BAFTA-winning TV person with oodles of experience making promos, online videos, short-form content, and full programmes for kids' TV. Currently freelance as a producer, director, and writer. Also working on a novel, raising kids, and reading comics.
This is one of those times when I had a fun idea but it ended up getting pushed back for various reasons so any notion of ātimelinessā has gone right out the window. Because I thought of this when I was watching the ludicrously violent, surprisingly bleak, but also outrageously fun Punisher: One Last Kill one-shot doo-dah on Disney+ recently. Because Jon Bernthalās Frank Castle (aka the Punisher) sports a particularly impressive piece of facial topiary in that.
And that got me thinking: who has the best beard in the MCU? And letās get it out of the way right at the start: Iām not talking about Sharon Carter. I mean actual facial hair.
The first thing I had to decide was: am I sticking with beards, or are simple moustaches allowed too? And after a great deal of thought I have plumped for Proper Beards. If itās just on the top lip, Iām not interested ā sorry, Howard Stark and Thunderbolt Ross! Because there are just so many cool examples of full-face-fuzz in the Marvel Cinematic Universe that the need to go top half only didnāt really arise.
So, with no further ado, please enjoy my ranking of the best examples of chin gardens in the MCU...
Ten: Ben Grimm (The Fantastic Four: First Steps, 2025)
I might have some issues with this, both logistically and aesthetically, but I had to include it because: the Thing has a beard? Eh? How does that work? Is it just the rocks on his chin that... grow, or do they also grow... elsewhere? I feel like Marvel have opened a Pandoraās Box here and it doesnāt bear thinking about the ramifications.
Nine: TāChalla (Black Panther, 2018)
When we first meet TāChalla in Civil War, heās sporting a very thinly-trimmed goatee. By the time he stars in his own film, heās allowed it to fill out a bit more, and it looks a lot better. It's still a bit too fiddly-looking for my tastes, but it suits his personality: it looks modern and cool, but also gives him a bit of kingly gravitas.
Eight: Tony Stark (Iron Man, 2008)
Tonyās beard is iconic but itās also a bit dumb. A very neatly-trimmed and angular goatee that looks like itād be a nightmare to maintain. On the other hand, itās stylised enough to feel like a signature, and its hard edges reflects his high-tech futurist persona, and the sheer fact that it looks like it requires daily upkeep suggests the owner of the beard is someone with the time and the money to employ a full-time beard specialist in his entourage. The fact it doesnāt seem to change much either when heās in captivity or lost in space does imply heās using some kind of advanced technology to keep it neat.
Seven: Odin (Thor: Ragnarok, 2017)
A powerful king like Odin needs a big bushy beard to show off his inherent kingliness, and this doesnāt disappoint. He doesnāt go the Full Gandalf, but itās more than just a robust growth: thereās a distinct amount of work done to this, as befits his status as, like, one of the most powerful beings in the cosmos. It practically screams ākingā, and to be honest it goes quite a long way to screaming āgodā too. I've gone with Ragnarok because it looks just a shade longer, which I like.
Six: Alexei Shostakov (Thunderbolts*, 2025)
Ah, my beloved Red Guardian. The worst part of Thunderbolts* is right at the end when we see heās trimmed his beard, urgh. But the frankly massive fizzog shield heās got in this is a delight. In Black Widow, when heās in prison, itās wilder and woollier; here, heās definitely keeping on top of it, but itās still got a sense of danger to it. It's big and it may at any moment escape containment. It perfectly marries with his character: crazy, silly, but adorable.
Five: Nick Fury (Secret Invasion, 2023)
You're not going to see Secret Invasion crop up on many Top Tens, but I canāt not mention Furyās amazing mouth merkin. On the one hand, we contrast it with his incredibly groomed, neat little beard from his earlier MCU appearances: this is the wild growth of a man off his game. Itās facial hair as character development. But on the other hand, what a beard: bold, beautiful, and bushy, and the grey adds even more gravitas to Furyās already-impressive aura.
Four: Thor (Avengers: Endgame, 2019)
Thor has, on balance, had the best beards of the MCU. His initial look was a bit āObi-Wan in Episode IIā: too thin, tepid, pale. By the time of Ragnarok and Infinity War, it was thicker and darker, and it looked amazing. However, Iām going for his OTT Endgame look, because, well, itās just badass. When he Thors Out at the end, his damn beard is plaited. Heās full-on superhero space Viking, and itās incredibly cool. It's a bit of a shame he got fit, really!
Three: Frank Castle (The Punisher: One Last Kill, 2026)
The guy who inspired it all has to have a place. Frankās beard might be unkempt and definitely born out of trauma and despair, but it still looks great. He just suits a beard, even if the character doesnāt really have one in the comics. It's dark, like his psyche, but itās also thick and strong, because heās a Great Big Manly Man. Itās a beautiful testament to check forestry. He appears to have shaved it off by the time of Spider-Man: Brand New Day; but, to be fair, he probably found it was hard work cleaning all the mobster blood out of it after he stabbed them to death with a biro.
Two: Ego (Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, 2017)
Broadly similar to Odinās beard, and occupying an adjacent niche of āpowerful space godā, Egoās boy-bristles get a higher spot because itās a fuller, rounder, more voluminous experience. This is a broad, soft, incredibly coiffed beard: big, grey, and seeming like itād be soft to the touch. Itās the beard of an older man, for sure, but it doesnāt really give off Old Man the way Odinās does: thereās still a suavity there, as befits a character whose whole deal is sowing his wild oats across the universe. Itās the beard weād all like to have when we grow up, but we also have to acknowledge that only of us gets to be Kurt Russell.
One: Steve Rogers (Avengers: Infinity War, 2018)
Utterly stealing Thorās thunder (see what I did there?) comes Captain America himself. This is, again, beard as storytelling tool: it conveys his journey from the idealistic youth of The First Avenger. He's on the run, so who has time to shave? But beards connote not just masculinity but maturity: heās weathered, aged, grown wiser through his mistakes. Heās a leader, both of a team and also, morally, of a nation. And the darker blonde in the beard matches his darker outlook ā and, indeed, his darker uniform, the gaudier colours blacked out. It's also a realistic beard: unlike some of these, you could just have this beard and youād look great going to Asda! In a very real sense, it is Americaās Beard, and I bet Scott Lang would love it.
Shout-out to Matt Murdock, who would have got a place here, but I decided he doesnāt really have a beard, he just canāt be arsed shaving. Looks good, though, Matt!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Thereās a new Star War out this weekend, if you hadnāt noticed. Itās a far cry from the furore that greeted The Phantom Menace or The Force Awakens; clearly a galaxy far, far away isnāt quite the must-see destination it once was. All the same, Iām quietly excited; in fact, itās a bit of a thrill to just be going along to see an entertaining space western without worrying about how theyāre going to stick the landing or save the galaxy. Iām not anticipating any tragic deaths or shocking revelations; I just want to see Mando smoke fools and Grogu eat space macaroons.
Anyway, the touching relationship between Mr. Mando, Din Djarin, and his young ward Grogu made me realise how much of the Star Wars saga is built around parental relationships. I mean, the whole deal with the original trilogy was Lukeās search for his father; as Empire developed that switched from, I guess, avenging his fatherās death/confronting his fatherās killer to discovering that he was, in fact, the son of the big bad himself. The children of Darth Vader then became the lynchpin of the whole shebang, with the prequel trilogy built around the spine of Anakin Skywalker falling to the Dark Side whilst also knocking up Padme (who says men canāt multitask?). Since then weāve had loads of parent-child dynamics in Star Wars; some good, some bad.
This, then, is a list of my favourite long time ago mums and dads. Some of them are cool; some of them are rubbish. Seriously, youād never want to speak to them at the school gates. And because biology doesnāt mean anything, Iām looking here at parental figures; those whoāve shaped and guided windswept urchins, unofficially or otherwise adopting them. Youāll see as we go along.
It is interesting to note, however, that almost all of these die in the course of the story. I suppose itās fitting that Star Wars is a Disney joint now; we know how much that company loves an orphan. Ā
Oh, and when Iāve listed films below, Iām talking about the film where I think they ābecameā parents. Itās somewhat arbitrary I guess, but then a lot of stuff is when you discuss Star Wars. Anyway. To the parents!
Ten: Anakin Skywalker (The Empire Strikes Back, 1980)
Anakinās whole deal could really be defined by his being a father. As soon as he discovers he has a son, his attitude and aims change: he ceases to be a mere pawn of the Emperor and seeks to be close to Luke. True, heās still at that point an evil Sith Lord and wants Luke to join him as his apprentice, but still: he cares. And, of course, itās the love of his son ā and love for his son ā that ultimately compels him to kill the Emperor and return to the light. Heās the franchiseās most important parent, but letās be honest, trying to co-opt your kids into your creepy death cult isnāt the greatest dad move, so heās here near the bottom of the list.
Nine: Obi-Wan Kenobi (Star Wars, 1977)
Old Ben is interesting, because really he had two shots to raise a kid, and you could argue he cocked it up both times. He was too young, really, to be saddled with the responsibility of training Anakin; but, of course, younger men have had fatherhood thrust upon them and done a better job. He tried, bless him, but his strict interpretation of Jedi codes wouldnāt allow him to be flexible to Anakinās needs, especially with the Dark Lord of the Sith looming. So as much as he loved Anakin, as much as he tried to shape him into a good man, we have to acknowledge his failure. And then with Luke, he was a bit better in terms of offering training and advice, but he still lacked the courage of belief to accept that peace and forgiveness was the path to redemption, and not going in swinging. So: nice guy; great beard; spotty record as a parent.
Eight: Han Solo and Leia Organa (Star Wars: The Force Awakens, 2015)
Iāve lumped them together because theyāre the first actual couple weāve encountered (by the time Anakin knew he was a parent, Padme was already dead, hence her not being counted here). I donāt blame them at all for what happened to their son, Ben; they tried their best, and even after being defeated they still believed in him, believed he could return. In Ā fact, they both bet their lives on it, and in a way they both sacrificed themselves to help bring Ben back from the Dark Side. But still, they did raise a mass murderer, so, yāknow, swings and roundabouts.
Seven: Jango Fett (Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, 2002)
Jango is a little bit like Vader or Jabba, I guess, in that he clearly loves his son, but heās not the most ideal parental role model. Raising little Boba, teaching him, spending time with him, is clearly a big deal for Jango; he loves having a kid, and thereās a real tenderness between the two of them. But then, heās training Boba to be a ruthless assassin and criminal, so is that really a good thing? Plus itās a little bit narcissistic if your child is an exact clone of yourself. I mean, make the kid ginger or something, just to differentiate.
Of all the parental types weāve had so far, I think Qui-Gon is probably the healthiest. He sees the humanity in Anakin as well as the power and potential; heās willing to defy the Jedi Council to teach the boy. I like to think he understands that someone as strong with the Force as Anakin needs a soft hand and close, emotional guidance, rather than the doctrine of the Jedi. His last thoughts are about Anakinās welfare, pleading with Obi-Wan to see the good in him and help to bring it out. I do wonder what would have become of Anakin had Qui-Gon survived.
Five: Luthen Rael (Andor, 2022)
There are two sides to Luthen, and itās the kind of dichotomy that we see in a few of these parents. On the one hand, heās a loving and attentive parent who has a great relationship with his adoptive daughter Kleya; on the other hand, heās a violent revolutionary not afraid of cold-blooded murder if he thinks itās in the greater good, and from the off he instructs her in his line of rebellious work. Luthen and Kleya are fascinating, complex characters, in many ways the heart of Andor, and their relationship is beautiful to behold. They bicker and joke the way parents and adult children often do, but they are clearly very close. Their dedication to the nascent Rebellion is reinforced by the love they have for one another: when an injured Luthen risks being compromised by the Empire, Kleya goes to extreme actions to prevent that happening because she knows itās what heād want, even though it breaks her heart. I mean, I guess thatās good parenting?
Four: Owen and Beru Lars (Star Wars, 1977)
The Lars get a bad rap. Owen is very grumpy, constantly chiding Luke to do his chores, and refusing to let him run off to have fun with his friends or ā ye gods! ā join the Imperial Academy. But thereās good reason! His dad fell to the Dark Side and massacred all the Jedi! So itās understandable they want to keep Luke on a tight leash just in case. But think about it: they took in this kid, technically their nephew although thereās barely any relationship in place there, and raised him, fed him with lots of nice blue milk, despite knowing that at any point he might (a) develop freaky powers, (b) become the subject of a galaxy-wide manhunt by an evil space wizard, or (c) turn evil himself. And what thanks do they get? They get skeletonned. I mean, whereās the justice?
Three: Luke Skywalker (Star Wars: The Last Jedi, 2017)
Now, although he never mentions them, Luke owes Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru a great debt. You could argue that their down-to-Tatooine nature gave him a great grounding which prevented him from going off the rails. But sadly this wasnāt enough when he had a go at being a parental figure himself. He lost his cool teaching Ben Solo and then went full-bore grump with Rey. But I think thereās something supremely honest about his relationship with Rey; he doesnāt view the Force quite as reverentially as Obi-Wan did, and he really tries to instil not just a scepticism but also a respect of its power in Rey. And heās open about his failings, and desperate for her not to make his mistakes. I think given time heād have been a fantastic father figure for her, and even in the short time they spend together sheās a wonderful influence on him. We are what they grow beyond indeed.
Two: Maarva Andor (Andor, 2022)
So after a list of relatively famous names and faces, we come to what is perhaps the most obscure character but also clearly one of the best. Maarva, the adoptive mother of Cassian Andor, is brilliantly played by Fiona Shaw, is both nurturing and educating. She takes in Cassian as a child and, with her husband Clem, raises him as their son. However, they also become increasingly radicalised, and she tries to instil in him a rebellious nature that encourages him to kick back against the Empire ā as well as, presumably, teaching him all sorts of criminal chicanery. She refuses to give in, stands her ground even when old and frail, and manages to deliver a rousing call to arms from beyond the grave. Sheās the perfect combination of Star Warsā sympathetic heart and its fighting spirit.
One: Din Djarin (The Mandalorian, 2019)
How many of these parents would throw out central tenets of their faith for their children? Din Djarin, so committed to his particular fundamentalist sect of Mandalorianism, repeatedly takes his helmet off because of his love for Grogu. Itās a slow-burn but incredibly powerful relationship, father and son, as Djarin risks everything and burns everyone for the protection of his little green baby. And even though he kills people for a living, he still finds time to be nurturing and caring, trying his very best to stop little Grogu eating too many biscuits (or frog-person babies). Theyāre just great together, their little back-and-forth banter and the subtle grace notes of their relationship, and as Grogu grows more powerful itās also cool to see Djarin become more of a teacher. Perhaps it was inevitable that in the week The Mandalorian and Grogu comes out in cinemas that Iād rank the Mandalorian as the best Star Wars parent, but what can we say? This is the way.
Pour one out for Jabba the Hutt, who I really wanted to include but who sadly slipped off the bottom of the list. Never mind, Jabs; youāre still a filthy space slug who deserved to get strangled to death by Princess Leia. Ā
A few weeks ago I ranked the best henchman deaths in movies; now Iām going to turn the tables, and look at the good guys.
Man, I love an heroic death. Iām a sucker for them. You build up a hero really well, you make them all stalwart and noble, and then you pit them against insurmountable odds until they cark it in spectacular fashion. Itās totally my jam. I blame the Transformers comics I read when I was little; writer Simon Furman absolutely loved killing of characters, and the bombastic, melodramatic tone of Transformers allowed for all sorts of larger-than life sacrificial heroism. Who among us can forget Impactor, the Autobot who died twice so that all might live?
Sniff.
Anyway, that sort of thing has carried over into all the stuff I like nowadays. I mean, comics ā and superhero fiction in general ā is awash with this particular trope. When Superman isnāt battling Doomsday to the death, then Batman is getting Omega Sanctioned by Darkseid, or Jean Grey is leaping in front of a an alien death ray. Even when they donāt die, theyāre trying to die! In the Justice League animated series, Batman tries to crash an entire space station onto the baddies, but is saved by Superman; and in the first Captain America film, before taking the serum, Steve Rogers heroically jumps on a grenade that turns out to be a dummy. These guys just love to sacrifice themselves! Itās in their DNA!
So you wonāt be surprised that a movie superhero death does feature in this list. But only the one; and, indeed, the kind of high-pitched dramatic save-the-world moments that are superhero-adjacent arenāt the only things here. Because itās not just fantastical knights or mystical space wizards who have the monopoly on heartstring-tugging sacrifice; weāve got humble priests and professors here, too. And only one giant robot.
Now, the thing with noble sacrifices, is that generally speaking you have to die. And all these characters do, indeed, die. Some of them are only sort of dead; some of them unequivocally come back to life. But I donāt care about that; in the realm of sequels and shared universes, as one of our heroic walking corpses says, āno oneās ever really goneā. So, yes, at least one of these guys gets an entire movie about how they were brought back to life; one of them is even sorta alive again by the closing credits. But Iām letting it slide; because whether through cloning, demonic forces, or simply just being virtually indestructible, even if they sorta survived, they didnāt think they would. Every act of heroic self-sacrifice here is just that: an heroic self-sacrifice. And I also donāt think we should blame the heroes just because the writers wanted to bring them back.
Also, this was really hard. Iāll talk a bit about the also-rans at the end. But for now: witness them.
