the slow casual creep of misogyny back into every point of our lives both digital and physical is making me feel fucking insane
Show & Tell
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
hello vonnie
Sweet Seals For You, Always

â

pixel skylines
Cosmic Funnies
i don't do bad sauce passes

#extradirty
RMH
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

JVL
almost home

blake kathryn
ojovivo
cherry valley forever
noise dept.
$LAYYYTER
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from South Africa
seen from Singapore
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from India

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Canada
@fedupradfem
the slow casual creep of misogyny back into every point of our lives both digital and physical is making me feel fucking insane

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Trans activists think they're super fucking smart when they point out that some women don't have cervices, uteri, vaginas, breasts, etc. They like to say that radfems think these women aren't women because of it. Yes, we are all aware that some women are missing body parts or have body parts that don't function due to injury, illness, or developmental disorders. But in the same way that some humans missing a leg doesn't mean all humans are not bipedal, some women missing components of their reproductive system does not make them not female.
Trans activists, by insisting that women having missing or dysfunctional reproductive organs make them the same as men who identify as women, YOU are denying them their womanhood. Being female cannot be taken away as much as it cannot be opted into. Stop using disabled women, women with DSDs, and women who have had parts of their body removed as your pawns.
there is a synonymizing of "butchness" with "mastectomies" happening in our current day and age that I find highly disturbing. I see butch representation photosets going around where almost all of the women have elective mastectomies. People in the notes find this aspect specifically inspiring.
"placing the woman in the same prison cell as an aggressive male inmate in order to placate the male inmate" sounds super familiar but idk why đ¤đ¤đ¤
âItâs painful when I hear/see quotes from men, waxing poetic about how violent and inhumane âweâ âhumansâ are âto each otherâ. When historically and globally, males account for the vast, vast majority of violence. Mostly against women. I used to wonder, how could these men â fancying themselves profound and in-on Truth â possibly call âhumansâ violent when they are technically the source? But I guess thatâs what happens when the only people you consider humans are other men.â
â Alicen Grey (via ourwildways)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
lol could you imagine seeing a grotesque fetishized parody of your identity hit the mainstream . I am glad us lesbians never have to deal with that !
Xitter ate the tweet this is from, but Tim Bender posted it
On what the male loneliness epidemic is really about. Given actual alternatives, women are opting tf OUT of "traditional roles".
Edited to add found the tweet
on this lefty livestream this dude said it's "mostly the women" who have x attitude then points with his cursor to the TIM on the debate panel, then says "these three...." referring to the TIM and two other guys. OH IT'S MOSTLY THE WOMEN BUT IT'S TWO MALES AND ANOTHER MALE WHO SAYS HE'S A WOMAN. I FUCKING HATE THE LEFT
conservatives call gay sex taboo and disgusting and that is bad
okay yes
Therefore it is praxis to support all taboo sexual practices no matter what they are because being taboo automatically is anti-conservative and therefore progressive
okay no
The american government pumps out so much propaganda about china that is blatantly misleading
Okay yes
Therefore the solution is to start consuming chinaâs government propaganda unquestioningly
Okay no
People who are overweight are mistreated interpersonally, societally, and by the medical system
Okay yes
Therefore it is praxis to get as fat as possible and all health risks are fake
Okay no
Why are progressive spaces like this.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
no donât worry i totally love how we shamed women out of using vagina imagery in their art ever again but i have to see 500 degenerate posts about girl dick every time i open social media
Itâs true. Porn subreddits are the place you can have a âcis women onlyâ rule and not get banned
i scrolled past this and then as it sunk in i found myself shaking with fury in my computer chair. all this talk about "sisters not cisters" and this is what they think of "cis" women. they think of us as meat.
so "what is a woman" doesn't matter because "define chair" but if I don't say and act like you are a woman then you'll literally kill yourself. kinda seems like what is and is not a woman is actually of unbelievably great importance to you, perhaps even more than it is to me. idk.
maybe you have a perfectly clear idea of what a woman is, but you just don't want to confess, so you pretend it's insignificant and undefinable.
âchairâ is supposedly impossible to define, but if you were blind and asked me to find you a chair to sit on and I instructed you to sit down on a cactus, somehow I suspect youâd have complaints
