a few months ago i submitted a draft of a kevjean fic for a fiction writing class and my professor (who had never heard of the aftg books in his life btw) gave me some of the most INSANE feedback ever....because what do you mean "we're getting kevin's idea of jean, the absence-shaped jean, the jean whose success kevin made possible by sending him away" and "jean is a person, not a wound kevin is still tending" and "kevin and jean share something that can't be named because its context was unspeakable" and "kevin understands the grammar of the nest: you can protect someone only by protecting them sideways" and "someone who is both present and unreachable. that's kevin's situation with jean." what the fuck. what the actual fuck. i'm going to throw up.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I love Andrew Minyard so much because wdym it was YOUR idea to kiss him and YOUR idea to jerk him off but then YOU were inconvenienced by having his cum on your hand to the point of using HIS SHIRT as a cum rag? Fucking iconic.
The analysis that Kevin was both a victim and and enabler really irks me SO MUCH.
(this ended up getting too long, so there is more bellow the cut)
To enable is to "give (someone or something) the authority or means to do something." An enabler therefore is someone who enables
Example: Zane was an enabler to Grayson because by leaving the room when he COULD have done something to stop It, he gave Grayson the means to hurt Jean
So the main problem I have with the analysis that Kevin in some way was an enabler is that there was nothing he could have done to stop Riko (beyond the things we already know he did, like trying to convince Riko to stop). Kevin wasnt in anyway giving Riko authority or means to abuse Jean. Riko already had the authority to abuse BOTH of them from the start.
The worst of this stupid analysis is that it indirectly implies Kevin enabled his own abuse. When Jean arrived, Kevin had already been living in the Nest for 7 years (Kayleigh died when Kevin was 9 and Jean was sent to the US when Kevin was 16). For those 7 years, he was Riko's sole victim. There was no one in a better or worse situation than him because it was literally just him. Through out those 7 years, he wasn't able to do anything to stop his own abuse, both at Tetsuji's and Riko's hands. He had no power to defend himself whatsoever.
Jean himself says Kevin was "the first body upon which Riko could practice his fledgling cruelties". So we know for sure during the time Kevin lived alone with Riko that he was being bpth physically and psychologically abused.
If we are assuming he could have stopped what was being done to Jean and didn't because he was afraid, then we also have to assume he could have stopped what was being done to him before and didn't. In other words, this would make him an enabler or complicit in his own abuse, and I hope you all realize how bad this sounds.
Suffering less physical abuse for the sole reason he had to look okay for a camera doesn't mean he had any power whatsoever to stop Riko. We know he used his priviledges in the ways he could, but straight up fighting isnt exactly smart and wouldnt take anyone any where.
The only time in canon Kevin tried to stop Riko from hurting someone, Riko elbowed him in the face in the middle of a tv Studio (this happens right after Kathy's Interview: "A black look twisted Riko's expression into something ugly and unrecognizable. He reached for Neil, but Kevin caught his arm to stop him. Riko slammed his elbow back into Kevin's face without missing a beat"). All of this taking in consideration they were in a public space, where anyone could come in at any time and that Riko didnt know who Neil truly was, so to him this was just a random boy. That was Riko's first instinct. He did It without missing a beat.
Suffering less drastic physical abuse doesn't equate being in a position to stop abuse from happening. We know that Kevin used the small "priviledges" he had to help as he could (like taking the Ravens' attention from Jean so that they wouldnt notice where he was hurt, trying to convince Riko to stop or not do certain things, taking care and staying with Jean after, bringing him presents, etc.), but there isnt much more that can be expected from someone who was essentially still a child too, and also being abused.
It always baffles me how the fandom somehow thinks that Kevin should have had the power or capcity to protect another when he couldn't even protect himself, neither before Jean arrived nor after.
Another thing that makes me so annoyed is him being called a coward for not fighting Riko. I am sorry, but straight up defying Riko wouldn't be brave, it would be stupid, for a number of reasons. Firstly it wouldn't stop Riko from abusing Jean, and now instead of being in conditions to help and protect Jean from the other Ravens, Kevin is hurt too and the both of them are hurt (was he supposed to make Riko punish him too in solidarity? Because that is most definitely not the revolutionary take yall think it is). Second, and most importantly, it would probably make the abuse on Jean worse. Jean himself says that Riko already hated how much Kevin cared for him. Now, image Riko for 7 years has this obedient pet, with whom he is obsessed, that has been oh so well trained and conditioned. He knows his place, obeys and lowers his head, everytime without fail. Look how cool, Riko can beat him and he won't even try to defend himself, he has a brother and a personal punching bag, isn't that amazing? But then, all of a sudden, this french kid arrives and Riko's ever so obedient brother/pet starts openly defying Riko. Kevin, who has never sided against or fought Riko for seven years, is now actively and openly siding against Riko and with Jean. What exactly do yall think Riko would do to Jean?
I know we are used to seeing Neil run his mouth and only think about the consequences (both for him and for the ones around him) later. This is what ultimately gets Seth killed. But I dont think Kevin not being like that is a bad thing. That's how he survived and how he made sure Jean survived too.
Kevin would have been a coward if he didn't do absolutely anything to help Jean, but not doing the one thing that would make it so much worse for both of them and not having the power to stop the abuse from happening does not make him a coward.
If you ask me, the fact Kevin kept on going behind Riko's back for Jean, even though Riko would hurt him if he found out, is actually pretty brave. A coward would have never asked to learn french or gotten out of his way to see and talk to Jean or tried to talk Riko out of hurting Jean whenever he could or actively brought the Ravens attention on him.
Honestly, for someone who spent 7 years alone with Riko and Tetsuji, being conditioned to think he was inferior and that he owed the Moriyamas obedience forever, the fact Kevin, time and time again, rebels and disobeys, even if in secret, shows more courage than 90% of the fans calling him a coward would have.
The most upsetting thing about this argument that 'Kevin is such a coward because he didn't do anything' is that it completely crumbles when we bring it to reality and compare it to actual situations of opression. My country lived a military dictatorship and during this time many common citizens would, in secret, do things against the regime, from housing people who were victim of political persecution to printing or helping give out censored material. Those people didn't invade detention centers where there were others actively being tortured, they didn't openly scream against the regime (which would have landed them on one of said detention centers). Still, can you call them cowards or say they were complicit with what was happening? Because in my books, these people were still brave as fuck even if they weren't openly defying a power that they had no way to win against.
There is a difference between courage and stupidity.
(Also worth to note that you can literally make someone go mad without physically hurting them in anyway. This myth that psychological abuse is a lesser form of abuse when compared to physical is a lie. So the fact Kevin was mostly psychologically tortured does not mean he was chilling or less of a victim of torture. Jean himself says there were forms of mental abuse that were RESERVED for Kevin. So if the fandom could actually stop comparing deeply debilitating trauma, that would be wonderful. This shit is not trauma olympics)
arranged political marriage narratives are for me similarly fraught to unplanned pregnancy in that they tend to skew towards a conservative, anti-choice sentiment regardless of the author's intentions or ideology, because the end goal is typically the realisation of an apparently empowering and subversive romantic fantasy where the characters involved experience compellingly turbulent and sexually charged conflict between normative expectations and their own desires, but ultimately find themselves fulfilled in and even healed by the acceptance of undeniably important and worthwhile but conventional (and oppressively gendered) roles like that of the loving husband and wife or parental figures. which is a shame because i Do think that there's some interesting and worthwhile commentary to be explored through these kinds of kinky fantasies that reflect the anxieties surrounding very real and enduring sociopolitical issues regarding autonomy and consent, but when that tension is ultimately resolved by settling into a role that's always been what's expected of you, even if it does allow you to manipulate certain social power dynamics in your favour, it just rings kind of hollow. all of which is a very long-winded way of saying that i wish there were more arranged marriage narratives where the participants never fall in love, but still come to care for and respect one another, and perform the marital duties expected of them out of that affection and desire to both help each other advance their sociopolitical countermoves to subvert the status quo and to survive, using the legal and social trappings that come with their marital status to their advantage to protect each other.
like i really Cannot stress enough how imperative it is that they never feel anything like romantic love for one another - nor are they really friends, although they may like each other's company and even actively prefer it to anyone else's. rather their relationship is comparable to that of two people covering each other's backs in a fight, or two prisoners in the same cell, and there's as much of the beauty of human connection to that as there is tragedy that those are the circumstances that brought them together. and they can absolutely have sexual tension and even consummate a sexual relationship and enjoy it, but it will be unavoidably dubiously consensual at best by design. no flinching from it.
arranged marriage where you love each other so much that you'd both shove the other person through a crack in the wall the moment it opened up in front of you while screaming at them to go, go now, run, and don't you dare look back
Hey there! I love your AFTG meta, you make me appreciate the narrative structure and care in these books (that often gets overlooked tbh).
One thing I struggle with understanding is why Nora thought it necessary to include the whole Proust thing. I get that Riko's threat is necessary to get Neil to Evermore and it's also a way to show Neil's character growth and how much he is willing to sacrifice for Andrew. But why make it so that Neil's sacrifice was in vain? I don't see how Andrew getting assaulted by Proust furthers the plot or the characterization. It's just another retraumatizing experience for Andrew which seems narratively unnecessary to me. And we already know that Riko is cruel so that decision doesn't paint him in a new way.
I know some people criticize AFTG (especially the new trilogy) for being trauma porn and I don't agree usually but in this instance I'm struggling to see a narrative purpose. What do you think?
Hi there,
Thank you so much! I love AFTG & its narrative structure, parallels, themes, characters, relationships, etc.,. I do think it’s a lot better written than some readers suggest it is. Of course, AFTG isn’t flawless. No book is, and there is definitely aspects of AFTG to be critiqued. (I also think it’s important for people to reflect on what books they consider to be “high-brow literature” and WHY they or society considers certain works to be “classics” versus other works as “trashy.” And whose works often get to be considered “classy and influential” and whose works are considered “trashy and garbage.” As well as reflecting on who the intended audience for those works are).
Now, as for Proust… I admit this is an aspect of AFTG I struggle with, as well. I don’t consider AFTG “Dead Dove do Not Eat” (or trauma porn, as you mentioned) b/c compared to other works - both OG fiction and Fanfic found on AO3 - AFTG isn’t actually all that dark tbh. Neil’s torture at Evermore fades to black relatively quickly, and even when Neil is being tortured by Nathan & Lola it’s not very explicit, and Nathan & Lola are very quickly murdered by Stuart. Drake assaulting Andrew is from a Outside POV and is mainly about the aftermath & Drake is quickly murdered by Aaron, and Proust assaulting Andrew happens off-page.
