Hey don't cry. Fireflies exist in the southern USA again
They never stopped.....this is such a weird rumor to me. I see it on tiktok, too. People saying the fireflies are gone when I saw them on my drive home tonight.
tumblr dot com
Three Goblin Art
KIROKAZE
h

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

★
i don't do bad sauce passes

#extradirty

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

roma★
Mike Driver
Show & Tell

tannertan36
Stranger Things
One Nice Bug Per Day
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from Türkiye

seen from Spain

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Philippines

seen from United States
@kyidyl
Hey don't cry. Fireflies exist in the southern USA again
They never stopped.....this is such a weird rumor to me. I see it on tiktok, too. People saying the fireflies are gone when I saw them on my drive home tonight.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
When you remember the anti-vax movement
I first reblogged this in January, and here my ass is in March 2020 self-quarantined at home.
Ur right and u should say it
Reading this in 2021
Reading in 2026
Y'all, we as a community have got to get better at dodgeball if we’re gonna keep tempting fate like that.
i actually get to go to the ren faire this august i have no idea what to go as aaaahhhh
Something with very breathable clothes because faire in August is hot as balls. 😂
bitches be sucking farts there
Found the source of the infographic that explains how the results were obtained!
there’s sixteen Colorado counties that their most searched was “wolf furry”, plus thirty-odd counties (not counting either Arapahoe or any of the ones marked here as “Insufficient Data”) which may well have had plenty of searches for “wolf furry”, just fewer than for whatever they’re labeled here
and “skunk furry” searches in Arapahoe County outnumbered “wolf furry” searches in the entire state of Colorado
something tells me Skunks Georg
we did it, we created furry gerrymandering
WOW I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS MY FAVORITE TELEVISION SERIES OF ALL TIME (it's not out yet)
Oh, I am in.
WANT. :)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
How to make Warrior Outfit of Withered Leaves (cr粘花贴草)
reblogs were off
After 85 years of research, scientists have reached a clear and surprisingly consistent conclusion: staying socially connected is one of the
The "loneliness factor," he explains, has evolutionary routes. Natural selection chooses those ancestors who lived in groups. Whenever these socially connected ancestors found themselves alone, they went into hyper-stimulated mode, looking for danger and trying to get back to their tribe. It was hard-wired into them. And it is still hard-wired into us.
That hyper-stimulation of the brain and body when we are chronically alone is what causes not just bad mental health outcomes (suicide), or death by addiction (OD or just destruction of the body over time), but pretty much every other major disease category from cancer to heart disease. Many other important risk factors are highly correlated with these diseases.
But chronic isolation, when examined head-to-head with every other risk factor, is the most important according to Waldinger when looking at this 85 years of data.
Vulnerability is the answer
Every time I read something like this I'm like "did you ask an anthropologist? You should have asked an anthropologist. This is like anth 101". I read so many papers in undergrad from other fields that ended with "we know this is a thing but we don't know why" because they refuse to believe that anth has valuable information. Like yes. Obviously the species that literally cannot have proper brain development in juveniles without interaction with other humans is going to have some issues with being solitary. Like there's a reason the vast majority of human evolution research is done by bio/physical anth and not by biologists. It's because you have to understand both sides of the coin - the behavioral and biological - to actually get any of it right. Now, I don't resent that they do this because when fields outside of anthropology do research like this and come to the same conclusions anthropologists do it's validating. Also sometimes anthropologists do this to prove a point so maybe the authors are anths. Idk. I just think it's kinda funny when a other field comes to a conclusion that is taught really early on in anth and then it's spoken about like it's a revelation.
I feel like there is a balance to be held
between
stressed from being alone
and stressed by the kind of person you have to settle for
Sometimes being alone is less stressfull ...
Sure, it's not ideal ...
But neither is having to stay away from medical personal until the person is healthy enough to advocate for themselfes becasue otherwise it can get realy dangerous -> Something I have heard from multiple disabled and/or chronically sick people
Life Ain't No Pony Farm
And sometimes hell IS other people ...
The article actually covers that as well. The people with the highest health benefits were the ones that registered satisfaction with their social relationships. The point is not to plop yourself with random humans, it's to form functional communities and social relationships. It's all covered in the article itself.
The article actually covers that as well. The people with the highest health benefits were the ones that registered satisfaction with their social relationships.
