hit up my main @iamthelowercase instead || general "dumping ground" sideblog || the theory goes that I put stuff here instead of using my drafts as a bookmarks folder
tending to my pet anarchists. going into their solarpunk themed enclosure and spreading packaged medicine around in bushes for them to naturally gather. refilling their stock of grain discreetly so they think it all comes from their garden sized wheat field. I spot one and she hisses at me and calls me an authoritarian tankie but i make cooing noises and offer zines as treats and she lets me pet her
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is not in any sort of principled stance or hot take or anything, because I honestly am baffled by my own reaction here! But when I heard that there was going to be a movie adaptation of the odyssey my entire reaction was just, "why?"
I read the Odyssey in high school and I liked it! But I feel absolutely zero emotions about seeing it on screen. Just a big "why would somebody take the time to do that?" Which is weird!! Because I have been excited for movie adaptations of books before! But not this one???
Somebody needs to help me process my feelings around this, I fired my therapist when he got a little too supportive of my ambitions
That's not it, I haven't been keeping up with the discourse and I know very little about what choices were made for this adaptation. This is literally my reaction from the first announcement before I even knew who was directing it.
I cannot emphasize enough that the details of the production did not matter in the least to me, this could be Guillermo del Toro's self-funded ultimate vanity project with a fully animatronic cyclops and I'd still be like 🤷♀️
Figured it out: I liked the Odyssey as a poem. My ideal adaptation would be a stage play with the narrator standing center-stage and reciting the whole thing, while a shadowcast of actors play out the scenes in the background in complete silence with no spoken lines. Or like, marionettes instead of live actors maybe. That would be cool.
Contrary to a popular belief, pollution plays virtually no role in creating urban heat islands. They're due to dense concentrations of buildings and impermeable surfaces.
Climate change, land take and urban density contribute to rising air and ground temperatures in city centres – especially at night, when road surfaces release the heat they have absorbed throughout the day.
A number of factors combine to create a heat island – the materials used to create buildings (bricks, stone, concrete, etc.) and road surfaces (e.g. asphalt mixes), land use (i.e. building density), most often without plant cover, as well as human activities such as road traffic and the use of heating and air conditioning.
More nature in the city
Trees, shrubs and plants help cool the city by providing shade and 'evapotranspiration', which refreshes the atmosphere. Local temperatures can drop significantly by:
reducing the waterproofing of pavements
planting trees
placing mobile forests
greening the ground, facades and roofs
Improving access to water in the city
In its Climate Plan and Municipal Water Plan, the City has committed to improving access to drinking water for residents and users of the City. Several water access points have been set up for this purpose:
Drinking water fountains
Water bottle network: a network of shops that fill water bottles free of charge in Brussels
Adapt buildings and urban landscaping
Adapt materials to the amount of sunshine in the area
Prefer light-coloured cladding or white roofs that reflect rather than absorb the sun's rays
Allow wind to circulate by considering the urban form of construction or renovation projects
Insulate buildings to prevent overheating
Create shade with shade sails
Cool spaces during heat waves
Map and make available private or public indoor spaces to provide cool places nearby for shelter during heatwaves: Map with urban cooling islands
Provide support to vulnerable populations
This difference can reach 10°C in summer between two Brussels municipalities (measurements in July 2022 between different parts of the City
Surface temperatures at a busy car park in Western Sydney are being reduced by as much as 35 degrees by vine-covered trellises which were in
I’m not trying to play devil’s advocate about the Tolkien and race post, I agree with most of what you’re saying about the denial. But modern non fiction Marxist critics forget one thing that hopefully fandom doesn’t, that is to give the author grace instead of immediately deciding that the racial politics of his work is intentional. I accept Tolkien was a conservetive, but I find it hard to believe that he was exposed to anti racist thought like we are today. I think it’s important to acknowledge the biases in his writing, but not decide it as intentional, because he’s a linguist based in a very white part of England, whose background is in European history who did not anticipate a world where migration is the norm. Of course that doesn’t make the text less racist but it’s an important thing to consider. That’s all, I agree with your other points.