I don’t really consider Andrew or Neil’s back stories to be trauma porn either - I think I’ve mentioned before but I do admittedly get a bit irked when some readers interact with Andrew/Neil & the other Foxes as if they’re entirely unrelatable or as if ‘no one can possibly understand what these characters have gone through.’ And yes, some elements of AFTG are unrealistic, however the elements that often get critiqued… aren’t the unrealistic aspects. Andrew experiencing multiple instances of CSA DOES happen to children, especially children without adequate care/forgotten by an over-burdened system. Neil being on the run with his mother from his abusive father is a reality for MANY women in shelters with their children. Kevin being raised in an abusive cult does happen to people - perhaps more people than even some readers realize. Many of the Foxes being addicts is, in fact, a high possibility with at-risk youth. I don’t think writing about this reality counts as trauma porn especially b/c for the MOST part I do think Nora treats her characters with respect & dignity, particularly the Foxes.
I have seen the arguments that Proust not assaulting Andrew would have worked equally well for the narrative, and tbh I agree. I think Riko making the threat & Neil’s willingness to go to Evermore to defend Andrew based on that threat alone would have had the same narrative impact. While Neil going to Evermore and Andrew still getting assaulted is, perhaps, a commentary on futility & how even the intention to save Andrew is just as important even if Neil did not succeed, I admittedly don’t really think the narrative impact worked b/c it wasn’t really explored.
In fact, I think Riko NOT having the resources to follow through on the threat would have made more sense: he’s not as powerful as he’s making himself out to be. Sure, he had the resources to get Drake to assault Andrew, but Drake was already under investigation for sexually assaulting children, he had very little left to lose. Proust, however, was already a doctor working at what Betsy considered to be a decent hospital. I think having Riko make an empty threat would (a) have shown that Riko is a liar and therefore what he says is unreliable - he’s talking himself up more than what he’s actually capable of doing and (b) would have also shown that the Moriyamas are not as powerful as Kevin (someone who had been conditioned to fear them from a young age) thought them to be. And I think this would have worked well because tbh I do think the amount of power that the Moriyamas have after only being in the United States for 3 generations is a bit… unrealistic. This is an actual unrealistic aspect of AFTG.
One of my big critiques of AFTG is the fact that by making the Moriyamas the All-Powerful Villains instead of having the Wesninskis, Hatfords, Moreaus, etc., be equal in terms of just being… affiliated gangs who all run in the same criminal circles, is that the underlining message is very much that Evil Japanese People control the Western World and are Stealing Your White Children. Especially b/c none of the other characters in AFTG are Japanese. I’ve mentioned before that I DON’T think this is what Nora legitimately intended, however, this is what happens when you don’t think of race & racism when you are writing your novel. A lot of readers have defended Nora on this b/c she was trying to pay homage to her love for Japan/the fact that AFTG was originally set in Japan, but she did so by making all her Japanese characters… unrepentant villains. And I have seen the argument that this isn’t racist b/c the “Moriyamas could have been not Japanese and it wouldn’t have changed anything” and listen… your Japanese characters with generational Japanese names despite having lived in the U.S for several generations who speak Japanese & teach those around them to speak Japanese… should not be so easily divorced from “being Japanese” that readers think it would be easy to make them NOT Japanese. This isn’t the winning argument some people think it is.
Frankly, I think the Wesninskis & Moriyamas SHOULD have been criminal business associates, and Kengo & Nathan should have just been criminal friends with different criminal empires who occasionally worked together. Mary still could have run away from her abusive husband who she thought was in danger of killing her and her son & Neil still could have played Exy & even still have met Riko + Kevin as a child. Riko still would of had leverage to hold over Neil if he knew Neil was running from his criminal father - actually I think this could have been MORE interesting b/c Riko would of have some jealousy over the fact that Neil would have been in more similar standing to Ichirou than to Riko himself (although I also have complicated feelings over the whole “Main vs Side Branch” thing the Moriyama family does… like maybe if the other criminal families had similar set-ups it wouldn’t feel as, again, a weird representation of Japanese/Asian culture but more like how you see a lot of Royalty across different cultures functions).
Anyway, sorry, side track (as usual) back to Andrew & Proust: I think an argument could be made about how Andrew’s character also explores themes of medical abuse as part of the institutional abuse Andrew has experienced his entire life (in the foster care system + in juvenile detention) and Proust is part of that - Andrew goes from being forcibly medicated on medication that is BAD for Andrew (to which many people ignore), and even in the process of trying to detox from medication he never should have been placed on in the first place, Andrew is institutionalized in a “safe” place where he is once again assaulted by someone who is responsible for his care. It very much fits with the theme of his character & the message that within every “safe” system where people of authority are meant to take care of you, there is a risk of predators. It will reinforce Andrew’s world view, as well. (I suppose it was one of the earliest lines in TFC: it’s not the world that’s cruel, it’s the people in it).
I think the problem is the fact that… outside of the brief conversation Andrew & Neil have about Proust, and Andrew’s obvious desire NOT to talk about Proust, the consequences of Andrew being assaulted in Easthaven aren’t really addressed nor do they seem to impact the narrative (other than having Neil request for Proust to be investigated & killed by his Uncle Stuart). Unlike Drake assaulting Andrew, which: reveals Andrew’s back story to Neil/the reader & explains Andrew’s behaviour and mentality and the trauma that Andrew has gone through, shows how ruthless Riko (not just of orchestrating murder like with Seth but also of orchestrating rape) is & what Andrew is in danger of for trying to protect Kevin (and what Andrew risks by continuing to protect Kevin + addressing Andrew’s own lack of self-preservation) allows Andrew to be taken off his medication earlier which allows Andrew to disappear from the novel for a bit & then of course this allows Neil to go to Evermore, Proust just kind of… happens. Andrew has already experienced being sexually assaulted as an adult by Drake, which already adds to his trauma, Proust (other than perhaps adding to the institutional trauma that I mentioned above) does seem rather unnecessary.
I have mentioned before that I think after being sexually assaulted while handcuffed, the one “safe” object Andrew had been using to explore his sexuality with Roland (the handcuffs Andrew had been using on Roland) likely wouldn’t have been viable any longer, therefore Andrew probably wouldn’t have been able to continue his FWBs thing with Roland (thank GOD get that creep out of here) - but that had already come to an end, anyway, b/c Andrew’s relationship with Neil was starting up - so there wasn’t really a chance to explore how being assaulted as an adult would have impacted Andrew’s ability to continue exploring his sexuality with Roland/what kind of setbacks it would of had - we did get one comment from Nora that Andrew wouldn’t have responded well to Roland’s pity, but that’s about it (and that would have been pity about Drake, not Proust).
This also could have been an opportunity to further Andrew’s distrust of medical professionals - perhaps thrown a wrench into his dynamic with Betsy, but that also doesn’t happen. (I'd say or adds distrust to his and Abby's relationship but they were already doing pretty poorly even before Easthaven).
& obviously it doesn’t really hinder Andrew’s relationship with Neil - in fact, Andrew is able to progress in his relationship with Neil MUCH more rapidly than it seems he was able to progress with Roland. We know Andrew started hooking-up with Roland when he was 17 & the last time he hooked-up with Roland at 19 (two years later) he still cannot let Roland touch him. Obviously, that is b/c Roland… completely failed at following Andrew’s boundaries not to touch him in the first place, so it could be that b/c of that Andrew never would have been able to trust Roland to touch him (which is why it’s so interesting that until Neil, Andrew never tried to find anyone else). Perhaps, the narrative is trying to show how much Andrew DOES trust Neil/how much he wants to be with Neil that he refuses to let what happened with Drake or Proust hold him back from his relationship with Neil especially b/c Neil DOES respect Andrew’s boundaries.
I’ve also mentioned before that the only other exploration of Proust that could be interesting would be Andrew finding out that JEAN knows what happened with Proust b/c Riko made Jean read (and possibly watch) what Proust did to Andrew. It’s why I don’t think Andrew & Jean could ever be friends in Canon b/c of this secret: Jean knows what happened with Proust & Andrew does not know that Jean knows. And since we know how closely Andrew guards his secrets/his privacy, I don’t think he would cope well with Jean knowing such extreme details about Andrew’s assaults/knowing in detail what triggers Andrew had. Jean basically knows all of Andrew’s vulnerabilities, and I’m pretty sure if Andrew knew this he would seriously contemplate killing Jean. He couldn’t control everyone knowing about Drake, and as far as he is aware only Neil (someone Andrew already trusts) knows about Proust… to have Jean, someone unknown to Andrew, also know… I don’t think it would go well. [I also don’t think it would be fair of Jean to be friends with Andrew and NOT tell him, which is why I think it’s best if they just remain distant].
was originally gonna put this in the tags but i changed my mind
i agree with all of this but also i think noras intention with proust was to emphasize neils habit of not thinking about how his actions will bring rikos wrath down on others, like with seth (and also the ravens fans trashing the cars but thats less relevant here because rikos not directly involved). after neil and riko get in a fight at the banquet, riko tells neil “you just cost him something he didn’t want to lose” which implies that until neil picked a fight, riko had planned to honor the fact he said it wouldnt happen if neil went to the nest. he only went back on it when neil got violent because riko is vindictive and sees the fight as neil not knowing his place
it feels shitty to say but if you lay the blame on neil for seth and the cars for being the igniting force despite them being another persons actions, then in this case is neil is also the igniting force for proust
if nora had had neil realize this then i think it wouldve been more interesting but she leaves it implied for the readers and doesnt have neil touch on it, which makes it fall flat imo. i wouldve loved to see neil put the pieces together and grapple with guilt regarding this, but the most we get is him feeling like his effort was in vain (which it was! but not because riko lied)
This is really interesting, I had never thought about how the fight might have been the thing that made Riko change his mind!
I do actually think that the Proust assault was narratively necessary for Andrew and Neil's relationship, which as we know is the thing that ultimately saves both Andrew and Neil.
Imo Andrew would have found it really difficult to recover from Neil being tortured FOR him, possibly he never could have recovered from it, at least not enough to enter into a relationship with Neil. Andrew identifies himself as the protector and at this point still has extremely low self worth outside of that self-designated role, he isn't ready yet to conceive of himself as someone worth protecting. Neil understands this and calls him out on it in the Proust-revelation scene ("You spend all this time watching our backs [...] Who's watching yours? Don't say you are, because you and I both know you take shit care of yourself."). Andrew dismisses him, because he just does not think of himself as someone worth taking care of or having his back watched.
Neil's response ("if it means losing you, then no") is so beautiful and devastating precisely because it challenges this narrative that Andrew has about himself. The assault happening anyway lets Andrew have the essential revelation that Neil would voluntarily choose to put himself in mortal danger to keep Andrew safe, but doesn't force Andrew to live with his safety being bought at the cost of Neil's safety (which he isn't ready for).
Relatedly, Andrew's promises and deals are still his main framework for self worth. The assault happening anyway means that Andrew didn't cost Neil anything, he can process Neil's time in the Nest as the result of Riko's and Neil's decisions that exist independently of what happened to Andrew. Andrew didn't fail in his promise to Neil, because Andrew suffered anyway.
Of course, Neil (or anyone not massively traumatised!) wouldn't see Neil succeeding in protecting him as a failure of Andrew's, but I think that Andrew would! Especially because Andrew has a history of processing his previous SA as something that he somehow "chose" or was responsible for, in that he interprets it as the price he chose to pay to keep Cass as a mother (this is Andrew's trauma speaking, ofc we the readers know and it's impossible for a child - or anyone - to have chosen this).
