I have longstanding theory the women are more horny than men but weâre tricked into thinking otherwise bc men donât have to worry about ~~consent~~ so theyâre free to experience more sexual desire
Women have better orgasms than men
We have no refractory period between orgasms
We have an entire organ dedicated to pleasure
Our orgasms have no other biological function - we orgasm for the pure joy of it rather than to impregnate/pass on DNA
Our arousal is hidden - I could be literally thinking of sex 24/7 and nobody would know. This is also why I think it should be men who are flaunting themselves sexually in public/all over media - women can experience arousal entirely privately and not be a public nuisance
Our arousal does not make us vulnerable. An erection steals bloodflow and sticks out awkwardly, making it vulnerable to being broken, as well as emotionally vulnerable - men should naturally feel self-conscious about their erections. I think this is part of the reason men are so obsessed with making their dicks out to be some sort of weapon and symbol of power - they are massively overcompensating for their inability to experience an incredibly powerful, intimate and vulnerable sensation privately and safely.
Men being âvisualâ is a massive overcompensation for the fact that their orgasms just arenât that good. They lack the sensation in the penis that women do in the clitoris, and so they âneedâ visual stimulation to give them extra incentive to be sexual.
Examples of women desiring sex from their aging, disinterested husband are commonplace, but every time a woman loses interest in sex we can always point to a man who is uninterested in her pleasure. A lot of those disinterested aging husbands will suddenly find their libido again when they find a younger woman - which, once again, shows that their sex drive is fueled by external factors such as rape/exploitation and being âvisualâ
Unfortunately, a culture of mass dehumanisation of women has rendered consent meaningless for men - men do not have to consider sex as a joint enterprise, meaning they can see a hot woman and fantasise about her sexually as much as they like. An emotionally and morally healthy person may experience arousal regardless, but considering someone elseâs humanity and desire will always deflate any arousal to a healthy level. Men have artificially raised their perceived level of sexual desire via rape culture.
Oh also: the fact that menâs âvisualâ attraction seems to be largely based on whatâs considered attractive for the time period and/or culture - Iâve always considered that odd bc if attraction is supposed to be this primal biological drive then why is it so easily influenced by fashions? Why are some cultures attracted to women with artificially raised necks, bound feet, corseted waists? Men are pathologically obsessed with attractions to women based on symbols of submission and literally restricting our ability to get away, not to mention the fact that they can be sexually attracted to bodies and faces so distorted that they donât look like human women at all - this says to me that men actually have a lot more vulnerable feelings about sex than theyâd like to admit; they want their sexual desire so safe and protected from pesky things such as consent, humanity and mutuality. If we took away such symbols of submission would men be as hyper-sexual as they claim?















