The GOAT

baby i think ur just racist and trying to hide it under progressive language

if men can be feminine, to the point where they are assumed to be female while still idenifying as male it threatens the idea that presenting a certain way and liking features (think being hairless, boobs etc) makes you male or female.

Since 2005, there are more registered female drivers than males and for the past 30 years male drivers account for 70% of all fatal car accidents.

I feel like if women could do the same and build around a common goal instead of constantly excluding each other, movements like “I hate men” or women centered movements would have a stronger chance of succeeding. A movement that excludes too many potential supporters will struggle to gain enough power to create large scale change. The broader the coalition, the more disagreement it will have to accept, while smaller movements may be more consistent ideologically but will also have less reach.

I shouldn't have to explain to you why a community that looks down on male-partnered women will have problems attracting straight women, who just happen to be 90% of the female population. This sort of mockery drives away not only women who are already partnered, but those who don't feel ready to commit to separatism, or simply unwilling to. The result is that women who would've agreed with you on everything else (surrogacy, prostitution, sex-based oppression...) end up distancing themselves from the online space, which results in them seeing fewer articles, studies, and discussion from a feminist perspective. It doesn't mean these women will throw away everything they've learned and become anti-feminist, but I'd still consider their absence a loss.

I feel like if women could do the same and build around a common goal instead of constantly excluding each other, movements like “I hate men” or women centered movements would have a stronger chance of succeeding. A movement that excludes too many potential supporters will struggle to gain enough power to create large scale change. The broader the coalition, the more disagreement it will have to accept, while smaller movements may be more consistent ideologically but will also have less reach.

Hopefully this isn't too cruel of me because I do believe males can be abused and are sometimes.

Men convinced themselves they're being victimised systematically by women with no evidence and therefore will act like someone being emotional is being psychologically abusive (which is ridiculous).

Though there is a big profile case of a man lying on purpose when he was the abuser: Depp.

Men that claim to have been abused by female partners are quite likely to have been the abusers themselves. Not all, but the majority. It really is a red flag to watch out for.

this pretty much sums it up. males trying to silence women, minimizing male violence, and being pro abuse.

“Men suffer in silence” until that father and husband comes home and drinks and beats his wife, kids and the dog/cat, cause “he’s stressed from work”.

word

So you feel chill hanging out with a huge crowd of drug fueled creeps who will sexually assault a woman if they get the chance???