Questionable Post-Doctor

I don’t mean Australians are a “stick it to the man, fight back against those in power” kind of people – we’re generally not. And I don’t mean we have a “we’re going to do the status thing but pretend we don’t and pretend to all be equal in mixed company” thing that middle-class Americans do. I mean the status-respect system does not exist, and if you try to use it, it weirds people the fuck out at best, and insults them at worst. Treating someone most countries would say is ‘above’ you differently in Australia is basically telling that person that you hate them; it’s saying “I’m forced to interact with you due to our current circumstances but I don’t see you as a person and won’t grant you the basic respect of treating you like an equal”. (When I was in America, I was constantly suppressing the instinct that random service people were sassing me because they overuse honourifics and were so keen to help me.)

This makes interacting with foreigners really baffling in a lot of circumstances. In university, my international friends would often describe Australians as “friendly, but very rude”. They thought we were all arseholes because of the way we spoke to our PhD supervisors and soforth, and wouldn’t believe us when we explained that our behaviour was respectful and that being deferential would be weird and awkward and insulting to them. Learning Japanese had a similar problem; everyone in the class could get the concept of different levels of formality and deference in language, ans was happy to memorise the usage of various words for Japanese people, but using them on each other was super weird, and we’d only ever use the most casual form of anything unless specifically instructed otherwise by the teacher.

The reason I’ve been thinking of this lately is because I’ve recently become aware that a lot of countries have like… a special respect for their country’s leaders? I don’t just mean “yeah, that guy makes the rules”, but that having that office makes them better than everyone else, somehow. Which I expect from countries with royal families, because Tradition, but I’ve recently found that Americans feel this way about their President, too. (Except the current one, who seems to be enough of a dick to break the system.) Like, if six Americans were in an aeroplane that was going down and there was only one parachute and one of the Americans was A Generic Non-Trump President, it’s just assumed that that guy gets the parachute? Like he’s automatically the life worth saving over the others, and they’d just give up their chance in favour of him? And that’s so weird to me. An Australian prime minister would have a 1 in 6 chance at the parachute; however the people decided, “this guy happens to be the leader of the country” wouldn’t be a factor. 

When Americans don’t like a President, they usually feel the need to work in how he’s “not my president”, either through sheer denial, or by finding some way he’s theoretically illegitimate (different ways votes are counted, wild conspiracy theories about birth country, etc.), and while making sure those rules are obeyed IS extremely important, I’ve recently noticed that part of the motivation seems to be that they’re invested in whether he’s Really The President because being the President somehow makes someone Special rather than just a normal dick who’s been put in charge of the group project. (You see the same thing in “THIS IS TRUMP’S AMERICA!”, like him becoming President gives him superpowers or something).

I remember in school we were always taught to treat others how you wanted to be treated. You were no better or worse than anyone else. You want to be treated equal to everyone else and that meant being polite and showing decency and helping each other out. It’s true we only use titles for teachers or elders (indigenous Australians use “Aunty” and “Uncle” as a show of respect to their elders) but outside of that if someone calls you Miss y/n or sir or whatever it’s just uncomfortable. In hospitality and retail some of us will still use sir/ma'am mainly because we don’t know customers names but even then that’s rare and usually applied only to elderly. We personally don’t want to be addressed by titles or even surnames (unless it’s a nickname which I’ll get to) so we don’t use the titles or surnames for other people. With surnames often we use them as a nickname if we dont/can’t shorten their names. Getting a nickname (a good one, not one that is intentionally meant to bully you ofc. E.g. ScoMo is the nickname for our PM but he’s a piece of shit and ScoMo sounds a lot like Scum-mo) is the biggest show of respect in Australia. Usually it’s simply just adding a vowel or changing it up a little. I.e. John = johnno, Darren = Dazza, etc. If we can’t do it to your first name we do it to your last name. If we can’t do it to your last name it’s either a feature or behaviour and we put it in a good light. You ever notice that Australians like to make fun of each other and “insult” each other? There’s a very subtle difference when it’s truly meant to be insulting but that’s our way of being affectionate for each other. We will point out your flaws and make fun of you (and stop if you say no) and we will give you a nickname and it’s all in good humour. It’s one of the things I find foreigners get really upset about because they dont understand why we are so rude to each other. You build up a hard skin in this country and forget hat sometimes that stuff IS a bit insulting.

Let me open this one on a positive: the way this show looks positively FUCKS.

