I'm Belly, based in the so-called US. No pronouns.
Pro-liberation, anti-imperialism/colonialism/capitalism.
[This user's special interest is sociology]
taylor price

tannertan36
todays bird
Cosmic Funnies
Not today Justin

@theartofmadeline
KIROKAZE
Sade Olutola

bliss lane

ellievsbear

Origami Around

Andulka
Xuebing Du
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

#extradirty
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi

2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
The Stonewall Inn
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Sri Lanka

seen from Malaysia
seen from Barbados
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from Argentina

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland

seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia
@queerpunktomatoes
I'm Belly, based in the so-called US. No pronouns.
Pro-liberation, anti-imperialism/colonialism/capitalism.
[This user's special interest is sociology]

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is also what frustrates me about the "do trans men have privilege" conversation- because I do not think a discussion of privilege is ever as easy as a "has" and "has not"- but especially so with something as changeable as gender presentation and transness.
I find it inarguable that I have some access to male privilege. I do. I think those saying that I don't are being completely absurd and disingenuous when they deny it. I am, in fact, materially treated differently and at times even better than many of the women within my social sphere. It is plain as day when I no longer need to be spending my money on period products, when male clients defer to me despite being the newest on the team, when interacting with other men who do not know that I am transgender.
This, to me, is the white passing privilege argument. It is equally inarguable to me that my mother and my nephew who are completely white passing have some access to white privilege. They are treated materially differently than the rest of our family- including my nephew's own little sister who while being light skinned is clearly of color somehow, including my mother's somewhat darker brother who has since passed away. While the rest of us must deal with the more overt and violent racism that comes with being native and black, they are spared this experience, watching from the outside, knowing that if they speak up it will be their heads next on the chopping block.
However, like my mother and my nephew, I still am affected by laws that this conditional access to privilege do not protect me from. Any laws that is designed to hurt cis women will inevitably hurt me, someone with an "F" marker. Any laws designed to hurt intersex people with hurt me, someone with an intersex variation and extensive medical history of such. Any laws designed to hurt transgender people will hurt me, as I am someone that is transgender.
Often when we talk about male privilege, we talk about freedom from laws restricting reproductive rights, body autonomy, and social movement. This is why arguing if trans women have male privilege is also a moot point- as they are also not free from these laws and on fact are directly targeted by them much the same. Thus an "M" marker is not a guaranteer of privilege *either*, as more and more nations impose tighter restrictions on trans women specifically.
Often when trans men point out how we are affected by things, there is a sense that this implies that trans women intrinsically aren't affected- but they are. We are hardly mirror images of each other in anything except presentation goals, and even there we find common ground frequently outside of primary or secondary sex characteristics. This is what I mean when I say that I truly don't think there is anything that one type of trans people experience that other types of trans people don't in a similar manner- and what is there as a stark difference usually has an answering stark difference elsewhere.
As I begin to take steps towards bottom surgery and everything it implies, as I am accepted by those who don't know me and don't see my legal or medical documents more and more as a cis man, as I continue this walk through life as a cis-passing trans man, I do see more and more the social privileges I am afforded as a result of my transition.
It's just, as the leader of my country is poised to end all gender transition for all transgender people and specifically cites my presumed fertility as a reason to save me from myself, as I race against the clock to at least remove my uterus before he stops that from happening too, I realize that this privilege stops at "social". And that I have a very narrow window to be able to hold onto what transition I've already done, if I don't want a single signature to completely undo everything I've worked for over the past 20 years.
And that doesn't really sound like freedom from laws restricting reproductive rights, or body autonomy, or social movement, to me. It's nice to be treated nicely at work. I would like to not have to worry about someone forcibly impregnating me because the president has degreed the only thing I'm good for is breeding, whether I want to or not.
there's this weird thing people fall into online a lot, where people assume that if the [perceived-to-be-inferior] version of [activity] is discouraged then people will, naturally, do [perceived-to-be-superior] version of [activity] instead. When really it's just as (or more) likely that if [perceived-to-be-inferior] version of [activity] is discouraged people just won't do it at all.
audiobook listeners are not necessarily people who would otherwise do a lot of traditional reading if audiobooks did not exist, many are people who simply would experience zero books. Booktok romance readers would not necessarily be reading the classics if booktok did not exist, many of them would simply not read. Fanfiction writers would not necessarily be novelists if fanfic wasn't an option, many would just be people who didn't write. You know?
The thing is, right, that overworking yourself is still harmful if you're doing it for politically good reasons. It's not the presence of a Capitalist Boss demanding overwork that makes it bad. It's the other way around, incentivizing overwork, a bad thing, is one of the reasons why capitalism is bad.
Whether you're overworking yourself out of a sense of moral obligation, or because you're super passionate about the thing you're working on, you still have to take care of your health and take breaks.
This is literally one of the most common contributors to burnout.
probably the worst attitude tumblr unintentionally cultivates is "the world out there is completely dangerous for you and no one can possibly understand you, so you should isolate yourself from it and avoid interacting with it as much as possible"
Time to roll out the Andrew Marr quote again...
"If you put away social media and you walk out into the streets and you look at real people, three-dimensional people, they mostly smile back at you. If you look around you- you see perfectly decent, ordinary people getting on with their lives and inclined, by and large, to rather like each other, that is the real us. Let us not be fooled."

