TIL that there is journalism equivalent to the Bechdel Test. An article about a female scientist fails the āFinkbeiner Testā if it mentions one of seven topics regarding her womanhood
via reddit.com
The fact that sheās a woman
Her husbandās job
Her child-care arrangements
How she nurtures her underlings
How she was taken aback by the competitiveness in her field
How sheās such a role model for other women
How sheās the āfirst woman toā¦ā
Okay, one quote, and then you absolutely have to read the whole thing.Ā
Still, the virtue of some rules in Aschwandenās test is difficult to see at first. Take the rule of āno firsts.ā In the comments section below her post for Last Word on Nothing, Finkbeiner explained that no sooner had she taken the vow to ignore gender, than she caught herself writing that the astronomer she was profiling was the first to win a certain award. After a reader urged her to stick to her pledge, she removed it.
āThe fact that sheās the first woman to do that says a lot more about the prize-giving committee than it does about her,ā Finkbeiner explained in our interview. āSo if I were going to put that into a story, it would be a story about prejudice in that prize committee.ā
It blew my mind, because sheās right. The fact that thereās some many firsts left is the result of bias in the committees NOT IN THE WORK WOMEN DO




















