made a meme for anyone else out there who gets stuck in the "it wasnt that bad!" or "maybe im not traumatized!" loops because trauma denial sucks ass!!! you all are valid!!!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
So we had the great displeasure of talking to a Willo "system" (we did not know they were Willogenic until recently.) And they confessed. By this point we had LEARNED they were willo, because the whole conversation came up when we called them out. Basically it was this:
"We found a post saying you're willogenic, you do know we're anti willo, right? We've said this before."
"Well yes, but we wanted to try to subtly prove we exist to you..."
"It's not going to work. Why put in so much effort for a useless cause?"
"Because we have a crush on you :("
"What."
And then they went on a tangent like "we can put ourselves in a risky situation to get repetitive trauma if it means you'll like us more" (they apparently believe that DID can form at ages 15-16 as well. I'm not convinced that is possible, but even if it was, wtf???)
Anyway we rejected them, they got mad and blocked us, and we later on found out through a mutual that they "willoed" every headmate they knew we had into their "system" as a "willo subsys" (???) And were now saying they were dating that "subsys" ?????
syscringe users will be like “you don’t have DID just because your mommy yelled at you. DID is caused by experiencing Unimaginable Horrors in childhood” and then when u say you have DID because you experienced unimaginable horrors they don’t believe you
If professional, scientific evidence is released that systems can form without trauma, then I will retract my statement and stop posting anti-endo content. However, it has not. There is no evidence of trauma based disorders being possible without trauma.
And when I say evidence, I do not mean citing a .com site, or a caard or however it's spelled, a professional who said it COULD be possible, but more research must be looked into it. I mean actual studies, hard factual evidence that proves of the existence of nontraumagenic systems.
Unless genuine proof is given, I stand on my belief that systems are caused by heavy repetitive trauma from a young age, because that is what has been scientifically proven, and I'd rather believe the proven science over a group of people on the internet.
Clarification: even if they are proven to exist, I still don't believe that we need to share spaces with them. If endos can truly exist without trauma, then their experiences are far different than traumagenic systems, and they shouldn't act like they do.
Welp. My life has gone to shit so here's a notes game with me if you want to help out or not. I've been busy with work and therapy, and I don't do any self care or my hobbies and more, so here's bow many notes to do something for self care.
Update: Since you guys have actually been blowing this up, I decided if you guys can get this post to 1000, I'll deep clean my depression room. See new post for proof of teeth brushing and picture of depression room. Thank you guys so much for the help
Update 2: I actually ended up deep cleaning my depression room because I was very motivated one day, so feel free to leave suggestions for what I should do for 1000 notes
10 notes: I'll brush my teeth with toothpaste and floss
25 notes: take a shower
50 notes: Finish reading my book
100 notes: Process big trauma with our therapist (will happen on July 7th, 2025)
150 notes: eat three meals
200 notes: draw a full 2 page in my sketch book
250 notes: start and end chapter two in my memoir
300 notes: write and post a new poem
350 notes: make a doctor's appointment for my doctor to approve my top surgery and send it to my insurance
400: bleach and redye my hair (guys I really need to do this help)
500: fill out 20 profiles simply plural programmed alters
600: do my laundry
700: fill out 30 of our simply plural profiles of programmed alters
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
1. mega fakeclaiming, most of us have stated we are introjects
2. making up anti willo blogs?? theres no anti willo andy OR lele or wtv her name is
3. i havent seen ANY anti willo/endo character post tell endos that they should die. i have also never seen any of them go to pro endos directly without a pro endo interacting first
4. we DO focus on uplifting people with DID. AND PDID and UDD and OSDD-1, all which you fail to name. if youre going to "uplift" us, name all of us.
5. a lot of us are introjects, not "dolls" we play with. your "characters" are introjects and we are anti endo. and in my specific case, im from the team itself where i can literally confirm we are anti willo and endo. we used to make fun of you.