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
hello! this is anon from before. Please do not apologise!!! I was grinning at seeing how much there was to read lol
on roland: oh how i hate when people try to frame his relationship with andrew as a good thing for andrew and I've seen it happen. i agree that andrew most likely approached him first but roland should have immediately turned him down. roland will always be a creepy weirdo to me there's this fic i read ages ago called one more time (with feeling) it's a time travel fic andreil in their 30s are sent back to the beginning of the tfc and have to relive past events and in chap 8 there's this exchange:
“Okay,” Neil replied with a shrug. “I forgot how old Roland was.”
“What do you mean?” Andrew asked, though the bleak twist of his stomach gave him a hint. He crawled on the bed, not making Neil move as he crawled over him to his spot against the wall.
“He’s in his late twenties. When we were that age, we were both pro, with our own apartments and multi-million dollar contracts. We weren’t hooking up with high schoolers.”
Neil’s words hit Andrew like an exy ball to the gut. “I chose him,” Andrew said shortly, staring directly at the ceiling above him.
Neil exhaled loudly, rolling over to turn off the light and plunging them into darkness. “I know you did,” he said, somehow sounding sincere when he should sound patronizing. “This isn’t about you. You did nothing wrong.”
“Then why are we talking about this.”
“I guess I just have a question,” Neil finally said, rolling back over to face Andrew, his eyes soft in the faint moonlight. “Were you still attracted to high schoolers when you were a pro?”
Andrew stopped being attracted to high schoolers years before he graduated college. “Go to sleep, Neil.”
and like yeah
in my mind post canon andrew doesn’t think of roland or speak to him again
there is a fic where the foxes including aaron and nicky listen to andreil have sex and I'd like to scrub it from my brain it actually made me a little nauseous
there's also discussing andreils sex life, betting on them in regards to sexual things, things like where neil walks in to the locker room and they pass over money to each other or make weird comments, neil tells them he doesn't want them asking about his and andrew's sex life and they continue to discuss things about him and andrew privately like jfc what kind of friends are you?
oh i actually hate that i thought i was overreacting for finding those moments weird in fanfic why would neil be comfortable around people who all want to fuck him and keep commenting on his body. do you think it'd make him feel gross knowing they we're all looking at him this way? do you think he'd have issues with people thinking of him like that almost in a way like andrew is but in relation to his demisexuality?
allison neil besties has always confused me as does Katelyn neil it might be harsh but i prefer fics where he just doesn't care about her that's really just canon neil lol
but if the story is good, I'll go meh whatever and let it go
that bit about people treating andreil like a fanon ship where shippers are reading into every interaction was very interesting its definitely not a take ive seen before because like you said people don't really view any moment pre edens confession as romantic and I've absolutely seen "neil didn’t mean it that way" posts a lot
Im sorry if some of what im saying is coming out strangely its like 4:34 rn lol my brains scrambled
anyway thanks for sharing! I really like your writing :)
bye! :p
Hi there,
What an opportunity to return to my roots: disliking Roland. On Twitter, back in 2019 after Nora told everyone about Andrew being 17 & Roland being 22-23 and someone responded mentioning how that was a bit of an inappropriate age gap Nora did respond saying that nothing about Roland is appropriate considering he also: knowingly serves alcohol to underage people & also helps the Monsters drug the Foxes. I notice others also bring this up when mentioning that Andrew/Roland was “technically not illegal” compared to Roland’s other, actually illegal, crimes. Which, yes technically in the state of South Carolina it is not illegal for adults to have sexual relations with minors who are above the age of 16 (I believe an attempt was made in 2007?? To change the age of consent to 18, but the law didn’t pass) so of all of Roland’s crimes he would actually go to jail for, having sexual relations with Andrew MAY not be one of them.
I say may for a reason.
Since if the adult is in a position of power over the minor (teacher, coach, employer) than the law is stricter and technically the only reason Roland wasn’t in an official manger position of Andrew when Andrew worked at Eden’s was b/c Andrew couldn’t even legally work at Eden’s and worked under the table, b/c he wasn’t of age to be working at a night club. Andrew never being sober (mandated medication, cracker dust, alcohol) also muddles the laws of consent as well. A good lawyer might have been able to make a case.
However knowingly serving alcohol to minors IS definitely illegal in South Carolina and would have gotten Roland (and Eden’s Twilight) in a lot of legal trouble if they were ever reported/caught. Helping the Monsters drug the Foxes would also be illegal (also I think it does say something about Roland’s character that he just trusts he is helping roofie people for information and not sexual assault (y’know, the usual reason people want to drug other people’s drinks)… also if Neil had been a threat & Andrew found out after Roland drugged him and then Andrew killed Neil, that would be accessory to murder! Fun times - I mean, I’m sure Andrew would have covered his tracks, but still). Roland is either (a) stupid (b) doesn’t think of Andrew as THAT dangerous or (c) does think of Andrew as THAT dangerous and doesn’t care.
Interesting notes on laws in South Carolina during the time of AFTG as well: “sodomy” was still illegal & hate crime wasn’t punishable - meaning the men who beat up Nicky could have been charged for assault but not for a hate crime. It was also legal at the time for “gay panic” to be used as a legal self-defense in regard to men who attacked outwardly gay men b/c they were worried about being “predated” upon.
The thing is, I don’t think Nora intended for Roland to be quite AS creepy as he ultimately ended up being. He is obviously disgusted by rape & supports Aaron killing Drake. Nora also once answered a question - probably a decade ago - saying that Roland asked Andrew if he was okay & was concerned about him the first time they had a conversation post-Drake (Andrew, who hates pity, and would have particularly hated pity from someone he had a sexual relationship with, likely did not appreciate the sentiment, as she said Andrew wants to appear to be “strong and unbreakable” - Nora also once said that Andrew had been terrified Neil would pity him after Drake + finding out about Andrew’s self-harm & thankfully for Andrew pity isn’t an emotion Neil really bothers with: I also think it’s important to note that Nora DOES characterize Andrew as someone who experiences a lot of shame surrounding his sexual assaults & ppl knwoing about them - Andrew’s behaviour isn’t atypical for people who have survived CSA/SA but sometimes I think Fandom thinks Andrew is… I don’t know how to explain it properly, but almost as if Andrew is “too strong” to feel shame. And the thing is, Andrew is trying to be strong about it b/c he does view his SA - particularly his SA at 20 - as making him “weak” but this preoccupation with strength & weakness is due to feelings of shame).
Part 1/?
Anyway, Roland I don’t think was written to be or initially considered by the author to be purposefully predatory. He’s basically a product of the time AFTG was written & the attitudes surrounding consent in that time period. The in-universe explanation of his character is that of someone who doesn’t think of themselves as a “bad guy” or “predatory” but also thinks it’s okay to sleep with willing minors as long as it’s “technically legal (again ignoring Andrew never being sober/illegally working in a bar) he would never view himself as having “taken advantage of a vulnerable person”
[also just to add: I don’t agree with readers who say Andrew at 17 wasn’t a “vulnerable person” just b/c Andrew as a character would hate being called vulnerable/not consider himself vulnerable or b/c he frequently got into fights & had enough bad experiences to “know better.” Some people argue that trauma forces kids to “grow up faster” but trauma is just as likely to stunt developmental growth, it doesn’t kick-start maturity. A traumatized 17-year-old is, I would argue, is more vulnerable than a well-adjusted 17-year-old from a loving home.
Andrew at 17: spent 13 years in the Foster Care system at 13 different homes (that’s basically a new home every year). The Spear House that Andrew moved into at 12 was his 13th house.
He was sexually abused at 4 different foster homes from between the ages of 7-13. We have some hints that at 7 Andrew breaks his leg & arm, causing him to bed-ridden and this is when Steven made him say please. We aren’t given the exact ages of when Andrew was assaulted by Jesse (who also choked Andrew) or Samuel (who would call Andrew a whore/tell him he wanted it/liked it) but we can assume it happened between the ages of 8-12. Then, obviously we know about Drake from ages 12-13 who tortured Andrew with a knife & also tickled him to make him laugh. While Andrew’s other homes were not sexually abusive, Andrew says none of them were ‘good’ so we can assume all of them were in some way spanning from neglectful to emotionally/physically abusive.
From 12-13 Andrew was self-harming in order to feel some semblance of control over his body - and I’ve noticed some ppl say that Andrew’s self-harm wasn’t “that bad” b/c his motivation was to “survive not kill himself” to which I say (a) a lot of people self-harm b/c they want to feel in-control not b/c they want to kill themselves and (b) Andrew was 12 and being sexually abused let’s not pretend his severe mental health issues are actually rational thinking. Having the need to feel like you need to re-claim your body from sexual abuse at the age of 12, as a literal child, via self-harm is Not Good.
Then at 13, he was funneled from foster care into juvenile detention - which is prison for children, and has detrimental impacts on children’s well being & development. Andrew is in juvie from March 2000 to March 2003 based on the time line given to us in AFTG (he went to juvie in March & was there for 3 years). When thinking of Andrew in juvie it’s important to picture him as he would be at the ages he was there: 13, 14, 15, and 16 (Andrew celebrates his 14th, 15th, and 16th birthdays in juvie) and not as an Adult Man. (This might help ppl who write fanfic/meta based on Andrew in juvie or Andrew/Neil meeting in juvie: unless you are aging up the characters, it’s important to scale down from Andrew as he is written at 20 vs Andrew as he ought to be as an early-to-mid adolescent. The boy is 14, not an army vet).
Nora has said juvie was better for Andrew than his foster homes b/c there were (a) no sexual predators and (b) the guards weren’t physically abusive and (c) he stops self-harming (self-harming can be addictive, as well, but in juvie it’d be harder to maintain the addiction - we don’t know when Andrew started smoking I think, but he could’ve reasonably replaced self-harm with cigarettes, it’s a lot easier to replace one addiction with another) he learns to play Exy - and is made goalkeeper b/c the coach thought he’d be less likely to harm other players this way. Despite these positives, let’s not get confused, Andrew was literally in baby prison from the ages 13-16. That’s what juvie is, it’s not boarding school or a hospital to help troubled children, it’s prison for children. It accomplishes as much ‘rehabilitation’ as American prisons for adults does. It’s also implied that while Andrew had some good experiences in juvie (accepting he was gay & kissing a boy consensually for the first time) this is also where Andrew learned how to fight, so it wasn’t a place completely without violence (also even adolescent “prisoners” [children] in juvie can be placed into solitary confinement for causing fights, be shackled if behaving violently, can be pepper sprayed if behaving violently, and be strip-searched for weapons so while Nora says the guards weren’t sexually or physically abusive b/c Higgins helped get Andrew into a “good” juvenile detention, any juvenile detention is, like I said, prison for children and would realistically function like a prison for children) [we are also told both that Andrew ‘narrowly avoided a second-term’ and was then ‘released on early parole’: we can read this as Andrew initially behaving as violently as possible (likely to avoid being released back to the Spears) & then started behaving at 15 so he could be released to the Minyards after he met with Luther & Aaron and noticed Aaron was being physically abused + when Luther confirmed he convinced Tilda to take Andrew & promised Andrew that he would ensure the Spears couldn’t foster any more children]. While it was nice of Nora to not make Andrew’s time in juvie another Absolutely Terrible Period of Andrew’s life, realistically it wouldn’t have been sunshine & roses.
