★
art blog(derogatory)
Cosmic Funnies
d e v o n
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
hello vonnie
One Nice Bug Per Day
tannertan36
Stranger Things
Game of Thrones Daily
祝日 / Permanent Vacation
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
h
Love Begins
occasionally subtle
Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Romania
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Lebanon
seen from South Korea
@zendayaimdb
(talking to the wall) you’re right, i should have my vicar’s wife character fuck an RAF boy … she’s a devout woman, true, but she did sleep with that priest … she’s a patriotic englishwoman, of course she’d feel tenderly for one of the heroes facing off against the germans … why, she’s my character and i can make her do anything i want …
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Any time you say something about men being inherently predatory (man vs bear, a group of men is a threat, etc.) you are being racist. Treating men as inherently predatory is fundamentally inseparable from anti-blackness because Black men are hypermasculinized. That rhetoric affects Black men the most.
When you say you'd pick the bear over the man or a group of men is a threat, you are saying you'd pick the bear over a Black man and a group of Black men are a threat. It's not changing anything or flipping the genders. All Black men are men. If it sounds racist now, that's because it's always been racist and you didn't realize the implication.
Sure you could freely use your free speech to freely say, "A group of White men are a threat" or "I'd pick a Black man over a bear but a bear over a White man." But you and I and everyone else all know exactly how that sounds. And it's still racist because why do you always think only of White men when you're thinking about an abstract hypothetical man?
When you hear something about men being predatory, you should always think about how that affects Black men or you will inevitably say something racist.
framing black men in this way (as victims who could never hurt a woman) is an interesting choice when western black women are currently in the midst of a yearslong femicide crisis. said femicide (and rape, and abuse) is committed almost entirely by black men who, as men, are indeed dangerous. your rhetoric frames the modern issue of black femicide as inherently less important than the historical issue of black men being wrongfully accused of sex crimes. it suggests that black women should shut up about their negative experiences with men out of a kind of race fealty. it’s despicable because black women are indeed incredibly race loyal and suffer in silence from the physical, material harm inflicted on them by black men as well as the psychological warfare of being subjected to constant, intense misogynoir within the community and also outside of it. black cultures, like all cultures, are rooted in patriarchy. the logic of this post is a particularly ugly and blunt example of what afro-patriarchy looks like.
a black woman, along with any race of woman, has every right to say, “i hate all men” because men are dangerous. you should not seek to control the speech of women when they discuss misogyny, as women are a marginalized group based on sex and subject to sex-specific violence, a universal force that keeps women at the global level under the control of men. when men stop targeting women for sex-based violence, then we can speak on the issue of whether or not saying “all men are ___” leads to racialized thinking. until then, telling women to not disparage men is simply another manifestation of silencing victims and survivors. the fact that you felt this was at all appropriate to write is the perfect demonstration of how misogyny warps thinking to minimize harm to women as mere collateral damage in the rhetoric of political activism.
Rhetoric like this is how the black power movement shamed black women who were raped and sexually abused by Black men in the movement to stay silent or they're race traitors. 30 to 60% of all black women in America are victims of sexual assault. Many Black male predators in the black power movement knowing this, used this to have a captive stock of victims who were too scared to speak because black men are seen as violent.
Lets not forget the femicide rate in the black ass Caribbean and Africa is also high and will regularly be in the top 10 highest femicide rate countries
You people do not see Black women as subjects of oppression or misogyny. Doing PR for Black men is almost more important than the rape, beatings and abuse of Black women.
You people think that everyone lives around white people and that the home is a space place for women and girls
hi daddy big dick let’s see you and your nephew thanks
Ok but more importantly re: the heated rivalry guy what do you think of his face in a completely shallow way? Bc tbh there’s something abt his face that makes him look annoying
i think he has a head that looks like it was over-inflated with air. i don't like the look of him. he looks skinny fat, maybe. i don't understand how a man that fit can look so bad. maybe i'm in a bad mood because my expensive NARS foundation arrived and looks terrible on me so now i have to return it, but i'm remembering how shitty his makeup looked at the met gala ... triggered. looking like that, waxy and sweaty at once, is a personal nightmare for me. it probably wasn't anything to do with his makeup, it was the cocaine that gave him that sickly sheen, but my god! have some self-respect, man.
ykw. hunter biden male judgement. but like sober hunter biden.
yuck. not only is he not my type (too irish and not irish enough at once), i absolutely cannot stand him as a person. seeing him preen candace owens made me sick. even worse, he's very funny. i hate it! why did god choose to save him and kill his brother? it's like with joe kennedy jr. dying while jack survived (... briefly) to become president. why!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Opinion on Sombr?
ED rehab and a re-education camp where he has one chance to learn to not be so fucking annoying. if he fails, hard labor for 15 years.
Hi, I just saw your post about Inda Navarrette playing in possession instead of Margaret and now can’t unsee it. Now I want to see Inda in the role. She was absolutely incredible in obsession. It’s performance that’s going to stay with me for along time. I have liked some of Margaret’s projects like the Maid and the Substance, but I think that’s the only projects that I’ve liked so far. Nikki deserved better and I also feel that Sarah deserved better too but some people seem okay or that she deserved what happened to her ( I don’t agree). I think it’s one of the best movies I’ve seen this year. I will say that I think that I had a problem with the pacing, but It’s still a great movie and that ending is going to haunt me for along time.