Sitting here and pretending that any individual screenshot of Maul– Shadow Lord isn't dazzling would be a waste of all our time. I could hit pause at almost any point during any episode and behold a shot that is beautifully lit, well composed, and reflects the budget Disney typically have on offer for their shows.

Similarly, the fight scenes are incredibly choreographed. This show is truly the culmination of decades of developing a style with increasing gains in technology and investment.

But you would expect this, wouldn't you? Star Wars as a property is valued at billions of dollars. The Walt Disney corporation paid a pretty penny for the rights, and a spare-no-expense approach is the theme of their projects. Though the animated show budgets have not been publicized in the way the live action shows were, the relative jump in quality reflects a financial interest in making sure these shows look as good as possible within the constraints of this style.

So the show looking good is expected. A lot of Star Wars looks very good. The Rise of Skywalker has some genuinely gorgeous shots in spite of the movie being... like that. The show looks great. I have a few hangups about the movement and overall look of the show though. This is largely a style preference, so let it not be said that I don't respect the immense amount of skill and work on display.

I find the movement in this animation style to lack strong follow-through or weight, and it really makes it hard to appreciate the fights, the general motion of characters, and it makes the environments feel very stiff. It has an almost video game feel. Especially the fabric on characters' costumes feels jarring. It'll look loose but move like it's glued to the characters, and I wish it was a bit more tactile. Likewise, a lot of the textures lack depth or tooth to them.

This isn't to say that the show doesn't look great, but when I compare it to something like Love, Death + Robots, or Arcane, or some of the work on Star Wars: Visions, or even a lot of 2D animated series, it feels like both movement and tactile environments in Maul– Shadow Lord struggle to feel truly integrated with each other in this style. Things just don't deform, don't push, don't stretch. It softens any blow or landing or crash, even as the beautiful lighting and backgrounds and individual shots do their best to set up drama.

Like I said, this is a personal preference, but I really do feel that lack of flexibility in the character animations and in how the environment responds to them, and it leeches some of the tension of any given scene away from me.

For one great example of a little detail that I think adds so much: hair! The hair in Maul just doesn't move, and that could add so much to the characters. Let us see their hair disheveled, or flying in the wind. Let it move independently of them at times!

(Confession: I'm actually not a huge Arcane person, I watched the first season when it came out and thought the style was great but I've just never been a big League of Legends person, so I fell off the wagon. But I do think the animation is a great example of how 3D animation can feel super tactile and impactful)

I have to assume these are stylistic choices rather than a representation of the budget, because Disney has an astonishing amount of money on hand to make any show. And if they're a reflection of budget, I would have to wonder why Disney wouldn't allocate a larger budget to this show, which focuses on a beloved character in an extremely popular property.

Nevertheless, I still would like to credit the cinematography, lighting, and background work on this show immensely, as well as the fight choreography. Like I said: hit pause on almost any shot and you have a nearly perfect composition. One of the shots I really loved was of the shadows of the imperial star destroyer and all the fighters over Janix in episode 5. Great work.

But let's set aside the animation and get to the meat and potatoes of the show: the story!

Let it not be said that I did not wait to post. We're now 60% into the first season of Maul– Shadow Lord, and I have held my tongue, observed, and taken in the show as it's been released. But seeing as I think it'll be fun to return to this post after the show has reached its temporary end (of the first season), I'm getting this in NOW. For the sake of brevity I will not be summarizing the happenings of the show, but please note that this will contain spoilers for what's come out so far. Like... lots of them. In fact, this is going to be extremely spoilery. If you care about that sort of thing and haven't seen the first six episodes, look away.

This show is getting 10 25 minute episodes (well, the first episode was 31 minutes), but this includes several minutes of credits and a recap at the beginning of each episode of everything leading into the episode. In reality, each episode is a bit closer to 20 minutes in duration. Which means, in the 10 episode series run, we're getting somewhere in the range of 3-4 hours of content.

This is in line with prior animated Star Wars shows, but unlike those, which tend toward the episodic adventure with a lighter overarching plot, this show is directly and emphatically a plot driven serial. Though the show is more or less for all ages, it gears itself tonally to a more mature audience than Clone Wars or Rebels did, and I would argue the Bad Batch as well.