Thanks for the question, and please bear with me re asks gang, I was stupid enough to leave inbox on for a while, not realising the post would break containment, so I’m snowed under atm ☠️
So there’s a lot of talk about Tolkien being ‘of his time and class’ but precious little about what that environment actually looked like other than comparing him to his fellow religious conservative Oxford dons. ‘Of his time’ is not a neutral statement and it certainly isn’t applicable to Tolkien, but more importantly, ‘norms of his time’ seem to often be, in this fandom, calibrated to ‘what Tolkien said’ rather than ‘what was actually happening then’.
Anyway, I will try to be a little more direct than in that last post. So the “the fundamentally racist elements of the legendarium are because Tolkien was a man of his time” line really annoys me (and others!) because imo it lets Tolkien's own Oxford tea table stand in for the entire twentieth century as if there wasn't an entire world outside the Inkling Orgy arguing furiously about race and empire.
I can give you an example literally from Oxford itself! The Indian Majlis had been meeting at Oxford since 1896! The Majlis, for those who might not be aware, was a full-on political and debating society which produced a fuckton of the people who'd go on to lead independence movements across South Asia. This was not some obscure footnote he would need to trudge to a specialist archive to dig up, and I can confirm that attending debates and discussion groups is, was, and has always been a large part of Oxford University life. Ie this was happening in his university in his lifetime among people of his class group he'd have had every opportunity to meet and engage with, whose existence he absolutely would have been aware of.
Beyond the Oxford ventures, you have things like Moody’s League of Coloured Peoples, founded in London in 1931 and organising against colour bar practices in Britain itself. The West African Students' Union had been running since 1925, building a public anticolonial intellectual culture that fed directly into multiple independence movements of the following decades. CLR James was in England from 1932! And so on and so forth! And many in these organisations were white British activists or public intellectuals or writers! This was a live political and literary scene running in parallel with Tolkien's and explicitly arguing against the racial categories his fiction sought to preserve. Which is to say, I think what’s more likely than ‘the legendarium is the way it is with regards to race because Tolkien didn’t know any such antiracist thought existed’ is that ‘the legendarium is the way it is with regards to race specifically because Tolkien did know such antiracist thought existed’.
can i say i am so glad the guy was not a lazy writer and also that he disliked direct allegory because if one of sharky’s minion gangs in scouring of the shire were called the hobbiton majlis or something, i would probably start cooking people’s cats
Anyway, I’m so tired of how “of his time" just keeps getting used to mean "the time as understood by conservative Oxford dons," when the actual record shows Black British and colony diasporas and white progressives were producing sustained public counter-discourse in the same space the whole time, in his own country, in his own language, in his literal university. So when people say he was "just a product of his environment," I just always want to know which environment they mean exactly, because the one he was actually in very much did sustain quite a lot of anticolonial thought.
Also just to get into the basics again, bro was famously a philologist, ie not exactly a profession where you could plausibly bumble through life without ever encountering race-as-a-formal-category. Philology in this period, and especially in Oxbridge, was literally a primary engine of race science. The Indo-European/Aryan linguistic apparatus that mapped language families onto racial stock was built by people doing Tolkien's exact job, so I really don’t think he passively inherited racial categories without noticing, he inherited them deliberately through years of formal study, with copious footnotes and his own academic judgement. Like I always find it so funny when people, even on that post, refer to the racial dynamics of the legendarium as ‘unconscious bias’ because I just know Tolkien is spinning like a power drill in his grave every single time, because they just implied he was shit at his job 😭
Anyway, the entire feudal value system of the legendarium runs on inherited blood as a determinant of worth (even within the Shire, ie the most ‘normal people not kings of men’ place, where Sam is placed as a Good Man Friday), and this is a very well known fact within fandom. Aragorn's legitimacy is genealogical-first and earned-second, the blood of Númenor "running true" in some lines and "thinning" in others is outright presented as a real, quasi-biological fact about a person's capacity for greatness, and not to forget Faramir’s entire speech about greater and lesser men, and the ‘childless lords sit alone while barbarians bay at the gates’ bit.