Andrew also (a) commits a crime that somehow justifies as THREE year sentence or (b) commits a crime that gets him a short sentence but continues to act violently in juvie to add to his sentence and (c) is purposefully committing these crimes/acts of violence b/c Drake tormented him with threats of biological incest if Aaron were to ever visit California (who knows if Drake would have actually followed through on these threats but Andrew clearly believed he would).
In March 2003, at 16, Andrew is released released from juvie to his biological mother - who is an addict & physically abusive - after 5 months of living with her, he risks killing himself in a ‘car accident’ to save Aaron from her abuse: Andrew at this point is not a master criminal and his plan was to literally… cause a head-on collision, after allowing himself to get beaten by Tilda to show Luther & Maria that Tilda was being abusive to Aaron
Andrew must have realized, even wearing his seatbelt, there was a chance of (a) him dying alongside Tilda or (b) Tilda somehow surviving despite not wearing HER seatbelt and then telling the police Andrew tried to kill her. Or (c) Tilda dies but Andrew still gets caught b/c given Andrew’s criminal record + being abandoned to the foster care system the fact that his mother ends up dead not even within half-a-year of him living with her is, well… Suspicious. Thankfully, none of those things happen, but Andrew’s relationship with Aaron is unfortunately ruined (apparently they had a “wary but chatty” relationship prior to Tilda’s death).
Nicky tells us he returns to Columbia the day of Tilda’s funeral and convinces his parents to let him have custody of the twins (and Luther co-signs on Nicky’s house in Columbia: I wonder if it’s the same house Tilda & Aaron & Andrew were already living in or a new house - are we told this?). The time-line is pretty tight here: Nicky tells us Andrew sent Aaron to pretend to be him at Andrew’s “study session” and 5 months from March would be August, so Andrew & Aaron would have just returned to school as Juniors (I am assuming Andrew also finished his sophomore year at Macon), so what a wonderful start to the school year. Listen: I know Andrew doesn’t feel guilt for killing Tilda (she had it coming) but regardless of guilt, deliberately murdering someone is going to impact a teenager’s psyche. Especially if Andrew did it for Aaron (b/c he promised to protect him) and Aaron… (a) doesn’t believe Andrew did it for him, thinks Andrew did it himself and (b) resents Andrew for it & mourns his mother. Andrew got himself hopeful about this, it was going to be him & Aaron against the world, and then everything was ruined. One more hit to the psyche, another confirmation that it’s stupid to want & Andrew’s never going to have a human bond with someone.
Back to Andrew’s newest family dynamic at 16: Nicky (who he doesn’t really know yet and is probably not all inclined to trust after his interactions with Luther + Tilda & being burned by Aaron: biological family is proving to be just as shit as foster families) and Aaron (who he is now in a cold war with as both of them feel betrayed by one another: 16-year-old Andrew legitimately thought Aaron was going to appreciate him killing Tilda and instead gets… the opposite reaction). Nicky get’s a job at Sweetie’s & get’s Andrew clean by… locking him in the bathroom (and I’m assuming afterwards Andrew & Aaron make their new deal regarding outsiders for Andrew’s protection so Aaron doesn’t immediately start hanging out with people who do drugs again… despite their cold war. Andrew who is upset about Aaron not believing him when he promised to protect Aaron from Tilda is immediately trying to make him more promises: this unfortunately reeks of loneliness & desperation).
Nicky, for whatever reason, lets Andrew lock Aaron in the bathroom to detox. And listen, I don’t hate Nicky, and yes it was wonderful of Nicky to abandon his life in Germany to take care of (thing 1) cousin he didn’t know and (thing 2) cousin who was undoubtedly homophobic to him - and Nicky himself was very, very young, only a boy himself when he returns to America (20 I believe), but Nicky’s “parenting style” was permissive & enabling: more of a “cool and lax older brother” than actual parenting. Definitely better than Luther & Tilda but I sometimes see Fanon!Nicky as like “a father-figure” when that definitely wasn’t the dynamic going on in the Minyard-Hemmick household.
Nicky, in AFTG, also describes sober!Andrew as “soulless” and Neil suspects Nicky (and Aaron) to be afraid of Andrew sober… based on their memories of the last time they saw Andrew sober when he was 16-17. I’m sure Andrew at 16 may have cultivated this image on purpose - he was already convincing himself it was better to be thought of as “predator” than “prey” (which is why he initially starts wearing the armbands to cover his self-harm scars b/c he’s worried that if someone recognizes that he’s depressed (or in Andrew’s minds “thinks he’s depressed” b/c Andrew seems a little bit in-denial about having depression) they’re going to think he’s easy to take advantage of) and better to be “monster” than “human” but also being 16 and your newest guardian is… visibly afraid of you is not great.
It’s going to encourage Andrew to continue feeling numb/refuse to engage with life or his emotions: he got out of juvie with some hopeful expectations of how his new life as “Andrew Minyard” was going to go and it’s going… pretty shit tbh (when Andrew talks about the “dangers of hope/want” he’s not just referring to Cass he’s also referring to Aaron - thankfully, his relationship with Aaron CAN be repaired). Nora once described Andrew in high school as believing he’s perceived as “only capable of ruining other people’s lives.” And sure, Andrew wanted to be seen as scary but now it’s the only thing people see of him.
Nicky, to his credit, also seems to be afraid for Andrew b/c Nicky himself also has experienced being suicidal and was possibly able to see a shade of that in Andrew’s apathetic behaviour: Andrew may not be actively trying to kill himself but according to Nora, prior to Neil he isn’t interested in living either (“passively suicidal” I would say, since he’s literally just… waiting to die) & Nicky genuinely wants Andrew to be happy and have a good life. But there’s also a Canonical reason that Andrew resents Abby and I think their EC convo when Abby finds out about Andrew’s self-harm scars sums it up: You’ve heard what they say about me, and you believe at least some of it. Oh, it’s so boring when you try to lie. I see it in the way you look at me. *Andrew would be 18 for this conversation. Andrew wants to be perceived as scary to deter threats & simultaneously resents ppl for being scared of him. People, especially teenagers, are inherently contradictory so I think it makes sense for him. In Andrew’s mind it’s better to be predator than prey but neither of those options get to be human (the reason Andrew gets along with Bee is b/c Betsy is never afraid of Andrew, she views him as he is: human. Also when he talks to Wymack before signing Andrew seems curious that Wymack (a grown man twice the size of Andrew) isn’t afraid of him: Wymack’s POV also gives us more insight to the Andrew-Nicky-Aaron dynamic, which is as Andrew asserts: Nicky may be his & Aaron’s guardian, but they listen to ANDREW, not the other way around. While I’m sure this control feels great for Andrew, it’s, uh, still not giving Andrew any parental guidance in his life).
Sometime after Aron gets sober, Nicky gets another job at Eden’s Twilight & then somehow get’s his cousins hired. Since we are told Andrew & Roland begin hooking up when Andrew is 17, I am assuming this is sometime after November of Andrew’s junior year. (Also, again
again Nicky is super well-intentioned b/c they likely do need the money & jobs can be good structure for teenagers but also please do not get your cousin who has LITERAL addiction problems and was recently locked up in your home bathroom for DIY rehab & detox a job that allows him access to addictive substances i.e., dust and alcohol - like it was framed as “good” for Aaron to stop him from “slipping” but dust & alcohol is slipping, it’s just Nicky, Aaron & Andrew all have generational addiction issues). Since Nicky has no problems with Andrew & Aaron drinking & dusting, Andrew basically has free-reign now to get drunk and high (some more addictions alongside his cigarettes).
Part 4/?
If we give Roland the credit that Andrew hadn’t yet been medicated - FUCK - I wrote so much and then realized: Roland tells Neil he thought Andrew being off the medication would change Andrew’s no-touch rule. Roland has canonically never hooked-up with Andrew prior to his court-mandated medication. If Roland thinks that the medication is to blame for Andrew’s “no touch rule” he can’t have any experience with Andrew prior to Andrew being medicated. (I have literally been trying to give Roland some credit by saying “maybe he and Andrew initially hooked up PRIOR to Andrew being medicated” as if that would somehow be better considering Andrew’s age and circumstances, but I am an idiot who failed to remember this crucial line from TKM that disproves that.
So, uh, Andrew would be medicated until May 2004 (as his medication was another three-year sentence that he was initially meant to be taken off in May 2007 - three is Andrew’s number: 03 jersey, three years in juvie, three years on his medication, 13 foster homes, 13 therapists, important things happen to him in March which is the 3rd month).
Now, when Nicky was jumped, it was quite possibly… December, based on Nora’s earlier drafts when Nicky & Erik were both jumped & Erik was killed & Andrew killed the men over Christmas break (but in that draft it was the December of Andrew’s first year of university right before Kevin came & Andrew wasn’t working at Eden’s Twilight since only Nicky & Erik worked to support the twins and I guess Andrew wasn’t medicated in this draft… anyway it doesn’t really line up with AFTG but we know in Canon it has to be before May 2004 b/c Andrew was scheduled to come off his medication 3 years later in May 2007 & was only taken off in November after Drake attacked him) Either way, somewhere between prior to May 2004, Nicky & Andrew & Aaron are working at Eden’s Twilight and Nicky is jumped (and Andrew defends him b/c even though Nicky was a permissive guardian, he WAS the best guardian Andrew ever had & despite his fear of Andrew he also loved Andrew and he was Andrew’s which means he automatically had Andrew’s protection - also Nicky would have been the first adult gay man Andrew met who was in a happy relationship with another man and was specifically jumped for being gay like this was undoubtedly a trigger for Andrew on quite a few accounts). Andrew nearly beats the four men to death (good for Andrew). Andrew is still 17, and for plot-related purposes avoids prison & instead his violence is blamed on untreated mental illness (frankly, based on the laws in South Carolina I mentioned above, it’s not that surprising that Andrew’s defense of Nicky was treated as more “in the wrong” than Nicky being attacked by four homophobes).
From May 2004-onward Andrew is forcibly medicated & is now legally required to go to therapy. We know Andrew had 12 therapists prior to Betsy (which is practically a new therapist every 1-2 months, it’s basically the speed-run of Andrew being passed around from foster home to foster home). None of these therapists are good or helpful for Andrew.