So what I said is correct
Good thing you took the time to point that out :-)
.
.
The point is not to plop yourself with random humans, it's to form functional communities and social relationships. It's all covered in the article itself.
Again ...
You are agreeing with me, as I make the same point as the article?
Cool :-)
Actually, what I was doing was politely pointing out that you should read the thing in question before making repetitive comments that add nothing and make it sound like you didn't read what the rest of us did. But also now that you've crossed the barrier into rude: why the hell do you type in that weird, stilted manner that bots and edgy teenagers do?
Maybe you are a bot. It's not like I would know. :P
After 85 years of research, scientists have reached a clear and surprisingly consistent conclusion: staying socially connected is one of the
The "loneliness factor," he explains, has evolutionary routes. Natural selection chooses those ancestors who lived in groups. Whenever these socially connected ancestors found themselves alone, they went into hyper-stimulated mode, looking for danger and trying to get back to their tribe. It was hard-wired into them. And it is still hard-wired into us.
That hyper-stimulation of the brain and body when we are chronically alone is what causes not just bad mental health outcomes (suicide), or death by addiction (OD or just destruction of the body over time), but pretty much every other major disease category from cancer to heart disease. Many other important risk factors are highly correlated with these diseases.
But chronic isolation, when examined head-to-head with every other risk factor, is the most important according to Waldinger when looking at this 85 years of data.
Vulnerability is the answer
Every time I read something like this I'm like "did you ask an anthropologist? You should have asked an anthropologist. This is like anth 101". I read so many papers in undergrad from other fields that ended with "we know this is a thing but we don't know why" because they refuse to believe that anth has valuable information. Like yes. Obviously the species that literally cannot have proper brain development in juveniles without interaction with other humans is going to have some issues with being solitary. Like there's a reason the vast majority of human evolution research is done by bio/physical anth and not by biologists. It's because you have to understand both sides of the coin - the behavioral and biological - to actually get any of it right. Now, I don't resent that they do this because when fields outside of anthropology do research like this and come to the same conclusions anthropologists do it's validating. Also sometimes anthropologists do this to prove a point so maybe the authors are anths. Idk. I just think it's kinda funny when a other field comes to a conclusion that is taught really early on in anth and then it's spoken about like it's a revelation.
I feel like there is a balance to be held
between
stressed from being alone
and stressed by the kind of person you have to settle for
Sometimes being alone is less stressfull ...
Sure, it's not ideal ...
But neither is having to stay away from medical personal until the person is healthy enough to advocate for themselfes becasue otherwise it can get realy dangerous -> Something I have heard from multiple disabled and/or chronically sick people
Life Ain't No Pony Farm
And sometimes hell IS other people ...
The article actually covers that as well. The people with the highest health benefits were the ones that registered satisfaction with their social relationships. The point is not to plop yourself with random humans, it's to form functional communities and social relationships. It's all covered in the article itself.
After 85 years of research, scientists have reached a clear and surprisingly consistent conclusion: staying socially connected is one of the
The "loneliness factor," he explains, has evolutionary routes. Natural selection chooses those ancestors who lived in groups. Whenever these socially connected ancestors found themselves alone, they went into hyper-stimulated mode, looking for danger and trying to get back to their tribe. It was hard-wired into them. And it is still hard-wired into us.
That hyper-stimulation of the brain and body when we are chronically alone is what causes not just bad mental health outcomes (suicide), or death by addiction (OD or just destruction of the body over time), but pretty much every other major disease category from cancer to heart disease. Many other important risk factors are highly correlated with these diseases.
But chronic isolation, when examined head-to-head with every other risk factor, is the most important according to Waldinger when looking at this 85 years of data.
Vulnerability is the answer