Or if you prefer a Silm example, (note: the context of the exile and whether or not you think they deserved what they got is irrelevant to this point) but the Doom of Mandos and the Noldorin re-entry ban, when viewed as a mechanism detached from context, is fundamentally just the ontological excision of a ‘birthright citizenship’ as a consequence of a person’s actions. Idk how big this was outside the UK but remember when Shamima Begum was extensively groomed as a child and fucked off to join ISIS and the UK decided to strip her of citizenship and leave her stateless? This is basically just that, ie the legitimisation of an ontologically confirmed birthright citizenship that can be granted to exceptional cases at the behest of the ruling body (see: Hobbits, Peredhels) due to their extraordinary actions, but also can just as easily be taken away by the same ruling body in response to a transgression. Like this is literally just present-day ‘migrant criminality’ discourse, how can you say he didn’t anticipate the rise of postcolonial global migration 😭
(once again to the reader, please let me reiterate i am simply comparing the mechanism of the exile alone, i am not saying that the Fëanorians are fucking ISIS, and i certainly am not saying that the exiled Noldor are the equivalent of stateless refugees, so pls don’t jump up my ass 😭)
Tolkien wasn't writing this in a vacuum where phrenology was a fringe pseudoscience nobody respectable touched, it was institutionally embedded and state sanctioned British science well into the interwar period, with its own society and journals, and an enormous presence in Oxbridge. Moral and mental character of Great Men™️ being first fixed by descent and the subsequent positive/negative shaping of character by choices and environment being seen as a somewhat effective yet undeniably secondary mechanism, is literally the loadbearing premise of race science. It’s not a borrowed aesthetic! The entire legendarium runs on this logic!
Once again, and this is also re: a few reblogs of my original post that take a similar route, what do you mean ‘he did not anticipate a world where migration is the norm’??? 😭The legendarium isn’t a product of 1937 alone, bro was notoriously still tinkering with its genealogies and societal architecture well into the 1960s and early 70s and pretty much until the day he died, like a fucking dweeb (for once, complimentary), hence why it takes the fragmented form it does. That's a working lifespan that runs through major global decolonisation, Windrush, the 1958 Notting Hill race riots, the 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act, through literally the entire long and convoluted and drawn out process by which Britain had to publicly and unavoidably reckon with the idea that the empire's subjects were now their neighbours. At some point we need to truly engage with what "of his time" means, ie we have to reckon with the fact that “his time” kept moving and the foundational elements of the legendarium didn’t.
And to bring up the same example from my original post but in a different light, Tolkien was completely capable of precise and deliberate racial argument the second it was framed as being about himself rather than his fiction. In said well known example, in 1938, some German publisher wants confirmation of his "Aryan" descent for translation rights, and Tolkien's (drafted) response is sharp and furiously specific, knowing exactly what's being asked of him by the Nazis and exactly why it's grotesque. Compare that to the total absence of literally any comparable interrogation applied to the Haradrim or orcs, or the entire chronology and geography of Middle-earth where evil consistently arrives from the same two compass directions wearing the same coded features. Man like. Tolkien was honestly a pretty clever guy, and ngl I feel it does him a (very funny) disservice to assume he didn’t have the capacity to scrutinise race to the level he does ☠️
Anyway I think where the fandom focus on “unconscious bias of the era" does not actually originate in a true desire to absolve Tolkien (fair enough, because this is a man who has never once asked to be absolved of the opinions he holds strongly enough to work into his narrative at such depth) the individual, and but rather in the interests of keeping the emotional crutch of loving a beloved childhood text without having to acknowledge that the person who made it was making choices in the same way Rudyard Kipling or Rider Haggard was making choices, and yet very few people offer Haggard this kind of protective custody in present day.
Almost nobody aside from hardcore conservatives sits around saying King Solomon's Mines just "reflected the assumptions of empire" as if Haggard had no hand in shaping said assumptions himself, we read it (correctly) as a deliberately shaped ideological project worth taking seriously as an argument. Tolkien, specifically due to the fandom culture around him both then and now, often gets a pass that even Kipling doesn't, and imo it's not because the textual evidence is thinner but because the fandom loves him more and flinches harder when he’s hit. Which is to say, the insistence on ‘Tolkien was of his time and his time was bad’ being the chosen interpretive lens is less a claim about ‘the time’ Tolkien existed in than it is a claim about us as a fandom today.