In fact, this show is perhaps best understood as a continuation of the Clone Wars (2008) –> Bad Batch pipeline, and relies heavily on an understanding of Maul as seen in the 2008 Clone Wars series. It is absolutely not designed to stand alone. I don't necessarily view that as an inherently detrimental to the show, I just think it's important to note that the titular character is going to be nigh upon impossible to comprehend without at least skimming the wookieepedia page for what his whole deal is.

That's not in and of itself a problem, but it does point to a bigger difficulty for this show. We meet Maul at a very in-between time of his life. Seriously. After his first death-via-bisection, he comes back during the Clone Wars, only to eventually be defeated by Palpatine and lose his brother. Then we meet him again as a fallen, broken man in Rebels, obsessed with Obi-Wan Kenobi only to finally be killed by him in the end, at peace.

We're stuck in between the downfall from the Clone Wars and the end in Rebels. The ideal case for Maul in this show, then, would be to see him build up from nothing only to have a grand, colossal fall. One that lands him where we see him in Clone Wars, with his fucked up little creepo cave.

The writers of this show have a considerable challenge, then, to take this character from a massive low to another massive low, keeping it compelling, not treading on the toes of prior work, and, well, fulfilling the promise of an animated Star Wars show that is more "adult" (though we'll get to that).

This isn't to say that I don't think this can be compelling. But this is absolutely to say that this is challenging within the confines of an action/adventure story that has, all things considered, a pretty considerable amount of moving parts for being 10 episodes long in the first season.

Even more challenging, the show has to contend with telling a story that ultimately bears a striking resemblance to bits and pieces from a (pardon my french) metric fuckton of other Star Wars media. We have stories of Jedi hiding from the Empire after Order 66. We have stories about the Empire choking a planet, taking over. We have stories about the criminal underbelly of Star Wars responding to the Empire. There is a real glut of Star Wars out there, so what could Maul offer that's different? What does Maul give viewers from a story perspective that is new?

So we've arrived at the crux of the issue for Maul– Shadow Lord. The show wants to be a lot of things. It wants to do none of them.

In Roger Ebert's now-infamous review of Battlefield Earth, he claimed "The director, Roger Christian, has learned from better films that directors sometimes tilt their cameras, but he has not learned why."

Maul– Shadow Lord wishes to be a darker, more adult narrative than its animated predecessors. The plot, however, has remarkably little separating it from them. We've seen similarly grim themes explored in the Clone Wars (I would even argue that thematically the Clone Wars explores even darker areas. And though I will maybe someday explore why it struggles with some and does well with others, I want to emphasize that the point is that Maul is not a significant departure from that style of story). The show itself is rated as child appropriate, and even though there are several on-screen deaths, none are treated with any significant gravity. Being sliced in half by a lightsaber is bloodless, removed from the viewers in a layer of unreality. Though we nominally know there are crime empires Maul is subsuming, their crimes are sanded away, vaguely alluded to without any curiosity as to what they actually do.

The humor of the show is, similarly, nothing new. There is perhaps less of it than in lighter episodes of prior shows, but it still bears a striking similarity in dialogue and tone. A crime lord named "Looti Vario" who cowers before Maul and becomes his stooge spewing funny little one liners. There's a droid who has to learn the hard way (via being told his titular boots are not regulation-appropriate) that the empire is bad. There's the teenage son of our soft-boiled detective being woefully out of his depth, and sad his dad just is never home.

Perhaps there could be a departure from the norm in structure or genre, but the show does not do that. It is a largely action-driven adventure. Rather than take the trappings of a noir to give viewers a mystery story, or perhaps a horror, or even a pastiche of a noir, the story continues along the same lines as the final season of Clone Wars, or another season of the Bad Batch. There is no mystery to uncover because from the outset we know who Maul is, we know what he wants (he tells us directly), we know where he will end up, and the journey is just like the journeys we've taken before. Maul wants an apprentice, like he wanted in Rebels. Maul wants revenge like he wanted in the Clone Wars. Maul wants to rebuild his crime empire which he largely does unimpeded and we've seen in comics.

Though a character like Devon being drawn in by Maul and the dark side of the force could be interesting, I will point out that we have seen this format before. In multiple forms of media. And we've even seen it with Maul himself in Rebels. We've seen this all before, and the show, though beautiful, doesn't want to push outside of the established norm.

