoming place possible for Jews?
Could it possibly be youāre full of shit and you know it? Could it possibly be you donāt want Jews in Israel but you donāt want them anywhere else either? Thereās a word for that and it begins with N.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I saw a rae_review video about a woman who murdered her husband and his new wife, and, somewhat surprisingly, something she said resonated with me.
She was speaking about betrayal trauma (and her belief that the murder occurred because the murderer had been used, then gaslit, and was let down by the professionals she sought assistance from).
Her description of betrayal trauma:
This isn't heartbreak. This is a profound psychological injury that happens when someone you deeply trust or depend on for emotional or physical survival violates your trust. It is deeply dysregulating and traumatising because it really shatters your reality and it stops your ability to trust. This is what can happen if you discover that the institutions and people you thought you can trust, you can't. And what the untreated psychological torment and betrayal trauma can do to somebody if their pain isn't witnessed. Because if the pain doesn't have anywhere to go it goes inward and starts to metastasise and eats away at everything good in you.
And some of that seemed to kind of describe what Jews experienced on and after October 7th. Lots of betrayal, lots of gaslighting, a feeling that society has been lying to us about everything it is and everything it believes in, friends have lied about who they are. All the pain of seeing our people massacred, losing friends and family members, and then the repeated pains of all those betrayals has not really been witnessed (because we keep getting gaslit).
Some descriptions of betrayal trauma specify that the harm to cause betrayal trauma would come from significant betrayal by someone close to you, that you rely on, and obviously what I'm describing isn't quite as intimate. But it also describes institutional betrayal: When organizations, workplaces, or religious institutions cover up harm or fail to protect members. And, in a lot of ways, the betrayal is coming from an... entity?... we rely on to survive. If society turns against us, or doesn't adequately protect us, our safety and our lives can be at stake. And hasn't that been the most shocking thing? Even more so than friends. Individual people proving themselves to be easily influenced or secretly prejudiced is disappointing, sometimes bitterly so, but we assume that the organisations we rely on and trust are more robust and less likely to fail so spectacularly. Seeing how organisations that are trusted, even beloved by people, are not only letting Jews down but are actively causing harm? Extreme mindfuck.
And the amount of betrayal is what really sets it apart. This one issue (how they reacted (or didn't) to a massacre, then how they reacted (or didn't) to attacks on Jews in the diaspora. Seeing these horrific things happen to our people, and the world either ignoring it or celebrating it or denying it or justifying it. Everything we thought we knew about people was rocked. Almost everybody let us down. Friends, social groups, but also communities we belonged to or felt a part of, organisations and political parties we supported (so the betrayal felt more personal), but also organisations we might not have had any personal relationship with but had assumed had some level of decency and drive to do the right thing by everyone that could be relied on.
It was bad enough in the immediate aftermath, but we've had two and a half years of repeated, incessant betrayals.
Alongside the initial betrayal, there was probably some hope (or betrayal denial, I guess) and we gave too many chances, which just meant being disappointed again and again.
'They aren't speaking because they don't know, but when they realise, they'll speak up. They're scared to upset their pro-Palestine friends if they seem to be supporting Israel which is why they won't speak up for Israeli Jews, but they'll speak up for diaspora Jews getting hurt if it comes to it. Okay, they didn't speak up for those diaspora Jews being attacked but maybe they don't know about it and it's in a different country. They didn't speak up for those Jews being pogrommed but I'm sure if anything happens here they'll speak up...' On neighbourhood apps or groups, the people who would reliably step in if someone posted any prejudiced comments against other groups were nowhere to be seen when derogatory and hateful comments were made about Jews. Workplaces that celebrate various religious and cultural events chose to ignore Jewish events. All those 'punch a nazi' people suddenly turning a blind eye when the people throwing up nazi salutes and frothing about how they want to kill Jews are wearing keffiyehs.
Things continued to escalate both in severity and in spread. It's like wildfire, and all the friends, communities, organisations, we thought would put it out have just stood by and watched, fanned the flames, or even thrown on accelerant. We were even told, for a long time, by a lot of people, that there is no fire. We're making it up. Even as we watched it consuming Jewish establishments and Jewish lives.
So is it any wonder if we see a keffiyeh or Palestine flag or watermelon emoji and feel kind of uncomfortable, or even repulsed? Those things have become so deeply associated with all those many betrayals that it's hard not to associate them with hatefulness, gaslighting, lies, spite, abandonment, distrust...
Antizionism is Jew-hatred that hurts EVERYONE.
Stand up, speak up, name it, shame it.
source: theresherhymes
Hey students, hereās a pro tip: do not write an email to your prof while youāre seriously sick.
Signed, a person who somehow came up withĀ ādear hello, I am sick and not sure if Iāll be alive to come tomorrow and Iām sorry, best slutantions, [name]ā.