6. is DID the only disorder with systems that you can name? i thought you knew better since youre playing godsend here. recently i have furthered my research in understanding multiple treatments that have worked for CDD systems, including CDD specific IFS treatments. i have recently been able to apologize and fix things when i was mistaken and assist in wanting to educate people that needed it.
do you think fakeclaiming gets you anywhere? if introjects are little roleplay dolls to you i hate to say it but then youre not uplifting shit OR educating shit
by the way, the difference between pro endo and pro willo is that endogens are born systems and willogens are "willed" into existence. but you should know that. except you dont for some reason.
we can make as many blogs as we want btw! and if it pisses u off ill make more! thank youuuu
I saw a post that disgruntled me enough to want to talk about this, so here we are. There seems to be a heavy amount of misinformation on what "counts" as OEA, often excluding adult victims and non-programmed victims. So, within this post, we'll go over what the terms "OA, MC, and RA" mean, as well as commonly construed myths.
Organized Abuse
all-encompassing.
Organized abuse is a wide term that includes experiences of ritual abuse and mind control but is in no way exclusive to them. Often, only organized child sexual abuse is mentioned, which leaves out a lot of experiences it includes.
The most simple definition of organized abuse is "Abuse that involves a number of people doing something together in a pre-planned and/or structured way, rather than acting alone." In short terms, abuse done by multiple people in a planned way. [1]
All groups under the RAMCOA/OEA label will fall under this category. This includes, but is not limited to, Cults, Trafficking Rings, Labor Camps, "Troubled Teen" Camps, Intra-Familial Organized Abuse, and other experiences that fall under this definition. This includes victims indoctrinated into cults, trafficked, or otherwise abused as adults, as well as children born or brought into it. Location of the abuse (at home, in a church, at school, at a daycare, etc) doesn't matter, and someone does not have to go through ritual abuse or mind control to have experienced organized abuse.
Ritual Abuse
not inherently satanic.
Ritual abuse is a term often confused with SRA, or "Satanic Ritual Abuse," an outdated and often harmful label for forms of organized extreme abuse. Not all forms of organized abuse are ritual abuse.
Ritual abuse can be defined as "Abuse that occurs in a context where symbols or activities have superstitious, supernatural, or religious connotations. It is organised, often involving multiple perpetrators, and the abuse often happens as part of a rite or ceremony." Alternatively, the word 'ritual' refers to "a rite, ceremony or pseudo- religious service which involves a series of actions performed in a fixed order and/or at certain times; something that is done in the same way whenever a particular situation occurs." [1] [2]
Because of this, ritual abuse can be defined while including spiritual themes and non spiritual themes. So, many definitions include other forms of abuse that is ritualized/specifically repeated in nature, such as on a specific day or time or in a specific order.
This type of abuse is most dominated in literature by satanic overtones, once again from the term SRA. However, this is not exclusive to satanic cults. Any group based on a belief system or using other reoccurring themes/abuse can perpetrate ritual abuse. Though ritual abuse is also more commonly linked with mind control and child abuse, programming and age have no impact on if an experience is ritual abuse or not.
Survivors of ritual abuse include things like ritualistic ceremonies, games, symbols, set-ups, abuse on specific days/holidays, abuse in a specific order, etc as common experiences.
Mind Control
programming and beyond
Mind control tends to be the term that receives the most problems, as many people tend to only think of programming when hearing it. However, MC is not exclusive to programming survivors, and many types of MC have been recognized.
A good definition of MC is "Methods of thought reform to force submission or information from enemies and victims, or to indoctrinate and increase cooperation in members and captors," and is a synonym to coersive persuasion, defined as "attempts to force people to change beliefs, ideas, attitudes or behaviors using psychological pressure, undue influence, threats, anxiety, and/or intimidation." [3] [4]
Programming is an example of the far end of mind control, a severe form of conditioning. However, things such as cult and religious indoctrination, psychic driving, terrified submission, etc, are all also forms of MC that can occur within organized abuse. MC is not exclusive to child victims, as most forms of MC can be performed at any age.
Thank you for reading. If you have any questions or additions, feel free to send an ask or reply to this post. A reminder that I am not a professional, I am flawed, and I am just doing my best.
➜ @ a term for an alter who isn’t the core/original, but rather the remains/remnants of “who it was” (aka, who was told they are by abvsers) or whatever was left of the core who intergrated with fragments.
