Sweet Seals For You, Always

tannertan36
RMH
Stranger Things
trying on a metaphor

Andulka
sheepfilms
Show & Tell

#extradirty

â
styofa doing anything
Misplaced Lens Cap

Janaina Medeiros
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

pixel skylines
hello vonnie
AnasAbdin

â
đŞź
Cosmic Funnies

seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore

seen from Greece
seen from Venezuela
seen from Argentina

seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
@kereeachan

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I'm shouting into the void here but I need to get it out.
I don't label my politics, but I'm what someone would call on the left. I spent my teenage years when Tumblr social justice was at its height. I learned things, checked my own biases, and I would like to think became a more empathetic person because of what I learnt from online progressive spaces.
The way these spaces have treated Jewish communities over the past 2.5 years has been nothing short of fucking appalling.
The worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust was minimised, denied, justified, or outright celebrated.
Jewish people were immediately told to put their grief and trauma over this to away, because Palestine's pain was more important to talk about.*
Jewish and Israeli people were told they needed to try and understand why armed men raped, tortured, and killed members of their community. Because, you know, the murderous rapists are who we need to have sympathy for here. Anyone can be pushed to the point of, I don't know, murdering a young woman and parading her corpse around a street for men to spit on her dead body. If you really think about it, isn't that actually kind of an understandable thing to do?
When raising concerns over the rising antisemitism that was starting to look a lot like the build-up to that little historical tidbit called The Holocaust, Jews were told they were selfish for raising the issue.
When asking people not to call for intifadas that have historically resulted in thousands of dead Jews, they're told they're taking it all the wrong way.
When Israeli victims spoke of the abuse they received on Oct 7 and in captivity, they're told they need to stay silent because otherwise they risk justifying the genocide of Palestinians.
When 15 people were murdered at a Hannukah festival, there were no social media icons, no surge from progressive groups to find out what support they needed.
To be clear here, progressive groups seem more concerned with antisemitism in the Harry Potter books than they are about the actual, you know, string of dead Jews that have been murdered over the past few years. If you condemn antisemitic representations in diction and then turn around and completely ignore real-life fucking murder, then I'm sorry I genuinely do not think you ever gave a shit about fighting antisemitism, you just wanted to fight Jk Rowling. **
Absolutely fuck everyone who has justified or denied what happened on Oct 7th. There were ways to advocate for both Israeli and Palestinian victims, but the people who should have known better have ensured that Oct 7th wasn't just one day of hell for Jewish communities, but that its been currently 2.5 years of hell that seems to just be getting worse.
And the most infuriating part is the people who did justify Oct 7th will never admit they were wrong, because that would mean admitting they argued that the murder rape mutilation torture and kidnap of a Jewish community was acceptable, and that would break their brains. I mean it. The cognitive dissonance between believing you are someone who cares for human rights, whilst also being someone who justified all of that, is too great. The brain will always protect itself. Its why people are currently doubling down on there being no rapes on Oct 7th. Rape is not resistance, it is not self defence, it is not landback, it is not right of return, it is not decolonisation, it is not any of the shit people tell themselves Oct 7th was. Rape is just rape. It is just men torturing people (mainly women) for no other reason than because they enjoy it. You will never see these people admitting rape occurred, because the second they do is the second they realise just how horrifically they have behaved.
And it's not getting better. Hate crimes and murders of worldwide Jewish communities are rising. Jewish people are looking to leave places like the US, UK and Australia, which were once considered some of the safest places for them to live. A KKK slur (zio) is now common online usage. Jewish people are expected to sever any connection to an important part of their culture (Israel/Hebrew) in order to be treated somewhat civily. The more IDF crimes are uncovered in Gaza, the more worldwide Jewish communities bear the brunt of the anger. Typing 'Jewish' into any social media brings you into an absolute clusterfuck of the most horrific things you can possibly see people say about their fellow human beings.
