
#extradirty
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
I'd rather be in outer space šø

JVL
Game of Thrones Daily

Kaledo Art
Three Goblin Art

titsay

JBB: An Artblog!
Jules of Nature

ellievsbear
Today's Document

if i look back, i am lost

shark vs the universe
Misplaced Lens Cap

tannertan36

Kiana Khansmith
styofa doing anything

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
@mermaidvampire

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I've been thinking about why I love Thaisha as a character so much, and while there are many reasons, I think a lot of it comes down to how she engages with the themes of the story.
I see campaign 4 as largely focusing on two big groups of themes. There are the themes around change, rebirth, life vs death, past vs future, and then there are those around justice, rebellion, power, (anti-) authority. (of course, these aren't mutually exclusive groups, and there is a great deal of overlap. what is rebellion if not change, etc)
All of the characters interact with both sets of themes to different extents, but I love that out of all of them, I feel like Thaisha is probably the most or among the most firmly enmeshed in both themes. Every aspect of her story not only engages deeply with both but also highlights how inextricable they really are.
I remember that Aabria has talked about how she approaches stories through themes, and I feel like Thaisha is exemplifying that with aplomb. Every character choice she has made has felt so deeply grounded in the thematic fabric of the world and the story.
Hero is Brennanās self-insert secretary. The blackboard is him going āplease dear god thereās 13 of you just tell me whoās going whereā
white people will literally be like if u arent nice to me Im going to become a nazi. and think theyāre making a great argument
this stupid shit has been around for so long and itās crazy to me there are still people with enough rocks in their brain to believe it. āOughhhhh if you arenāt nice to you oppressors theyāll become bigots instead of alliesā if someoneās support for marginalized groups hinges entirely on whether or not that group is niceys, theyāre by definition not effective or useful allies and, by admission of this argument, an active danger to the communities theyre supposed to be allied with because they can Enter Bigot Mode the second they become displease
happy pride month
this one kinda hurts when i see it every pride month. im glad to see an art piece of mine still circulating, and with nearly 100,000 notes too! it just hurts that im separated from it. everyone in the notes thinks im gone. im still here, but my potential community and connection is lost because im forgotten in place of the art. yeah, my deactivated profile does add to the profoundness of what i was saying, but i am still removed.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Reblogging this manually. Op doesn't want credit for fear of being terminated.
TRA here means "transracial adoptee" fyi, just in case you're used to seeing that in another context
As a transracial adoptee (Native/Mexican to white Mormons) i have trouble putting to words the amount of harm having ~liberal white parents~ did to me. It is very very rare for me to go, yeah, okay, I support a transracial adoption. All of these experiences are absolutely believable to me.
the place where so many haunted house genre stories fall apart is where the writers try to explain why the house is haunted and it completely defangs the story because the explanation is never as scary as the haunting itself. "this house is haunted and bad things happen here" can be so artful and outrageously scary. "this house is haunted because Specified Bad Thing Happened Here" falls flat again and again. i'm not saying it can't be done but i'm almost never satisfied by it and often it ruins the whole story for me.
the thing is, a Haunted House story is not the same as a Ghost story. In a Haunted House story, the Haunted House is a character. Usually a main character. In a Ghost story, the ghost is a character. A Ghost's story may be explained by showing us the Ghost's origin. But a Haunted House story cannot be explained by showing us the origin of one of the House's ghosts. That's just one ghost. We're talking about the House.
my least favorite literary smut turn of phrase is when a guy is like āim gonna ruin this pussyā āim gonna wreck this pussy for anyone elseā like stop.. thats not yoursā¦!
āImma destroy that pussyā my friend š