On a vaguely related note, I also think ‘this fandom gives grace to the author’ should not be treated as a complimentary statement, especially because one of the elements of the Tolkien fandom which genuinely baffles me is the general air of author-genuflection across the board regardless of what fandom pocket you’re in (and a towards Christopher LMFAOOO) never have I been in a fandom that consistently deifies the creator to this extent, and it’s doubly baffling considering that he isn’t exactly a sensitive up and coming artist but a dude who has enormous mainstream cultural impact and, crucially, has been dead as a doornail for decades.
Like it is quite funny but also on a serious note, whilst the sentiment is understandable because yeah the world and its languages are as immense as the work he put into it and it is very important to so many of us, I think a publicly performed culture of ‘grateful to the author for this wonderful world’ is one of the things that preclude a deeper critical understanding of the legendarium itself. Amusingly, this is literally the only thing that makes me miss the bloodsoaked battlefields of anime fandom, because Masashi Kishimoto may have painstakingly drawn 3 billion pages of Naruto, but 95% of the fandom would probably, upon meeting the guy, tie him to a chair and beat him repeatedly on the head with a rubber hammer going ‘why the fuck did you do this? what the fuck is wrong with you? did you hate twelve year old me personally?’
I have a longer post cooking abt the historical elements of Tolkien as a man of his time re ideological genealogies and contemporaries, but in the meanwhile I just want to say by his own letters (letter 83, written in 1944), Tolkien was an avowed supported of General Franco, which a) most writers of his generation were in active and public opposition to Franco and b) Tolkien spends a not inconsiderate part of his letter bitching about how the notoriously conservative C S Lewis himself is opposed to Franco and infected by "Red propaganda" and c) if it comes to fellow Catholics, Graham Greene himself opposed Franco, even if he was unhappy abt murders of priests. And I also think it is very important to note re the stewarding of these conversations that there are exactly two papers on Tolkien's support for Franco, one by an independent scholar and one by the head of the Tolkien Society in Spain, who managed a private interview with Priscilla Tolkien and who cited her godfather having been a Francoist himself - and THAT author is, guess what??? a fucking Francoist himself. The conversations and scholarship about Tolkien are NOT happening in a neutral and "normal" space.
Lines of thought that seem Normal but are actually rooted in extreme puritanism:
-Seeing the nude human body is inherently traumatic
-Sex scenes in art are pointless
-Wearing kink-related clothing in public is the similar to performing a sex scene in front of unwilling participants
-Depicting female characters expressing sexuality is always degrading
-People's sexual fantasies are always an endorsement of the behavior they want to see in real life
-Sex work is more traumatic and coercive than other types of work
The goal is to treat sex as just another thing people do. That is a much healthier attitude than hiding it! It's not uniquely traumatic, it's not weird to talk about it or include it in society.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
obsessed with how fixable society is, on a structural level.
obsessed with how all you need to do is throw money at public education and eliminate most standardized testing and you will start getting smarter, more engaged, kinder adults. obsessed with how giving people safe housing, reliable access to good food, and decent wages dramatically reduces drug overdoses and gun violence. obsessed with how much people actually want to get together and fix infrastructure, invent new ways of helping each other, and create global ways of living sustainably once you give them livable pay to do so. obsessed with how tracking diseases, developing medicines, and improving public health becomes so much easier when you just make healthcare free at point of use.
obsessed with how easy it all becomes, if we can just figure out how to wrench the wealth out of the hands of the hoarders.
i've lived in four different cities in my adult life and talked to literally tens of thousands of people about politics and the change they want to see in the world and the overwhelming majority of them wanted life to be better, happier, easier for everyone, and dreamed of that world. the only people who didn't think that way were A) really obviously in need of mental/medical care, or B) rich.
wanting universal free healthcare, well-funded public education, and social support for all people is the most unbelievably normie opinion that exists, even among people who have lots of bad or misguided opinions about other things. when you feel alone, know that the reason you feel that way is billions of dollars are being spent to obscure the fact that you are in the majority.