Imagine a world where Maul's presence was kept ambiguous. Where we followed Lawson tailing a string of murders he couldn't identify. Where Devon was hearing whispers from the dark that she thought were just her thoughts. Having a real mystery to this noir! Let it inhabit the genre whose aesthetics the show seeks to emulate. Instead, the show retreads old ground, brings back characters we've already met (hello, Marrok), re-establishes plots that exist already. Because being nominally Maul (who spends much of the show monologuing and standing dramatically until he has to look cool in a fight scene) what does this show have?

I felt similarly about the Bad Batch as I do this show– they are "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" continued. They seek to continue along those lines rather than stand on their own. There's a real fear of departure from the familiar, even from a show that signals its intent to be different. The show KNOWS that a show with real grit (because yes, of course the success of Andor was influential to the studio) garnered critical acclaim, that that show showed how Bad the Empire is and was lauded for it. But the show goes through the motions of Empire Bad without the characters themselves mattering to it. A thing happens, then another thing happens, and then another. The characters act the way that they do because without them doing that, the plot doesn't happen. We are repeatedly told why things happen because there simply isn't enough time to motivate anything of its own accord.

There's too little runtime in this season for this much to happen and not feel like a checklist of events and character beats. It leans so heavily into tropes because there's too much they want to happen without actually taking their time to motivate it (Dad, you work too much) (I got sent to prison for stealing a loaf of bread some fruit) (The empire is bad, my wife works for them and we're on the rocks) (She would make an excellent apprentice).

It's a rush job. It's puzzle pieces from other stories that worked there because they worked there forced together in an extremely short timeframe. It doesn't fill out the aesthetics of the show because they're not trying to make a noir, they're not trying to make make a darker animated show, they're not trying to make a crime show, they're not trying to make a character study of Maul, the titular character. They're making a show that looks like all of those. The core of the show is essentially derivative.

The show brings back a character who got brought back to life (at the behest of George Lucas) at least in part because he was so beloved and liked by fans. But over the years since his initial revival, we've seen him die, come back, die again, come back, and can fill in so much of his life. This character, once praised for his stoic nature and the impact of his design, and how sparingly he was used as a secondary antagonist, now needs to be filled out in depth.

The character gets his own show about his crime empire, but the show does not take an interest in exploring the crimes, in having real violence and crime and evils. The show displays a remarkable lack of curiosity in the internal motivations of its titular character, even though he will repeatedly tell them to the camera, and has a hard time marrying the show's own family-friendly aims with the amorality of its character. It carries itself on a look and aesthetic that fans have come to associate with another beloved property, but demonstrates no ability to expand beyond the look. There is no exploration of the character in depth, nor is there an ability to depart, tonally or thematically, from the previous works

This post is also about the Book of Boba Fett.

THEY RELEASED THE COYOTE VS ACME TRAILER !!!!!

WE WON !!!

So I tell Jane to bring her boy over to a bbq I'm having and she can tell him she's trans at my place surrounded by queer and trans people who love her and will support her if he ends up being awful.

She waits till the end of the bbq to tell him the news, by which point the rest of us have learned that Jason is a kind, friendly, empathetic, hard working, dummy. So we sit down, all of us a little worried about this gym bro's reaction when she tells him she's trans, and that she understands if he doesn't want to keep dating her it's no big deal.

He's baffled, so we explain what trans is, and after the disclosure that she hasn't had bottom surgery yet...

"Oh you have a dick?"

"... yeah."

He look's around at the room full of people with baited breath, his clearly a little afraid girl friend says

"Oooohhhh! I get it! You think- don't worry Babe! Watch this!"

And ya'll this man jumps up, runs into the kitchen and returns with one of the bratwurst we had for grilling and proceeds to tilt his head back, put it down his throat, hold it in his mouth for a moment, and spit it up without even a whisper of a gag and then looks around at the group absolutely beaming with pride.

"Honey, I must tell you, i am in fact trans and I have not had bottom surgery."

It was only legalized in 8 US states (the 8th only a few months before), and wouldn’t be legalized nation-wide until 2015.

It was only legal in TEN COUNTRIES in 2011. We wouldn’t hit 20 countries until 2017. (Australia was 23rd)

As of today (April 14, 2026), I believe only 38 countries have fully legalized same-sex marriage. Out of somewhere around 200 countries in the world. That’s only ~19% of countries.

Point of order.

King of Horses ran 450 fucking miles at almost entirely a gallop, without more than a few minutes rest, in 4 nights and basically was like "wait why are we stopping?" when Gandalf took him into the city and he ended up in a stable.

This was not his top speed, nor did it push any limits on his endurance.