I mean, if someone wrote that to me, Iād probably believe they were sick.
āSlutantionsā has me crying laughing
i once emailed my professor with a migraine. a mistake.
āI amsick will not to choir because i have a heache. i Hope its very and i am so sorry
love,
blueā
the subject line was āOWā
THE SUBJECT LINE IS THE BEST PART JSJFJSJDJS JUST IMAGINE GETTING AN EMAIL WITH NO CONTEXT OTHER THAN āOWā
As someone who has taught college, please send those emails because 1) We WILL believe that; no one would write that on purpose and 2) we need a laugh sometimes.
On the other side of this, once after getting taken to the ER by ambulance, I got an email from the professor whose class Iād passed out in, and the message had no text, just the subject line āyou good?ā
Reblogging for the last addition
Claritin makes me weird, but I have allergies so thereās about a month and a half block of time where Iām taking Claritin and am just weird most of the time.
Anyway, my last year of college, I got the flu or something in late March and was also taking Mucinex. I told my professor I couldnāt come to class one day by email except I couldnt think of what to say, so my medicated ass decided to make a Fry meme. I think it said something like āNot sure if I can go to class with a head the size of Texas, bottom text.ā I didnāt think until the next day that it probably wasnāt socially-acceptable to tell your philosophy professor you werenāt coming to class via Tumblr style memes. When i got back to class, i found that sheād printed it out and taped it to the classroom bulletin board.
Oh shit you guys i turned on my WinXP laptop that I used to use back then.
IT WAS ON THE DESKTOP. THIS IS WHAT I SENT.
Itās even worse than i remember it
I laugh myself hoarse every time this post comes around, so here it is again.
Once emailed a professor from my hospital bed high on painkillers after a really bad car crash which my heart actually stopped the email āDead cant class soryā
i was very sick over new years and one day i woke up to find i had emailed my manager in the middle of the night:
she said it was the most beautiful sick email sheās ever gotten
had a similar situation that inspired one of my older comics. they absolutely gave me shit for it when I got back to the office.
Goyish internet acquaintance: Shares whole infographic post on Facebook about how to combat antizionism. Nice!
Same goyish internet acquaintance: Shares āanti-zionist Jewish authorsā post on insta. Ugh.
I guess it proves people donāt actually think for themselves, or necessarily believe in or understand the things they share, they just share whatever they think makes them look like an ally. Whatever sounds right at a glance. Even if they end up contradicting themselves.
yehudimomrim:
The only thing I am left with after watching Jews turn out their pockets to prove Israeli guards didnāt train dogs to S/A prisoners.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
You know I keep giving people the benefit of the doubt thinking they might just not know what's going on in my country or are just seeing the news echoing IRGC propaganda and I keep engaging with them and explaining things only for it to come down to these alternatives: you're a paid agent, you're a Nazi, you don't know anything so let me (who's doping on ideologies) educate you (who lived under the islamist state all your life)
Well it's clear to me that you're not looking for an answer now, you just want reconfirm your virtue and morals. As if discourse and debate is ever going to be more real than experience. I had hope and now I don't and I am done falling for this shit.
You know I actually need to add to this:
In 2016 when Trump first became president, even though I was inside Iran and dealing with the shit happening there, I was worried for the safety of the queer community. At that point there were a lot of concerns around that topic. Only for the same Queer community to tell me and other members of Iranian LGBTQ+ community that we should just live in quiet and not expose ourselves instead of asking for outside help against IRGC. Same fucking assholes that preach about loudly being yourself, told us that we don't deserve the same thing.
When October 7th happened I was actually worried about Gaza, Despite the long history of hatred between us and how my people were foregone in the name of "freeing palestine". Only for that same crowd to call us liars and Mossad agents, to turn around and protest for IRGC to stay in power, carrying Khamenei's photo around wearing Chafiehs or whatever tf you people call the white striped cloth.
This is my reality. All the people and every single community that I thought stood for liberty and freedom, every single organisation that I thought would stand with us in our demands for basic human rights, turned their backs against us.
So I'm sorry but no, me, my family's, my friends', and my nation's freedom is not up for debate. You won't find the vindication youre looking for here, take your discourse somewhere else.
The first step to enlightenment is realizing the pro palestine movement and pretty much any leftist movement is a fake pile of shit abusing the real plight of people for political gain
Peak Iranian Experience(TM) moment
I literally had someone tell me today that I "just want to be hateful while spouting leftist ideals" and then they called for the ethnic cleansing of Jews. Same sentence.
They literally don't care who they hurt if it means they can hate Jews. And unfortunately that also means you.
Know that I know better. I pray nightly for your safety, and that you see freedom in your lifetimes--swiftly and without delay.
When you see some really cool art and you go to reblog it, but this artist that you've never seen before inexplicably has you blocked, so just have to think... "What is the charge? Being a Jew? A succulent sexy Jew?"