I am just sick and exhausted and furious and it feels like I'm hitting my fists against a brick wall that is not knocking down. How do you even get people to realise how bad this is????
I am not Jewish. I know full well that Jewish people talking about all of this get ignored. I know full well that a Jewish person standing up for Palestine gets thousands of notes, and a Jewish person standing up for their own people barely breaks 100. I know full well that Jewish people are being smeared as paranoid or crazy or selfish. I know full well that non-Jewish people speaking up about antisemitism is taken more seriously than Jewish people talking about their own experiences.
Can you all just start fucking having some fucking empathy for Jewish and Israeli communities who have been facing the worst 2 years of their lives. Fucking please. It is not that fucking hard to feel empathy for lots of groups at once. To empathise with both Palestine and Israel, Muslims and Jews. Empathy for all is part of what brings us away from just being animals and makes us human.
If you can't do it, it is not an issue with Jews or Israelis or Zionists or the IDF, it is an issue with you.
*I am not saying Palestinian pain isn't important to raise awareness of, and the people fearing what the IDF would do immediately after Oct 7th were right to raise it. I'm saying asking Jewish communities to take on the trauma of Palestinians, when they were still reeling from their own inter-community trauma, was wrong and unhelpful. I wouldn't ask Palestinian communities to have centered the trauma of Oct 7th either. Trauma is not a competition and everyone deserves to have their respective pain treated fairly.
**also not saying that Rowling shouldn't be criticized, because she is awful, but that real-life massacres and rapes of Jews is sort of a bigger priority than bad representation in the Harry Potter books, and that if you can't understand that then...yeah. you didn't actually care about jewish people at all.
#thank you!#I really appreciate gentiles saying this#because genuinely I feel like I'm going crazy half the time#like the people who said that killing chickens to eat was too cruel are A okay with a Jewish infant and toddler being murdered#it's like everyone just forgot their morals#thank you for saying this#antisemitism via @shofarsogood
If republican propaganda mills (Beacon, Post, Examiner) are doing actual investigative journalism for their own strategic reasons that ostensibly more credible/mainstream sources (NYT Wapo, whatever fetid sewer rags Grim/Greenwald/Carlson/Vigeland/Medhi Hasan work for) are failing to cover because they're all in the same group chats and wiping each others' asses and they think they need to 'massage the narrative for the good of the movement' what you have is not credible or mainstream media. You have a propaganda wing that ONLY attacks Democrats, Jews, and women, protects actual rapists while cynically sourcing accusations of their own to try and play temu kingmaker (hi Ryan Grim, Hi Tara Reade) and is still vulnerable to GOP aligned sources actually covering the stories because they FUCKING BURIED THEM and lied to people who trusted them.
NYT/Wapo/every single pundit thirsty for the Nepobaby Nazi Rapist Populist man is less effective at being organizational propaganda AND CREDIBLE NEWS than the insane republican publications!
Because they're cowards who all clean up after each other, and their morals AND their tactics stink.
This is not new. Remember when Reality Winner went to the Intercept with a story that implicated Russia and Greenwald took such good care of her?
Why are crazy conservative right wing newspapers the voice of reason here. Why am I reading the post or the beacon. What the fuck is going on.
You know how leading up to the World Cup everyone was line âoh no evil America with evil Americans who hate soccer and love guns and fascismâ and then thousands and thousands of people from all over the world were posting constant updates about how Americans are nice actually and the media led them to believe complete falsehoods about America and Americans.
Can we do that, but for Israel, please.
But that would take, like, work.
LOL yeah, BUT the work is fun. Itâs literally just people coming over and interacting with other humans and having fun and eating good food while engaging in some mutually enjoyable activity.
I think the motivation for outsiders is more daunting than the work.
I am begging you to look up Chriscaresnone on Instagram.
I LOVE HIM SO MUCH. BEEEN FOLLOWING HIM FOR YEARS.
HE'S WONDERFUL
heard someone say "who even owns a rolling pin anymore" and my brain froze trying to process it. what does that mean. are u implying rolling pins are outdated technology? did we come up with a shiny new 21st century method of flattening dough of which i remain uninformed? is there now an app on the app store people are using instead??? im losing my mind "who even owns a rolling pin" people who BAKE
#kneadless comment