Ten: Harry Stamper (Armageddon, 1998)
Propping up the list is this supreme bit of nineties cheese. Armageddon is a fantastically daft film, one in which every emotion is dialled so high that the speakers blow, every raised eyebrow scored to high-tension strings, and not a single brow is unmolested by beautifully photographed sweat. So of course it ends in the most melodramatic of moments, Bruce Willisā grumpy oilman refusing to allow Ben Affleckās young doofus to die detonating the bomb that will save the world. Weād all like to shake the hand of the daughter of the bravest man, etc etc etc.
Nine: Ellen Ripley (Alien3, 1992)
Lower down than maybe it could have been because itās a tiny bit of a cheat: Ripley is dying anyway, a xenomorph queen embryo growing in her chest. Itās a fitting and symbolic end for the character after fighting these beasties across the universe and back again. But itās her final act of defiance ā throwing herself into molten steel to deny Weyland-Yutani the opportunity to get their hands on a baby alien ā that cements her place. Holding the xenomorph to her chest as she falls to their collective doom is a great visual, and ā all the other weirdness about Alien3 notwithstanding ā a cool place to end. Er, until they didnāt.
Eight: Tony Stark (Avengers: Endgame, 2019)
Ah, my beloved MCU: where would we be without you? Probably one of the most iconic deaths of recent cinematic history, this is one of those neat pieces of long-form writing that knits together multiple threads ā Tonyās ego, his protective streak, his technological nous ā and gives us an epic finale as he uses his suit to steal the infinity stones and get rid of Thanos once and for all. His statement ā āI am Iron Manā ā obviously repeating his lines from the first MCU movie, a declaration that really set the nascent Marvel universe apart from the very secret-identity-focuses worlds of past superhero movies; and Pepperās āyou can rest nowā adds to the tragic sauce.
Seven: Gordon Zellaby (Village of the Damned, 1960)
Okay, bit of a niche one perhaps, thatāll need a wee bit of explaining. A creepy, slow-burn sci-fi horror that follows a group of otherworldly children born to every woman in the village; as they grow their mental powers increase and itās clear theyāre up to no good. Enter schoolteacher Gordon Zellaby (George Sanders), who is attempting to dispose of the kids with a bomb hidden in his briefcase. They turn their telepathic gaze upon him, and to try to block them out he envisions a brick wall. We have moments of tension as we see the wall in his mind, cracking and straining as the kids try to force their way through, until eventually the bomb goes off and kills everyone ā Zellaby included.
Six: Father Damien Karras (The Exorcist, 1973)
Another classic horror death! This one is really cool because not only is it a supreme act of self-sacrifice but also completes Father Karrasā arc as he reconciles and recovers his faith. At the climax of the exorcism of Regan MacNeil, he basically entices the demon Pazuzu into his own body, thus freeing Regan of her possession. At which point, he promptly hurls himself out of the nearest window and down a flight of incredibly painful-looking concrete steps, killing himself and thus preventing the Pazuzu within him from wreaking any more havoc. His willingness to both accept his lapsing faith and also risk the wrath of a demon elevates his sacrifice.
Five: Luke Skywalker (Star Wars: The Last Jedi, 2017)
Iām going there! I am! Despite what some would have you believe, Lukeās death in The Last Jedi is supremely heroic, noble, and a stunning display of powers. The whole film leads you to believe that Luke will, indeed, stride forth and rejoin the fight, wielding his lightsaber and facing down the First Order; meanwhile, Luke keeps trying to tell us that confronting violence with violence is not always the way, and that he canāt physically stop the First Order. So when he does step out onto that field to fight Kylo Ren, we think itās a classic duel; but in reality heās astrally projecting himself across the entire universe, fooling everyone into thinking heās really there. The strain from his endeavours causes him to expire and rejoin the Force. Itās a brilliant ending to the movie, and to Luke; and, of course, the main reason heās doing this is to give the Resistance time to escape. Itās a last-ditch suicide play to not only inspire people, to show them the way, but basically just to save his friendsā lives. And his final āSee you round, kid,ā to Kylo is a terrific last line.
Four: The Iron Giant (The Iron Giant, 1999)
Here we are, the best Superman film of all time. Yeah, I know: the Giant doesnāt actually die here, because the last thing we see is all the various cogs and bolts and screws and things slowly rebuilding themselves somewhere in the Arctic. But it doesnāt make his sacrifice less noble. With a nuclear missile about to kill everyone he cares about, he instantly flies up to intercept it; but what gets me ā what makes this one of the greatest heroic deaths ā is his reasoning. He embraces his freedom, eschewing his creation ā he was a weapon ā and choosing who he wants to be. And ā this is the kicker ā based on everything heās been shown on Earth, who does he want to be? āSupermanā. See, itās not just about how heroic the Giant is; itās about how heroic Superman is. The character so good, even a totally unrelated film manages to somehow be about him.
Three: Bing Bong (Inside Out, 2016)
Of all of these deaths, this one is the really tragic one; the one that really makes me cry ugly tears. Bing Bong, the silly, adorable little elephant-thingie with a cute song, an imaginary friend created by a tiny Riley, is about to be utterly, permanently forgotten by the now-adolescent Riley. But knowing that what Riley really needs is her Joy back ā and her core memories ā he sacrifices himself to allow Joy to escape forgetfulness, diving off the back of his super-powered kart to give Joy the lift she needs to get away. And thus he fades, destined to be forgotten, but not for a second regretting his choice; ātake her to the moon for meā. Itās the way this act of heroism represents the growth of children ā how in order to become the adults they need to be, they are forced to forget some of the things that made them children ā that makes this one really sting; and, of course, Joy is the parent who will always remember the child, long after sheās grown up. Sorry, is someone cutting onions nearbyā¦?
Two: Spock (Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, 1982)
Weāre really hitting the icons now, arenāt we? For a long time this was the gold standard of cinematic death scenes. Thereās a colossal weight behind it; this is Spock, for Christās sake. With the Enterprise crippled, he undertakes his own Kobayashi Maru and makes the logical decision to repair the engines despite knowing heāll suffer a lethal dose of radiation. Itās only logical, after all; the needs of the many and all that. But Nimoy and Shatner put so much into their final scene, from Spockās little tug to straighten is uniform, to Kirk not pressing the intercom properly, to their plaintive Vulcan greeting across the glass. āI am, and always will be, your friend,ā he says, and he might as well be saying it to all of us. And thus a titan of sci-fi passes; an icon breathes his last. Of all the souls we have encountered in our travels, his was the most⦠hhhuman. And then he comes back to life, natch.
One: Boromir (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, 2001)
If youāre going to do an heroic death, this is the way. Do I need to spell it out? Yes, Boromir done cocked up by trying to take the Ring; but thatās coz it was working its evil magic! Once itās out of his system he comes to his senses, and by God, does he prove himself, facing down an army of Uruk-Hai single-handed, batting them away like flies. The sense of weight and grandeur given to this scene is immense, as heās peppered with arrows, and time and again he rises, understanding the gravity of his task. You can see in his eyes that he knows itās a failure, that he knows heās already dead: but he refuses to stop, getting up again and again to fight off more Orcs. He absolutely must keep going until all the strength leaves his body. And, of course, heās ultimately successful: yes, the hobbits are briefly captured, but his actions lead to the Ring going on its true course, and the hobbits engaging the help of the Ents. He kept his honour, he looked cool doing it, and it gave Sean Bean ā king of the cinematic death scene ā the most heroic of send-offs. Blow your horn, fellas. Ā
Yeah, so like I said, this was an incredibly hard list to finalise, even after Iād worked out all my little concessions and rules. Duncan Idaho from Dune was here for the longest time, but he just kept slipping further and further down; his demise a little bit too similar to Boromirās, perhaps. I really wanted to include Nux from Fury Road because of his ark and how beautiful it is, and also because his death is the death of the filmās iconic War Rig too (I did at least paraphrase his last words right at the top). And then there were the likes of Leon, or Terminator 2ās Miles Dyson (who just missed out because he was kinda already dead meat before he decided to stay behind and set off the explosion). Yondu! Holdo! Arguably the entire cast of The Wild Bunch!
What did I say at the start? People just love sacrificing themselves. We are, indeed, Groot.
Itās May, in case you hadnāt noticed, which means over in Hollywoodland itās officially Summer Blockbuster season. Weāve already had a few breakout hits this year, from the truly excellent Project Hail Mary to, er, well, I havenāt actually seen The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, so letās move right along to the recent Michael, which, erā¦
Anyway, films that make a lot of money are great, arenāt they? And Iād argue the season really gets underway this month with the release of The Mandalorian and Grogu, the first Star Wars film since the universally adored/potentially-franchise-destroying The Rise of Skywalker (delete as appropriate) in 2019. A brand new Star Wars film! Iām excited. Arenāt you excited? No? Oh well. It doesnāt matter, because Hollywood will keep delivering great big stonking, expensive films for us, custom-engineered to give us a good time. And, of course, make a lot of money.
Iāve been āintoā film for over thirty years now, reading about the industry and watching a lot of things at the pictures. And itās been fun in that time as Hollywood has gone from tentatively giving a success one diminishing-returns sequel, to chasing the platonic ideal of a ātrilogyā, to trying to establish a huge cinematic universe. Truly, no ambition is too great. And, yāknow, Iām being snarky, but I was really excited for everything from Men in Black II to The Matrix Revolutions to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Genuinely! So it makes sense that if thereās something great out there, weād like a bit more. Sure, okay, every now and again the industry will put the cart before the horse and we end up with Universalās āDark Universeā of non-existent interconnected monster movies. But I watched Mike & Nick & Nick & Alice this week, and ā no spoilers ā it could have a sequel very handily, even though the director has insisted that wasnāt his intention, and Iām not going to lie, Iād be quite into it if they did make Mike & Nick & Nick & Nick & Alice or whatever.
So amongst all the Shanghai Knights and Meet the Little Fockers itās often quite surprising when thereās a great big movie ā especially a good movie, especially a successful good movie ā that doesnāt get a sequel. Now, Iām definitely not saying we need to sequelise everything: itās actually very refreshing to just get a one-and-done story. And, of course, if theyād just stopped at Terminator 2: Judgement Day weād all have been much better off (apart from Schwarzeneggerās accountant, presumably). But sometimes, like a say, itās surprising just to get the one instalment of what could have been a franchise. And ā hey ā in some cases, itās not for want of trying!
This week, then, to kick off blockbuster season, Iām taking a look back to the films of the (semi-recent) past, and thinking: what could have had a sequel? Iām trying to be realistic here and think of films that had a great premise that naturally lent itself to more stories; I like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but Iām not really sure what a sequel to that would look like (er, unless it ends up looking like Disclosure Day, I guess). But very often thereās a cool premise or interesting characters, and you would be up for another trip in that world.
Now, I understand why some films donāt get sequels. A couple of these films, for instance, were considered disappointments ā at least financially ā at the time of their release. And thatās discounting whether any of the talent involved would want another go around anyway. there are other films, not on this list, that Iād be interested to see another version of ā letās say Wild Wild West, for instance ā but Iām not certain Iād like an actual sequel because the first one was, well, a bit rubbish. Or itās got, like, Johnny Depp in it or something. Also, Iāve tried to think of films that arenāt really a part of some other media already; you might want a sequel to Dredd or The Rocketeer, but those were pre-existing works before the movies came out, and already have a long life elsewhere. These were all ā as far as Iām aware ā original screenplays. I almost had Edge of Tomorrow on here, for instance, until I remembered itās based on a comic (which I own!).
Anyway, thatās enough of my waffle. Letās get on with it. Weāve only got one shot at thisā¦
Ten: Timecop (1994)
A genuinely enjoyable, if very daft, sci-fi action film that centres on a terrific premise: officers who police the timeline, preventing manipulation of the past and chronal chicanery. The groundwork, and the rules, are all established here; and at the time of release, Jean Claude Van Damme was certainly a big enough star to carry a sequel. I mean, considering how many Universal Soldier movies they made, with and without JCVD, itās surprising we never got Timecop 2. But itās languishing at the bottom of this list because technically they did make a very short-lived TV show spin-off. But letās face it, a movie would have been better.
Nine: Inception (2010)
I think it says something for the power of Christopher Nolan that even sixteen years ago he had the clout to make a massive, original sci-fi blockbuster that grossed nearly a billion dollars⦠and seemingly no one wanted to sequelise it. The setup is ripe for continuing adventures, too: a team of high-tech criminals who invade peopleās dreams. The film spells out all the logic, and how that can lead to exciting set-pieces such as the famous rotating corridor sequence. Now, yes, it does have a famously enigmatic ending that I would not want messed with; but you could definitely have had more fun with the premise or the world. But this film is at nine because, really, we should celebrate these one-off, individual ideas more; I wouldnāt want anyone but Nolan really having a shot at Inception 2: Dream a Little Bigger, Darling, and itās kinda nice at the end of the day that we just had this one spin of the top. But if I could plant an idea in Chrisā headā¦
Eight: Commando (1985)
When I started writing this list I was a little bit worried it would just degenerate into a bunch of Sly and Arnie films from the eighties; those guys made a lot of ā frankly pretty cool ā one-off action movies. Nevertheless, Commando feels like it could have been the beginnings almost of a Rambo-style franchise for Big Arn. His John Matrix is just the right mix of badass cool and preposterous silliness; he gets cool one-liners after he kills people (āHeās dead tiredā; āI let him goā); and, yes, there is outrageous and over-the-top action. A Commando sequel was, apparently, in the works for a while, and Arnold has even suggested it still might appear; but it would have been cool to see Matrix once more dragged out of retirement with Chenny forty years ago.
Seven: Event Horizon (1997)
It doesnāt have to be big, explosive action movies that deserved a sequel. Horror movies often start big, long-running franchises; and Paul W.S. Andersonās has the benefit of being both an intensely creepy, demonic horror film of both supernatural and psychological chills, as well as a cool sci-fi with great production design, modelwork, and ā yes ā some big explodey bits. Famously a critical and commercial flop on release, on the one hand itās unsurprising it never got a sequel; and, indeed, it has a great ending that doesnāt need unpicking. But a follow-up featuring the return of the Event Horizon? Iām kinda surprised they didnāt even try it as a straight-to-DVD movie in the mid-noughties. Ā
Six: The Last Boy Scout (1991)
This is another one that could have been said to underperform, hence no sequel. But another big Shane Black-written action-buddy-comedy ā Lethal Weapon ā ended up with three sequels (and Melās threatening a fifth), so itās a shame this delightful, knockabout, hilarious little film only had one go. Bruce Willis is slobby, grumpy, and very funny; Damon Wayans is cool; and it does some good work undercutting its own badassedness (Willis begins the film learning his wifeās having an affair). Iād have loved to see them trading barbs and punches one more time.
Five: The Fifth Element (1997)
Oh, hey, welcome back, Bruce. Iām gonna deal with the elephant in the room right away and say Iām not really in any rush to see another Luc Besson film; but this film had such a cool, unique sense of style and identity that I do think itās a shame we only got to experience it once. Itās hard to imagine now, but for the longest time we didnāt get complete sci-fi worlds: this film came out before the Star Wars prequels, and gridlocked hovercars in a futuristic cityscape was mind-blowing, visually, before we even got to the really trippy stuff (like Gary Oldmanās accent). The film does feel rather wrapped up, plot-wise, to be honest, but that never really stopped the likes of Star Wars, so Iām sure some other space-nasty could see Corben Dallas and Leeloo venture out once more. Not now though; letās leave it be. Circa 2000? Yeah, Iād have been down.
Four: True Lies (1994)
Yep, Arnoldās back. This spy movie is, in many ways, something of a Bond parody: itās certainly very funny, with the playful back-and-forth between Arnie and Jamie Lee Curtis, inept terrorists, and Tom Arnold providing wisecracks. Yeah, okay, there are some dodgy, dated bits; but there was certainly enough here to suggest further adventures for Harry and Helen Tasker, especially with an ending that basically establishes her as his new partner. And itās not as if James Cameron is against sequels! And this film was a huge hit at the time, as well. Oh, and I am aware that after claiming these were all, to the best of my knowledge, āoriginalā films, True Lies is a remake. But, yāknow, the sequel would have been original!
Three: Galaxy Quest (1999)
A delightful sci-fi comedy that, like a lot of these films now I come to think about it, succeeds on the strength of its characters. Itās also another film that ends with our heroes off on more continuing adventures: theyāve got their TV show back, and thereās a whole galaxy out there that theyāve just prodded a stick at. Who knows what other weird aliens could come crawling out of the cosmos? Basically, another, er, quest through the galaxy would totally have made sense, and itās not as if theyāre having to pay a Schwarzenegger-sized salary to anybody. Incidentally, Tim Allen had this and Toy Story 2 in the same year, which is an incredible achievement for anybody, let alone Tim Allen.
Two: The Rock (1996)
In a way, The Rock is very one-and-done. I mean, how many times do terrorists take over Alcatraz and you need to team up a mild-mannered chemist with a sexagenarian secret agent to break into an unbreakable prison? Itās a fantastic high concept for a fantastic action movie, but it doesnāt lend itself to further adventures. On the other hand, the film ends with Nicolas Cageās Stanley Goodspeed in possession of a sensitive government data; one could imagine him going on the run and needing Sean Conneryās help to get the goons off his back. Or maybe John Spencer tracks down Conneryās supposedly-deceased John Mason and Nic has to run and warn him? Whatever, itās the characters ā and the slightly-OTT world they inhabited ā that were the real stars; and there was enough there to allow for a further bite of the apple. And yāknow what? Even though some of the principles are sadly no longer with us, Iād still get excited if I heard Cage was gonna tell someone they were the Rocket Man one last time.
