#syscourse unaligned

I hate how misunderstood osdd-1a is. I made a post a while ago talking about systemhood with a lack of amnesia barriers like osdd-1b and alters like osdd-1a, and so many ppl were like "so you mean a singlet" no that's actually not what I fucking said. Osdd-1a does not mean "doesnt have alters" it means theyre less elaborated or differentiated, like theyre all fragments or just different "versions" of the same identity, or maybe they all appear the same in headspace but use different labels and names. The best analogy I have for it is all those 2016 sans undertale AU ensembles and comics people would draw, theyre all the same person just different "versions". It doesn't matter if alters aren't that different from one another, if you still hear them in ur head and they still front then they are not just "mood states" like bpd or cptsd.

Even if I am syscourse unaligned, I feel more drawn to pro endo spaces because I do not feel this systematic feeling of aggressiveness and miserably. "Endos die" and "endos kys" are common tags with anti endo people, as for now, I never saw an "anti-endo die/kys" tag.

Every time you say "plurality is CDD-only",

Disclaimer: This blog is completely neutral and does not claim a syscourse stance. We believe there's a lot to be gained from both sides of the community. Our posts are in-good-faith and meant to stir up honest conversation in all syscourse stances and beliefs.

Reminder :) the ISSTD says that DID is not rare