That “conservatives” are going bananas about casting a black woman as Helen in The Odyssey (a woman who probably never existed and no one has the slightest idea what she looked like if she did, except that she certainly wasn’t Scandinavian) is extra hilarious given that the movie has a Cyclops, metal giants, shades from Hades, witches, and sea monsters (to name only a few entities).
this was on one of the Anne Rice writing method reblogs and its so good but i know people will take it the wrong way and i want to post it here to preserve and honor it. because theyre right, her writing IS mid. i really really enjoy her work but she is not particularly good at it. and i think that is the most important aspect of conceptualizing of yourself as a creative producer that is performing non-alienated work: how "good" it turns out to be has nothing to do with 1. how much of it you will sell 2. how much people will enjoy it 3. how MANY people will enjoy it and finally 4. the effort you put into making it. developing skill and taste are DIFFERENT tasks from the actual production. let this inspire you
I mean, I'm not a psychologist, but I'd imagine if you're mid but very popular, you're more likely to get weird and defensive about stuff. Because oh no, what if people realize suddenly that I'm actually pretty mid?
Where if you're used to thinking "oh, I'm not great at this, but I'm having a good time and I hope you like this thing I made" or "yeah, I'm actually pretty good, because I've studied this/I have a specific Thing I'm especially good at that some people want/wev" you're less likely to feel vulnerable over it.
I Might Just Be Average is threatening when everyone wants to be Something.
(It is not, in fact, bad to be average at something. You are, in fact, allowed to do it anyway. People can and do like stuff that's mid! Just don't be like this about it.)
What makes a piece of art or writing "good" (beyond how popular it is) is also notoriously hard to define in any kind of objective way. You can point to certain specific qualities something has and put forth an argument but inevitably someone will disagree that it has those qualities and put forth a counterargument.
I don't care for Anne Rice but apparently her writing has some quality that makes a lot of people enjoy it but that I'm just not tuned into. If I knew how to duplicate that quality, I would be doing it.
Obviously Anne Rice is also from a different time and being successful is often about being in the right place at the right time and producing the specific thing that resonates with the cultural zeitgeist at that specific moment, but there are still going to be multiple people doing it, and what makes one person's work resonates while another's quietly dies is often quite mysterious.
If you say "this thing isn't actually good, it just happened to get popular" you're still left with the question of what made it get popular while comparable works which came out at the same time failed. And sometimes the answer might be something like "it was propped up by the system due to the the author having connections within the industry, which gave it the necessary boost to reach a wider audience while many comparable works never got the chance." Or it might be something like, "It just happened to match the really specific tastes and values of the editor who picked it up and then passionately advocated for it, giving it the necessary boost." But when it's not that, when the popularity arises from some intrinsic quality of the work itself, I think it's only fair to call that "good," even when you personally don't see the merit.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Wait I never noticed in my entire fucking life that Hospice by the Antlers is the record lying down until I saw the comments / tags on this post. I thought it was just showing itaots and mpp. Losing my fucking mind. The world you grew up in really no longer exists when’s the last time anyone talked about fucking Hospice
Scott's recent post on AI chip regulation made me absolutely livid, in a way that's definitely not healthy for me, but I'm going to process it by blogging a bit and then hopefully I can stop thinking about it as much.
It feels very confident and smug about how this isn't going to be a dystopian surveillance state. But the main thing I was thinking through the entire first part was "couldn't a government abuse these powers to stop people from running cutting-edge AI on their own hardware? Setting up the infrastructure to do that is totally unacceptable." And then I get to part 2 where he says "also we'll need to stop people from running cutting-edge AI on their own hardware."
Like, the big concerns I have about LLMS are that they're being run centrally, on servers, where people can read what we say, and where both companies and potentially the government can regulate how it gets used. The thing I want to make sure happens is this gets decentralized, so people can run it locally, without being observed, and ideally disable stupid ethical blocks like "I won't make porn".
And Scott's post is basically saying "we already don't live in that world, so it's not a problem to move further away from it". But it is! I want people in the AI space actively advocating for more decentralized AI use—and as strong a taboo as we can fashion against the government limiting AI, or really anything about the software we run on our computer. Total legal ban on in-hardware DRM. Crash course on fully homomorphic encryption so we can set it up so that openAI can't read our chat logs. A government commitment to reverse-engineer any model and publish the weights openly.