One: Demolition Man (1993)
This one has it all: a fresh and distinctive sci-fi setting; the sort of procedural status quo that allows for new adventures; a fresh hook ā defrosted super-criminals! ā that can sustain more than one story; great characters; and big action superstar from the eighties. Itās shocking, really, that we never got more than one Demolition Man. What became of the future after the death of Dr. Cocteau? Who else was put in the cryo-prison? Whatās the rest of America like if San Andreas was so seemingly perfect? And, most importantly, how do the three seashells work? Okay, yeah, maybe some of the quirkier āperfect futureā edges would have been sanded down; and, again, itās nice to have this one shining gem of a mid-nineties action movie. But unlike the future worlds of Blade Runner or RoboCop or The Terminator, weāve only really visited San Andreas once, and on balance thatās a bit of a shame. Even if Stallone in Judge Dredd was almost a photo negative reproduction, it still wasnāt quite the same. Be well, John Spartan. Be well.
Yāknow, if nothing else, this has been a bit of a nice retrospective, nostalgic look back at films mostly from the nineties. I did flirt with newer films ā Baby Driver, for instance ā but their very ānewnessā (relatively speaking) counted against them; if Edgar Wright announced Baby Driver 2: Babyās Day Out, we wouldnāt be all that surprised, whereas Beyond the Event Horizon would be a bit of a shock. All the same, looking back at these films, and how excitedly I invented sequels in my mind, was quite a fun exercise. We must do this again sometime!
Where would a bad guy be without a henchman? Nowhere, thatās where; you need good henchman to do all the dirty work for you. You need disposable foot soldiers for the car chases, fist fights, assassination attempts, āgo see what that noise wasā scenarios, kidnappings, and all sorts besides. And letās face it: the main role of a henchman is to die before you do.
Most action movies follow a template of a hero is, for whatever reason, an underdog against more serious foes; thereās quite often a one-man-army element to them, whether itās Commando literally having Big Arn mow down a haciendaās worth of heavily-armed cartel members, or Bruce Willis methodically picking off terrorists-cum-thieves one by one in Die Hard. Generally, the more impressive your adversary, the bigger the army theyāll send after you: witness (no pun intended) Immortan Joeās War Boys chasing down Furiosa and Max, or even the Penguinās gang of circus freaks in Batman Returns.
All these goons give our heroes ample opportunity to dispatch foes in varied and interesting ways. Sometimes theyāll be gunned down willy-nilly; sometimes theyāll perish in the course of doing business, their car careering off the road, their plane being shot down. Sometimes ā if theyāre very lucky ā theyāll get a nice one-on-one fight with Our Hero before being brutally dispatched. And sometimes the method of dispatch will be so interesting, so exotic, so repulsive, or so hilarious, that itāll one day end up on a list like this.
Now, I donāt necessarily think a āhenchmanā has to be someone working for the big bad. Yeah, okay, thatās a technicality, but I think in filmic terms it can also refer to basically a supporting villain whose only purpose is to be killed on the way to the main villain. So Iād count, say, the various āstalkersā in The Running Man (1987 variant) or the different fighters in Enter the Dragon, or whatever. Basically, if I think theyāre a step on the ladder to the big bad, Iām counting them as a henchman; although I think ā for want of a better word ā ālieutenantsā like Count Dooku or General Grievous are perhaps a bit too big to be a mere henchman. Does that make sense? I do like to overthink these things.
Thatās all there is to it, then: a list of cool ways in which supporting villains were offed in the movies. From the sublime to the ridiculous to the disgusting. Get your hilarious quips ready, because weāre about to kill a lot of folk.
Ten: The āI hate working hereā guy (Iron Man 3, 2013)
So weāre kicking things off with a fantastic scene that is also a bit of a cheat ā hence itās placement at number ten. Because technically this is one guy who doesnāt die. After a protracted, hilarious, and ingeniously-choreographed action sequence where Tony Stark is trying to assemble his modular armour whilst fighting off a room of goons ā flying with only one boot, shooting with one glove, that sort of thing ā he gets down to one last bloke aiming a gun at him. Said final guy immediately throws his hands in the air to surrender, saying āI hate working here, theyāre so weird.ā Comedy gold!
Nine: The washing machine (Ready or Not: Here I Come, 2026)
I was a bit worried this was recency bias talking, but Samara Weavingās Grace kills a lot of people across these two films, and this one is the stand-out, gross-out, hilarious death. Grace and her sister Faith (Kathryn Newton) manage to briefly overpower their pursuer Viraj (Nadeem Umar-Khitab) and shove him into a large industrial washing machine. Itās a comic delight as he screams amidst the boiling water, and the slow shift in the sistersā expressions from elation at the victory to realising theyāve just killed a man in a horrible way is hilarious. And then, Grace has to search his burned and mangled body, gipping as she peels clothes away from runny flesh. Like I said, hilarious!
Eight: The cigarette (The Last Boy Scout, 1992)
Going slightly more serious ā although sticking in the same Shane Black world as Iron Man 3 ā is this underrated Bruce Willis joint. As PI Joe Hallenbeck, he finds himself captured by a couple of henchmen, sitting on a nice chair in a plush mansion awaiting the boss. One of the goons - Chet (Kim Coates) - toys with him, punching Joe whenever he asks for a cigarette; ādo that again and Iāll kill ya,ā says Joe. Chet ā clearly never having seen Die Hard ā hits him again, at which point Joe whacks him in the face and shoves his nose through his brain (a move which I feel was more famous in the nineties than it is now). The sequence is sudden and brutal but also ā whisper it ā pretty funny.
Seven: The book (John Wick Chapter 3: Parabellum, 2019)
So weāre getting to a point of order here which is: what is a āhenchmanā? Because a lot of the people John Wick seems to fight tend to be individual, rival hitman rather than the hired lackeys of some Big Bad. And so, in Chapter 3, quite early doors, the recently-excommunicado Johnathan comes across a frankly colossal adversary in a library ā Ernest, played by Serbian basketballer Boban MarjanoviÄ ā and what ensues is a brutal close-quarters beating. In the end, the Baba Yaga is victorious when he uses a chuffing huge book to shatter Ernestās jaw, leaving it hanging loose and wobbly on his face, before breaking the guyās neck. Itās a nasty business but an iconic moment.
Six: The train fight (From Russia With Love, 1963)
These have all tended to be either humorous or kinda cool so far. But this tense, gritty dust-up is far more down-to-earth; memorable more for its brutality and the physical presence of Conneryās Bond and Robert Shaw as his Soviet counterpart Red Grant. Finally meeting in a secluded train compartment, they batter the heck out of each other in extreme close quarters, before Grant gets a garrotte around his opponentās neck. But Bond has a hidden knife and stabs Grant, turning the tables and garrotting the Russian. For a film over sixty years old, itās incredibly violent and realistic, and reinforces the brutality thatās often present in Bond.
Five: The pencil trick (The Dark Knight, 2008)
Nobody said the person doing the henchman-slaying had to be the hero. In this unforgettable full scale intro to Heath Ledgerās Joker. In his flamboyant but demented style, he makes a pencil disappear by ramming it through the eye socket of a gangsterās bodyguard. Itās a shocking and rather squirmy moment, but showcases how much of a threat he really can be; and his slightly lacklustre flourish of āta-dah!ā afterwards is the icing on the evil cake. My only real quibble is: how on earth did he get the pencil to stick to the table in the first place?
Four: The corkscrews (The Equalizer, 2014)
My favourite Equalizer beat-down is actually when Denzelās Robert McCall takes down a room of misogynistic frat boys in part 2, but technically none of them die so I canāt count that. But this scene, which is the first time we see his particular skillset and single-minded, logistical approach to problems. He makes his way through a room of Russian mobsters, using whatever is at hand ā glasses, bottles, other peopleās guns ā until he finally faces off with some final guy whilst wielding two corkscrews. He repeatedly stabs the guy ā with corkscrews ā until he sticks one through his chin and we can see it in his mouth. Itās totally great.
Three: The toxic waste guy (RoboCop, 1988)
Weāre into the gold standard now, guys, and this is one of the most iconic deaths of the eighties ā hell, possibly of all cinema. In the final conflict of the film, badguy goon Emil, played by Paul McCrane (E.R.ās Dr. Romano!), crashes his van into a vat of toxic waste, rolling out of the back doors amidst a deluge of steaming liquid. He emerges all mutated and melty, which seems horrible enough; but then Clarence Boddicker (Kurtwood Smith) hits him with a car, at which point he explodes like a water balloon filled with raw meat, his body sloshing over the windscreen in the worldās worst car wash. I cannot overstate the impact this scene had on the children who watched the film, far too young, in the eighties.
Two: The steamroller (Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery, 1997)
Okay, weāre back in the proper comedy here, and this one is so funny that it makes it almost to the top of the list. In a fantastic parody of the entire concept of henchman deaths, we first of all have an hilarious send-up of the kill itself ā Austin driving an incredibly slow-moving steamroller at a henchman, neither one managing to move despite the glacial pace. And then, going deeper and denser, after he dies we cut to his family ā his wife and stepson ā receiving the news of his death, in a scene wonderfully framed in the iconography of suburban Americana. Doubling down in such a ridiculously silly fashion on the trope really reinforces the gag; and itās such a good one, that Mike Myers does it twice. Mutated sea bass, anyone?
One: The swordsman AND Propeller Nazi (Raiders of the Lost Ark, 1981)
Once again I cheat. Because how can I pick between these two? The scene where Indy faces the swordsman is one of the most iconic in all of cinema. Itās so perfectly framed and timed: the crowd parting to reveal the swordsman, his impressive twirling, Indyās knackered and disinterested shooting of him. Itās a moment of sublime and rather silly comedy, and could easily be number one on its own. But later on, he has a protracted and bruising fist-fight with a large, shirtless, moustachioed Nazi whilst Marion tries to stop a propeller plane from taking off. Now, Harrison Ford can take a punch on camera, so the fight is full of his lovely little comic grace notes of pain, surprise, and resolve; but itās all capped off when the Nazi himself is shocked to discover the propellers are upon him, and as Indy cowers, the plane is lavishly splashed with blood. And once again I am forced to say: this is very, very funny.
Iām a little bit worried how many of these were incredibly violent and I was left saying āno, really, this is the funny kind of violentā. Oh well.
Man, there were some I was really disappointed to lose. Bob Hoskins making the weasels laugh to death in Roger Rabbit was so nearly in there! I wanted to include Hot Rod driving over Kickbackās head in Transformers the Movie. I donāt have a kill from Die Hard, Mission, or Bourne. And for my money, Marvin from Pulp Fiction counts as a henchman too. What can I say? Horrendous violence. But still ā fun!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I feel like Iām a little behind the curve on Stranger Things. The first three seasons I watched more-or-less as they dropped: big, bold sci-fi/fantasy series werenāt ten-a-penny a decade ago, and the well of retro design or Stephen King homages didnāt feel quite as dry. And right from the start, it had enough of The X-Files about it to scratch my itch for trippy puzzle-box narratives and government conspiracies. But the longer it went on, the longer it went on, and when youāve got two kids to put to bed, finding the time to watch a two and a half hour episode of a TV series was hard going. I mean, come on: itās an episode of a TV series, not the latest Scorsese film! If youāre skirting three hours, just make it two episodes! Hell, make it three! Netflix wonāt mind!
Anyway, for a while I was happy to stick it on the backburner, especially as I was way more invested in the likes of WandaVision or Andor (or, if Iām honest, Only Murders in the Building). But! Fate (and time) has a habit of catching up to you, and before long my own demadogs (affectionate) were demanding to watch Stranger Things themselves. And, lo, it became so: as a whole family, we watched the entire saga from beginning to end.
Iāve been a bit snarky over those last two paragraphs but I do actually really like Stranger Things. Yeah, it goes on a bit, and itās somewhat derivative, but itās damn good fun, really well-produced, has some gnarly moments, and ā crucially ā a set of characters that you can really get behind (even if, arguably, there are too many for the show to deal with come the finale). And so, with little in the way of fuss and fanfare, we come to this: me listing my favourite characters from the show. Will it surprise you? Will it be incredibly obvious? Will we all lament the fact that I wanted to include Murray but he just slipped off the bottom?
And, of course, thereās a great bit of (accidental!) synergy in that this week saw the debut of the spin-off animated show Tales from ā85, which Iām sure Iāll be watching at some point. I mean, the episodes canāt be that long, right?
Ten: Joyce Byers (Winona Ryder)
Joyce is kind of the beating heart of the first season. Ryder gives the stand-out performance of the entire series as an increasingly harried mother who seems to all concerned as if sheās going insane with mania over the disappearance ā and alleged death ā of her son. But, obviously, we know sheās right, and if truth be told her light doesnāt shine quite as bright after that. Sheās certainly very funny, and the strength of spirit remains when she is (for example) breaking Hopper out of a Russian prison; but her force and tenacity in the early years is what earns her a place on this list.
Nine: Eddie Munson (Joseph Quinn)
Johnny Storm himself only has a brief tenure in Hawkins, but he burns very brightly (sorrynotsorry). Heās open-hearted and good-natured despite his rough exterior; a real Nice Guy Eddie. Heās so enthusiastic and positive towards his friends that it makes the tragedy of his āSatanic Panicā storyline all the stronger. And in a group that comprises wiseguys, badasses, and at least one actual superhero, his fear and reluctance coupled with his eventual quiet heroism stands out. Ā
Eight: Will Byers (Noah Schnapp)
Overcoming not just a relentlessly traumatic storyline ā that sees him abducted, possessed, separated from his friends, and traversing an incredibly difficult emotional minefield ā but also the worst haircut in ten yearsā worth of programming, Will is a star. Comfortably one of the best performances from the young cast, despite the repeated horrors inflicted upon him he doesnāt seem like a victim or a martyr; rather, his inner strength frequently shines through. The delicate, tragic, and ultimately victorious way he navigates his sexuality is also rather well done, not least because of Schnappās earnest, truthful performance.
Seven: Jane āElevenā Hopper (Millie Bobby Brown)
Probably some will find it surprising that El is so far down this list; hopefully my enthusiasm for the other six will explain why! But all the same, sheās still a cool character, transitioning from the almost alien-esque outsider to a regular teenager to a truly heroic power player across five seasons. She is one of the most honest and heartfelt characters, wearing her emotions as openly as her nosebleeds, and her relationships with ā in particular ā Mike and Hopper are endearing, amusing, and often moving. Plus, sheās just really cool when she unleashes her powers.
Six: Max Mayfield (Sadie Sink)
Coming in hot with a snarky, spiky persona, Max is immediately interesting, and how she mixes up the dynamic of the boys creates a lot of humour and drama. But underneath the tomboy exterior thereās a lot of intense drama, first with her brother, and then as one of Vecnaās victims. Throughout it all she maintains her fantastic, caustic, sarcastic demeanour, and Sinkās performance is one of the strongest in the show. Also: arguably the best love story in Stranger Things?
Coming right out swinging as one of the funniest characters in the show, Robin is fast-talking and just a joy whenever sheās on screen. Someone who can put Steve in his place and also call him up on his privilege, sheās also a chaos engine who absolutely does not have her shit together. The situations sheās forced into ā from the comedic joy of impersonating a college student to the straightlaced tension of evacuating kidnapped kids ā are ripe with opportunities for humour and pathos, Hawke bringing every shade out of the character. Also, itās cool to get an LGBTQ+ character out there, and her relationship with Will in the later seasons offers more opportunity to explore those issues in the wider, crazier, more fantastical context.
Three: Steve Harrington (Joe Keery)
A genuine twist in the first season was Steveās journey from being an absolute douche to being something of a hero. We instantly distrust him, heās clearly manipulative and only out for his own enjoyment, and we celebrate when Jonathan beats the crap out of him. But he has the humility to come back from it; he genuinely cares for Nancy, and his realisation that heās blown it hangs heavy over him. Portraying that shift, and that painful self-reflection, is a great thing for Keery. And, amidst all that, heās a comic high-water mark, especially his banter and bonding with the younger kids. And he has great hair.
Two: Dustin Henderson (Gaten Matarazzo)
Amidst all the younger cohort ā and I do feel bad I couldnāt fit them all in ā itās Dustin who stands out. This isnāt just because, arguably, Matarazzo puts in the best overall performance; itās because Dustin is always interesting, a grade-A uber-nerd who has a fact for every occasion, and is basically the teamās Egon Spengler. He starts out as kind of the āother friendā, seemingly not as close or as invested but just wanting to be along for the ride, but then makes himself invaluable both with his brain and his heart. His friendships with Eddie and Steve are beautiful to behold, as his rebellious streak, most clearly delineated in the final episodeās graduation scene. Of all the characters, heās probably the one I most want to follow up on: whatās he been doing for the last forty years?
One: Jim Hopper (David Harbour)
Look, I guess at the end of the day, I just feel seen. A paunchy middle-aged man whoās got a huge heart but is preternaturally grumpy and has a penchant for facial hair. Heās even called David H, for heavenās sake. The tragedy underpinning Hopper ā not just the loss of his first daughter, but his troubled youth and trauma in Vietnam ā brings us a tough old sod whoās emotionally crippled but desperate to love and be loved. This brings out both his brutality and his over-protective streak, but you canāt deny the strength of his feelings for Joyce and El, or how much heās willing to sacrifice to save them. Heās kind of the seriesā Logan, but heās not really the best there is at what he does because he does get kinda beaten up a lot.