genderists know what words mean - if they didnât, they wouldnât be able to communicate enough to get their basic needs met, let alone make threats and arguments on the internet. they just pretend that âwomanâ is an especially, impossibly complicated word, because they donât want us to be able to use it to talk succinctly and clearly about our experiences
You never hear them ask âWhat is a man,â though. Men get to keep their language. Rule 8 of misogyny: Men are whatever they say they are and women are whatever men say they are.
Imagine if a boss tried to redefine "chair" to make sure their employees can't sit down
What feminists meant when they said "Gender is a social construct": Hey, we're actually real human beings here, not just the degrading social status and role you've forced on us since birth. Like, we have full humanity and deserve human rights.
What "woke q*eers" mean when they say "gender is a social construct": Anything I do to "women" is a victimless crime because the "woman gender" is socially constructed/isn't real. I can mock feminity or wear a woman costume 24/7 and it's fine- "woman" isn't real, it's just a concept for me to use as I please. Defining woman is like defining a chair. Of course, women deserve rights but also nobody knows what a woman is so..
Feminists really said gender is a social contruct so women would stop being treated like theyâre predestined to clean the toilet and men weaponized that to be like âyeah gender is a social construct- so ill construct it to be a 24/7 masturbation tool. Time to pop E and beat my dick in the female restroomâ.
how it feels to be classmates with someone who thinks like this (and also got all pissy when i said i didnt wanna reclaim queer)
https://www.tumblr.com/bobzillashiftwoods/799601259638358016?source=share
The only way they can win arguments is by taking things out of context, itâs pathetic. Itâs also interesting how theyâll happily acknowledge binary sex in animals when it suits them
God theyre so stupid. If you're reading a post on twitter it can be assumed that you are human. Their "clever response" isn't even "technically" correct, just stupid all around.
Itâs so childish. Same with the whole âdefine a chair -> oh so youâre saying a horse is a chair???â Thing. Can we please sit down and have a conversation like adults instead of treating everything like a game?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Tinfoil hat moment but I swear this âomg evil SWERFs!!!â nonsense is a psy op bankrolled by the sex industry because in what world is âI think itâs okay for 60 year old men to buy sex from 18 year olds struggling to afford their next meal :)â something you can say with a goddamn straight face.Â
thatâs not even a tinfoil hat moment tbh like âturn off the blue lightâ was a campaign run by traffickers, the #notyourrescueproject was run by a man who posed as one of the women he trafficked under the name âmolli desiâ, thereâs probably more examples but yeah, thatâs 100% whatâs going onÂ
Red umbrella project was started/run by pimps and traffickers too.
Also think about now much modern feminism has to do with âsex positivityâ and glorifies PornHub đ
Also the NSWP, one of the most influential sex work orgs (backed by Amnesty & funded by George Soros) has ties to human trafficking. One of their leaders got sentenced for procuring and trafficking a few years ago
Oh and the IUSW openly takes money from pimps, including Douglas Fox who ran one of the biggest prostitution rings in England
Julie Bindel took a trip to Phnom Penh, Cambodia in 2015 to visit women who were supposedly apart of a popular and well-funded NGO called âWomenâs Network For Unityâ (WNU). She was not aware beforehand that a board member would actually be at the meeting. She details in this article that the board member consistently interrupted the prostitutes she came to speak with. When asked about the services they provide for women, she said that âIf the women are beaten up by the police, they are given legal training on their rights; if they are arrested, the WNU will provide food during the time they cannot work; and if one of the women dies, they will help to buy the coffin.â When asked by Bindel if the organization was planning to raise money to help women out of prostitution, she replied âNo.â When Bindel spoke with the women at the WNU meeting, many told her that they needed hundreds of dollars to obtain identification documents that they would need to seek out other, less dangerous work. Many said they had no idea they were apart of any sex workers union or NGO, which WNU claims to be.
The International Union of Sex Workers (IUSW) is a UK-based union for sex workers, and became a part of GMB, another general workers union and Britainâs third largest union, in 2002 after a vote to become an affiliate. Like @feministclassicist mentioned before me in the thread, Douglas Fox is one of the many donors to the IUSW, and is also a part of Amnesty International, which Iâll address shortly. Fox owns the largest escort service in north-eastern England, and has dedicated a lot of time, money, and resources to lobby for the legalization of pimping, brothel-owning, and sexbuying.