Nicky says Andrew’s high school guidance counsellor believes the medication “saved” Andrew’s life based on how Andrew acted in his junior vs senior years of high school & Nicky at this point in the time line also believes the medication is “helping” Andrew (b/c the medication makes Andrew laugh (and none of these ppl know how being forced to laugh is a trigger for Andrew b/c he was tickled during his CSA) to them Andrew seems happy & he isn’t having angry outbursts anymore!) We, the readers, know better. Andrew’s medication is horrible for him: it makes him permanently manic, he cannot concentrate properly (constantly fidgeting & unable to drive his own fucking car - like sure it’s a bit of a joke that Andrew’s car is basically a joke b/c he killed Tilda in a car crash but having his own car also gives Andrew freedom to have his own escape route if necessary - Andrew also cannot regulate or process his emotions or his trauma on his medication: it basically had Andrew living in a haze).
Andrew hates being medicated. He tells Wymack in the EC that he tried going sober 6 times (even if that technically violated his parole) and failed. 6 times from May 2003 to when Wymack tries to recruit him, say around winter of 2004. Say he’s trying once a month for 6 months, or twice a month for 3 months - and I guess it’s through this trial & error that Andrew eventually learns he cannot be “sober” but he can avoid being as high as his medication forces him to be if he takes dust & drinks alcohol when he misses a dose (but even that only holds Andrew off for so long before he needs the pills again). Part of the reason Andrew signs with Wymack is b/c Wymack agrees Andrew can miss dosages on game nights & even though Andrew is extremely sick after game nights from missing said doses & Andrew hates being sick & is anger at everyone for being sick, he would rather be sick & angry than fucking high.
From May 2003 - until November 2003 when Andrew is desperately trying to experiment with his pills to see if he can be less high Andrew is still 17. (Wymack calls Andrew a fucked-up druggie in the scene I mentioned above (and Andrew is 18 then b/c it’s after November 2003) and yeah, that’s just the way Wymack talks and I admittedly laughed, but also Andrew is not a fucked-up druggie by choice). I imagine having to accept being medicated & then actually experiencing the effects of the medication & then trying and failing to combat said effects was a blow to Andrew. The medication is not something Andrew can physically or mentally fight.
Andrew at 17 is only four years removed from his last sexual assault (the loss of his body autonomy). One year removed from being in juvie (incarceration: the loss of physical autonomy). And now at 17, via the the court-mandated medication, he has lost his mental autonomy.
In response to this loss: Andrew tries to gain some element of control back. If he cannot control his brain, then he can control his body, and so he… makes an offer to the 23-year-old bartender at Eden’s Twilight (sometimes between May 2003 after when he is on his drugs but before he turns 18 in November 2003). Maybe this is the only gay person Andrew knows who isn’t related to him. Maybe Andrew doesn’t want to risk hitting on a boy at high school and then having rumours spread. Maybe he was thinking of Roland when he was sober and just hadn’t gotten around to making an offer (or worse never was going to make an offer but the drugs make him impulsive enough to go for it). [I still like to think Andrew pursued Roland & not the other way around b/c I don’t think Andrew would be as comfortable being “pursued” versus if he was the one initiating b/c he doesn’t want ppl looking at him thinking he’s prey and if Andrew initiates & sets the pace of the relationship & he is the one “in-control.”] [And maybe this is me giving Roland too much credit & I just don’t want to think Roland - knowing that Andrew was forcibly medicated, knowing that Andrew was never sober and had dust & alcohol in his system as well - looked at this drugged-up teenage boy and was like “I should ask him if he’s down to fuck.” Like even if he thought Andrew was “cool” for beating up homophobes (which yes Andrew was cool for beating up those homophobes) Andrew’s violence is also a trauma response and shouldn’t be viewed as making him “more adult.”
Nora says they start with “cautious make-outs” which would be nice if it was a boy Andrew met at high school & not a man who has: graduated high school, graduated college, has a full-time job bartending & despite presumably knowing gay men his own age decides to hook-up in secret with the nearest high school boy who has just been placed on drugs that have a visible impact on his personality. We know Andrew never let Roland touch him (which Roland apparently just never… questioned outside of thinking maybe it was b/c of Andrew’s medication) and Andrew eventually starts hand-cuffing Roland especially when they begin experimenting with Andrew giving handjobs/blowjobs so that Roland cannot touch Andrew (and Roland is still not… questioning anything. Perhaps, he could have thought Andrew’s “no-touch” rule was b/c he was 17 and shy (big yuck) or a kink thing - but Andrew must have lashed out at some point when Roland first touched him, first said the word please - and so Roland must realize there is something going on beyond Andrew just being shy or a control freak, but he still continues his arrangement with Andrew all the way up until Andrew turns 20 [and listen I know this is just b/c of the AFTG time line and it just so happens that Andrew turns 20 and Drake happens, and then Easthaven, and then he’s with Neil, but like C’MON the narrative implications of Roland only being with Andrew when he’s a TEENAGER from the ages 17-19. Like this is why it’s important to think these details through].
Anyway, it’s these details & history that make Andrew Minyard a “vulnerable member of society” and someone who is actually MORE vulnerable to having his need for human connection & validation & personal autonomy be taken advantage of than someone WITHOUT his background and experiences. Andrew so badly wants to be seen as “scary” as not “prey” like how children are prey, that he forgets he is still only a teenage boy in high school. “Andrew knows what rape looks like! He wouldn’t let anything happen he didn’t want” (a) Andrew is fucking high (b) Andrew knows what VIOLENT rape looks like (c) even if Andrew wants to reclaim his body autonomy, which makes sense considering his mental autonomy has just been ripped away from him that doesn’t mean the way Andrew goes about it is actually giving him body autonomy. He has to hand-cuff Roland. Despite his situationship with Roland lasting until the end of his teenage years, Andrew STILL cannot handle being touched (cannot ever handle Roland touching him b/c if Andrew had to hand-cuff him once that meant a verbal no wasn’t strong enough for Roland, and what if Andrew releases him from the cuffs & says “you can touch me here” but Roland touches him somewhere else/doesn’t stop if Andrew changes his mind and somehow overpowers Andrew) and despite this lack of trust Andrew just… accepts this is as good as it’s going to get. That there’s no point in wanting anything better (this is why Neil is his pipe dream, why he can progress so much farther in his sexuality with Neil who proves time and time again that a verbal no enough to stop Neil in his tracks, & moreover that Neil isn’t going to do anything without a verbal yes. It’s not enough to say no but you should also be saying yes.) That’s what I mean when I say not only was Andrew/Roland stagnant it also reinforced negative beliefs Andrew had about himself & what he deserved. Maybe this isn’t what Nora intended by her narrative, but this is where we end up].
Anyway, back to why Roland wouldn’t consider himself as someone who had taken advantage of a vulnerable person even after finding out what Drake did to Andrew: b/c what Drake did that’s force that’s violence and during that time period that’s what rape/sexual assault was thought to be (when someone needed to “prove” that they were raped by supplying evidence that they “fought back” b/c how else can you prove you weren’t willing?), with little regard given to the more subtle forms of sexual violence: power imbalance, intoxication, coercion, etc.,. A lot of people during the early 200-s (and even now) didn't think it counted as SA if it's from a SO b/c or if a SO begs until a 'no' becomes a 'yes'. SA was a stranger in the park with a knife not a college man telling his high school girlfriend she's "old enough to lose her virginity" and "there's nothing to be nervous about." Sex Education was pretty bad particularly Sex Education around consent was not good back then.
And unfortunately for Nora, when she was writing, a lot of media had this attitude as well, and minor/adult relationships (including ones that would actually be illegal such as student/teacher) were pretty popular: Pretty Little Liars, Gossip Girl, Riverdale… I mean unfortunately even Queer as Folk had Justin in high school at 17 vs Brian being 29, someone before mentioned Call Me By Your Name which has Elio at 17 and Oliver at 24. Frankly, it’s only relatively recently with the Me Too Movement & Epstein & ppl noticing strong patterns of particularly famous men who are 40+ and always seem to be dating barely-legal girls and realized hey maybe there’s a problem here.
I don’t think Nora intended for Roland to be QUITE as creepy, I think maybe he was meant to be Andrew’s “building block” to Neil (as she wanted Andrew to have SOME experience prior to Neil), and while she did acknowledge he wasn’t exactly “appropriate” I don’t think it was intended to be quite as predatory as it narratively ends up being. That’s kind of where you get into the question of authorial intent vs narrative outcome (how the writer INTENDS for something to be perceived vs how the readers ACTUALLY perceive it).
In the same way Nora never intended for her characterizations of Thea & Nicky to be racist or for AFTG to be anti-Asian considering all the villains are canonically Japanese and all the heroes are canonically white (and yes Nora supports fan!casts of the Foxes that are more racially diverse, but when she shared the actors/actresses she initially envisioned as potentially actors/actresses to play the Foxes… practically everyone was white. The Foxes, unless other specified (i.e., Nicky) were canonically written to be white, which is important when analyzing the texts for how canonical white characters vs canonical characters of colour (Black, Asian, Hispanic) are treated.
She evidently feels remorse for this, particularly the racism, and has acknowledged it and you can see in Jean’s trilogy that she’s trying to fix these issues by adding more characters of colour and having the text specifically point out how racism effects how these characters are treated by those around them (which is good - growth is good - I love AFTG and I’m not arguing that it should be thrown into the trash b/c it has problematic elements. AFTG was written by a human and all humans have their biases. As long as we're all unlearning our biases and improving). And while Nora hasn’t acknowledged Andrew/Roland since, I believe, 2019, Jean’s trilogy definitely addresses power imbalances in age-gap relationships (such as when Jeremy says even if 16-year-old Jean had pursued the 20-year-old Ravens they should have rejected him on the basis of their age. When the Trojans are horrified to realize Jean was 16 and he’s the one being blamed for “seducing Ravens” versus the Ravens in their early-20s not getting any flack for… having sex with a teenage boy.
The last thing we know about Andrew & Roland time-line wise is that in August 2007 (after Aaron’s trial) Roland gifts Andrew/Neil a pair of padded hand-cuffs. Nora said Roland was “well-intentioned” with his gift (maybe he really is just a fucking idiot b/c at this point the man is 26 and thinks padded-handcuffs are a GOOD GIFT to give a rape victim after they’ve been forced to testify at court about their rape so their twin brother doesn’t go to prison for murder - like, learn to read the room). Roland says in the note that he’s “happy that Andrew finally found someone who will stick with him” (Nora also says Roland never liked Andrew as more than a FWB and never wanted a real relationship with Andrew but also this note seems a bit backhanded - maybe the man really just has only marbles in his head). Andrew is furious at the gift and cracks a window when he throws them. He see’s the hand-cuffs as insulting his relationship to Neil (not that Roland knows that Neil is allowed to touch Andrew) but Andrew is offended, anyway. I think Nora implies that Andrew doesn’t return to Eden’s Twilight until he’s calmed down enough not to have an angry outburst at Roland & Andrew never tells Roland how much the gift upset him: I’m assuming, based on how Andrew is with ppl who he feels wronged by, that Andrew just… permanently a lot colder to Roland.