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
We need to isolate and start selectively breeding the plastic eating bacteria so we can optimise their efficiency, and then somehow splice their DNA into the gut bacteria of an obligate carnivore, so we can put it in our cats gut biomes so they'll finally be free of having to choose between whether they want to eat plastic or whether they want to live.
As a geneticist and microbiologist who has worked with plastic-degrading microbes briefly, this is theoretically possible. The most difficult parts would be finding a microbe that could take plastic in it's unaltered (or slightly stomach-acid degraded) form.
For my project, we were trying to identify microbes that could use partially treated plastic as a food source and break it down further. The carbon bonds in our daily plastics are really hard to get at and break, hence the bad degradation, so breaking some of those bonds through heat and chemicals first can help microbes get access to them. Once we identify a microbe that can do this, we could test giving them slightly less degraded plastic to live on until they develop a way to eat it and go until they either get back to normal plastic or hit a wall where the microbe can't progress anymore (which may be likely).
An alternative approach to breeding (although you don't 'breed' most microbes since they reproduce asexually but instead find strains with mutations that lead to desired changes) would be trying to predict an enzyme that could break the bonds in plastic, engineering it, and putting it in microbes to test if it works. On one hand it could overcome any natural halt selection has but would be initially harder to discover.
The best solution would probably be to find the microbe that can eat the partially degraded plastic, figure out what enzyme is doing the work, then see how the enzyme could be improved to work through plastic in its default state.
Once you have that, the next consideration would be what byproducts are created from eating plastic? Part of the project was hoping that the microbe that could eat plastic would produce a useful byproduct that could be harvested, as an unfortunate reality of our current world is that if it's not profitable it probably won't take hold. But if we wish to put this in a living organism, we need to make sure it won't produce a harmful byproduct, or if it does, then ensuring the organism can quickly turn it harmless before it builds up.
Once all of that is figured out, the next hardest thing would be ensuring that whatever gut microbe you put the plastic eating gene in continues to express it. Since plastic is so hard to use it would probably prefer to use any glucose lying around first, and if that runs out then switch to eating plastic. We could try removing its ability to eat glucose (or whatever other compounds it lives off of), but then it would be less competitive in the gut environment and would require a steady source of plastic in order to not die off.
Although, I assume cats (and some people) would not find that a challenge.
...holy shit.
the only research I did for this post was 30 seconds to double-check on wikipedia whether or not bacteria have DNA.
Honestly, my first thought was "what about whales?"
Like we have so many animals dying because their stomachs are filled with plastic. Cleaning all that shit out of the ocean is a worthwhile goal, but the truth is there will probably always be some plastic.
Is this something that could (again, theoretically) be introduced into populations suffering this problem?
I hope Maine understands if they vote for that Nazi, they're going to be subjected to intense national scrutiny usually only reserved for states like Florida.
Ask Pennsylvanians how they feel being the home of the most hated Democratic senator.
Vibe check?
I will note he might not have gotten so far in Florida but only because my home state actually has some pretty broad "freedom of the press" laws that might have gotten this stuff spread farther sooner.
I didnât mean to offend you I just genuinely think youâd like what the ai did with the story, itâs really great and maybe even better than the first chapter! I also asked it to make fan art based on some of your shorter works and theyâre gorgeous, some of the best art Iâve ever seen. Ai isnât as bad as people think so if you ever realize that and change your mind I can still send it all to you!!! <3
i wasnât going to respond to this bc of how much it fucking pissed me off but i feel like this needs to be said.
donât ever come into a writersâ inbox and openly admit you used ai to, letâs face it, plagiarise their work. i donât CARE if you want it to be on my blog, you still fed it into an ai bot for your own gain. itâs fucking ridiculous that you blatantly ignored the rules on my page that state NOT to do this to my work.
also saying itâs âbetter than the first chapterâ sorry but fuck you?? first you steal my work and put it into ai and then basically say my works shit and ur ai slop is better???
i work full time, i dont tend to write all that often, hence why longer one-shots/fics are barely posted. sometimes all i can get out is a little drabble/blurb. and then sometimes i lose motivation for fics/seriesâ that iâve previously posted about. this doesnât give you an excuse to take my work and use ai to create your own. sometimes fics just donât get finished and you have to fucking deal with it. if i ever find the motivation again, i might post about it again, but if i donât, then donât use ai on my work. and especially donât use it to create fucking fanart on my other pieces.