(I feel like we should all be really worried that the government feels like it can ask openAI to pause a chatbot release. That shouldn't be allowed! That's...well, it's not in the top fifty bad things the Trump administration has done, but it's a serious civil liberties problem that has me deeply worried.)
But the real upshot of this is that I'm definitely not the target audience, and in a real sense, Scott and I are on opposite sides.
Plan A’s regulations on chips bear more than a passing resemblance to the way the United States currently regulates “controlled substances” - potentially addictive medications like Xanax or Adderall. ...
But has the existence of controlled substance regulations indirectly plunged the world into Orwellian dystopia? Has it turned life into a global panopticon? I wouldn’t say so.
You see the way we regulate Xanax has introduced one genuinely horrifying civil liberties violation. Sometimes, people want Xanax, and they can't get it. That's a problem and we should fix it. And we shouldn't introduce that problem to private home AI setups if we can avoid it.
Going back to ME1, it's just… very clear that the outlook for a lot of people on Earth in the 2180s is… horrific.
Basically, every colonist we meet is eager to escape Earth. This is especially obvious with the people of Zhu's Hope on Feros, or in the cut content for Caleston. If we piece everything together, when you want to leave Earth and have no capital or marketable skills :
you can join the Alliance military and benefit from the Deferred Education Plan (if you don't die in the line of duty first !)
you can, apparently, go to some bureaucratic entity called Colonial Affairs, which sets you up for a colony and definitely isn't downplaying how awful and dangerous it gets because they want as many colonies as fast and far as possible (Fai Dan : "Life is hard and often brutal, even without our current problems. Colonial Affairs back on Earth told us we'd be beneath the notice of any raiders — I guess they weren't counting on the geth." Hollis Blake : "It's a little different from what they claimed."), and worst of all it pushes you toward "corporate sponsors" like ExoGeni or Genex Chemical who are eager to make a profit on your back and at your expense (presumably to offload the financial burden of setting up colonies to the private sector ?) — and if I take Arcelia at her word when she says that "most of us" worked for ExoGeni, that means the colonists are also contractors, liable for damages if they do not fulfill their end of the bargain.
you can bypass the Alliance's bureaucracy entirely and go straight to Eldfell-Ashland Energy, who'll give you a job and an education through their subsidiaries, though you'll eke out your contract in a company town for God knows how many years.
per cut content, you can also benefit from an aid program called "contractual transit" (basically, an organization pays for your transit off-Earth to a location where you'll get to work) except when you end up on an independent colony technically outside of the Alliance's jurisdiction you've got no protections and might end up becoming a debt slave who's ruthlessly exploited.
if you can somehow scrounge up enough resources, you can set up your own independent colony outside of the Alliance's purview, like Horizon… but you're entirely at the mercy of space bogeys. And with no prospects. So the best shot for your kids, like Traynor, is… the Systems Alliance military, and the Deferred Education Plan.
"Colony Life — It's Not That Bad !"
Also, here's a completely accidental possible explanation as to why Americanish people are overly represented in the Alliance : per the first book, at least some parts of the UNAS (e.g. the Texan megalopolis) are among the poorest on Earth, period. So, uh, I guess people might wanna leave ?
tMRAs: well you see, we are oppressed for being men
me: I'm not a man
tMRAs: well you are oppressed for having a uterus
me: I don't have one
tMRAs: you're oppressed for having a vagina
me: I don't have one of those either
their analysis is so resistant to acknowledging transphobia as a form of oppression that they cannot account for even other TME trans people. like this is fundamentally incoherent theory--it explains nothing about anything! I don't care what terminology you use (transandrophobia, transmisandry, anti-transmasculinity, etc etc)-- your entire framework for understanding sexgender does not hold up at all.
all it exists to do is flatter men by reaffirming their own self-importance. no serious person can humor this because it is very obviously transmisogynistic nonsense. that's why your only allies are TWERFs who find your transmisogynistic bioessentialism useful. it's fully ridiculous.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming