evoking bertholt brecht’s “the way people cast a play!” quote as a spell against prescriptive, stereotypical, fatalistic typecasting
idk what to tell you except go look at the fishwives
KIROKAZE
untitled

#extradirty
Show & Tell
art blog(derogatory)

Origami Around

tannertan36
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

ellievsbear

PR's Tumblrdome
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
cherry valley forever
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Keni

Misplaced Lens Cap
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Indonesia
seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Mexico
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye
@ashlgcostumes
evoking bertholt brecht’s “the way people cast a play!” quote as a spell against prescriptive, stereotypical, fatalistic typecasting
idk what to tell you except go look at the fishwives

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
so many misguided metaphors around violence and desire. if the open maw of a panting beast fills you with the want to be devoured, that does not make you prey. while the rabbit trembles in fear, its deepest desire is to run. evolution demands it. in fact, the desire to be eaten does not make you any small animal at all.
it makes you a fruit.
You might be a cordycep
Industry says government’s failure to address cooling demands means AI growth plans are ‘fatally flawed’
“There appears to be an assumption that the country will always have enough water for its economic needs,” the briefing said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.” In May, a House of Lords report said England faced a 5bn litre a day shortfall for public water supplies by 2055. Water UK said datacentres were already being built in water-stressed areas, with more than three-quarters located in the south and east of England. Millions of people in these regions have been placed under a hosepipe ban by water companies after prolonged extreme heat and lack of rainfall.
[...]
The government has designated datacentres as critical national infrastructure, on the basis that their loss or compromise could result in “major detrimental impact on the availability, integrity or delivery of essential services” and “significant impact on national security, national defence, or the functioning of the state”. Oliver Hayes, head of big tech and campaigns at the campaign group Global Action Plan, said it was not clear why datacentres had been given this status, but that water companies may be powerless to restrict their water use as a result. This could risk datacentres being prioritised over households at times of peak water demand. “I think it is highly likely that we’re going to end up seeing datacentres that are actually running chatbots, or enabling people to do benign and very wasteful, pointless things, protected and given favourable treatment when it comes to resources,” Hayes said.
21 July 2026
A reasonably significant factor in this is actually GDPR - not the most significant by a long way, but a surprising amount of data now HAS to be stored and processed in the UK. This ranges from things as complex and vital as “running the railways” where it’s a matter of security to have everything in house, all the way down to “the contact details of everyone who signed up to this small museums mailing list” where they’re not equipped to hunt down international data centres who are GDPR compliant (and may indeed not even know where their data is being stored and accessed). It’s a pretty fascinating landscape out there
To put it very bluntly.
You will always make a better impact helping people who need it than trying to hurt people you think deserve it.
the idea that restrooms, locker rooms, etc need to be single-sex spaces in order for women to be safe is patriarchy's way of signalling to men & boys that society doesn't expect them to behave themselves around women. it is directly antifeminist. it would be antifeminist even if trans people did not exist. a feminist society would demand that women should be safe in all spaces even when there are men there.
btw this is maybe the single most key distinguishing feature of the terfy strains of radical feminism, the seed all the rest of it springs out of: they have absolutely no faith in the ability of feminism to actually destroy patriarchy. they do not think feminism can truly build a better world. they cannot really even imagine that possibility. they think patriarchy is an inevitable natural consequence of unchangeable biological facts, and therefore the goal of feminism can only be to mitigate the worst effects of patriarchy, not to get rid of it.
they can imagine a society where women get some designated safe spaces without men around. they cannot imagine a society where the presence of men is not inherently a danger to women.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
My son I love you but why
Devastating! Art museum gift shop doesn’t sell prints of specific and unpopular painting that struck a cord with you!
Ocean Blue - Jeanne Rosier Smith , 2020.
American , b. 1966 -
Pastel , 32 x 20 in.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
~ Etiquette, Jr., by Mary Elizabeth Clark and Margery Closey Quigley, 1965
Serious question , if “you cannot force your oppressors to stop seeing you as a subhuman” then what’s the point of passing any anti bigotry law?
you cannot stop someone from seeing you as subhuman. you can try to legally prevent them from acting on it.
It's not "incorrect" to treat tabletop RPG character creation as a guided OC creation tool – heck, it's not even novel; the first published tabletop RPG to explicitly frame character creation as a standalone solo minigame came out in like 1977 – but you do need to recognise that each character creation system is tuned to produce a very particular Type of Guy. Yes, even the ostensibly "generic" ones. This isn't a flaw – obviously you want character creation for a game to strongly push people toward creating characters who are both willing and able to participate in the things the game in question is about – but it's something to be aware of when using tabletop RPGs in this way. If you're trying to use Dungeons & Dragons as a creative framework for a character who would never under any circumstances voluntarily go into a dungeon to fight a dragon, you're gonna have a rough time!
WoD’s kinda messy character creation could probably be streamlined into the question “what’s wrong with you??” Tbh
literally the worst way of ending a series is “all the survivors are happily straight married with tons and tons of babies!”
people still getting mad at this post i made in 2014 so I will add here. in 2026. that the point of this post isn’t “happy endings bad” its when the story’s only way to imagine a happy ending is a heterosexual nuclear family for everyone.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
many will attempt to "end" the hug after only five to ten seconds of holding you. crucially, this is where the claws come into play
I used to think “soupçon” was a French word for crouton and I used it as the French word for crouton for a long time and nobody stopped me.
Soupçon actually means “suspicion” and the reason nobody called me out on this is because I would use the word to imply the idea of something sprinkled on top of something else ala croutons. If someone said, “A soupçon of homoeroticism,” I thought it meant “Someone sprinkled homoeroticism on this story like croutons on a delightful Caesar salad.”
I wrote multiple essays that used soupçon as a noun with this translation in mind and I got a degree and this haunts me.
There’s no point to this post, it’s just very important to me that you know that I can be quite stupid