Every time I read something like this I'm like "did you ask an anthropologist? You should have asked an anthropologist. This is like anth 101". I read so many papers in undergrad from other fields that ended with "we know this is a thing but we don't know why" because they refuse to believe that anth has valuable information. Like yes. Obviously the species that literally cannot have proper brain development in juveniles without interaction with other humans is going to have some issues with being solitary. Like there's a reason the vast majority of human evolution research is done by bio/physical anth and not by biologists. It's because you have to understand both sides of the coin - the behavioral and biological - to actually get any of it right. Now, I don't resent that they do this because when fields outside of anthropology do research like this and come to the same conclusions anthropologists do it's validating. Also sometimes anthropologists do this to prove a point so maybe the authors are anths. Idk. I just think it's kinda funny when a other field comes to a conclusion that is taught really early on in anth and then it's spoken about like it's a revelation.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
warming carafe with a stained glass pattern (ca. late 50s-early 60s)
I work in a library, and one of the types of people I see the most are people who come here for access to technology. One of the simultaneously frustrating and heartbreaking groups are the elderly people who are trying to get back into the work force. On the one hand, it's frustrating because these are boomers who refused to learn how to use technology in the previous 30+ years even when they were working. Like they could have when they were younger and it was less frustrating for them, but they outright refused. Now they want to get a job and they're finding that they absolutely cannot just show up somewhere and apply or talk their way into a job. But it's also heartbreaking because these people are truly elderly - 70s and up - and they've been retired and they're finding that their finances aren't enough to live on and so they want to work again. Not only do I think they shouldn't have to work (because they're elderly and in a lot of cases disabled.), they have no IDEA what they're up against. They cannot use tech well enough to even apply, so they obviously aren't going to get hired, and they don't have the physical ability to do more manual jobs. Alcoholism runs rampant among them because they feel lost, left behind, lonely, and purpose-less. 99% of the time they're not even mean about any of it, they're just asking for help using the computer. And I like...I couldn't bring myself to tell them how hopeless their situation is even if I were allowed to do it. It sucks. They have no communities and all of the structures they knew how to use in order to reach out to people are gone. Like it really shouldn't matter whether they can use tech or not because they shouldn't be having to re-enter the workforce. They should have been financially able to retire and live out the rest of their lives with dignity. And yeah, boomers as a group are obviously the biggest cause of their own problem, but not EVERY boomer was like that, and not all of them enjoy what Trump is doing. There's a significant amount of them that are just as much victims as everyone else, but they're more vulnerable and less able to recover than most other populations. I know that there's a lot of complicated things behind what I'm expressing here I'm just saying that like...I don't really like being there when they figure out that there's nothing they can do. It's really sad, and a bit frustrating. It's a really uncomfortable feeling.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
seeing straight men be disgusted by booktok smut recommenders has actually radicalized me to the side of booktok smut recommenders. girls your taste may be atrocious but i will never disparage you for exposing mainstream discourse to the concept of soaking through your underwear. spent my whole life listening to men talk about penises it’s about time they get jumpscared by women talking about pussy in crude detail on social media. go forth and goon my warriors
I work at a bookstore and hearing one of my male coworkers call smutty romantasy "the downfall of society" because it's "literally just porn" radicalized me
Men have an entire industry. Entire industries dedicated to their sexualities. Let women have fantasy sex. there's not even a camera crew involved.
Left this in the notes
My feelings on the badly-written werewolf porn or whatever are best summed up by a paraphrase of Voltaire:
"I disagree utterly with what you say read, and I will defend to the death your right to say read it."
My mom likes to tell me about how when I was a little kid riding public transport with her I'd always smile and giggle and chat with weird old ladies who smelled like cat pee and homeless folks and strangers dressed in bizarre outfits but any time a tidy and respectable businessman in a suit and tie waved at me I'd immediately clam up, and she takes a great deal of pride in my supposed inherentability to clock personalities but the truth is I do vaguely remember those bus rides, and it was never about the clothes or the hair or the smell, but more because everyone "strange" asked interesting questions and listened to what I had to say and seemed to think about what I said while the neat and tidy and rigid folks only ever acted like they were going through the motions, which was boring as hell and also pretty annoying
Well-to-do finance manager with tidy shoes: "Why hello, sweetheart. Can you say 'hi'? Aren't you cute. Are you on a trip with your mom?"
4 year old me: why must we do this
Fantastic old woman in the leopard print coat: "Why yes, my tooth IS real silver! Nobody ever asks me that. Do you like cats?"
4 year old me, suddenly paying attention: Finally, A Person Of Intellect