Top Ten Moments in the Marvel Cinematic Universe ā Phase 2026
Every four years, about mid-April, I rank my favourite MCU moments. Iāve been doing it for a while now; itās my quad-annual tradition. I think four years is a good amount of time to take stock and reflect on the moments that have faded from view, somewhat, as well as celebrate new moments that have occurred in the meantime.
Itās interesting to look back and see what has bubbled more to the surface, or stuck around. There are some obvious ones. But I think I tend to gravitate to the emotional stuff ā Steve being selfless, Peter being Steve-ish, that sort of thing. The funnier moments have dropped off a little, such as Nick Furyās hilarious gravestone or Korg yelling āpiss off, ghost!ā to Loki. Similarly, Iād say that for the most part the many excellent action beats have also dripped away ā the Avengers āsplash panelā moments, Bruce always being angry, that sort of thing. There were a few similar scenes that I did consider here ā Rocket and Yonduās blood-drenched escape from the Ravagers, the bus fight in Shang-Chi, the Hawkeye car chase, or even ā to bring us bang up to date ā Bullseye stopping for a milkshake in Daredevil: Born Again. But, softy that I am, I just kept going back to the soppy bits.
Whoād have thought Iād focus on the heroism in a series about superheroes.
There are quite a lot of major Marvel moments Iāve not included. I mean, thereās no snap, for instance; no āI am Iron Manā. Thereās only one death, and even then itās semi-debatable. But what there is, at the end of the day, is a series of amazing moments from a terrific series of films and TV programmes, that generally speaking are all about how cool Steve Rogers is, even if the moment itself doesnāt feature Steve Rogers. It is, very much, the toast of Croydon.
Oh, and needless to say: SPOILERS!
Ten: Memory (The Marvels, 2023)
The MCU is often very funny, so it stands to reason thereād be at least one joke in the Top Ten. And, just pipping āthereās only one Bladeā at the post, is this incredible needle drop from The Marvels (the most criminally underrated film in the franchise!). the three-way juxtaposition of horror (as the SWORD crew are, essentially, hunted down and eaten by aliens), comedy (the creatures eating them are adorable kittens), and an incongruous but on-the-nose musical choice (Babs singing āMemoryā from Cats) all adds up to an incredible, ridiculous, hilarious scene that also manages to make total story sense.
Nine: Agatha All Along (WandaVision, āBreaking the Fourth Wallā, 2021)
There are a few big twists and surprise reveals in the MCU ā weāll get to another one of them later. But few are as joyous as the unveiling of Agatha Harkness in WandaVision. The show was a glorious puzzle box, teasing greater mysteries, and whilst the few red herrings did disappoint, the discovery that a bitchy, manipulative, murderous witch was behind a lot of what was happening was a worthy and entertaining sleight of hand. Especially because it was delivered in such a fantastic, meta, fourth-wall-breaking way, and with a delightful performance from Kathryn Hahn. Ā
Eight: A Good Man (Captain America: The First Avenger, 2011)
The more time passes, the more I fall in love with Chris Evansā debut as Cap. Here, in an intimate and quiet moment, the filmās philosophy ā and the core of Steve Rogersā character ā is outlined by Stanley Tucciās Dr. Erskine. Itās a great exposition dump, in a beautifully delivered monologue by Tucci, but also his declaration that Steve is a āgood manā gets to the core of the whole endeavour. That Steve himself seems to have internalised it is a nice recurring touch: he passes the shield onto Sam Wilson by calling him a āgood manā too.
Seven: The Catch (Spider-Man: No Way Home, 2021)
I wanted to celebrate so much about No Way Homeās perfect use of the multiverse: blending nostalgic fan-service with character building and story heft. It makes sense for the three Peters to join forces, but itās also a wonderful meta event to see the history of Spider-Man share the screen. But in trying to single out one moment within the finale, Iāve chosen Andrew Garfieldās Spider-Man catching a falling MJ. Itās incredible how this brief cameo manages to shine a new light on the disappointing Amazing Spider-Man 2 and that filmās contentious ending, and give a degree of closure to Garfieldās Peter. Plus itās just a great action sequence in its own right.
Lokiās arc over the course of the MCU is extraordinary, taking in full-on villainy, grudging attempts at repentance, and actual death. Loki ā the series ā really unpicks and unravels the God of Mischief, as it tears him apart, showing multiple versions of himself, and he has to reckon with his small place in the entirety of the multiverse. And, after coming to the conclusion that he doesnāt want any kind of throne after all, he sacrifices himself to save reality, becoming ā essentially ā the cornerstone of reality itself. The scene where he marches into the maelstrom and seizes the strands of reality, turning them into the branches of Yggrdasil the World Tree, is deeply moving and epic in scope, and gives Loki both a glorious, heroic send-off whilst keeping him around just in case.
Five: The Man Behind the Mandarin (Iron Man 3, 2013)
I mentioned twists before, and this one is the doozy of the whole franchise. Masterfully played and exceptionally well-hidden, the rug-pull that the supposed villain of the film isnāt who we thought is made all the funnier with the juxtaposition of Ben Kingsleyās Trevor Slattery and the persona of the Mandarin. Itās a shock, itās hilarious, it gave us one of the greatest original characters in the MCU ā a comic gem who has, brilliantly, returned over and over again. The fact that it seems to really annoy some people is incredibly odd.
Four: Grootās Sacrifice (Guardians of the Galaxy, 2014)
There are a lot of memorable deaths in the MCU, and some of them have even stuck! From Quicksilver to Iron Man to Loki to Loki to Loki to⦠you get the picture. But the most emotional is this, Grootās great sacrifice play, encasing his new found family with his own body to protect them from a horrific crash. And his reason? āWe are Grootā. And yāknow what? We are. We really are. And it kinda stuck! Because the other Groot isnāt really this Groot, itās more like his son or something. I guess. If you squint.
Three: Steve Passes the Test (Captain America: The First Avenger, 2011)
Imagine how good a film would have to be for me to feature it twice! And yet here we are: Capās back. This was one of the first gasp-inducing emotional moments for me in the MCU, where Steve Rogers shows his true colours by leaping onto a grenade during training, his first instinct being to sacrifice himself for everyone else. It was, of course, a dummy grenade, but the inherent goodness and heroism of Steve is evident to everyone. Even grumpy old Tommy Lee Jones. Also: if you watch back, youāll see that Peggy Carter makes a step towards the grenade as well. Great characterisation.
Two: Hammer Time (Avengers: Endgame, 2019)
One of the benefits of a very long-running serial like the MCU is you can seed story elements and then have them pay off big time. The scene in Age of Ultron where everyone is failing to pick up Thorās hammer is a comic gem, especially the fact that Steve seems to manage to make it wobble a tiny bit. And here, when all hope is lost, we see the hammer rise from the ground, to be wielded by Captain America himself. Did he know all along he could do it? Did he find the inner strength at the right moment? Thor himself isnāt that surprised. But let me tell you, when the hammer flew back into Capās hand, the cinema I was in exploded. Itās the greatest moment of audience exultation Iāve ever experienced. Electric.
One: When Peter Met Tony (Captain America: Civil War, 2016)
I feel like Iāve wanged on about this ā one of my favourite scenes in any movie ā over and over again. But here it is: Peter perfectly encapsulates what I think it means to be a superhero. āIf you can do the things I can, and you donāt, then when the bad things happen, they happen because of you.ā Basically, itās a sense of duty: but also itās a death sentence, because itās the sort of thinking that has you jumping on grenades. Whatās brilliant isnāt just how this reflects Peterās character, but that Peter is here throwing Steveās argument back at Tony without realising: that Steve is against the Accords because they might prevent him doing something when bad things happen. Tony, of course, is breaking all his own rules and several laws by binging Spider-Man into the fight. So as well as being a funny scene that nails the characters (and itās the first time Peter Parker was in the MCU!), itās also the beating heart of the movie, and its inherent tragedy. See? Theyāre all about Steve Rogers, even when theyāre not.
Ah, I love the MCU. Anyway, Iām off out to get all the cheeseburgers that I want. Oh no! Too soon!
Top Ten MCU TV Characters Who Should Appear in the Movies
I had a whole other list planned for this week, but Iāve been incredibly busy and havenāt had time to write, so Iām retreating back to my safe space and doing another Marvel list. This one is ā semi-relevantly ā inspired by the second season of Daredevil: Born Again and Spider-Man: Brand New Day this summer, so thereās that I guess. Itāll probably make sense.
From quite early in the MCUās history, there have been TV programmes; but they were always kept at something of a remove. The likes of Agents of SHIELD or the Netflix shows centred on the āDefendersā may have purported to be set in the MCU at the beginning, but they barely played lip service to continuity as they went on, and ā especially SHIELD ā became borderline impossible to reconcile with the movies. When Disney+ launched, we were promised āproperā in-continuity TV shows; so far, however, links between the film and TV arms of the Marvel empire have proved thin on the ground.
The biggest ācrossoverā ā if you can call it that ā is probably Ms. Marvel in The Marvels, or Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness drawing heavily on WandaVision for its plot (and Wandaās motivations). Beyond that, there have really just been the odd cameos ā Wunmi Mosakuās B-15 popping up in Deadpool & Wolverine, or Kate Bishop in the end credit sting of The Marvels. And now, with the Punisher appearing (and getting his potty mouth webbed up good) in the latest Spider-Man film, now felt like as good a time as any to look back at the telly and think wistfully about which characters would be good in a filum.
Because I think theyāre missing a trick here. Sure, the continuity is probably convoluted enough without requiring everyone to watch three separate multi-part TV series with arcs and everything just to ensure that the latest Ant-Man movie makes sense. But some of the TV characters have been extraordinary, in series that have been excellent. Itād be cool either to see these stories carried on in an IMAX format, or even just the characters themselves given their due in a bigger ensemble.
And thatās all there is to it this week. Characters from Marvel TV that Iād like to see in Marvel movies. Oh, a couple of rules: Iām very specifically sticking to the series that I know are in continuity with the rest of the MCU. This discounts Agents of SHIELD as that does seem to me to be set in an alternate universe. So basically itās all the Disney+ shows and I guess the Netflix ones too (because Born Again certainly seems to imply that all those series are now definitively in continuity). And Iām going to be very strict and say, if they have appeared in a film, then they canāt count for this list. So that excludes Kate Bishop and Daredevil, even though their appearances thus far have been far too brief, and they should really be part of the Avengers by now (seriously, Marvel, just give Hailee Steinfeld a chair already! You know she deserves it!)
For the longest time, the running gag was āMephisto confirmed?!ā Everything was pinned on Marvelās de facto Devil, so when he finally appeared in the guise of Sacha Baron Cohen ā complete with London accent, calling people a twat ā it was a tiny joyous revelation. Iāve no idea whatāll happen with Ironheart herself, especially given she had something of a cliffhanger ending, but surely this canāt be the last time a character crosses swords with Mephisto. Doctor Doom has a history in Hell, so could be crop up secretly in Doomsday? Or fight Doctor Strange? Or we could do an adaptation of Spider-Manās One More Day! Actually, no, scrap that one.
Yes, yes, I know: Secret Invasion is the show that dare not speak its name. I would argue the only genuine, proper dud in the MCU canon, it nevertheless gave us something great to grab onto in the shape of Olivia Colman. Almost operating like a British Nick Fury ā or perhaps closer to Julia Louis-Dreyfusā Val ā sheās a government player who rubs shoulders with superheroes, and has motives that may or may not be pure. Sheād be terrific in a future Captain Britain movie, but regardless I feel like it was too good a performance to leave in the gutter.
Eight: Luke Cage (Mike Colter, Luke Cage, 2016):
The Netflix shows had some structural problems (basically all of them were too long and went round in circles) but for the most part had spot-on casting. Colter is excellent as Cage, bringing not just the required toughness, but an innate sense of the characterās gravitas and place in history. Now that his stablemates Murdock and Jones have started cropping up in the MCU proper, I think itās time for Power Man himself to make a return. Whereās my money, honey?
Seven: Billy Maximoff (Joe Locke, Agatha All Along, 2024):
I really hope the ending of Agatha wasnāt the last we see of Billy in the MCU, because he wasnāt just a cool character in a great show, but thereās so much potential there with Wiccan as a fully-fledged superhero. Ideally, weād see him reunited with his mother Wanda ā and given what happens in The Multiverse of Madness, I feel like any return of the Scarlet Witch should likewise happen on the big screen. More than that, though, the whole Young Avengers as a concept ā or whatever they end up calling them ā is something Marvel should grasp with both hands and make a movie of, pronto.
The MCU definitely needs more gay witches, thatās what I say. Hahnās performance is a never-ending delight, and although her status still feels very open-ended right now, itād be great to see her given a bigger canvas for her spooky brand of bitchiness and tragic selfishness. Tormenting a serious character such as Doctor Strange would offer endless comedy, and also an opportunity to show how strong Agatha still is. If Billy were to come back on the big screen rather than small, then his spectral guide should absolutely return alongside him.
Five: Mobius M. Mobius (Owen Wilson, Loki, 2021):
Possibly not the last Loki character on the list, Wilson gives the show ā and, potentially, the whole MCU ā a whole lot of heart as the tragicomic Mobius. His friendship with Loki is one of the key relationships in the whole show, and his slow acceptance of the truth of the TVA is a driving part of the series. His current status is a bit up-in-the-air ā is he still part of the TVA seen in Deadpool? ā so I feel he could pop up anyway to offer good-natured advice, a friendly ear, and a slice of pie. Not to be confused with Morbius, who should not be part of the MCU.
Moon Knightās story was fascinating, and even if the series didnāt quite nail the premise, it was still a bold attempt to deal with mental illness in a superhero setting. Isaac is superb as the multiple personalities on display, and the trippy interpretation of Egyptian mythology was a cool supernatural twist not commonly seen in the MCU. I think Marc/Steven/Jake being part of a team-up of some kind would add all sorts of interesting wrinkles and story potential, and Moon Knightās power set would likewise set him apart somewhat.
Three: She-Hulk (Tatiana Maslany, She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, 2022):
Maslany was done dirty, in my view, She-Hulk getting a very unfair kicking for being something a bit different. I reckon, to be honest, that doing such an expensive CG effect in a relatively small-scale sitcom is perhaps too tall an undertaking; but cropping up as, maybe, a sub for her big brother, a far funnier and sunnier Hulk? Thatād be great, especially as Jennifer Walters would be really excited to be asked to be on a team. Recreating the comics where sheās part of the Fantastic Four would be fun; but sheād also fit in well with fellow West Coast hero Ant-Man and his brand of silliness.
Two: Jessica Jones (Krysten Ritter, Jessica Jones, 2015):
Ritterās hard-bitten ātec is going to pop back up in Daredevil, but itād be good to see her flinging people through walls in your local cinema too. Itās a great performance, full of sarcastic humour, and she makes a fantastic addition to a team ā especially if thereās a more straight-arrow hero in the midst (thatās why sheās so good set against Daredevil). Iād love a street-level New York story that teamed her up with other heroes ā Ms. Marvel? Kate Bishop? Spider-Man?! ā so she could be cranky and a bit wise and then throw somebody through a wall.
One: Sylvie (Sopha Di Martino, Loki, 2021):
I really donāt feel enough has been made of a more vengefully-inclined genderbent alternate version of the God of Mischief (to be fair, I donāt even think enough was made of her in Loki season two). Di Martino gives a tremendous performance, full of anger but also a ton of heart. It would have been really cool to see her teaming up with Thor, as they could both come to terms with what theyāve lost; surrogate siblings from different dimensions. I have a funny feeling Secret Wars will spell the end of the story for a lot of these characters, so itād be nice if one of the next two Avengers movies gave her a chance to shine on the big screen.
The Marvel Cinematic Universe doesnāt really need any defending. Theyāre probably coming in for more stick nowadays than they ever have, and their fortunes are certainly a lot more variable than they were five years ago. But, I mean, come on: itās the MCU. Theyāve made literally billions and billions of dollars ā in some cases, from one film. The trailer for Spider-Man: Brand New Day broke all kinds of YouTube records. Theyāve more or less defined pop culture in movies for the last decade. Even if they were now a busted flush (and I think both Spidey and Avengers: Doomsday will end up sitting fairly high in the box office chart come 2027) their overall legacy is pretty secure. I mean, nobody really did what they did before they did it, and almost everyone else whoās tried has failed. So they were definitely doing something right.
Even so, some of their films come in for a kicking critically or commercially. And I donāt always think itās fair. Whilst they donāt always hit it out the park, most of their weaker moments are more just mediocre ā disappointing, or perhaps predictable. The only thing theyāve ever made that feels like a total mess and Iād be happy to see retconned is Secret Invasion (a terrible waste of an excellent premise, to say nothing of an excellent cast ā will we ever see Olivia Colmanās wonderful Sonya again?). So most of their ābadā films I think have very good points ā and in a lot of cases, theyāre great films! Genuinely really good! Honestly!
So this list is really just me finding another excuse to talk about the MCU for a bit, and also sing the praises of some wrongfully maligned movies. Thatās it. Assemble, or whatever.
