hello!

'AI Overview' I DIDN'T ASK FOR THAT. I WANT OBSCURE REDDIT THREAD. I WANT 15 YEAR OLD QUORA POST. GET OUTTA HERE SCRAM

this is what cis ppl sound like when they ask trans ppl gender questions

i love you archival work. i love you alphabetizing. i love you sorting. i love you reshelving. i love you document restoration. i love you shelf reading. i love you inventorying. i love you analysis. i love you archival work.

It’s so fucked how people automatically grant a higher presumption of innocence to the cops than they grant to literally anyone else. If Luigi Mangione had been wearing a bodycam for some reason, and if he turned that bodycam off for the specific 11 minutes when the murder occurred, no one would be arguing that he was innocent. But if the cops all turn off their bodycams during the specific 11 minutes where they are transporting the shooter’s backpack, just before they “find” crucial evidence in it that implicates Luigi Mangione (in a search incident to arrest, which is interesting, because the backpack wasn’t on his person, and so therefore couldn’t have ordinarily been part of a search incident to arrest), then we’re all just supposed to just buy that? We’re supposed to just believe that none of that evidence was planted, and that their bodycam was just coincidentally switched off during that time for no reason?? That’s more benefit of the doubt than we give to literally anyone else, and I’m sorry, but the cops deserve it less than ordinary citizens. And sure, people may not want to be filmed when they don’t need to be, but you don’t see people in any position other than the police disabling workplace security cameras while they’re on break purely because “the employment contract doesn’t say we have to leave it on.” I’m not pro-mass surveillance, and I’m not saying that there’s no reason to want privacy if you have nothing to hide… but the double standard is egregious, especially given the fact that there is a compelling reason to expect on-duty police officers to have reduced privacy while on duty. I’ve reviewed a lot of police bodycam footage over the years, and I’ve yet to encounter a single odd footage gap that didn’t actively reek of malfeasance in light of other circumstantial evidence... and yet every single time, people are suddenly tripping over themselves to offer alternative explanations for on-their-face bad facts. “There are valid reasons for them to turn off their body cameras apart from planting evidence or coercing a confession” truly can only get you so far; there are valid reasons for suspects to do a whole host of things that we as a society see as clear-cut evidence of guilt regardless, and I’m not about to give the cops more leeway than a jury would give to the people who they arrest.

(so mad i can’t see straight) Yeah i just don’t think chat gpt is a good classroom tool

i think they should allow everyone in the world to vote in american elections

YES LET US VOTE

does the body ALWAYS have to keep the score? maybe we could just have a friendly game this time. maybe we can just have fun without putting numbers on it

public defenders get behind me. i’ll defend you this time

“so you like criminals?” I LIKE THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL.

One of worst things copaganda ever perpetuated is the rhetoric that if you aren't guilty of breaking the law, you shouldn't value your personal privacy against the state's surveillance and interrogation. That only guilty people hire lawyers when talking to police.

deeply amusing to me how the term "minicomputer" was coined very prematurely

We should keep the trend going, laptops should be nanocomputers and smart phones should be femtocomputers

I think I'm mutuals with a femtocomputers

every time i search where a movie is streaming and it’s not on like one of the big streamers i whisper to myself ‘poob has it for you’

WHERE are all the hot dorky bears i've been yearning for

Out catching salmon