Frankly, if Roland were to be fixed he should have been friends with Nicky. They were closer in age (20 and 23) both gay, friendly, like to chat and party. Nicky definitely needed friends who weren't his cousins & Roland still could have been a "support person" for the Foxes/their connection to Eden's Twilight.
I know your Ask involved a few more questions, I actually have some similar asks in regard to Neil & Allison/Neil & Katelyn, as well as my opinion on Foxes betting + my opinion on the Foxes as an audience stand-in far too curious about Andrew/Neil's sexual relationship vs being characters in their own right (who would not be nearly THAT invested in Andrew/Neil's sex life) so I'll address that in those asks!
And for my promised "why Andrew/Neil/Kevin doesn't work in Canon and why I think Kevin WAS perfectly removed from the Andrew/Neil romance" it is coming, it's just... getting longer and longer.
Also: for the fic you mentioned, I haven't read it (yet, I'll certainly give it a glance when I have time to sit down and read) but for anyone who has asked me for fanfic recs, check out the one mentioned in the original Ask and give it some kudos if you enjoy it!
Except the "them" that Andrew is afraid of turning into isn't Drake. Andrew is terrified of being like Cass.
We all know that Andrew hates Cass so ardently partly because he also loves her so much. He's scared of allowing himself to want so desperately, and he's filled with self-loathing at the suffering that he's willing to endure to keep Cass.
But he also hates her because she failed to protect him. She unwittingly used love as bait to capture Andrew and hold him down, while allowing him to be harmed beyond measure.
Andrew's moral compass, the way that he loves, and (at points) his very reason for living are all built around being the exact opposite to Cass.
It's why Andrew has himself thrown into juvie to keep Aaron from being in the same room as Drake. Andrew refuses to be the loved one that lures Aaron to Drake, refuses to let Aaron's wish for a family be the thing draws Aaron to harm.
It's why Andrew won't stop shaking at Thanksgiving until he can see that Aaron is alright, until he knows that running into the room with a weapon out of love for Andrew isn't what put Aaron in Drake's path.
It's why he kills Tilda. He will not stand by and watch someone hurt the people under his protection, even though the person doing the hurting is his own blood.
It's why he protects Nicky. He won't let Nicky's love for Andrew - Nicky's insistence on raising him and Aaron - be the thing that damages Nicky.
It's why he protects Kevin and why he protects Neil. To be that person, that safe person who uses himself as the bait that keeps them there, while refusing to let anyone touch them.
Andrew loves with his whole heart. But people miss it because the way that he expresses love is calibrated to be the exact opposite of the way that Cass loved him. Don't you think that Andrew wishes that Cass had loved him like this, too? That she had shadowed him, monitored him, fiercely controlled who came near him? Violently extracted all of the secrets that he was keeping from her, bullishly inspected his scars? Threatened to stab and hit until one single glare was enough to make everyone stop?
Andrew is not making the same mistake. He won't be like them, he won't let the people that he loves let him be.
LEFT CHEEK — Lighter burn x2, multiple strikes to the burns after, cleaver cuts to the burns.
[Lola] pressed the lighter to his cheek.
[Lola] dug her fingernails into his raw skin just to make him cry out again.
[Lola] held fast to Neil so Romero could crush the lighter to his face once more. Lola's strangling grip on his throat meant the best Neil could manage was a pained whine.
Lola considered Neil again, then smacked his burned face as hard as she could.
Nathaniel braced himself for the inevitable blow, but his knees still buckled when Nathan punched the burns on his cheek. Nathan caught him by his throat as he fell.
Nathan put [the dull axe] to Nathaniel's neck next so he could carve shallow lines in Nathaniel's burned face with his cleaver.
RIGHT CHEEK — Knife cuts x2 (likely similarly placed wounds)
Lola wound her arm around the back of his chair so she could hold her knife to the right side of his face. The blade cut a paper-thin line from his mouth to the corner of his eye.
Heat ate a fierce line through his [left] cheek as he retreated right into Lola's waiting knife…He twisted his head out of her reach and remembered her knife too late. He tore a second line down his cheek and hurriedly hunched forward instead.
THROAT — Scar from throat to collarbone, sharp cleaver to the throat.
It started at the base of his throat, a looping scar curving down over his collarbone.
[Nathan] must have just sharpened [the cleaver], because blood welled up almost immediately…A fist to the face killed his next attempt and then Nathan was sitting on top of him with his cleaver to Nathaniel's throat.
CHEST — Bullet scar near collarbone, knife cut to chest, long knife cut to chest.
A pucker with jagged edges was a finger-width away [from the looping collarbone scar], courtesy of a bullet that hit him right on the edge of his Kevlar vest…[Andrew’s] right thumb found the puckered flesh from a bullet.
Riko pressed the knife to Neil's chest and slipped the edge under his skin.
Lola dodged, but barely, and left a hot stripe up his chest with the tip of her blade.
LEFT SHOULDER — Roadburn scar from shoulder to navel.
A shapeless patch of pale skin from his left shoulder to his navel marked where he'd jumped out of a moving car and torn himself raw on the asphalt.
RIGHT SHOULDER — Half an iron burn scar (old).
And there on his right shoulder was the perfect outline of half a hot iron…his father ripped the iron from his mother's hands and smacked Neil with it. Neil still remembered how his skin looked as it peeled off with the metal…On Neil's right shoulder was a burn scar, courtesy of getting smacked by a hot iron. Andrew put his left hand to it, fingertips lining up perfectly with the raised bumps the iron's holes had left behind.
FOREARMS — Cuts and burns to the forearms, scratches to the injuries.
Time stopped as Lola burned and cut a path up Neil's arms.
[Lola] sounded appreciative, not insulted, and scratched hard lines down his injured arms.
WRISTS — Handcuffs x2 instances.
Metal cuffs locked his hands to the headboard. He yanked his arms as hard as he could, nearly skinning his wrists in the effort, but the headboard didn't even creak…Andrew reached for the bandages on Neil's wrists, and Neil let him rip tape and gauze off. The scabs looked worse today…Neil dragged his stare up from the ugly lines striped across his wrists to Andrew's face.
Lola climbed into the backseat behind him and pulled Neil's arms around back of his chair. She cuffed his hands together and clicked them as tight as she could…He tore his wrists open on unyielding metal but he couldn't stop.
HANDS — Knife to fingertips, knife to base of fingers, knife from base of finger to thumb, burns to the palm, crosshatch knife cuts on back of hand, burns to knuckles, burn between thumb and index.
Neil kicked his legs a bit, testing his range of movement, but was quickly distracted by the press of sharp, cold metal against his fingertips.
[Lola] got bored of the teasing before long and cut a shallow line along the base of his fingers.
[Lola] cut a stinging line down from the base of his finger to the thick flesh of his thumb. She covered his hand with burning lacerations before moving on to the next one.
He traced the outline of a key into his bloody, burnt palm with a shaky finger, closed his eyes, and wished Neil Josten goodbye.
Lola had lined the back of his hand with crosshatches and burned angry circles into his knuckles. Another burn mark stained the tender flesh between his thumb and index finger. The burns were starting to ooze, but drying blood smothered most of the mess.
ABDOMEN — Multiple large knife cuts and punctures to abdomen.
Along his abdomen were larger overlapping lines from confrontations with his father's people while on the run…All of his men were well-versed in knife- fighting, and more than one of them had tried to stick Neil like a pig.
Andrew was quiet a long time, then dropped his hand to the slashes across Neil's gut.
LEGS — Less extensive, handcuffs on ankles.
He pulled his new shirt on over the one he was already wearing and wrestled the bottom layer out from underneath. It took a bit of work, but he managed to keep most of his skin hidden. Changing out his pants was easier, since most of the damage was on his upper half.
Neil watched Lola cuff his ankles to the seat's rails and barely refrained from kneeing her in the face.
MISC — Random old scars on torso, 50+ stitches from knife cuts all over, cane whipped across the mouth/cheek, most extensive are the burns on his face after the Lola incident.
Faded scars crisscrossed here and there from his life on the run, either from stupid accidents, desperate escapes, or conflicts with local lowlifes.
"I think I pulled my stitches," Neil said. "I feel blood." - "Where?" Wymack asked. - "Everywhere?" Neil guessed, and tried undoing his coat buttons one-handed…He didn't say anything about how many bandages Neil had wrapped around his chest and abdomen or how many bruises showed around the gauze…He'd ripped threads loose on his side, down near his waist…"Shut up," Wymack said. "When you're sporting fewer than fifty stitches I'll consider letting you on my court again.”
He saw the cane come up, but it was too fast for him to dodge. It caught him in the face across his cheek and the side of his mouth.
The worst injuries were the ones on his face, but the mess Lola made of his hands was the most inconvenient.
For a little context, I left out any that didn't sound like they'd scar (bruises), but otherwise this should include everything from the first 3 books in the series. I mostly made this for my own reference since I kept forgetting what to draw for Neil lol, but feel free to use them! They're all direct quotes from the books; the ellipses (...) just indicate that these were multiple different passages talking about the same wound.
do you think if someone expressed discomfort with the foxes betting on them, they'd actually stop? because i have a hard time believing they would, especially allison
Hi there,
Interesting question! I do think the bets are such a compelling aspect of the Foxes dynamic with one another - these are all characters who are frequently gossiped about & shit-talked by the general public and it’s fascinating to see how they basically make a game out of that with one another.
As always, my Long and Many thoughts will be under the Read More. (Actually my thoughts got so Long and Many that this will be part 1/2 haha].
So, in regard to the betting, we are told by Neil:
“The only thing the Foxes had in common besides Exy and hardship was their strange obsession with betting on the stupidest things. Neil had figured that out only two weeks into practice. A week didn't go by when there wasn't money on something or another.”
Based on this, we can assume all the Foxes (outside of Neil, who considers the Foxes betting on one another to be strange part of their ecosystem) engage with the bets!
Nora did once say in the EC that Neil ONLY ever joins in on one bet the Foxes make in the future, and it is about Robin (which also implies that the future Foxes continue the betting tradition even after the Upperclassmen graduate).
Therefore, we can assume Neil would NOT bet on a Fox who expressed discomfort with being bet on. Although, that is also partially because Neil wouldn’t have been betting on them, anyway, even prior to said Fox expressing discomfort.
However, I’m not sure if Neil would interfere with the other Foxes betting on said uncomfortable Fox even as their future captain because Neil respects the idea that the Foxes need to sort out own hierarchies without someone in authority trying to interfere - Neil might say something if he personally thinks the bet is extremely offensive, however, he might also encourage said Fox to stand up for themselves versus having Neil fight their battles for them.
Now, because all the current Foxes (other than Neil) bet on one another, the person who expresses discomfort would have to be a future Fox. Because the thing about the current Foxes is that they are all, in varying degrees, invasive & callous towards one another. Therefore, if they wanted to make a sound case regarding being uncomfortable with a bet about THEM, they would also have to reflect on their own behavior to avoid looking like a hypocrite.