Ten: Iron Man 3 (2013)
Only at number ten by virtue of it actually being a legitimate success that grossed over a billion dollars, and is very highly thought of by a fairly large segment of the audience. But there has been, ever since release, a vocal contingent of āfansā who hate it, possibly because it has the gall to wrongfoot the audience and play fast and loose with comic history. But make no bones about it: this film is excellent, a really funny and clever buddy movie that strips away the effects-heavy Iron Man schtick to just give us a peak-form Downey cracking wise and taking down the bad guys whilst always on the back foot. The Mandarin reveal is the greatest twist ā and one of the funniest moments ā in MCU history, and is responsible for the solid gold nugget that is Trevor Slattery. And the film gave us War Machine Rocks With An X.
Nine: Captain America: Brave New World (2025)
Iām not going to pretend that Brave New World is on a par with Iron Man 3 ā theyāre opposite ends of the MCU ranking, really ā but this film still came in for an undue bit of stick. I think its messy production might have contributed to its overall quality ā the scars of extensive rewrites and reshoots are all over it ā but it still has something to offer. Itās shot really well, like a conspiracy thriller, and thereās a nugget of a good concept with Isaiah Bradley and the āfirst Black Captain Americaā. Harrison Ford is excellent as the duplicitous but beleaguered President Ross, and it has quite a lot of nice other-MCU linkage.
Eight: The Incredible Hulk (2008)
Two Hulk-adjacent movies in a row? Whoād of thunk? For a long time this was pegged as maybe Marvelās worst film, but taken on its own merits itās got a lot of nice ideas. In many ways it feels more like an update of the eighties TV show, with Banner on the run, and the gimmick of his heartrate signposting his conversion is a nice visual motif if a little corny. Deepening the Hulk āloreā is quite good, with many cameos from other comic characters, but the plot is woolly and the CG smack-a-thon in its climax has aged very poorly. Still: not bad!
Seven: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)
Itās probably fair that with the bombastic title and return of Sam Raimi to superhero filmmaking, the end result is a bit disappointing, especially considering the rather abrupt heel turn of Wanda. However, the film is still really enjoyable, with some terrific visuals and sequences, such as the opening monster attack in New York and the incredible āmusic battleā. And some of the creepier Scarlet Witch set pieces are very Raimi. Plus we get a terrific Bruce Campbell cameo, and some of grisliest deaths in the MCU. So not the heights of Spider-Man, but still great fun.
Six: Thor: The Dark World (2013)
Another film that I think suffers from production shenanigans, and an absolute waste of Christopher Eccleston as the baddie. Where it shines, though, is in the characterisation, with the relationships between Thor and Jane, and especially Thor and Loki, proving to be the filmās heart and soul. Itās also proven to be an incredibly important lynchpin film for the MCU as a whole, incredibly important for the charactersā arcs going forward. And whilst itās often a muddy and drab film, the climax is well-staged and exciting.
Five: Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)
After the lofty heights of the first Avengers ā the massive success of which I think took everybody a little bit by surprise ā Age of Ultron was, perhaps inevitably, bound to disappoint. And itās very true that itās a messy film that struggles to give most of the cast anything significant to do. But itās one of those things where itās only bad in comparison to the other three, five-star, Avengers films. Because this is still an exciting, action-packed movie with the core team on the back foot the whole time, full of great sequences (the opening battle! The Hulk fight! Everything on the farm!) and some genuinely funny moments (itās the best Hawkeye movie). And although Iād argue that Ultron is rather poorly defined as a character (and frankly an ugly design), the performance by James Spader is excellent.
Four: Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023)
Iām genuinely baffled by the overwhelming negativity this film received, because my only real criticism is that by becoming a big, effects-driven cosmic-adjacent adventure, it dispenses with a lot of what made the Ant-Man films feel unique. On its own merits, itās still an incredibly fun, boppy, frequently-hilarious film, that really leans into the weirdness of its anything-goes setting (living buildings! MODOK! Drink the ooze!). I can accept the visuals themselves are, perhaps, an acquired taste, but I found them to be fine given its totally otherworldly setting. Itās perhaps a shame that itās a narrative dead the within the MCU, but as grand, bonkers sci-fi adventures go, itās a blast.
Three: Eternals (2021)
An odd duck, certainly, and one that for lots of reasons feels a bit divorced from the MCU as a whole. But it benefits from this: itās a long, lyrical, epoch-spanning adventure that tells what is it its heart the story of a family. Itās a lot more esoteric than most Marvel movies, but thatās to its credit: it feels incredibly authored. I think its odd rhythms, its atypical story beats, and, frankly, the languorous way it spins its tale, all counted against it. But itās probably why I like the film as much as I do: less superhero adventure, more dysfunctional deity drama. In fact, its biggest sin is how it set up multiple threads that have been mostly ignored by the wider MCU story arc.
Two: Thor: Love and Thunder (2022)
The hate this film received from some quarters on release is mind-boggling. I get that it goes instantly for a particular tone and pretty much sticks with it for the whole film. If youāre not on board with its inherent silliness, then youāre not going to have a good time. But itās not just funny ā and it is funny, itās incredibly funny ā itās really well-staged. The action set-pieces are dramatic and impressive, from the opening fight against the chicken biker aliens, to the stunning monochrome battle, and climactic showdown featuring a bevvy of super-powered children. Itās got a terrific sense of visual style, and feels very much pulled from the comics. Beyond all that, itās genuinely emotional: not only Thor and Janeās relationship, but the final reveal of what āLove and Thunderā means is a bit of a gut-punch. I genuinely love it. Itās brilliant. So you can all shut up.
One: The Marvels (2023)
Marvelās lowest-grossing movie, and one that was not just maligned but also totally overlooked. There are some genuine reasons for this, as well as some pretty horrible ones, but everyone who skipped it missed a gem: this is a fantastic film. The central trio shine on an intergalactic road movie, each coming to terms with one another and having a ton of fun along the way. There are inventive action scenes, a musical number, genuine intentional hilarity, and the greatest needle drop in MCU history. And as Kamala Kahn, Iman Vellani is a gem, right up there with Downy as Tony Stark in the MCU casting echelon. Seriously, itās great.
Yeah, I know itās Easter, but I couldnāt be arsed thinking of something eggy. Maybe next year.
Sometimes itās fun when a brand new topic comes crashing along and knocks all your plans out of whack. Sometimes it leads to a fun list! Like today! This list was fun. Didnāt need a lot of research. Just me pouring my thoughts out my earhole and onto a Word document. Joy!
So, anyway, in a rather surprising bit of news, we discovered this week that Stephen Colbert ā off of the telly in America ā is currently co-writing a brand-new Lord of the Rings film, which is going to be made properly with the involvement of the likes of Peter Jackson. We knew that Warner Bros wanted more LOTR stuff; Andy Serkis is pulling double duty (or is that triple, what with the Smeagol of it all?) by acting in and directing The Hunt for Gollum, which comes out Christmas 2027. So the fact that thereās going to be another attempt to mine the bits between the lines of Tolkien isnāt that surprising. But itās amusing and somewhat pleasing that Colbert ā who, obviously, is a gifted performer and writer himself ā is going to be contributing to the screenplay, as he is famously a massive fan of the books and a huge nerd for all things Middle-earth.
The other big surprise, though, was that this new film ā currently titled The Shadow of the Past ā is going to take as its āinspirationā the chapters of the book not adapted in the films of 25 years ago; principally, it seems, the four hobbitsā encounters with barrow-wights as they leave the Shire (the film also serves as a bit of a sequel, with some of the story set fourteen years after LOTR ā presumably so they can get Sean Astin and co back without too much makeup; although if theyāre also playing their 2001-vintage selves in flashback, then perhaps some hefty computers will be involved too). Now, this section of the book is famous (infamous?) for the inclusion of one character in particular; and, frankly, I just donāt see how you can adapt that bit without him. Heās the yellow-booted oliphaunt in the room. I am, of course, talking about the one and only Tom Bombadil.
Bombadil is an enigma, because he seems to have stepped out of a different story altogether (which is partly true, as Tolkien had written stories about him prior to LOTR). On the one hand, heās almost fairytale-esque in his gambolling about and his sing-song ring-a-dillo speech patterns. Heās a funny, weird character, in a way far less serious than even the hobbits at their most befuddled-Edwardian-gentleman extreme. However, heās also deeply uncanny and surreal, and there are elements to him both big and small that hint at a far denser, possibly darker origin. For one, he is said to be āoldest and fatherlessā, with the implication that he was on Middle-earth before anything else. Given that the elves are supposed to be, literally, the first life created by Middle-earthās god Eru IlĆŗvatar, the existence of something even older raises questions. Is he one of the Valar or the Maiar, the angelic orders of beings that also include the likes of Sauron and Gandalf? Or is he literally God Himself? He describes himself as āThe Masterā at one point, which I donāt think is a reference to Doctor Who. The fact that the One Ring not only has no power over him, but that he seems to have some degree of power over it, suggests that heās far, far stronger than almost any character we meet. So what is he? Why are his songs stronger songs? Whatās up with his weird wife Goldberry? And why oh why is his jacket blue and his boots yellow?
Look, this sort of combination of whimsy and deep, dark, uncanny weirdness is exactly up my street. So the fact that we might be getting a film in which old Tom plays a major role-a-dillo is incredibly exciting to me. Now, Tom was recently brought to the screen by Rory Kinnear in the latest season of Amazonās The Rings of Power ā but Iāve not watched that, as I was a bit lukewarm on the first season. Kinnear is a good choice, though. Iām sure his portrayal is a good one. But who else could do it?
And thatās what this list is. Ten actors who I think carry the necessary mixture of gravitas, good humour, and the ability to sing about plants and talk in a weird fashion without it seeming annoying (although letās be honest, thereās no guarantee that it wonāt end up annoying regardless). Thereās not much more for me to add, so letās get on with it: ten actors who I think would be quite good at playing Tom Bombadillo, bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow.
Ten: Lenny Henry
Lenny is just the right amount of sentimental and exuberant, and he has a good way with a weird noise. Heās only propping up the list, in fact, because heās already had a bite of the Middle-earth cherry and it feels perhaps unfair: he was a hobbit-esque character in The Rings of Power. But that made him do a slightly dodgy accent, here Iād want him to stick to his native Dudley.
Nine: Hugh Jackman
Jackman is ebullient; heās a natural born showman (some would say the greatest). Heās a song-and-dance man at heart, so you can totally imagine him troll-a-lolling his heart out. And heās ageing into a nice weathered look that would suit the character. But is he too much of a heartthrob movie star? Would we see Tom, or Wolverine?
Eight: Jonathan Bailey
Bombadil is supposed to be old, obviously, but heās not necessarily supposed to look old. Most old people in Middle-earth donāt look at old as they are! So maybe getting a younger actor could put across the youthful energy of the character. Bailey is a great actor who we know can do the charm and handle the songs, and Iām pretty sure he could bring the necessary depth and ambiguity too.
Seven: Jared Harris
Harris, compared to others on this list, isnāt quite as exuberant. However, what he can portray is an intense tightness of character: he can be exquisitely good. Being given free rein to really show someone who is just totally nice and will look after you could be absolutely amazing. And he can do wise with ease. It would be a delight to see him cut loose in this role.
Six: Ewan McGregor
McGregor can be the show-stopping song and dance man; he can be, we all know, a manās man, ladiesā man, man about town. And he can be as learned as any Jedi Knight you care to mention. But what heād also bring is a bit of ambiguity; heās dabbled with the dark side as much as the light. And he possesses an innate sexy kind of cheekiness. Not that Iāve ever thought of Tom Bombadil as sexy. But I guess Goldberry sees something in him. Maybe itās the beard.
Five: Paterson Joseph
I feel like Wonka showed the world how great Joseph been be and more films should take their lead. Heās got such a twinkle, and heās such a sexy comedian; but heās also a terrific actor who can bring the nuance and the hints of darkness the character requires. And we know he can do the old soft shoe ā again, look at Wonka.
Four: Brendan Gleeson
There are few actors who can be terrifying and cuddly at exactly the same time but Gleeson is one of them. He can be the hardass who knows the darkness of the universe, but he can also be the kindest soul you ever met. We know once heās on the scene the hobbits will be safe from evil trees or whatever it is that barrow-wights actually are; heās got oodles of charm so you can see why Goldberry feel is with him; and if someone told you he might very well be god youād probably believe them.
Three: Robert Downey Jr.
Iāve tried to steer clear of Americans in this list. I feel the accents shouldnāt wander too far from Tolkien, really. But Downey is pretty good with accents: look at his weird Richard Burton thing he does in Dolittle. Anyway, it should be obvious that RDJ can do everything this role requires: the capering, the singing, the paternal qualities, the hints of darkness, the eccentricity, the ambiguity. And if the two main hobbits can be American, maybe old Tom can too?
Two: Michael Sheen
Sheen, in many ways, seems an obvious choice. Heās obviously a wonderful actor capable of great range, but beyond that he has such an incredible, sonorous voice. All the trill-a-rillos will sound amazing in his dulcet tones. Heās got the twinkle, heās got the edge, heās effortlessly charming. And I feel like heās due another big Hollywood fantasy role. Underworld was a while ago now.
One: Stephen Graham
I think Graham might be the best actor of his generation, which should be evident. He seems capable of turning his hand to just about anything. I think heās got the right physicality for the role: standing next to the likes of Elijah Wood, I think heād just look like Tom Bombadil if he was in a bright blue jacket. But Graham is such a distinctly humane actor, and I feel his ability to convey the heart and soul of Bombadil would be second to none. Heād bring across the warmth and heart of an uncanny, otherworldly creature in such a beautiful way. And whilst heās obviously a big figure in film ā heās worked with Scorsese! ā I donāt think heās anchored a blockbuster in quite this way before, and it would be lovely to see. Plus Iād want him to keep his natural accent. I donāt think weāve gone Scouse in Middle-earth yet and itās well past time.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
My sorta-Oscar-adjacent little run of lists concludes this week. The big new addition to the Oscar ceremony this year was an award for Best Casting (won by Cassandra Kulukundis for One Battle After Another, which is fair enough as she discovered the excellent Chase Infiniti). Thatās not where the newness ends over in Oscar HQ, though, because at long, long last theyāre finally going to introduce an award for Best Stunt next year. I canāt help but feel theyāve timed this perfectly, as Tom Cruise has just stopped making Mission: Impossible films; it must be nice to get trolled by an entire industry awards body.
Where was I?
Oh yeah. Stunts.
Stuntwork has been an integral part of movies pretty much since they began. Youāll find two silent classics right here in this list: but filming people hanging off of stuff or jumping off of stuff or driving really stupidly has always been a mainstay of film.
As time has gone on, stunts have got more elaborate; itās probably no surprise that most of these films are from the last twenty years. As technology improves, so does our ability to fling people around in decidedly dangerous fashion. However, I did make up my trademark rules for what I consider a āstuntā ā and it might be different from what the Academy will use (although theyāre free to follow my example). For one, these have to be predominantly physical stunts: actual real people doing dangerous stuff for realsies (but with ample safety precautions, natch). Secondly, for the purposes of this list at least, I wanted it to be activities focused on people. So Iāve tended to steer away (no pun intended) from specifically vehicle-based stunts. There is some car work here, naturally, but not really car chases; similarly no dogfighting. In fact, fighting itself I think is its own category: there are no Raid brawls or Crouching Tiger swordfights, nor is there Matrix bullet time as that is not only a fight but also one where the most exciting element of the stuntwork is the computer-assisted cinematography. Oh, and Iāve eschewed pyrotechnics, too: I know that leaping away from an explosion is a big deal, but bangs are their own thing.
(Incidentally, Iām pretty sure Iāve done lists about swordfights, fistfights, car chases, and explosions in the past ā and if I havenāt, I will do in the future, no doubt).
Right, where was I? Oh yeah. A list of my favourite stunts. Letās kick ass.
Ten: Tom Takes the Plane (Mission: Impossible ā Rogue Nation, 2015)
I had to include Tom doing something, didnāt I? In the course of the seventy-six Mission movies, heās climbed rock faces, hung off skyscrapers, flown helicopters, and gotten chucked down the Channel Tunnel. But I think on a purely physical level, holding on to the outside of a an aeroplane whilst it takes off must rank as one of the most impressive. We see the wind on his face and his cheeks blowing back as the ground pulls away behind him. And, look, letās just say it represents everything heās done in Mission. Including having to speak to Jon Voight.
Nine: Another Tom Also Takes the Plane (The Dark Knight Rises, 2012)
Fun fact: I nearly included the mid-air heist from Cliffhanger, but at the end of the day I think Bane just ratchets the scary sky shenanigans up to eleven. This does feature some intense physical action, from the agents rappelling from one plane down onto another, and also the stuntwork required to simulate the plane interior as itās decompressing and getting ready to fall from the sky. Tom Hardy is excellent here, so chunkily physical and present as a force. And letās not forget the pilots: they really did fly the planes that close.
Eight: Zoe Bell Takes the Car (Death Proof, 2007)
Tarantino is mostly thought of as a writer-director with emphasis on the writer; it was his fast-paced pop-cultural dialogue full of wit and F-bombs that catapulted him to the stratosphere. But heās a great director, too, and I think his action chops are sometimes underrated. Witness this supremely intense and terrifying car chase, as Kurt Russellās Stuntman Mike pursues our heroines. Tarantinoās camera holds the car in centre frame, giving us a sense of presence, making us feel part of the action. But itās all exacerbated by the fact that Zoe Bell is literally clinging to the bonnet the whole time, buffeted and whacked around, sliding across the car. Itās terrifying.