tl;dr donât fucking steal my work and plagiarise it through fucking ai. i donât want your ugly nasty disgusting ai slop anywhere NEAR my blog and my content and my works.
to the ppl who reblogged this and replied to this w messages of support tysm <333
Iâm so sorry about this!
What a fucking asshole.
Not you, OP, you're absolutely correct. The thief, however, can walk barefoot in the dark across a football field covered in legos.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Amidst all of this: Fetterman setting up a joint fundraising committee with McCormick (R-PA). The man is transparently preparing to switch parties and once again Conor Lamb supporters are forever vindicated.
This guy should be blacklisted from politics.
The fact that 150K Mainers enthusiastically voted for a man they knew had a Nazi tattoo should haunt them like the legacy of voting for Klansmen haunts the South. Maybe the crackers up in New England are overdue for some national shaming.
I also want to point out that he was running against one of the least popular governors in the country.
Why Janet Mills is so unpopular beats me. A lot of it's probably for dumb misogynistic/ageist reasons.
But, nonetheless, I strongly suspect a lot of Nazi Tat's support was less about people wanting his "progressive" policies and more about people just wanting someone other than the old lady governor. It's very reminiscent of Bernie's Rust Belt "support" in 2016 and how it completely evaporated four years later when he was running against another man instead of a woman.
If I'm right, this is still a pretty damning indictment of Maine voters. An "annoying" old lady was more of a dealbreaker for them than a Nazi tattoo. đ
We definitely need to be having more discussions about not only the left's open misogyny and ageism (on top of their racism and antisemitism) but also why the majority of leftist Zoomers in particular are so bigoted.
Why was Janet Mills so unpopular when she fought Trump in court (and won) and gave Mainers free community college? Would she have been as unpopular if she were 20 years younger and male?
One of the few things that's bipartisan in politics is a hatred of all things feminine. Many voters instantly recoil from politicians that remind them too much of their mother or grandmother.
We're also in an era of populism, where voters are looking for politicians that are "authentic" and have "charisma" and are "willing to fight," and they always seem to define those traits as traditionally masculine qualities -- has a deep voice, has an imposing stature, is willing to trash-talk others, wears jeans instead of a suit, and so on.
I have little doubt that Mills would've cleaned-out Nazi Tat in the primary if she were a younger man. She barely even edged-out David Costello in the primary vote, despite him being a no-name with little funding and attention. Maine voters truly wanted a man on the ticket, more than anything else.
we really should be calling it fanworks, not content
I'm here for fun and community not to rp a mega corporation's underpaid social media intern

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointeeânot a career expert or peer reviewerâto ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people existâthrough its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processesâcould be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to âsupport the notion that sex is mutableâ and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitationâhospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that itâs worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.
This torches everything. And I do mean everything.
A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):
ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
requiring that topics must support the presidentâs agenda.
What this means, and if anything Iâm under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.
Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.
Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.
Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:
"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; âif an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ËŽ"
But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.
Some added 101-level context from someone (me) whoâs worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. Itâs been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.
This yearâs is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means thereâs no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.
This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how theyâre going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasnât covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.
So yes, please comment. You donât have to read all 400 pages before doing so, itâs dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isnât voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying âhey what the fuck are you doing hereâ is good, though.
Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.
As of today, 7/8/26, we have five days for public commentary on this to go through. I am begging y'all: if you care about independent science in the country that produces the most global science funding in the world, please leave a comment.