(Andrew goes through people’s belongings & drugs people for truthful answers, and while he IS definitely possessive over his own secrets, my boy doesn’t exactly make a strong case for The Importance of Respecting Privacy, but frankly NONE of the current Foxes do so he is in good company).
Let’s start with Andrew, then! Interesting enough, we are told that Andrew does not participate in all the bets. Nicky tells Neil in TFC that everyone BUT Andrew has placed a bet on whether Wymack/Abby are together/having sex & the bet is currently a tie - therefore Neil’s vote would be the tie breaker. [Fun fact, my opinion: Kevin, Renee, Allison & Nicky are the half that voted YES. Dan, Matt, Seth, Aaron voted NO].
The bets that we DO see Andrew participate in, in Canon largely involve Neil (for example, the two private bets between Andrew & Renee: the first being if Neil would like Betsy & the second being if Neil would finally speak to Renee). Why Andrew specifically likes to flaunt his Understanding of Neil to Renee is perhaps a discussion for a different time, haha.
We also know that Andrew uses the bets regarding him & Renee to his advantage. Not financial advantage, however, as Renee does (Allison gives her a share of her winnings b/c Renee stacks the bets in her favour) but to help him guard a secret: the fact that he is gay. Andrew instinctively twists something (the bets) that could work against him to his advantage, instead of making it obvious that the bets were crashing their way into something he would find uncomfortable to address (his sexuality).
I think if someone expressed discomfort about the bets, Andrew would view admitting that discomfort as a sign of weakness. In Andrew’s world view that would basically be exposing a vulnerability to everyone and their mother & unless this person had the ability to enforce ‘don’t bet on me’ (with threats, violence, blackmail, some other kind of unhinged behavior) Andrew would view them as having showed their belly for no good reason.
He wouldn’t bet on them out of disinterest in them as a person but he wouldn’t be motivated by compassion for their discomfort. Thankfully, though, I don’t think a sober Andrew would begin betting on this person just to Piss Them Off after they said they are uncomfortable by the bets, whereas a court-mandated medicated Andrew may have done that.
Nicky, however, is motivated by empathy, which I think his Fanon characterization often ignores by making Nicky a jerk on purpose. Whereas usually Nicky is not intending to cause harm, even though he certainly can cause harm. He’s often torn between his loyalty to Andrew & Aaron and the fact that he does want to be friends with the other Foxes.
In fact, in TKM when Neil tells Nicky off for betting on Allison’s grief, Nicky does express remorse and says he was trying to, “lighten the mood.” Sometimes, people who experienced a lot of trauma (like Nicky has - it is important to remember that Nicky was canonically abused and disowned by his parents for being gay, tortured in a Christian conversion therapy camp, thought about killing himself, and was then was severely beaten by 4 homophobes for being gay) do sometimes use dark humour to deflect from a sad situation.
Neil even says, “putting money on someone’s psychological trauma wasn’t new or unexpected,” however, Neil - in that moment - found it distasteful. This moment of compassion from Neil is motivated by his own grief for his mother, but remember this is still the same Neil who expresses triumph when Andrew strangles Allison. Neil in general I would argue is often less compassionate than Nicky. Also, I think this is an interesting aspect of ALL of the Foxes’ characterizations: moments of compassion intermingled with moments of callousness, which none of them really hold against one another in the long-term b/c it’s a trait they all share.
Nicky, however, despite his ill-timed jokes is also one of the ONLY members in Andrew’s group who instinctively expressed genuine grief when Seth died, and Nicky DID try to comfort Allison in TRK (even though Seth was a homophobic ass to Nicky & Allison is a canonical heterosexual woman who dated said homophobic ass - I know a lot of readers ignore this aspect of Allison b/c they don’t think Seth’s behavior is a reflection on her, but tbh I DO think heterosexual women who date homohpobic men is a reflection on them).
Nicky also tries to comfort Allison when Andrew strangles her in TKM. Nicky can put his foot-in-his-mouth & has a tendency to lash out at a world that consistently lashes out at him, but Nicky also seems to have difficulty holding long-term grudges even against those who wronged him and he longs for genuine human connections, and he can feel remorse & apologize when he is in the wrong (he is the only one to apologize to Neil in TFC for the first Columbia trip & also feels bad when he wished harm on the Trojans so the Foxes could win). Nicky obviously feels empathy when someone is in distress, even if it’s someone he is not close to. Therefore, I think Nicky would stop betting on a Fox if it made them uncomfortable. Again, there’s a chance he would still impulsively say something Kinda Mean, but I think he would put genuine effort into trying not to upset them.
This is an interesting contrast to Renee. Renee we know doesn’t FEEL remorse about several of her past actions even though she feels like she should (killing people, getting her mother & boyfriend locked up, which got them killed them, as well, etc.,). Additionally, Renee also cheats with Allison to help win the bets regarding her & Andrew (and then Renee soothes her conscious by donating her portion to charity). Which, actually, I think explains Renee quite well: Renee will perform acts of penance when she believes she is doing something “morally wrong” although she doesn’t quite feel the remorse to actually stop doing it [very Catholic of her. Everything can be forgiven with confession & penance).
Even Neil says this about Renee - she would teach him how to kill a man even though Renee believes killing is morally wrong. I think sometimes Fanon!Renee can be a too… rigid in her moral code or her character is motivated by feeling instead of rationality & logic. Renee acts based on how a “good person” would feel even if that is not necessarily how SHE feels. What is most interesting about Renee is that she does genuinely have to put effort into being a good person because it doesn’t come instinctively to her - I think sometimes Fanon brushes that aside as Renee just being “modest” or some shit but I think it’s far more fascinating that Renee does have to put genuine effort into being kind & compassionate.
Therefore, I think Renee would stop betting on someone who expressed discomfort about the bets, however, I don’t think she would stop betting about them b/c she felt genuinely bad/remorseful, which is what would motivate Nicky. She would do so because it’s the “right thing to do.” After all, Renee actively participates in a lot of the bets & is genuinely amused by them.
Now, I actually think Matt wouldn’t stop betting on a Fox who expressed discomfort. Fanon Matt I think is often portrayed to be… much kinder than he is in the actual Canon novels. Not to say that Canon Matt isn’t kind, but he’s still a Fox, he’s rough-around-the-edges kind. Some characters get their bad traits amplified, whereas other characters get their rough edges smoothed out and their good traits amplified until they are less of a well-rounded character and more akin to the smiling sun from the Teletubbies. That is what has happened to Matt. There is just this prevalent idea that Matt is a “good boy” and therefore he somehow has reached Total Enlightenment.
Matt was good friends with Seth, who was extremely homophobic - moreover, Matt treated Nicky like Nicky’s anger at Seth’s homophobia was NICKY’S problem. Matt does accept Neil being “gay.” I think it’s important to remember that Matt also fully did not believe Neil about not-swinging and thought Neil’s refusal to talk about girls was b/c Neil was too afraid to come out as gay (and does not seem to realize in TKM that Neil still isn’t gay). He’s not aware of what demisexuality/asexuality is, y’all. He also called Dan a man-hater, he’s not talking in PC terms or using therapy speak. He’s a rough guy who gets into fist-fights with opposing players & also with Andrew & Kevin, he’s struggled with addiction & still drinks and parties [which, uh, technically isn’t recommended if you have addiction issues b/c alcohol is extremely addictive and it can be very easy to replace one addiction - pills, heroin, coke, etc., with alcohol].
Anyway, I think if we engage with Matt’s character as he is in Canon instead of the Fanon version of Matt where he basically exists to be Neil’s Cheerleader and to only say Good Things, Canon!Matt would keep betting. Possibly on the down low if he thought he would get in shit for it, maybe just sticking to betting amongst the Upperclassmen (after all, he was betting about Neil and Neil had absolutely no idea).
I think this can be explained a bit by knowing that Matt had to radically accept everyone knowing his business & judging him for it, and sometimes for people like that - who know that everyone knows THEIR secrets & is gossiping about them - it’s a lot easier to ALSO talk about other people, which is kind of how, again, a lot of the Foxes function: they all have shitty pasts & have done terrible things & are judged by the rest of society for their choices (addictions, sexualities, poverty, gender, race, etc.,) that Talking Shit about each other just becomes the norm, especially b/c they know the other Foxes are coming from a similar background/understanding. [Part 1/2].
What I also find interesting about Matt is that Fanon rarely has him call Andrew & his group the Monsters. However, Matt was actually the FIRST character to call them the Monsters. Throughout AFTG Matt actually says The Monsters THE MOST - he says it 6 times, compared to Allison’s 5. Dan only says the term once and that is directly after Andrew strangles Allison. And yet, Allison & Dan are often thrown under the bus for calling Andrew & his group Monster/the Monsters, whereas Matt is just portrayed as this… happy-go-lucky guy. And again this isn’t to say that Matt isn’t kind - even though he DOES refer to Andrew’s group as the Monsters he also invites them to spend Christmas/NY with him & his mother. Basically, Matt is a pretty typical early 2000s dude and he is a FOX. He leaves group lunch to fuck his girlfriend in his truck and then a homophobic man named Seth cheers him with a fucking beer bottle when he returns.
As for Dan, I think it’s a combination of she would/she wouldn’t. I think publicly she would stop betting on a Fox who expressed discomfort because Dan is really into team unity/bringing the Foxes together. She consistently reaches out to Kevin (including after Kathy’s interview) as well as Aaron (after Andrew is brought to Easthaven) and does try to be welcoming to Neil (and encourages Neil to bring Andrew’s group into the rest of the Foxes). She pretended to be friends with Renee & Allison her first year even when they weren’t getting along in order to maintain a united image in front of the sexist male Foxes. Like I said, Dan only calls Andrew a monster ONCE and that if after he strangles Allison. She wants to get to know the Vixens & have team dinners/team movies/team vacations.
However, I think Dan would still secretly participate in bets but only with Matt & Allison. They would keep it super on the down low, but I do think Dan logic would be that if the Fox in question doesn’t know to be offended, it can’t really hurt them. Again, Dan is also used to being shit-talked a lot, so I think she would be sympathetic in that sense but Dan is also of the mindset that you need to roll with the punches if you want to survive in the world, so while she would be sympathetic & outwardly supportive, I think she’d still participate in a bet or two b/c I don’t think in her mind it would really be harmful.
Allison definitely would keep participating in the bets both in secret & publicly & without remorse. She would be of the mind that the Fox in question needs to toughen up and stop being so sensitive - again Allison is ALSO used to being gossiped about and having her business everywhere, including her eating disorder & her own estrangement from her parents - so I think the idea of “being invasive” doesn’t really phase her. Allison also thought that Matt’s struggles regarding his addiction his first year b/c the other guys on the Foxes in his dorm were doing drugs (including Seth) was an issue that Matt needed to get over & that the other guys weren’t obligated to try to make things easier for Matt. She also told Aaron to get used to the gossip after Andrew was raped & Aaron was being charged with murder.
Allison is also interesting in the sense that she gets thrown under the bus a lot for calling Andrew a monster but what is actually kind of fascinating is that she doesn’t often say it with a whole lot of disdain. She refers to Andrew as a monster for giving Matt speed but then also praises him at the same time for saying his method worked. Very much “the ends justify the means.” Allison genuinely thinks Andrew fixed Matt and therefore there isn’t really a need to hold a grudge against Andrew for it (even though Dan holds a grudge that she does try to set aside for the rest of the team - but Dan is also in love with Matt & more protective of him). She also calls Andrew a monster when she mentioned he visited her at Abby’s after Seth died (although Andrew did just strangle her when she has this conversation with Neil, so) but again Allison says it was that conversation with Andrew that got her back on the court & moreover she doesn’t really seem to have any kind of grudge against Andrew for strangling her. Even when she outs Andrew/Neil in front of everyone and says she’s happy she won a lot of money - it is definitely done with a callous disregard for Andrew/Neil’s privacy, the fact that the FBI are literally Right There, that Andrew isn’t out to his family - but also she does seem to be trying to frame it in a ‘we’re all still supportive of you’ like I think sometimes Allison gets framed of being “against Andreil” b/c she thinks Neil can do better - which, Allison dated Seth & I don’t think she’s invested enough in Neil to care who the fuck he dates - but also she does kind of frame Andreil as Happy News compared to all the torture.
Allison can be callous and her nicknames cruel - however, I do think that Allison has likely experienced a lot of cruel nicknames herself over the years considering she’s a beautiful outspoken woman with a temper (bitch, cunt, slut, whore) so I do think Allison is of the opinion that you’ve just got to embrace the shitty things people say about you instead of whimpering about it. This is obviously a personality that some people are not going to like & it isn’t exactly going to win Allison a lot of friends, but a certain amount of viciousness is the norm for the Foxes.
Another Fox who would still publicly bet is Kevin. Kevin doesn't really give a shit about other people’s discomfort (like when he tells Neil to get over his scars if he wants to be a star & to stop being shy about changing in front of others), frequently shares his unpopular opinions regardless of if they could hurt other people’s feelings (like talking about how much the Foxes suck & they’re going to Lose) and can be rather controlling when he thinks he's being Helpful (telling Nicky not to eat junk food). Kevin, also like Allison, is used to being in the public spot light since birth & knowing that everyone is already talking about him. He’s also used to having Everyone in his business considering the Ravens are a cult & he had a whole codependent friendship/brotherhood/whatever going on with Riko, AND Kevin basically immediately spills all of his and (some of Jean's) secrets to the Foxes a couple months in. Therefore, Kevin like Allison is desensitized to gossip & everyone being in your business - particularly your teammates being in your business, for the Ravens that was the norm.
Basically, if Kevin wants to join a bet/make a bet, he’s not going to let a Foxes discomfort stop him. Like Allison, he’ll basically think they need to Get Over It and Toughen Up. Especially if they want to make it on a team like the Foxes/make it to court as an Exy star. In a way, I think Kevin & Allison would actually be MOST united on this matter b/c unlike Dan & Matt they would not be trying to hide the fact that they are still betting on said Fox.
Lastly, Aaron. Aaron, I think has always seemed the most disjointed from the rest of the Foxes & I think that would continue. I don’t think he’ll be as antagonistic as he was in AFTG b/c he’s not actively pushing them away, however, I do think he’s going to be focused on his romantic relationship with Katelyn & rebuilding his relationship with Andrew as brothers, maybe even trying to connect with Nicky a bit more now that Aaron is Okay With Being Gay (plus he & Nicky will be sharing a dorm without Andrew, Neil or Kevin). Like Andrew, I don’t think he would go out of his way to be antagonistic to the Fox that doesn’t want to be bet on, but I don’t think he’d be kind, either. I think this is another would/wouldn’t like Dan. However, unlike Dan I don’t think Aaron would try to be low-key, I think if there just happened to be a bet that he found genuinely interesting or thought he could win A Lot of Money (maybe to take Katelyn out on a nice date) he would participate & not really give a shit if the other Fox was bothered. As far as Aaron is concerned it’s not like he’s Punching You In the Face, so they’ll get over it.
Seth is dead, but we all know he would just be an Asshole and keep betting on them, regardless. Frankly, he’d probably bet on them MORE if they complained. For once he & Kevin would be united.
I think an important thing to remember about the Foxes is that they cannot be examined through a perspective of what… well-adjusted people would find acceptable either socially or in a friend group. They have very different lines of what is appropriate vs inappropriate & often fist-fight one another, verbally fight one another, cross boundaries & fail to get along - however, they can also be united against common enemies (such as Riko & the Ravens) as well as the fact that they are all seen as unwanted and disposable by the rest of the Exy community/the wider world & they can understand one another’s struggles, even if sometimes they don’t like one another/can clash.
I find sometimes there is a tendency to either (a) make the Foxes the Perfect Found Family and they’re all SUPER close and don’t have any conflicts/always get along/apologize to one another, which can make the Canon Foxes seem even WORSE in comparison, although I do find the Canon Foxes dynamics to be a lot more compelling than the sanitized Fanon dynamics. Or (b) to fixate on one Fox/a few Foxes being “victims” of the other Foxes bullying. I don’t think that is necessarily the case b/c ALL of the Foxes can be horrible to one another - either verbally or physically. I think cherry-picking can make it seem like this is not the case, however, when looking at the way the Foxes interact throughout AFTG… they’ve all had their moments of compassion & their moments if viciousness. And that is what makes them Foxes!
Thank you so much for this Ask - it was actually a very interesting opportunity to do Foxes Character Analysis of each of them individually through the betting system & I found it very enjoyable. I hope you enjoyed my thoughts!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Neil who never lets Andrew carry his own bag through an airport or out of a stadium, even though Andrew is inarguably bigger and more muscled than him. Who always keeps the freezer stocked with ice cream no matter the circumstances. Who keeps a bubble of space around Andrew when they’re walking through thick crowds, always a bicep or an elbow in the way to stop people from getting too close. Who gets his wallet out every time they get dinner like Andrew doesn’t make 80% more than him. Always free shoulder and feet massages, post-game and in-bed and whenever, without Andrew ever having to ask. He always washes Andrew’s hair first in the shower, always cups the water away from his face so soap doesn’t get in his eyes.
Neil who is always down to do Anything Andrew Wants, Ever. Andrew wants to go on a drive in the middle of the night? Or an impromptu road trip in the off season? Sure, Neil’s grabbing the keys. On the road they pass a pungent, fresh-made bakery and Neil turns the car around without uttering a word. Neil, who, after years, always answers the phone when Andrew calls on the very first ring — who turns his full-attention to Andrew when he calls his name, even in the most crowded room. Who does pretty much anything Andrew asks of him and anticipates dozens of other wants and needs. Who always goes out of his way to make Andrew’s life easier. Neil, who puts Andrew above anything and everything else.
Spoiled-as-fuck Andrew, and he knows it, and he carries that comfort and security with him everywhere.
Enter DAISY GRIME, a CLOWN, accompanied by FOOLS, HARLEQUINS, and JESTERS.
GRIME
I say ‘tis dirty, wicked, foul, and dark --
An opportunity both miss’d and scorn’d --
That vampires of any shape or shade
Would drink the blood of innocence most pure
When Pepsi costs a dollar sev’nty five.
FIRST FOOL
O lady, I must ask, and tell the truth:
Wherever in this God’s green holy land
Canst thou obtain this drink for such a fee?
I’ve seen no less than fifty-five pence more.
GRIME
A hospital, good sir.
SECOND FOOL
(Does some figures)
And might I ask
Wherever in this land (of any hue)
Is fellow who two dollar thirty pence
Dost pay for si of Pep?
GRIME
Not I, i’faith.
I pay a mere two shillings short of two.
And, once again, I pay in hospital.
CANADIAN JESTER
I pay a hefty two and half for mine.
But in my blood runs maple syrup, too.
GRIME
O Jester fine, I pray thee, still thyself.
Thou stray’st from this, our mode of speaking here.
FIRST FOOL
But blood costs naught but time.
SECOND JESTER
Aye, that is true;
But sir, remember this in figuring:
A Pepsi, too, is free, if stolen ‘tis.
FIRST FOOL
I see, but -- wait, another thought occurs.
Wherefore, I ask thee, for what reason, sirs,
Dost Lady Grime buy Pepsi from the house
Of healing, birth, and death?
GRIME
‘Tis simple, friend.
Allow me to explain to thee the cause.
The Pepsi sold by those who follow in
The footsteps of St. Luke, Evangelist
Is sold for a mere dollar sev’nty five.
FIRST HARLEQUIN
(Aside, to SECOND HARLEQUIN) Why wouldst a vampire drink Pepsi, then?
SECOND HARLEQUIN
(Aside, to FIRST HARLEQUIN) Why wouldst an honest man drink Pepsi, sir?
FIRST FOOL
A femboy, it would seem.
(There is general applause and agreement.)
GRIME
O fool, a what?
Enter KONAHRIKS De’ACTIVAT EDZOZ ESQ., a SCHOLAR and WARD OF THE SKY.
WARD
You see, my friends, this selfsame story tells
The truth of why the incubus’s tale
Is one that bears to no more to be declared.
I’ll tell you all my reasons three. The first:
The wealthy ghoul who drinks the common blood
Is overused and stale, like molding bread;
But also hangs upon the teller’s face
A pallid, gasping idol worship mask.
The second mark I tally here along:
A vampire who sucks the blood from men
Does hold up in the mind a mirror cold.
This mirror shows that, far from fantasy,
The vampire is real, ‘tis Elon Musk.
The reason third is simple, clean, and pure:
A werewolf’s just, like, sexier, my dudes.
(GRIME dances like a ferret. There is rejoicing.)
Exeunt.
Enter LARA, FELAGUND, and SHERLOCK, accompanied by the MANGO MERCHANT.
LARA
I feel these words have struck me to my core.
Is this, the world, collapsing to the ground
Or is it just my weary, shaking soul?
FELAGUND
‘Twould seem my lady needs to see St. Luke.
SHERLOCK
I’ve heard his fellows sell a Pepsi cheap.
Rather than distinctly male or female, the human brain is much more like the heart, kidneys and lungs – basically the same no matter the sex of the body it's in.
“This collapse is a telltale sign of a problem known as publication bias. Small, early studies which found a significant sex difference were likelier to get published than research finding no male-female brain difference.”
Kevin Day's favorite team is the kindest one in the sport. His body was the first Riko Moriyama practiced his "fledgling cruelties" on. He learned French as the only mercy he could offer in the Nest. He was never family but a pet to the very people who raised him. He saw an Olympic future in a no-name striker from Arizona. He begged the same one to leave when it came between him dying and everything they've worked towards. He gives Andrew Minyard a reason to live. He has has never and will never truly leave the Nest.
Kevin Day, may you one day taste the very sunshine you give to others.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if, this evening, the image of a certain childhood comes back to me, how can i keep from welcoming the lesson of love and poverty it offers? since this hour is like a pause between yes and no, i leave hope or disgust with life for another time