I have question it’s about the cat. It’s probably a silly question but why do Nikki give Bear the cat ( I don’t want to spoil the movie lol) ?
i'm glad you agree with me! lol. i find margaret qualley to be one of the least-compelling actresses working today, and it is beyond frustrating to watch her be handed these high-profile roles that call for specific skills she demonstrably doesn't have. i'm afraid that we're going to be in another situation like with lily rose-depp and nick hoult in nosferatu, where the supporting male performance needlessly and consistently upstages the central (female) performance due to the frankly exaggerated gap in acting competence.
i can almost guarantee that margaret was hired for the possession role because she "looks" the part. luckily, so does inde. and, more importantly, inde has demonstrated that she is capable of tackling the physical and emotional range required for the role. obsession is a fine script (i especially love the monologues), but her performance is what makes the film work. without her, it would not be the phenomenon it is. i would be, i fear, on par with less-interesting feminist 101 navel gazing like companion.
vague slight spoilers: as for your question, i think the writer has niki do That Thing with the cat to illustrate for the audience that 1. she has no control over her actions (she is possessed by the specter of what bear wished for) and 2. the specter that possesses her is a kind of malevolent force that turns expressions romantic love into something nefarious. this is better illustrated, i think, by the hansel and gretel incest monologue. niki told sara that she saw bear as her little brother; her specter has eaten that thought and turned it into a violent, controlling, incestuous impulse. niki felt bad for bear when he lost his cat; her specter turns that empathy into something dark, because she cannot comprehend not wanting to literally consume the thing she loves.
my favorite part of the backrooms movie was that sexy targaryen boy from a knight of the seven kingdoms wearing an end apartheid crop top
How it feels complaining at you guys
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
CHASE INFINITI Photographed by Dan Doperalski for Variety
Carl van Vechten (American, 1880 - 1964)
Carmen de Lavallade, 1955
this is like 50% of tumblr’s user base summarized
i named them cruelty of the heart and sickness of the mind
flirting vs harassment
literally 😭
olivia, babygirl, respectfully this is not how we maximize our rebound potential. yes, he is tall and he is in a popular band, but his energy is all wrong. louis gave the appearance of being trained like a housepet whereas new man veers a little too closely to matty healy. he’s dirty, he’s unruly, he looks like he smells of pizza. as a rockstar, he’s inherently untrustworthy in a way a former child actor is not. it’s all wrong for her image.
i hate to bring up dua lipa and callum (i don’t) but their relationship demonstrates how to tactfully maximize your couple potential by leaning into the woman’s aesthetic. callum, like louis, isn’t posh or very smart, and he likes the pub and soccer a bit too much. but with patience, dua cleaned him up and now he talks about books and fountain pens and has the veneer or a gentleman rather than a football hooligan because that matches her image. it’s like the anti-taylor swift and travis kelce—taylor is attempting to convince us she is nothing more than a normal white american woman who loves sportsball and sportsmanballs. no one is buying it because it doesn’t match her established persona.
you have to aim for a man who complements you, as a powerful woman, rather than upstages you. tom holland and z are another example of this—a rowdy middle class englishman who has been thoroughly tamed in his public image by his association with his wife. we know all these men are slurping beer and barking like dogs at home while watching tv with their m8s, but in public they’re accessories. louis was an accessory. i’m not sure an american zoomer rockstar can be molded in that same way.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
people telling chatgpt their problems is insane to me like girl just get a tumblr….
Any time you say something about men being inherently predatory (man vs bear, a group of men is a threat, etc.) you are being racist. Treating men as inherently predatory is fundamentally inseparable from anti-blackness because Black men are hypermasculinized. That rhetoric affects Black men the most.
When you say you'd pick the bear over the man or a group of men is a threat, you are saying you'd pick the bear over a Black man and a group of Black men are a threat. It's not changing anything or flipping the genders. All Black men are men. If it sounds racist now, that's because it's always been racist and you didn't realize the implication.
Sure you could freely use your free speech to freely say, "A group of White men are a threat" or "I'd pick a Black man over a bear but a bear over a White man." But you and I and everyone else all know exactly how that sounds. And it's still racist because why do you always think only of White men when you're thinking about an abstract hypothetical man?
When you hear something about men being predatory, you should always think about how that affects Black men or you will inevitably say something racist.
framing black men in this way (as victims who could never hurt a woman) is an interesting choice when western black women are currently in the midst of a yearslong femicide crisis. said femicide (and rape, and abuse) is committed almost entirely by black men who, as men, are indeed dangerous. your rhetoric frames the modern issue of black femicide as inherently less important than the historical issue of black men being wrongfully accused of sex crimes. it suggests that black women should shut up about their negative experiences with men out of a kind of race fealty. it’s despicable because black women are indeed incredibly race loyal and suffer in silence from the physical, material harm inflicted on them by black men as well as the psychological warfare of being subjected to constant, intense misogynoir within the community and also outside of it. black cultures, like all cultures, are rooted in patriarchy. the logic of this post is a particularly ugly and blunt example of what afro-patriarchy looks like.
a black woman, along with any race of woman, has every right to say, “i hate all men” because men are dangerous. you should not seek to control the speech of women when they discuss misogyny, as women are a marginalized group based on sex and subject to sex-specific violence, a universal force that keeps women at the global level under the control of men. when men stop targeting women for sex-based violence, then we can speak on the issue of whether or not saying “all men are ___” leads to racialized thinking. until then, telling women to not disparage men is simply another manifestation of silencing victims and survivors. the fact that you felt this was at all appropriate to write is the perfect demonstration of how misogyny warps thinking to minimize harm to women as mere collateral damage in the rhetoric of political activism.