Seven: James Bond Spins a Car (The Man With the Golden Gun, 1974)
I donāt want to totally discount stunt driving. Car chases are an important part of the Bond tradition, and the stunts involved are often hair-raising. But thereās something about the audacity and ridiculousness of this that I just adore. Bond needs to get from one side of a river to the other, and so ā of course ā he jumps across on a handily-placed rickety bridge. Except he spins the car in mid-air as he does so. The jump was performed by Loren āBumpsā Willert, and unsurprisingly it required precise speed and position. The result is a car doing a crazy 360 in mid-air. Bonkers!
Six: Christopher Nolan Spins a Corridor (Inception, 2010)
Speaking of spinning things, Christopher Nolan is back to cock up everyoneās centre of gravity. His effects wizards actually built an entire corridor on a gimble that could rotate as required, and into it Nolan flung Joseph Gordon Levitt and a couple of heavies. The actual reasons for the corridor rotating are fascinating and part of the filmās wonder, but how it pans out is stunning to watch. Nolan often fixes his camera as the hall spins, giving it a floaty dreamlike quality as the actors jump from floor to ceiling or roll across the walls, guns sliding along a floor all magic-like. Itās really, really bloody good.
Five: Harold Lloyd Takes Time (Safety Last!, 1923)
I said that stunts have their origins in the origins of movie-making, and so we see here with this stunning silent effort. Thereās not much to say that canāt be said in a single sentence: Harold Lloyd clings onto a clock face. Heās up there, in the sky, with the ground visible behind him to give a sense of scale, and he fumbles and slips and grips and makes you gasp with how close he seems to come to certain death. Of course what we see isnāt really the whole truth of the matter; but then thatās the point of stunts, to suggest extreme danger when really itās just run-of-the-mill regular danger.
Four: Jason Bourne Fits Through a Window (The Bourne Ultimatum, 2007)
The Bourne films are full of really impressive, physical stuntwork: a lot of parkour and close-quarters combat, as well as some spectacular car chases. This sequence sees Bourne running across rooftops before leaping from one building and hurtling through the window of an adjacent building, an almost impossible threading of a needle that Matt Damon (or rather stuntman David Leitch ā yes, the David Leitch who later directed Deadpool 2 and The Fall Guy) did at speed. And the bloody camera follows him, a feat achieved by having the operator literally jump off the edge of a building. Ā
Three: Buster Keaton Also Fits Through a Window (Steamboat Bill, Jr., 1928)
Yeah, itās cool that the director of Atomic Blonde went through a window. But what if the window came to you? In another exquisite piece of silent stuntwork, Buster Keaton ā arguably the first real stuntman filmmaker? ā just stands still as an entire house falls on him, avoiding death just because he happens to be stood exactly in the negative space of a window frame. Itās some utterly demented Loony Tunes shit, all the more impressive because it predates Looney Tunes. Ā
Two: Jackie Chan Pops Some Lights (Police Story, 1985)
Speaking of āstuntman filmmakersā, nobody exemplifies that moniker better than Jackie Chan, a man whose entire career seems to be summed up with āwhat if I just utterly broke myself in the name of art?ā The mall fight in Police Story is chock full of Chanās trademark inventive, hilarious action choreography, and already features some vertiginous stuff leaping up and down escalators. However, the climax is something to behold, as Chan jumps off a balcony and slides down a huge poll, plummeting several stories before crashing through an atrium and onto the ground floor. And as he falls he shatters and explodes, like, a million light bulbs. Typically, this ruined Chan, severely burning his hands and leaving him in the hospital. Even better than the bit in the mall in Commando.
One: Going Under (Stagecoach, 1939/Raiders of the Lost Ark, 1981)
Iāve cheated! Yay! Yes, top spot is a twofer: the original and its homage. Stagecoach features an incredible sequence where stuntman Yakima Canutt (sidebar: hell of a name) leaps from a horse onto the horses pulling ā yes ā a stagecoach, before falling between said horses and going underneath them, allowing them to gallop over him ā and the coach itself to roar over his head. I mean, think about it: not just the skill of jumping from one running animal to another, but to avoid being trampled or squashed is incredible. Flash forward forty years, and stuntman Vic Armstrong is knocked through the windscreen of a Nazi truck, and proceeds to slide down the front of the cab to the ground, and then crawl underneath ā between the wheels ā all the way along to the back, before getting dragged along the ground. These two stunts exemplify not just the sheer bravado of stunt performers, but also how such high-wire daredevilry can be made into thrilling scenes of tension and awe. And how the whole medium is one continuum, artists learning form one another, building on the traditions of the past. Thinking about it, weāre probably due another iconic person-going-under-something scene right about nowā¦
Itās a wonderful night for Oscar! Oscar, Oscar! Who will win? Sorry, went a bit Bill Crystal on you all there. Anyway, itās the Academy Awards this weekend, and to celebrate Iām doing three sort-of themed lists that reference ā in big ways or small ā the Oscars, the most prestigious of prestigious awards ceremonies.
Now, one of the fun things about awards for big entertainment thingies ā and I maintain this is a feature not a bug ā is when the august bodies that bestow said trinkets get it spectacularly wrong. Itās fun to disagree! Obviously there are often bigger issues at stake ā such as the amount of money swirling around to promote one film over another, or the borderline-criminal historical neglect of women and people of colour in big shows like the Oscars ā but generally speaking itās amusing to get all frothed up over Forrest Gump beating Pulp Fiction (especially because The Shawshank Redemption is better than both of them).
This week, though, Iām not really talking about Oscarās āmistakesā. Yeah, I think they should have given it to L.A. Confidential rather than Titanic, and in retrospect I think we can all agree that it would have been better if George Lucas had picked up a trophy in ā78 rather than Woody Allen, but all the same: this is an old story. What Iām more interested in is the weird way in which the Oscars will often award somebody for the wrong film. This goes either two ways, basically: either thereās an apparent desire to correct a recent āmistakeā, or you have a storied talent who somehow has failed to win an Oscar over a long career and now the Academy have an opportunity to rectify that oversight, and they end up winning for a performance or film that isnāt really their best work.
With me? Good.
So for the sake of ease Iām calling these āconciliatory Oscarsā: awards given basically out of a sense of duty, to console us all because they kinda slipped up last time they had a chance. These are far from exclusive, and based on my age, they do skew relatively recent. Oh, and what they are not is a castigation of the films these people won for: in all cases, these guys and gals still turned in tremendous performances in front of or behind the camera. They might have even been deserving winners on the night! But when allās said and done, they know and we know that these folk should have gotten these trophies for different films. However, I am very glad that they all wound up with an Oscar at some point; they certainly deserved one for something.
Anyway, I can hear the orchestra striking up to play me off, so Iād best get on with it. The winners areā¦
Ten: Russell Crowe (Gladiator, 2000)
When I first saw Gladiator, I walked out of the cinema and said āwell, that was fun, but it wonāt win any Oscarsā. Obviously I was wrong, because it walked away with a couple, including for Croweās performance as Maximus Decimus Meridius Father To A Murdered Son Husband To A Murdered Wife And I Will Have My Vengeance In This Life Or The Next (to give him his full name). Anyway, Crowe is very good, all earthy, sweaty strength and quiet stoicism, with a couple of scenes of utter devastation. And I think very good action performances should be considered more; what Keanu for a living does aināt nothing. But letās be honest: Crowe had recently played nuanced, thorny, tricky roles in both L.A. Confidential and The Insider; an Oscar for Gladiator cemented his A-list status but was arguably a prize a year or two late.
Nine: Jamie Lee Curtis (Everything Everywhere All at Once, 2022)
Everything Everywhere is a great movie, a weird sci-fi action extravaganza, and that it won so many awards is a delightful mini-miracle. Curtis is always good value, and to be fair she does have to play multiple variations on a role here ā sometimes in dodgy makeup ā but with everything going on itās almost an extended cameo. It felt like an award for a career of great roles, right from Halloween through the likes of Trading Places or A Fish Called Wanda (all of which, Iād argue, could have won her a deserved award). It was especially frustrating because whilst of course Curtis should have an Oscar by now, so should Angela Bassett, who gave (arguably, subjectively) a stronger performance that year in the same category.
Eight: Paul Newman (The Color of Money, 1986)
Newman is, of course, terrific in Money (a refrain I think Iāll be repeating in this list) but itās crazy it took him this long to pick up an award. Heās Paul Newman! Butch Cassidy or The Sting should really have gotten him his Oscar (also probably Cool Hand Luke but Iāll be honest and say Iāve not seen it). This was, arguably, another case of ālate career award syndromeā. Whatās even crazier, is if you wanted to do that for Paul Newman, Iād have given him it for Road to Perdition twenty years later, which is a heartbreaking performance.
Seven: Kate Winslet (The Reader, 2008)
The Reader is one of those films thatās totally evaporated from the zeitgeist, but it was also one of those where everyone knew it was Winsletās year. Thatās because sheād already given several awards-worthy performances: right from the get-go, Heavenly Creatures could have nabbed her an Oscar in my book, but so could Sense and Sensibility, Iris, or Revolutionary Road, where she gives an astonishing performance. I think the fact that, reductively, The Reader had so many Oscar ticks ā World War II, an accent, a bit of blue ā that it makes it recede a little in the imagination. And Winslet had already sent up the notion of doing a WWII movie as Oscar-bait in an episode of Extras. Ā
Six: Nicole Kidman (The Hours, 2002)
Kidman, like Winslet, is an actor who banked a succession of tremendous, Oscar-worthy performances but still missed out on the little gold fella. To Die For was a fantastic role, really meaty and complex, and should have nabbed her an award; similarly, Moulin Rouge! showcased old-fashioned song-n-dance skills as well as giving her a tragic romance to deal with. Iād even argue that sheās fantastic in The Others, where she has to convey all kinds of grief and terror; but horror films are notoriously overlooked. The Hours is good, and sheās good in it, but I think sheās overshadowed by her makeup and her accent, and ā this old chestnut ā is basically an extended cameo.
Five: Leonardo DiCaprio (The Revenant, 2015)
There was a meme going round that Leo was desperate for an Oscar; Iām not sure if he was choosing roles with that in mind (I doubt it, to be honest) but he still seemed a perennial bridesmaid. The Revenant put him through the wringer, so you could say heād earned it; but it still feels belated. He could have deservedly picked one up decades earlier for Whatās Eating Gilbert Grape (although in retrospect his performance might be a tad problematic) or maybe The Basketball Diaries (confession: not seen it). More recently, Catch Me If You Can, Revolutionary Road, Django Unchained, and especially The Wolf of Wall Street would all have been far more deserved wins, showcasing a lot more of his range and nuance. Either that or Critters 3.
Four: Ennio Morricone (The Hateful Eight, 2015)
Morricone has a resume of massively iconic cinema scores. I mean, for a start, youāve got all of Sergio Leoneās classic Westerns; The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly just on its own has got to be one of the most iconic film scores of all time, right up there with Jaws. Itās so iconic it basically came to represent all Westerns, being parodied or homage anytime a cartoon wanted to do a Western episode. And then! He did all sorts! The Thing! The Untouchables! The guy was a master, and despite several nominations (not for The Goodā¦) he didnāt win anything. The Academy, in its wisdom, gave him an honorary award, but itās still ridiculous that he never won anything competitively. Until The Hateful Eight, a messy and overlong Tarantino Western. Yeah, itās nice he won one at the end of his career, but letās face it, it should have been decades prior.
Three: Judi Dench (Shakespeare in Love, 1999)
Denchās award for Shakespeare in Love is almost iconic in the realms of wrong-film-ness. She plays Elizabeth I for about three minutes of screen time, and whilst sheās obviously excellent ā sheās Judi Dench! Sheās always excellent! Even in Cats! ā itās hardly a curtain-raiser. But she took home the gong, a year after being overlooked for the much more nuanced, deep, and interesting Mrs. Brown, in which she played Queen Victoria. If the Academy felt that guilty about overlooking her, maybe they should have kept their powder dry until something like Iris or Notes on a Scandal came along.
Two: Martin Scorsese (The Departed, 2006)
Ah, Marty. Poor, poor Marty. For decades he was almost a running gag: be the greatest director in the world, but whatever you do, donāt win an Oscar. Do I need to refresh the films he was overlooked for? Taxi Driver. Raging Bull. Goodfellas. I mean, itās crazy! The Departed is fine and all, but itās a much lesser piece of work, with little that heās not done better in other films (itās nowhere near as good as Infernal Affairs, which itās a remake of). But the almost palpable sense of relief when he picked up his trophy was felt by the audience as well as the great man himself. Although, at least when his mate Spielberg had a similar āoh thank god theyāve finally won somethingā moment, it was for a genuinely exceptional piece of work. But not Marty! If only the Academy had waited for Wolf of Wall Street!
One: Al Pacino (Scent of a Woman, 1992)
The poster child for āoops we should have given him an Oscar decades agoā. Pacino is, arguably, the greatest screen actor of his generation. Serpico, Scarface, Dog Day Afternoon, just pick one of a dozen all-time classics. He was the actor, along with DeNiro. I mean, he did three Godfathers; three! Thatās three chances they had to give him a gong, even the third one which isnāt as good as the other two. It still would have made sense. Scent carries with it the aroma of a performance that was finally gonna get him his dues ā a role that cleared everyone else out the way. And heās still good, but you get a bit more of the hoo-hah Pacino; itās more easily parodiable. And letās face it, if youāre gonna celebrate Pacinoās crazier side ā and why not, he rocks ā then the utterly sublime Heat was only three years away. Whaddaya got?
A little post-script. Iāve tended to avoid people whoād already won an Oscar and then managed to pick up a second one for the āwrongā film: hopefully itās clear that this list is about the Academy awarding someone who should have already won but didnāt. Secondly, if you research this topic (and I always research a topic!) then two roles are often cited: Henry Fonda for On Golden Pond, and Whoopie Goldberg for Ghost. Iāve never seen On Golden Pond, but it really does sound like a Newman situation, a huge cinematic presence getting a gong later in their career when their better work was ages ago. But Goldberg in Ghost? Sheās great in Ghost! Yeah, okay, The Color Purple ā but still, she definitely deserved that Oscar.
Hello, friends, and welcome to another list, and another of my weird little themes. For, you see, very shortly itās the Oscars, and Iām going to do three weeks to sorta-celebrate the ceremony. As you may or may not be aware, the Oscars are going to start getting even longer ā but itās a good thing, because it means theyāll be adding categories that have long been overlooked. Next year sees the introduction of the Best Stunt Design Oscar, awarding films that have, well, the best stunt. Stuntwork and action filming has been ridiculously ignored by the Academy throughout most of its history, with their focus obviously being on the āseriousā and āimportantā films, like Chicago or Driving Miss Daisy, rather than pieces of populist filth like Raiders of the Lost Ark or Avengers: Endgame. So itās great that the incredibly difficult, dangerous business of making fights, falls, and explosions compelling is finally getting recognised. Even if itās sort of amusing that they waited until after Tom Cruise stopped making Mission movies.
Anyway, before that, we have the debut of a brand-new category this year: Achievement in Casting. This will recognise casting directors who have the all-important job of making sure we get the right Michael J. Fox for the role, and not the wrong Eric Stoltz (no shade to Eric). And this made me think of all the films that simply excel because theyāre so well-cast. And ā wouldnāt ya know it? ā that brings us neatly on to this list.
For just as ābest stuntsā is surely to come up in a couple of weeks, for now weāre going to celebrate those aforementioned great casts by ranking, er, the greatest casts. Now, Iām not just going to do this like āMatt and Ben were certainly well-cast in Good Will Huntingā. No, there needs to be a bit of order and decorum around here. So Iām looking at large ensembles here; big casts with multiple moving parts. Oh, sure, some of these definitely have a designated lead; but in general theyāre films that feature many great characters, a deep bench of talent. Some of it, of course, is brilliant actors; but thereās also the brilliant matching of actor and role. And then thereās an alchemy that can come both from a huge star fitting a great role like a glove; and the similar but different thrill of a relative unknown being allowed to blossom, defining both a role and ā perhaps ā themselves in the process. This list contains all sorts.
Ten: Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010)
In a film thatās based around a lover, his beloved, and her seven evil exes, it stands to reason that you need at least nine solid actors. And, yes, Scott Pilgrim benefits from well more than nine really great performers, all filling quirky niches in the ensemble, and finding grace notes in their performances. Perhaps unsurprisingly, future Oscar winner Kieran Culkin is the standout as blithe roommate Wallace; but itās the āstars of tomorrowā vibe of the cast that continues to be a delight as time goes on, featuring as it does a Superman, a Captain America, a Captain Marvel, and a Huntress, as well as proper stars like Alison Pill, Aubrey Plaza, and Anna Kendrick in relatively minor roles.
Nine: Little Women (1994/2019)
Cheating already! Thatās my go-to. But I find it amusing how both (relatively) recent Little Womens (Littles Women?) serve as a snapshot of the up-and-coming female performers of the day. The ā94 vintage stars Winona Ryder as Jo, with support from the about-to-be-huge likes of Claire Danes and Kirsten Dunst as her sisters, and no less than future Batman himself Christian Bale as spurned suitor Laurie. Flash forward a couple of decades, and Greta Gerwigās adaptation stars Saoirse Ronan, with the likes of Emma Watson and about-to-be-huge Florence Pugh as her sisters, and swaps out Susan Sarandon for Laura Dern as their mum, with a pre-megastardom Timothee Chalamet as Laurie. In both cases, they feel like era-defining cast lists, which is a heck of a feat.
Eight: The Avengers (2012)
Is this also a cheat? Because whilst I feel the solidity of the MCU cast list is undeniable ā especially this early on ā you could argue that, rather than an ensemble, itās a collection of individual roles. Nevertheless, I feel the overall casting should be celebrated. Obviously RDJ as Tony Stark is one of those lightning-in-a-bottle, era-defining pieces of casting that weāll talk about for decades; but the core Avengers all feel so perfectly suited that itās crazy to imagine someone else as Steve Rogers or Thor. Ruffalo stepping into the Hulk shoes is pitch-perfect, and Hiddleston as Loki is just another all-timer of a casting selection. And, as well as the other Avengers, weāve got Jacko being all grumpily stoic as Nick Fury, stepping off the pages of The Ultimates and into the movie theatre. Absolutely perfect.
Seven: The Magnificent Seven (1960)
Now, you might look at this list and say, āDavid, youāve only put The Magnificent Seven at seven because you find it funny to do so,ā to which I would reply, āand?ā However, that doesnāt change the fact that this is a cracking cast (Gromit). But this is another one of those slice-of-Hollywood cast lists that serves as a snapshot of the time. Yul Bryner was super-hot off his Oscar for The King and I; Steve McQueen was on the verge of megastardom; Charles Bronson was an established supporting actor on his way to becoming a leading man; the likes of Robert Vaughn, James Coburn, and Eli Wallach were still pretty early in their careers. They fit into their ensemble roles very well, and looking back itās like a cool Hollywood time capsule. The same could be said, to be honest, of disaster movies like Earthquake, The Poseidon Adventure, or The Towering Inferno. But I picked Mag Seven instead. So there.
Six: Oceanās Eleven (2001)
In a way, its like a millennial Magnificent Seven, in how it showcases a slice of Hollywood at that time and place. At its core are three million-wat megastars: Clooney, Pitt, and Roberts. Surrounding them are absolutely solid supporting actors like Don Cheadle; long-established pros such as Elliot Gould; top-class comic supporters like Bernie Mac; and, in Matt Damon, an actor already established (heād won an Oscar for writing Good Will Hunting by this point), but not quite the proper superstar heād become after The Bourne Identity surpassed all expectations. And thatās before we look at the likes of Andy Garcia, linking the film to the lineage of Coppola and DePalma. And itās got that cool cameo-studded poker game, featuring people like Topher Grace and Joshua Jackson as themselves.
Five: Predator (1987)
On the one hand, this is basically Arnieās show; his biceps are plastered all over the poster. But the film is more subversive, progressive, and interesting than it could appear at first glance, and a core part of that is the strength of its ensemble. Partly itās the tough-guy depth of the group, with the likes of Bill Duke, Carl Weathers, and Jesse Ventura playing some of Schwarzeneggerās fellow mercenaries: these are actors used to action (Duke had recently been killed by Arnie in Commando), so much so that the set became host to some gym-based one-upmanship and pranking. The inclusion of the decidedly less beefy Shane Black, ostensibly hired as an on-set script doctor, adds both a touch of humour and a bit of interesting complexity to the steroidal mix. All in all, these are actors who excel in supporting roles, tough-guy performances, baddies and soldiers, but who have a little spark of something extra that always makes them stand out; filling the cast with such actors gives the entire ensemble a dose of vitality. And thatās before we factor in Peter āOptimus Primeā Cullen as the voice of the Predator. Ā
Four: Tombstone (1994)
The bench of Tombstone is ridiculously deep and filled almost exclusively with either genuine movie stars or the sorts of supporting actors whose appearance enlivens any film they show up in; the fact that they encompass virtually the entire cast is something to be marvelled at. The Earp brothers are played by Kurt Russell (arguably at the height of his fame), Sam Elliot, and Bill Paxton, with Val Kilmer giving a career-best performance as Doc Holliday. The outlaws are led by Powers Boothe and Michael Beihn, because why have one Aliens alum in your film when you can have two? There are also smaller roles for (deep breath) Michael Rooker (Yondu!), Billy Zane (the Phantom!), Thomas Haden Church (Sandman!), Dana Delaney (Wonder Woman!), and Charlton Heston, for cryinā out loud. I dunno if Chuck ever played a superhero, but still, fair dos.
Three: JFK (1991)
Oliver Stone apparently had a strategic motive when casting JFK. He knew the story was dense and potentially confusing, with absolutely tons of characters; so he figured if he cast known actors in even the smallest roles, then the audience would remember them. So outside of Kevin Costner as the lead, we get Gary Oldman as Oswald, Tommy Lee Jones as Clay Shaw, Joe Pesci as David Ferrie, and then further supporting turns from the likes of Sissy Sapcek, Kevin Bacon, John Candy, and especially Donald Sutherland as the mysterious informant āXā, a character I assume had a big influence on Chris Carter. So extensively starry is the cast, in fact, that watching the film is almost like playing whack-a-mole with famous faces.
Two: Heat (1995)
When you start your ensemble cast with Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro, youāre in for a good time. This cast is sublime, not just for its depth and its quality, but for how it encompasses so much of Hollywood at that time. Pacino and DeNiro ā whoād never shared a screen before, so it was instantly iconic ā as well as Jon Voight represent the New Hollywood from the seventies whoād reached their apex abilities by the mid-nineties. You then have Val Kilmer, at the height of his powers and charm, as well as on-the-up roles for Tom Sizemore, Ashley Judd, and Danny Trejo, with more than capable support from the likes of Wes Studi and Ted Levine, and quite early appearances for people like Xander Berkley and Hank Azaria. And then thereās Natalie Portman, only a year after Leon, in the small but powerful role of Pacinoās stepdaughter. Itās basically an all-timer cast of absolute superstars ā even the ones who arenāt superstars are phenomenal actors, all operating at the top of their games. What could top this?
One: The Lord of the Rings (2001-2003)
I cheat again because Iām counting three films, but it was all one production so I think it should count. Because has an ensemble ever excelled like this? Have we ever seen so deep a cast, so perfectly embody a story that was all-but-unembodiable? Elijah Wood and Sean Astin might have had their child-actor chops, but two Americans coming in to play the oh-so-British-coded hobbits was a wild swing; but then again, the entire trilogy was one wild swing after another. Ian McKellen ā second choice after Sean Connery turned them down ā is utterly perfect as Gandalf, and it has become his most defining on-screen role. Christopher Lee as a twisted reflection is equally perfect, channelling his Hammer past. And where do we stop? The Fellowship is just sublime, with Vigo Mortensen stepping firmly into the limelight, Sean Bean delivering the right amount of braggadocio, John Rhys Davies giving us some comedy, and the hitherto unknown trio of Orlando Bloom, Dominic Monaghan, and Billy Boyd all blowing us away. And then. And then. Hugo Weaving! Cate Blanchett! Liv Tyler! Bernard Hill! Brad Dourif! Ian Holm! Karl Urban! Andy Serkis! It feels like they all knew the assignment, they all understood that this would probably define them from now on (very few of them will have a film before this on their obituaries), and they all delivered. More than delivered. Everything about The Lord of the Rings is a once-in-a-lifetime miracle (we know this, because they couldnāt quite recreate it with The Hobbit) ā and that includes the fantastic cast.
Okay, letās get it out of the way: is it makeups or makesup? I mean, is it like attorneys general? Courts martial? Fathers Christmas? According to the wiggly red underline, āmakesupā is wrong, but when was the last time we trusted Microsoft, eh? Eh?
Where was I?
Oh yeah: makeup in the movies. I'm not talking about blush and eyeliner here, I'm talking about special effects. Y'know, big prosthetic noses, latex foreheads, wigs and jowls and false chins and everything in between. Generally speaking, what Iām on about this week is the sort of makeup and effects that turn a human into an alien, or a monster, or some kind of weird undead dream-creature-demon thingie. Now, it doesnāt have to be: it could be just making an actor look more like a real-life person, or just less like themselves. So this list potentially runs the gamut from full-bore Star Wars background aliens to Nicole Kidman in The Hours.
I've basically made two distinctions that cover what Iām allowing. One is, no CG; whilst the interplay of digital and practical effects is often what makes modern movie creatures sing (not just full performance capture, but stuff like adding Mantisā antennae in the Guardians films) this is a celebration of the physical. The latex, the padding, the makeup involved in turning a human into a Cardassian (are the Cardassians actually in any Star Trek film? I donāt recall ever seeing them. Anyway...). My other criteria, following the same lines, is that there canāt be any animatronics involved. I might do another similar list at some point specifically talking about animatronics or costumes or whatever, but I donāt consider Howard the Duck or the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to be in the same category as Alan Rickman in Galaxy Quest or Bradley Cooper in Maestro. Basically, if thereās some kind of remote control or computer involved in producing an animated effect, such as the mouth movements or eye control or whatever ā then Iām disqualifying it this week. The makeup has to be applied to an actorās face, and the actorās performance is then allowed to come through. We have to see their lips move, I guess.
And, really, that is that. This ranking is based on my own personal preferences; I'm just trying to list what I think of as my favourite examples, rather than singling out the ābestā or most iconic. It may be that some movie makeup effects are way more elaborate or impressive from a technical or artistic standpoint, or that there are some all-time movie legends that Iāve missed off. In those cases, one of two things applies: for whatever nebulous reason I just didnāt like it quite as much; or I totally forgot about it.
Now, letās get you in the chair. This is going to take a while...
10: Jim Carrey in How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000), designed by Rick Baker
Iām going to come out the gate and say: I think this film is pretty awful. However, it does have a barnstorming performance from Jim Carrey at the centre, and his trademark rubber-band expressions have to be conveyed through the Grinch makeup. To that end, itās remarkable: it feels large, dense, like a full-body prosthetic; yet itās also unmistakeably Carrey coming through, his mouth movement, his eyes, his personality. I mean, apparently it absolutely screwed him up having to endure putting it on every day, but itās still an incredibly compelling effect.
This oneās a bit of a cheat because really there are two characters here: the titular Faun, and the iconic Pale Man, both played by the legendary Doug Jones. The Faun on his own would be impressive enough ā a large, horned creature, much thicker of leg and limb than your average Mr. Tumnus ā but the Pale Man is something else. A horrific baby-pink creature, his face all mouth, like a horrendous maggot made human; his eyes are in the palms of his hands instead of his head. Heās messed-up and frankly terrifying.
8. Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991), designed by Jeff Dawn
This one might be a bit more subtle; or maybe not? But it absolutely transfixed me as a nipper. Basically ā spoiler alert ā towards the end of the film, old Arnold gets bashed in the face quite a few times, and a lot of his skin falls off. Obviously heās a robot, but the effect of half his face missing, and the gleaming metal skeleton underneath ā complete with glowing red eye ā was absolutely iconic to me way back when. I became somewhat obsessed with fake-skin robots, peeling away their not-flesh to reveal cybernetic innards. Dunno what that reveals about me, but still.
7. Michael Dorn in Star Trek: Generations (1995), originally designed by Fred Phillips and Robert Fletcher
Okay, this one is a cheat, but thereās no way I could have a list of favourite makeup effects without including a Klingon. Dorn was obviously Worf on TV for seven years ā and would go on to play him for many more ā but Generations was his movie debut. Klingons had been in movies before, too ā the two Christophers, Lloyd and Plummer, were sublime in Search for Spock and Undiscovered Country ā but, cāmon, Dornās Worf is the Klingon. The ridged forehead, the weird hair, the pointy teeth ā itās a great look, and one thatās so established, it now feels like every alien is sort of doing their own spin on a Klingon, up to and including Alan Rickman in Galaxy Quest. Oh, and yes, I know that Dorn was in Undiscovered Country, playing a character called Worf, but that's not our Worf, is it? This is a celebration of the franchise's Best Klingon, the actor who embodies him, and the makeup effect that pretty much defined a franchise.
6. Max Schreck in Nosferatu (1922), designed by Albin Grau
Max Schreck, before he went to Gotham to open a power plant and help the Penguin run for mayor, established a look so strong that it basically became the other type of vampire. Far from the sexy aristocrat, here is a creature that looks undead: gaunt, hunched, animalistic, with long talon-like fingers, wide bat-like eyes, and two fangs in the centre of its mouth, curiously snake-like. I donāt know for certain, but itās almost like he was designed just to create awesome German Expressionist shadows.
5. Eddie Murphy in Coming to America (1988), designed by Rick Baker
Murphy is well known for playing multiple roles in his films, and I could have done something like The Klumps. But this is probably my favourite of his many-character schticks (and itās a much better film, too). He plays a couple of characters in a barber shop (alongside co-star Arsenio Hall, also playing double duty); I would hazard that neither character is instantly recognisable as Murphy underneath prosthetic. One of them, though, is a wild swing: he plays an elderly Jewish man in the barber shop, who is, well, a white guy. Black-to-White race-bending isnāt that uncommon in comedy films (who can forget Lenny Henry in True Identity? Anyone? Anyone at all?), but this is a full-throated performance that convinces not just in its delivery but in the fidelity of its makeup. Or maybe thatās just me.
4. Robert Englund in A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), designed by David Miller
Another look that is simply iconic. Freddie Kruger is a villain for the ages, and whilst his appearance may not be massively original, heās an indelible face in the horror canon. A hideously scarred visage, burned and mangled, rivulets cut into his face, he does look frankly quite scary ā and thatās before you get onto the clawed glove and the horrible Dennis the Menace jumper. Okay, we can have a debate about facial disfigurements reflecting a darkness inside, and how thatās a really problematic trope; but Kruger still has a cool look, and his aura of creepy menace is down to Englund.
3. Roddy McDowall in Planet of the Apes (1968), designed by John Chambers and Thomas Burman
Really, it could be any of the cast of the original film. This is a phenomenal achievement in makeup; not only is it instantly iconic (overusing that word a bitā¦) and recognisable, but itās a wonderful technical achievement, allowing the actors to emote through fairly heavy prosthetics. The individual apes in the film feel like different characters, the performances clearly coming through; this was, arguably, the precursor to the Worf-style alien prosthetics.
2. Tim Curry in Legend (1985), designed by Rob Bottin
Iāve talked a lot about these effects allowing the actorsā performances to shine through the makeup, and that is obviously still true here, but this is an effect that makes Curry effectively unrecognisable. Itās an incredibly strong look, utterly conveying the majesty and terror of the character of the Darkness. Curry just looks incredible here: heās huge, heās ripped, and his horns give a visual representation to the old James Cameron adage āless isnāt more, more is moreā. Pretty much the greatest ādevilā in cinema history (woah, thatās another top ten right thereā¦
1. Boris Karloff in Frankenstein (1931), designed by Jack Pierce
Letās face it, if youāre ranking makeup effects in the movies, this one remains the granddaddy. So utterly iconic it defined the look of a character for nearly a century, meaning every time somebody adapts Frankenstein it has to be āother than Karloffā. It conveys the difficult, lumbering nature of Karloffās creature, with his Cro-Magnon brow and flattop, and the electrical bolts in his neck nodding to his reanimation. Itās a pleasing touch that nods to the sci-fi origins of the tale. All in all, itās a brilliant piece of makeup design that not only utterly works for the character, but also as a piece of artwork and technicality that more than stands the test of time.
I've had houses on my mind a lot recently. And do you know where the best houses are? In the movies. And, er, on the telly too, sometimes, I guess.
Houses in films (and, er, TV) are often whole characters in and of themselves. Think of how many horror movies show off the spooky house on the poster: everything from Psycho to The Amityville Horror to The Others hang their iconography off the back of a really scary-looking place. I mean, you could make an argument that thereās a āscary houseā style that takes you through Bates Motel to the Addams mansion to Whipstaff Manor from Casper with not all that much variation ā New England Kooky ā but, still, it works, otherwise they wouldnāt keep doing it.
Of course, not all cool movie houses are scary. And thatās what I ultimately wanted to celebrate in this list: not just the coolest-looking houses, but ones where you could actually see yourself living. This, then, invites a certain amount of personal taste to the proceedings: after all, one manās Minas Ithil is another manās Minas Morgul*. There are some particularly opulent and luxurious abodes which I've skipped over here, simply because I think theyād be a bit crap to live in as your for-real house: Edward Nortonās ridiculous pad from Glass Onion, for instance, which is more prequel-era Coruscant office than it is cosy weekend getaway.
And thatās all there is to it, I guess. What follows is a list of my favourite houses from film (and TV!), ranked according to how much Iād like to live there. Oh, and Iām being very specific here about houses: for a start, that discounts any kind of temporary living space or dormitory (not that Hogwarts was ever going to feature in a list of mine), but also things like hotels (sorry, Norman Bates!) and spaceships that people happen to live on, whether thatās the Serenity or Red Dwarf or the USS Enterprise-D (quite frankly the only ship that would have made this list if Iām honest). Iām also discounting apartments, because Iām talking about houses here, and because āfictional American apartmentā has its own aesthetic that makes differentiating them all a bit more nebulous. Oh, and, again, these are places I think it would be nice to live, regardless of how otherwise cool or iconic they are: I've got a lot of love for Riggsā trailer in Lethal Weapon or the cabin from The Evil Dead, but letās be honest, theyāre crap houses.
Anyway, itās time to exchange the keys ā it's moving day!
Bag End (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, 2001): the Shire is a pastoral paradise of rolling hills, picturesque cottages, and charming little pubs. And pride of place is Bag End, which manages to be both cute cottage, stately home, and weird, quirky, fantasy place all at the same time. It looks incredible, all curved surfaces, with its big circular front door; and it juts out from literally inside a hill. Inside, itās all Edwardian splendour, gorgeous tiled floors and wood-panelled walls. Itās just delightful from top to bottom, and you know itās incredibly comfy and homely. Maybe the nosy neighbours would eventually drive you insane, but at least itās safe. And ā again ā thereās a great pub down the road.
Wayne Manor (Batman: The Animated Series, 1992): stately Wayne Manor manages to be both a vast mansion full of gorgeous, ornate rooms with very long tables and very large beds, but also has a top-secret underground layer complete with super-computer, hidden road network, and a giant mechanical dinosaur. I guess the only question is which version of the manor do we go for, and Iāve plumped for the animated one: partly itās the mix of art deco and gothic styling on the mansion itself, as well as its vertiginous position at the top of a hill, but also the sheer edges of the Batcave gives it a surrealist German expressionism vibe. Plus it has the sexiest Batmobile.
The Addams Family Mansion (The Addams Family, 1991): I guess if you were living there then the fact that house seems to be, well, alive and possibly even hostile might count against it, thereās no denying itās a sumptuous pad. A gorgeous gothic pad, itās got its own sense of style that is ā to say the least ā unique, from its ornate decoration to its somewhat trippy layout. It comes complete with vast grounds and its own graveyard ā what more would you want? Just donāt anger the gates.
32 Windsor Gardens (Paddington, 2014): a rather sumptuous London townhouse on a frankly ridiculously pretty street. And then you get inside, and itās a fantasy of urban living. All the rooms are huge and colourful, and the vast central hallway is topped off with an incredible sweeping staircase ā just perfect for sliding down in a bath. Like the film itself, itās an idealised version of what London itself has to offer; a supremely stylised living space that represents the best of the city. Mind you, youād have to live next to Peter Capaldiās grumpy bastard, so itās not all marmalade and roses.
Tony Starkās Malibu Mansion (Iron Man, 2008): generally speaking Iām not a fan of those kind of big, spacious, concrete-and-glass mansions that rich folk in American movies seem to like. You know, the kind where the whole ground floor seems open-plan with windows along the entire walls and everything is sparse and white. But this house is something special: itās got a great almost sixties aesthetic as it curves around the edge of a cliff. And although in some ways it seems a bit cold and sterile, Tony puts so much of himself into it that it does have a sense of warmth and character. Interestingly, his haphazard garage and workshop adds most character, with all his knickknacks and robots and, er, broken Captain America shields. Itās such a shame it got blowed up good.
62 West Wallaby Street (A Grand Day Out, 1989): ah, another fantastic British home! Itās so quaintly suburban, a thirties-looking semi on an ordinary street. Inside, itās decorated like a grandparentās house circa 1990: paisley and florals and ducks on the wall. So itās charming and old-fashioned in the way that Wallace himself is. But then, of course, thereās all the mental stuff heās added himself, all the secret tubes and robot hands with its secret underground laboratory. It combines the best of British in a way: the cosy and the crazy.
Lars Homestead (Star Wars, 1977): most sci-fi homes are rather cold affairs. Yeah, okay, it does look like itād be quite comfy living on the Enterprise-D, but usually youāve got a lot of bare metal and hard surfaces, or they have to cram everything in one room because itās a dystopian future. I guess the homestead benefits from being a real building in Tunisia, but itās still terrific. The domed structures just look really cool, like desert igloos, and you get the impression that itās actually quite cool in there, despite the desert heat. Then you get that frankly awesome pit-thing in the centre, where most of the house looks like itās underground. And thatās before all the trippy sci-fi stuff, like the freaky machines in the kitchen, or the vaporators outside. And, donāt forget, a fridge full of blue milk. Blue milk!
The Kusakabe House (My Neighbour Totoro, 1988): this is probably the most realistic house on the list; itās a pretty darn realistic interpretation of a rural Japanese house in the 1950s (so realistic somebody actually built it). I know Iāve used this word a lot, but this place just looks so cosy. Itās kind of ramshackle, and full of the chaos of life; this, coupled with its Japanese design incorporating a lot of wood, makes it feel at one with the natural world. And thatās before we talk about its proximity to a magical forest full of crazy creatures. And the sootsprites! Donāt forget about them!
742 Evergreen Terrace (The Simpsons, 1987): Iām going to try to divorce my opinion from the shenanigans of the Simpson family or the show itself and just talk about the house. Yes, okay, it is inexplicably decorated in pink; but this is a frankly huge suburban house, with at least for good-sized bedrooms, a large living room, dining room, kitchen-diner, and possibly other rooms of indeterminate size or position. Itās good a great garden, with a nice big tree you can put a treehouse in, and an attic and probably a basement, I canāt remember. And a two-car garage. This place ā to quote Frank Grimes ā is a palace.
The Beach House (Grace and Frankie, 2015): Iāll be honest, Iāve never really been too attracted to beachfront properties. I always think youād run the risk of damp, or sand getting everywhere (just ask Anakin), or it smelling of fish. And youāre first in line for a tsunami! But Iāve gotta admit, this is a great house. Tastefully decorated with nautical colouring, it has a nice open plan arrangement with a fantastic living space that opens out right onto the beach. And itās bigger than it looks, with four bedrooms and a double garage. And thereās even room for Lily Tomlinās art studio. Enough to make you overlook the sandy bottoms.
*This is a really funny Lord of the Rings joke, please just take my word for it.
PS. Next week - if I remember and if I do it properly - I'm going to start formatting these things differently, counting down from ten to one instead of just doing a numbered list. It's how a Top Ten should be formatted, really, and I should have made the effort a long time ago. I mean, 730 weeks is long enough to be doing it wrong, right? Anyway it might mess up the formatting a little bit as I don't think there's an easy way to "automatically" do it but I think it'll make these things read a bit better.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Ah, lāamore. Itās a time of romance, people! Also lots of cards and chocolates and little stuffed bears. Yes, Valentineās Day is upon us once again, and thoughts turn inevitably to famous actors running to the airport in the third act.
Yes, Iām looking once again at romantic comedies. I ranked my favourite romcoms quite a while ago ā all the way back in 2012, the year I started this very blog (it was, in fact, the fifteenth list I wrote). Back then I wasnāt going into so much (too much?) detail, so I have thought for a while about revisiting the list. But I wanted to make sure that Iād really be revisiting it; so whilst itās definitely true that there are some long distance romances here, Iāve tried my best to edumacate myself on classics of the genre.
The list, it transpires, is very heavily weighted to somewhat older films. Is this because older romcoms were legitimately better films? Or is it because I havenāt seen as many from this century? It is interesting, however, that one of the big changes from the last list to this one is that some of the more millennial films have slipped off: the ones that I saw as a teenager, or when my wife and I were dating. This could be down to changing tastes; or maybe Iāve just watched (or re-watched) Golden Age movies more recently; or perhaps they really just arenāt as good? Certainly itās true that there are quite a few recent romcoms ā from a long time after we started dating ā that Iāve not quite got round to seeing yet, from Rye Lane to Bros to last yearās Materialists, so maybe the classics might be in for some trouble next time I decide to do a list like this. On the other hand, are there many films in the history of cinema as good as Bringing Up Baby?
Anyway, enough with my self-reflexive self-analysis. As Jane Russell put it: is there anyone here for love?
When Harry Met Sally... (1989): the all-time defining romcom as far as Iām concerned. Clearly building on the screwball battle-of-the-sexes formula perfected in the Golden Age of Hollywood, it also established the template for the modern romcom that defined the nineties; as such, it stands as the pinnacle. The core is the script, which combines rat-a-tat-tat dialogue with true, earnest characterisation, and a timely debate on sexual mores; but then you have adorable, hilarious turns not just from the leads but from sterling support acts. And itās beautifully directed by Rob Reiner. Seems like he knows what heās doing. Wonder if heāll show up on this list again.
Bringing Up Baby (1938): one of those early screwball efforts I just referenced. Itās going to be boring if I cite how these films live or die on the chemistry of their leads, but here the performances are picture perfect. Hepburnās ditzy heiress is both of her time and also two or three generations early; Grantās clueless professor is a study in mannerisms and perfect reactions. Itās hilarious, just a script thatās so damn funny nearly ninety years on. And it might be the first use of the word āgayā in Western art. Seminal.
Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953): Iāve talked about couples with chemistry, and there are two actors here who burn down the screen, but theyāre not actually a romantic pairing (although, really, wouldnāt the film have been better that way?). Twin romantic subplots swirl around each other as sweet but flirty Monroe chases a wealthy husband whilst witty Russell just looks for a good time. The code-approved sexual politics are surprisingly frank, but the humour is thick, fast, and very clever, and it manages to be both a smart feminist treatise, a laugh-fest, and a banging musical to boot.
The Apartment (1960): threading the needle between dark workplace satire and knockabout farce, weāve got a film featuring oodles of adultery, a suicide attempt, and ā in Jack Lemon ā a man so put-upon heās practically underground. But Shirley McClaine, despite carrying a world of darkness, manages to be a joy throughout, and the ending is one of the most subtly romantic finales to a film you could ever wish for. Shut up and deal.
Some Like It Hot (1959): another Jack Lemon masterpiece, another Marilyn Monroe performance where she seems like a ditzy airhead but is actually one of the smartest characters; and we also have Tony Curtis doing his Cary Grant. A Shakespearean comedy of cross-dressing and impersonation, the farce is through the roof, but the characters are so well-defined that weāre rooting for them throughout. And, again, itās got one of the greatest endings of all time.
Groundhog Day (1993): this is almost a stealth romcom, a film where itās mostly focussed on Bill Murray being a douche and also suffering terribly at the hands of fate and his own inherent douchiness. But it does a great thing of not only giving us, in Andie MacDowell, someone so sweet and lovely you do buy him turning his life around for her, but also subtly showing how opening your heart to love and empathy, and just trying to be a better person for someone, improves everything. He changes the lives of everyone he meets in Punxsutawney, all because he fancies Margaret Qualleyās mum.
The American President (1995): a very old-school movie in a lot of ways, with grown-ups talking in rooms about serious things as well as matters of the heart, and doing so with fast-paced clever dialogue that bristles with wit and intelligence. Like a lot of Golden Age romcoms, it also talks relatively frankly about sexual mores without stooping to gratuitousness or crassness; itās got class. And itās just terrific, simultaneously a warm bath of a film and also a really smart political treatise. Itād make for a good TV show.
The Princess Bride (1987): I nearly didnāt include this film because I wasnāt really sure it was a romcom, traditionally. However, I relented for three reasons: one, at its core is a genuine, charismatic, adorable romance between Buttercup and Wesley; secondly, itās hilarious, not just with the wordplay and characterisation, but the meta-fictional dissection of the narrative through the grandfather/bedtime story framing device; and finally the film is just a flat-out masterpiece.
Shaun of the Dead (2004): the most recent film on the list is ā of course ā a romzomcom (zomromcom?). Itās perfectly constructed as a romcom, with its good-hearted but dick-headed lead, put-upon but still self-assured romantic foil, and its collection of assorted comic best friends and family members. Then you add the pitch-perfect zombie movie parody, which manages to serve up genuine peril and lashing of gore. Finally, the whole thing is just shot through with Edgar Wrightās sense of style, a smorgasbord of fast-cuts, smart-arse references, and well-staged action scenes.
Strictly Ballroom (1992): only propping up the list because I have to wonder, is it really a comedy? Itās certainly comedic but is that more Baz Luhrmannās wacky, surrealist style rather than a funny script? Regardless, I have to include it, because the core Romeo and Juliet romance at the centre is the sweetest, and the whole film is punch-the-air fantastic. We danced to it at our wedding! So itās totally great and it totally counts. And it has a happier ending than Romeo and Juliet.
For those keeping score, there are two Howard Hawks movies, two Billy Wilder movies, and three (3!) Rob Reiner movies on this list. Howās that for a legacy? Rest in peace, Rob. And Happy Valentineās Day.
It's time for another special edition of Davidās Weekend Top Ten! And it's one of those times when I slide the keyboard over to one of my vertically-expanding offspring and get them to do my work for me. This week it's the turn of Daughter #2 (chronological).
She's recently gotten way into Gilmore Girls, the fab fast-talking comedy-drama from Amy Sherman-Palladino. If you've not seen it, you should really check it out; it's on both Netflix and Disney+, so you've got no excuse. It's full of rapid-fire pop culture riffing, gentle family drama, and is chock full of hilarious oddball characters.
Which brings us to this list. For she has, indeed, ranked her favourite characters from the show. And I'm gonna pretty much leave it to her now; she's written a ton, so further waffle from me feels unnecessary. Just corrected any spelling and making sure it fits my usual formatting. Other than that, it's all her. So let's have it.
Paris Geller: Paris⦠my all time favourite character in Gilmore Girls. I will say (below - D) that Rory is one of the most relatable characters but I personally believe that I relate to Paris the most (apart from the fact that I donāt cheat on my boyfriend with a 60 year old professor, Iām also too young to have a boyfriend lol). Anyway, Iām good at crafts, Iām smart and I, also, can get a bit cranky when I donāt get my way hehehe, just like Paris. I find Paris overthinks a lot of stuff but she also is not afraid to bring up awkward conversations which I think makes her the character she is. I really love the way she acts and the way she can talk to people without hesitation. So, that is why Paris is my favourite Gilmore Girls character and that is my Gilmore Girls Top Ten.
Luke Danes: Hard on the outside but soft on the inside, thatās one thing that I like about Luke. Heās a sweet person but hides all his emotions behind a tough guy, making him seem rude and grumpy ā which makes him funny and a really good character to play. I love his relationship with his nephew and I believe they actually did like each other (except when Luke pushed Jess into a lake). I like the way Luke and Taylor always fight and the fact Luke can start an argument over anything is really funny.
Lorelai Gilmore: I'm going to say this again in Roryās paragraph (below - D), but Lorelai and her daughter are soooo similar, from their coffee addictions all the way to their sarcastic sense of humour. I love this duo the most. Lorelai is an extremely funny character, almost a comedian, who never cooks a meal, and, when not eating take aways, relies heavily on her dear friend Luke to support her with his cooking. She doesnāt have a very strong relationship with her parents and her reason for this is because she felt they were ācold and distantā or controlling. Other than that, I do believe Lorelai is a very kind and generous person while also being quite amusing to watch.
Rory Gilmore: Rory as a whole is one of the most relatable characters on Gilmore Girls. I love the way she reads and studies while hiding away from the rest of the world. Sheās kind and always keeps a promise. Even if her choices of boyfriends areā¦choices, she still has a good heart and is friends with everyone. Rory is a mini version of Lorelai and thatās what I love about her ā the way her and her mum are so close, theyāre like besties who tell each other everything about their lives; boys, friendships, school, work and I wouldnāt be surprised if they told each other about their morning poops!
Sookie St. James: I love Sookie ā the clumsy chef. Sheās funny, charming and is always really nice. Sookie always has such a bubbly personality and I think thatās one of the reasons why I love her so much. Sookieās baby boy Davey is so cute too an I love the way she treats him when, before he was born, she wasnāt sure if she could look after him. Sookie is obviously the happiest character.
Kirk Gleason: Kirk is such a diva. I like the way he acts around people; I have just got up to the bit where he gets a girlfriend and tells everyone. I just like how weird he is and the fact that he has tried every job in the town. Also he is my dadās favourite character so I have to put him on this list or else heāll try and find a way to put him in anyway and Iāll get told off lol.
Miss Patty: Miss Patty is the gossip queen! She knows everything about everyone, and when Lorelai wanted everybody to know the wedding was off, she made sure Miss Patty knew first ā that way the whole town could know in like 5 minutes. I love her energy and the way she talks to her dancers, her friendship with Rory is adorable. Miss Patty is the best number 7 ever.
Mrs. Kim: Sheās harsh but fairā¦. Never mind, just harsh. And I love that for her š. Mrs Kim is definitely the Grinch of Gilmore Girls and thatās why she is in my top ten. Her daughter is nothing like her but Mrs Kim obviously still loves her (I think). The way she acts around everybody is just funny, and the way she shouts at people when they come into her shop ā she always likes to have customers. The way she screams at people then softly says āPleasure doing business with you.ā It all makes me chuckle ā sheās just so persuasive!
Richard Gilmore: 3 words⦠Slay. Baddie. Queen. Richard is the best father character on Gilmore Girls in my opinion. My favourite scene with him is when Rory announces she is going to Yale and Richard and Emily try to play it cool. It is funny the way they break and start to act crazy, I find it so adorable the way they care for their granddaughter. Speaking of Yale, I love how he acts to any Yale sports games, cheering loudly and singing boldly. I told you, Richard is the best.
Jess Mariano: Jess is tenth on my list as I like his attitude but not his overall behaviour. I like the way he is extremely smart and quick-witted but hates doing school work. Although I enjoy watching him on the screen, I didnāt like his relationship with Rory as I think he didnāt treat her like how Dean treated her. However, Dean isnāt on this list because I preferred Jessā energy and how he acted in general compared to Dean, Deanās attitude was a bit iffy. I liked Jessā backstory and sometimes feel sorry for him tho.
Maybe after sheās done with this we can get her to watch The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.