Space and Stuff

Barbie

From Barbie (2023)

Headcanoned as aroace

Barbie's actress Margot Robbie described her as "asexual". Barbie also repeatedly expresses disinterest in romance or sex and her happy ending specifically avoids her ending up in a romantic relationship. 

Arthur Lester

From Malevolent

Headcanoned as aromantic

“He felt broken bc he couldn’t love his wife” - @the-frog-wizard-fe

Sophie Chi

From Dear Wendy by Ann Zhao

Canonically aroace

Charlie

From The Charm Offensive by Alison Cochrun

Canonically implied acespec

Gilgamesh Wulfenbach

From Genius Girl

Implied demisexual 

I have one actor that will most likely end up playing Nine (though I want them as Ten more, but the way the people I have works out they’re the only nonbinary actor I’ve got atm) and two others in mind for Ten and JUICE but I need to ask them if they want to lol

I’ve started a list of potential actors for the ensemble, but I need to make a tracking sheet of characters to make a track sheet for actors to see how many I’ll need

I also need to get permission from the planetarium (it’s literally just emailing my boss, and yet) to solidify dates, but it’ll likely be in November!

Planetarium didn’t work out (alas we’re very busy this semester) but that’s okay! I can still do the show in other places :)

I also have all my actors!! I have 8, which is the bare minimum number you need for the show

It’s gonna end up being a staged reading and not a full production, which is a little bit of a shame but also is probably for the better tbh because right now our department doesn’t have our usual building and we’re in a bunch of in between spaces across at least three buildings, so having this be smaller makes things easier :)

I also will be recording the show!! If all of the actors are okay with it, then I’ll post it, likely on YouTube or something!

You think? Let’s test that then!

First, you gotta get a cool cup. I got this one from a thrift store for a very affordable price. But if you can’t find one, a standard clear cup or jar should suffice

Now, you don’t need a decal, but I recommend it because they’re cool. I just got some sticker vinyl, traced and cut out the Wii logo and some stars

Now for the drink!!

Start by making or buying jelly. If you make it, you should do so a few hours before you intend to make the drinks, as it will need time to set. You can find jelly at most any grocery store.

Get your cup and add ice and jelly. You should cut the jelly into small pieces or use cookie cutters to make fun shapes. I recommend you don’t add quite all of the jelly, as you’ll need some for the top later

Next, add your flavoring syrup of choice, I recommend blue raspberry or melon. You should be able to find them at any restaurant supply store

Then, add carbonated water. Flavored sparkling waters also work fine, as they don’t taste like much. You should be able to find some at any store that sells drinks.

Next add Calpico, this is technically optional, but it tastes way better with it, so it’d highly recommend it. You can get it at practically any Asian market, or normal market if you live in Asia

Now, add some ice cream, or something of the sort, I use vanilla.

After that, you can top it with some whipped cream, jelly shapes, cherries, really anything!!

I would also recommend using a straw to drink it, because you will need to mix it up a bit. but you can’t really mix it before hand, because it will ruin the cool gradient affect

Red flags: Unbelievable nature you've never seen before!, no external source cited, low image quality could be hiding AI artifacts, lacks scientific name for plant, OP is an aesthetic blog (no offense, I see you credit most of the artists you post, OP <3).

Green flags: Common name of the tree provided (although the leaves don't look like any olive tree I've ever seen).

Reverse image searches and citation trails all seem to lead back to now-deleted Reddit posts. Google Images says it's this one in r/NatureIsFuckingLit, and TinEye says it's this one in r/interestingasfuck. Both were posted back in 2020. This is important because the rise of AI images was in 2022.

People in the comments of places this image is posted throw around botanical terms like "dichotomous branching" [branches split into two at the nodes] and "divaricated" [branches grow far apart from each other], which are cool, but don't tell me what the tree is.

Searching up "Black Olive" on iNaturalist finally got me some answers, and it turns out that YES. This is a real tree! This tree is a Dwarf Black Olive (Terminalia molinetii, Formerly Bucida spinosa). The above photos are some particularly nicely framed shots of a tree with particularly small leaves, which really highlights the branching structure. I really wish we knew the photographer's name. Here are some more photos of the same species:

Terminalia molinetii by jriveracruz50 on iNaturalist, posted under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

This tree is native to Southern Mexico, Belize, the southern tip of Florida, and Cuba. Dwarf Black Olives are completely unrelated to Olive trees in the Olea genus that I'm more familiar with (the former is in Order Myrtales [Myrtles, Evening Primroses, and Allies], and the latter is in Order Lamiales [Mints, Plantains, Olives, and Allies]).

Second two images show the same species of tree, but with much denser leaves. A hand to pulling down small sections of twigs. In the first of this pair, the hexagonal pattern is somewhat visible, in the second, the leaves are simply interestingly placed - a bit too geometric and regular to seem quite normal.

A pun post crossed my dash, and I reblogged it with an equally bad pun in return. A couple of my followers find it funny, it's a good day for everyone.

That was on July 7th.

Virality on Reddit was entirely algorithmic. You could garner a couple crossposts, but the success of a post was entirely dependent on whether or not it hit r/all--the main page of Reddit. If your post does that, it's immediately exposed to 10x the number of people and immediately gets upvoted.

On my pun post, I get a couple reblogs. And those reblogs get a couple reblogs--nobody really adds any content to the post, it just gets a couple reblogs here and there.

There's a specific chain of reblogs that I'd like to focus on. The most popular post on this chain has about 25 reblogs on it. Half the posts have three reblogs or fewer. Five posts in this chain have just one reblog total.

But the reblog chain keeps going. And going. It breaches containment many times over. And finally, after a chain THIRTY SIX posts long, at 9:30 AM, July 22nd this morning, it hits a popular account.

99% percent of the people who have seen the post--virtually unchanged from how it left my dash--have seen it because it was curated by 36 different people. That's insane to me.

None of those 36 people know that they're part of this chain. They saw a post, reblogged it, and moved on. If any one of these people had not reblogged, the post would have a fraction of the impact it has.

And yet, after two weeks, the post has effectively hit the main page of tumblr. It was picked up, only because people liked it enough to show it to their followers. There were no algorithms necessary.