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
everyone on here is good at repeating the idea that sex is just an otherwise-not-special thing you do but many of you don’t really actually believe it. many of you still have Puritanism Brain Worms
I don't care how much of a lesbian you are, saying that anyone who isn't a woman doesn't know how to treat women with respect and love is gender-essentialist bullshit.
Also transandrophobic from one view when you realize it, since it's essentially implying that a trans guy who's in love with a woman suddenly lost the ability to treat her with love and how he's just "an insecure woman". Would a bigender lesbian half-know how to treat a woman, half-not then?? /hj
(Technically I'm bigender & gaybian, just masc presenting, so no I'm not "speaking over" anyone here)
The idea that trans men gain privilege by transitioning is absurd. You can not queer your way into privilege thats not how anything works
not wanting to be a woman is not an act of misogyny but some of y'all are not ready to hear that
It is genuinely feminist action to take care of yourself. Not in a capitalist overconsumption "Do this 16 step skincare routine and clean girl makeup that doesn't look like you're wearing makeup ✨💖✨" way but in a, "Brush your teeth and do not intentionally starve yourself" way.
This is the only body you will have and you do have to take care of and maintain it.
This sentiment is, as always, disability/mental health friendly and if bodily maintenance is something you struggle with or cannot do on your own there is no moral failure there. We live in a world designed to prevent us from caring for ourselves and that system targets and fails you more than most. Doing the best with what you can and are able to do is always better than nothing.
This sentiment is, as always, very much meant for trans women. This sentiment is not a knock on HRT or surgery — that is a form of legitimate body maintenance. The point here is that you do not have to participate in capitalist femininity to be a "real woman" or to be feminine. You do not need a million products to be a woman. You do not need to be skinny to be a woman. You do not need to starve yourself to be a woman. Structural misogyny will try and pressure you into these things for gender validation and you do not need it. You do not need to validate your womanhood with patriarchal capitalism.
Eat something and brush your teeth.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
fun fact I take being woke and political very serious and if u think politics aren’t important you’re either way too privileged or straight up stupid
As trans people begin to organize politically, it is tempting to adopt the essentialist notion of gender identity. The cliché popularized by the mass media is that trans people are "women trapped in men's bodies" or vice versa. The attractiveness of such a strategy is clear, as the general population is more likely to become supportive of us if we could convince them that we are somehow born with a biological error over which we have no control over it. It is also often in tune with our own sense of who we are, which feels very deep and fundamental to us. However, as transfeminists, we resist such temptations because of their implications. Trans people have often been described as those whose physical sex does not match the gender of their mind or soul. This explanation might make sense intuitively, but it is nonetheless problematic for transfeminism. To say that one has a female mind or soul would mean there are male and female minds that are different from each other in some identifiable way, which in turn may be used to justify discrimination against women. Essentializing our gender identity can be just as dangerous as resorting to biological essentialism. Transfeminism believes that we construct our own gender identities based on what feels genuine, comfortable and sincere to us as we live and relate to others within given social and cultural constraint. This holds true for those whose gender identity is in congruence with their birth sex, as well as for trans people. Our demand for recognition and respect shall in no way be weakened by this acknowledgement. Instead of justifying our existence through the reverse essentialism, transfeminism dismantles the essentialist assumption of the normativity of the sex/gender congruence.
from The Transfeminist Manifesto (2001) by Emi Koyama. This quote is from the section "Deconstructing the Reverse Essentialism"
now for the propoganda i will not be falling for:
recreational ozempic
whatever the hell preventative botox is
self-help books > fiction books
fashion microtrends / clothing 'hauls'
antivaxers disguised as 'wellness' influencers
misogyny repackaged as 'divine feminine' and 'divine masculine' dynamics
the manosphere and any adjacent content
i'm gonna start wearing a tshirt that says "i don't care about what chemicals im eating" and on the back it'll say "don't talk to me about ozempic"
i think we should start openly mocking male creatives who can't figure out how to write women. like actually i think it's embarrassing that it took elliot page transitioning for christopher nolan to give him a good role. why did it take like ten years to get the first female lead in a marvel movie? why is it a Known Fact that stephen king can't write women? why is 50% of the population omitted from large ensemble works? i asked my friend to name a movie directed by a man with a majority female cast and he said ghostbusters 2016. ghostbusters. ghostbusters. g

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
my notifications are once again devolving into a spirited debate about the ethics of actions that could potentially make someone uncomfortable, and at risk of sounding like someone about to get a lot of irate anons I think we're frankly giving way too to much moral weight to hypothetical discomfort
the thing about discomfort is that it's an extremely nebulous category that can be triggered by virtually anything and that's far too broad a category to have any inherent moral quality to it. like. my mom was mad uncomfortable when I stopped shaving. that didn't mean I was doing violence against my mom it just meant she needed to get over herself. many such cases it must be said.
there's not a single example I could give that's better than this
A cannon event for me is hearing a rich Upper East Side lady talk about how she had "a right to feel safe" when she was arguing for the removal of homeless people from her neighborhood.
the number of people who think that they have some kind of right to not have to see unhoused people while doing absolutely nothing to help get those people housed (and frequently voting against any kind of measure to do exactly that) is astonishing, yeah.
My town keeps and entire facebook page calling the town gross and dangerous and its just homeless peoples tents or them asleep and if you say anything against this they all come at you as if you told them to take their own lives and not to maybe make better voting choices
the whole "insulting someone based on their appearance is bad because it could indirectly hurt people you like who share that feature" is a good start for unlearning body shaming but i do think we need to go further and remind people that even if there was some physical trait that was magically 10000% exclusive to conservatives and creeps and nobody else ever had it, we still shouldnt be insulting them based on that. because the problem with them is not their appearance its their ideology and actions. by insulting their appearance you arent just indirectly insulting others who look like that, youre literally not making the correct point. stay on topic ya know.