my biggest issue w how ppl talk abt literacy on this site is the like. implicit assumption that every society that didn't communicate through written language was inherently lacking & their ways of education and politics and storytelling were inherently less complex and engaged the brain less. like theres obviously benefits to having a written language esp when it comes to having records that dont exist inside human brains. but like humans have done some incredible stuff and had incredible complex thoughts and discussions w/o ANYONE being remotely literate. like maybe its not ''literacy is required for critical thinking'' maybe its ''in a society that depends heavily on literacy as a skill, you cannot access a fuckton of information without being literate''
YES! I really have to credit the hosts of one of my favorite podcasts, Material Girls, for enlightening me on this point with the simple observation -- if literacy boosts empathy, then 17th century Europe should have been far more empathetic than the rest of the world (since mass literacy rolled out in Europe before it rolled out in many other places), and that is transparently, observably false and also, you know, racist.
Basically, I believe the following things are true about written language:
-It is an incredibly nifty, useful human invention. It makes transmitting ideas and information across time and distance a lot more efficient.
-Everyone in the world should have access to it, just as I believe everyone in the world should have access to other nifty, useful human inventions like indoor plumbing, electricity, and antibiotics.
-In the modern, post-industrial, globally interconnected, late-capitalist global society humans have built, communicating with written language is a fairly essential life skill. People who can't communicate with written language and don't have a viable accommodation are at a severe disadvantage socially and economically, and are less able to access accurate information, because our global information ecosystem is built around written language.
-Advancements in communication technology, such as written language, the printing press, radio, film, the internet, etc., have made general education and knowledge-dissemination/acquisition much easier and more efficient. The more communication technology have access to, the more you can learn. That's why communication technology, and education in how to use it, is a human right.
I reject the following claims about written language:
-It is necessary for critical thinking (the vast majority of the world for the vast majority of human history was incapable of critical thinking?).
-It is necessary for empathy (the vast majority of the world for the vast majority of human history was incapable of empathy?).
-It is necessary for emotional regulation (the vast majority of the world for the vast majority of human history was incapable of emotional regulation?).
-It is inherently superior to other forms of communication (audio, video, textural, etc) rather than just one (albeit very useful) tool among many to advance human communication.