Something I hate is when people act like a story being a metaphor for something else means it's not actually what it's about on the surface anymore. Like, you know both can be true, right? It can be a fantasy horror with a real monster and that's the material reality for the characters in-world AND it can be a metaphoric commentary on XYZ themes for the audience too.
I'm reminded of the time we read Kafka's The Metamorphosis in school and the teacher asked us to raise our hands if we actually thought it was about a man transforming into a bug, and....I raised my hand. Because yes??? That is literally what happens! However, I also understood and knew it was acting as a metaphor too! But just because it is a metaphoric commentary on mental illness / disability and the way people around you change their treatment of you, doesn't mean the actual story is not literally about a dude who turns into a bug!
And it's the same with various aspects of Supernatural. But often worse because sometimes the things people insist the monsters are metaphors for really do not hold weight within the world of Supernatural. The monsters are often NOT representing the oppressed or minority groups and are more often aligned with metaphors for real life predators like serial killers. But anyway, regardless, they are still literal supernatural monsters killing human beings within the reality of the show! For the characters that threat is very real and not merely "metaphor."
This reminds me of when Frozen was first released. Some people decided that Elsa's ice powers were a metaphor for mental illness. In particular, some people noted a remark from Jennifer Lee about Elsa's body language, which she said was "to convey anxiety and depression" (presumably meaning Elsa's anxiety and depression caused by her fear of her powers and resulting isolation) and they decided that it meant that Elsa's whole struggle with her powers is a metaphor for clinical anxiety and depression, even though Lee never said that. And then they were offended on two levels. First of all, since the plot's main source of conflict is the fact that Elsa's powers are dangerous, they felt as if the message was "Mentally ill people are dangerous." And since she realizes in the end that love is the key to controlling her powers, many people complained that the apparent message was "Love is an insta-cure for anxiety and depression."
In-universe? Elsa has ice powers. Magic that creates ice and snow comes out of her hands, which can bury a whole kingdom without her even realizing it, which can stab you with ice shards or even conjure up a snow-monster to chase you away if she choses, and which will slowly transform you into ice if a blast of it hits you in the heart. This magic is linked to her emotions and becomes hard to control when she's upset, but can be controlled by love.
Many different groups identify with her story of being "different" in a way that she fears and struggles to hide. To some fans, she's a closeted lesbian or trans woman, to others she's autistic, to others mentally ill, or suffering from clinical anxiety, clinical depression, anorexia, or an "invisible" physical disability, or else she's just struggling with Eldest Daughter Syndrome and/or the stifling expectations of traditional femininity. I don't know if the writers intended her situation to be a metaphor for any one of those specific issues or not â and personally, I doubt they did. But in-universe? She has ice powers.


