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Somebody mentioned Thaisha and Elodie together and it made me think about the development of Hal through both relationships.
Because first there's Thaisha, and they were young lovers together who thought the world of each other. They had two kids together, then had to make a hard decision to live wildly different separate lives when Thaisha received her call to adventure while Hal was adamant in staying away from anything of the like just like he did when his brother asked him to join the rebellion.
Then we have Elodie who in many ways is the complete opposite of Thaisha. Yes they are both women of means but Thaisha comes from history and the defiance of destiny, while Elodie appears like an eminently practical merchant with a deep love for the arts. I think in a way Hal must have been looking for this stability as he had decided to stay away from all war and revolution.
Now we don't know why Elodie and Hal don't live together anymore or if they ever did at all, but I can't help but think that it's for the same reason he joined the Schemers after his brother died. There's something undeniable in his life that pulls him away from this type of quiet life. Even before his brother's death he was writing about uprisings of the past. I can't help but think that this push and pull is the centre of his character arc.
And now we are where we are, in the opening moments of Kother'ai about to see if his choices pay off and I can't help but think that his commitment to both ideas is what is going to carry the day. Home and Hearth but burning bright.
if you hate jazz you will die and go to hell
if you hate rap you will also die and go to hell
if you hate blues you will also also die and go to hell
Jonathan Ross is still avoiding accountability months after he shot and killed Renee Good.
Someone in my networks was asking about a social media call they saw for a ā30 day general strikeā where people make no purchases and donāt go to work. They asked, āthis would make me homeless but is it worth it as a tactic?ā As a union organizer, I had this to say and I think itās important enough to share with you all:
As a trade unionist, I would like to know what is being meant by āgeneral strikeā here because a lot of people are using that term but for things that have nothing to do with strikes or what a general strike has historically meant.
Itās not a boycott, itās not a sick out, itās a *strike* by workers at their workplaces aka refusals to work collectively as a unionized body of workers. A general strike would require dozens of unions to not merely tell some workers they gotta work anyways and tell others to call in sick - it requires a prolonged, structured, financially supportive struggle by unionized labor.
A 30 day general strike would achieve a lot but Iām not hearing any trade unions say they are directing their members to do this (which under current labor law and many of our union contracts, would be illegal but thatās not my issue, just a barrier towards success). Iāve not heard of any strike funds put into place so workers donāt lose their housing and can afford groceries. Factually it just isnāt a strike let alone a general strike. Itās a consumer boycott meets individual sick outs and while you can do that tactic in short bursts, you canāt do it for a month without a strike fund and unions actually declaring strikes.
I fear āgeneral strikeā is becoming hallowed out of meaning by liberals. Itās a powerful tactic and that just isnāt what weāre seeing. Itās gonna leave people with a bad taste in their mouth about the prospect of an actual general strike when these fake āgeneral strikesā donāt pan out because they arenāt leveraging our power as the people who actually run society with our labor but asking individuals to call out alone or as individuals not purchase goods.
Kinda reminds me of when people tried to define āmutual aidā as giving donations to nonprofits instead of building community networks of resiliency and support outside of capitalism and its charity arms. Pretty much every time thereās a big upswing in radicalism, terms get immediately bastardized by people outside of the work to describe tactics that donāt even share the same goals. Itās a deradicalization tactic.
You canāt just say āgeneral strike!ā and then it happens. General strikes in the past have been because unionized workers across different industries solidarity strike, which since the heyday of general strikes has been made illegal so if we want to actually do that as organized labor then we have to be prepared to have no legal protections around such a strike. Thatās not the level of preparation or thought weāre seeing.
If you want to see what an actual general strike in Portland looks like, this PBS documentary on the founding of the ILWU and the 1934 Waterfront Strike which was attacked by police and vigilantes leading to the entire towns workers joining the strike, is important. These were very organized, structured affairs that didnāt rely on individualist volunteerism.
United Auto Workers declared May 1st, 2028 to be a national general strike. He (Shaun Fein) wants unions to align the end of their contracts with May Day so we are not beholden to no strike clauses. Theyāre building a strike fund. Thatās actually a plan and that gives us enough time to energize our coworkers about it.
This āgeneral strikeā stuff coming out of Minneapolis will just get you fired and because youāre not doing it with a union, youāll have zero protections and no strike fund to rely on.
Itās a bad idea. Donāt leverage your purchasing power, youāre poor. Leverage your labor, because thatās what makes them rich. And donāt do it alone, youāll suffer alone.
"what if sex selective abortion leads to an heavy imbalance of genders?" Change the underlying social misogyny that causes that, instead of forcing women to have carry babies they don't want!
People are aware that "those stupid slut should've kept her legs closed, she should have the baby as punishment" is a bad thing, but often forget that forced birth as punishment is bad for bad things too
"dont have a child if it matters so much to you what they come out as that youd get a sex selective abortion" is not the same thing as "you have to have a child you don't want" there is no forced birth as punishment here
Ok, I don't disagree about that people should love children the same regardless of gender, but that's not the point: Someone is currently pregnant and doesn't want to be because the baby would be a girl. Should they be allowed to get an abortion or should they be forced to give birth?
why do you assume thats the grounds being primarily argued over? it doesn't even really make make sense, sexist parents would trivially just lie in india and china, where sex selective abortion is common, yes, the selective abortion is illegal, but so is sex *determination*, as in, testing the fetus, that afaict is really where any actual enforcement action happens. you can argue the state shouldn't have that kind of authority, and id be sympathetic in abstract principle, but this is not forced pregnancy.
also, some further scattered points/complications - abortion is not in my understanding actually generally legal in india. it requires a medical justification. tbc i think this is a bad thing, and abortion should not be restricted this way, but it means the sex selectivity thing does not stick out - in a lot of these cases these are like, highly patriarchal families where the husband wields coercive authority over the wife. what that says exactly on what to do if anything idk, but worth keeping in mind - i really really dont think it makes sense, morally, to compare the magnitude of being forced to carry a pregnancy and give birth, with someone who *was* going to carry a pregnancy and give birth only not wanting to because of a specific trait while still wanting to have done so in general
yes, abortion should be legal in general
sex determination should be legal because you should, in fact, be able to know what's going on with your body at all times, even if this has societal effects
the widespread existence of highly patriarchal families where the husband wield coercive authority over the wife is more, not less, reason to support a right to fetal sex determination and abortion, because a very common case for this sort of thing is "woman who has had three daughters and doesn't want a fourth, because her husband is going to want children until they have a son". bans on fetal sex determination and abortion are going to mean she needs to have an entire extra baby she does not want to have.
as soon as someone is carrying a baby they don't want to have because you don't think their reason for having an abortion is good enough, the morality becomes the same, because you are forcing them to have a baby they don't want to have. there are a lot of traits where someone saying "I dont want to have baby with [trait]" might be sexist or racist or ableist, I might think they're a dick, but at zero points should they be forced to have that baby

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Iād die on the hill that āstranger dangerā is a deeply unhelpful mentality to have. āOoooh everyone is out to get me theyāre all gonna perpetrate harm thatās actually more likely to come from someone I already know. I better never talk to anyone in my community who I donāt already know, just to be safe. Iām sure there are no other biases interwoven with this mentalityā like oh my god human traffickers do not just randomly spawn in every parking lot. You donāt have to go solo hitchhiking across the country but you also donāt have to live in fear that every guy on the street is the knife man whoās gonna get you. Like have situational awareness, yeah. But most of the time the guy on the street is not knife man heās actually just a guy on the street and heās probably pretty chill, and youāre driving yourself crazy by living in a constant state of unnecessary fear.
Like always safety comes first, especially if youāre in a marginalized group more likely to be targeted by random people around you. But thatās different from stranger danger. I might even say that stranger danger is something that contributes to marginalized groups getting targeted by random people. Which strangers do you find distrust worthy? Why? Does vague distrust justify harmful actions in the name of self defense? Stranger danger draws everyone away from more important issues of safety (underlying bigotries, systemic injustices, abuse in the home, etc) and towards an amorphous boogeyman that has no solution, because itās not the real cause or culprit.
like Murray couldn't have been more clear in her talk with Azune after the sewer fight that her protectiveness over Demodus has everything to do with that Demodus took a job through the school and ended up almost dying because of it. she wants the Penteveral to be a safe place for young arcanists like Demodus to learn magic, and within a day of the Sundered Houses' power grab, they exploited a financial aid student and framed him for theft, which directly led to him almost bleeding out in the sewers. making sure things like that don't happen is something Murray considers directly under her responsibility. this lines up with the fact that while she's less fond of him for being a rich boy, Murray also sprang into action to find Occtis when it became clear he was in danger from his father and literally performed a miracle to resurrect him. may I remind y'all, while it wasn't as explicitly about that, she also immediately stepped in when Azune suggested Occtis go in Demodus' place.
you can boohoo as much as you want about Azune but he's a grown ass man who isn't one of her active students. she's still pretty sympathetic to him, but he's a peer in her eyes because it's a whole ass different situation.
I know some of y'all zone out and go into selective hearing mode when a woman is talking, but if you pay attention to her personality and values, Murray has actually been remarkably consistent in the way she treats all three of these men. she puts in a sort of gruff tough love approach with all of them and is, unsurprisingly, the most protective of the financial aid student directly under what she considers her responsibility. any other interpretation is just woobie googles rotting your brain.