In 2010, Douglas Fox published a post on the official IUSW website, wherein he routinely refers to women who are prostitutes as âwhores,â claims that Julie Bindel and other anti-coercive sex industry feminists are not âtrue feministsâ, claims prostitution does ânot institutionalise the sexual objectification of womenâ, and states âthe whore challenges social oppression of both men and women by refusing to conform to narrow oppressive role prescriptions.â
These statements are diametrically opposed to the lives and vocalized experiences/desires of the overwhelming majority of so-called âsex workersâ, who want to leave these industries and find other sources of labor, but often donât have the resources to do so. [2] [3]
In 2008, Douglas Fox proposed a motion for blanket decriminalisation of the sex trade at the Amnesty International (AI) Annual General Meeting, a proposal that became international AI policy seven years later.
In October of 2014, Alejandra Gil, the Vice President of the Global Network of Sex Work Projects (NSWP), was arrested for running a massive sex trafficking ring, using APROASE (a proclaimed sex-worker led sex work Union, for whom she was a co-chair member) as a front for her illegal activities. In March of 2015 she was charged. Despite that, the very NSWP article I linked paints Gil out to be a victim, and dismisses her guilt.
âTurn off the blue lightâ is a primarily European campaign, whose mission is âto raise awareness on the violence, crimes and discrimination against sex workers, a marginalized female group and mobilize public opinion and stakeholders in order to tackle these phenomenaâ Despite this self-proclaimed mission, the campaign is backed and funded by characters such as Peter McCormick, a convicted pimp who rakes in millions of Euros from his online prostitution service annually. Additionally, his son, who was convicted of running 6 brothels is another advocate for the campaign. TJ Carrol is yet another of these traffickers and pimps who supported the campaign. Carrol ran the largest trafficking/prostitution ring in Ireland, and utilized African gangs to traffick women and sell them into sexual slavery, where oftentimes they were horribly abused and unable to escape. Carrol and his associates used voodoo rituals to terrify African women into staying in the industry, and he also groomed his daughter into the business. Tony Linnane is yet another convicted pimp who backed the campaign. He was also connected to an incident wherein a woman was âthreatened with being burned alive after gasoline was thrown on her.â Had enough yet? Mihai Selaru is a brother owner and pimp who plead guilty to beating the prostitutes forced to work for him, and threatened to starve a woman if she did not bring in more business.
Claudia Brizuela, a former leader of Asociacion de Mujeres Meretrices de Argentina (Association of Women Prostitutes of Argentina) (AMMAR) and a founder of the Latin American-Caribbean Female Sex Workers Network (LA-CFSWN), was arrested and charged with sex trafficking. The LA-CFSWN was represented by none other than Gil Alejandra.
Julie Bindel, through her fantastic and diligent research, discovered that the #notyourrescueproject hashtag and campaign, which claimed to be a âsex-worker-ledâ campaign was actually created and sustained by burner accounts of Dr. John Davies by women he had pimped and trafficked. Primarily, he posed as a disenfranchised woman from the Indian sub-continent named âMolli Desi.â All of the pictures of âMolliâ were actually pictures of a woman he had trafficked from Bangladesh. Davies was a Visiting Research Fellow with the Centre for Migration Studies Department of Sussex University, where he routinely hid behind his respectability as a doctor in order to promote trafficking denialism. Davies was also involved in an adoption scheme called the King Solomon Foundation, which operated out of Romania, and where he sold the children of prostituted women for up to $20,000.
Liberal feminists and pro-âsex workâ advocates, have you asked yourself who is benefiting from the constant platitudes you throw out? When you forego listening to the experiences of actual women who live in these conditions, the women who have been forever harmed and scarred by these immoral industries, and instead parrot talking points made by child predators, traffickers, pimps, and sexbuyers, who do you think is benefiting? I used to be like you. I used to spout the âsex workers deserve rights, and the way to go about that is through legalizationâ talking points. That stopped once I started dedicating time to researching the endless campaigns, legislative bodies and lobbyists that end up being the ones who are actively hurting women and selling them into sexual slavery. I started reading theory from women who have dedicated their lives to the protection and advocacy for women who donât have the privilege of seeking these outlets themselves. Almost one million men, women, and children are trafficked every year alone. Have you ever critically addressed why you support legislation that increases this number? Why you claim weâre âsex-workerâ exclusive when our feminism seems to be the only kind that seeks to abolish the sexual violence that pervades still? Empowerment is not commodifying women and selling us into sexual slavery. Empowerment is a state of being that requires that we have the conditions to make choices free of economic or otherwise violent coercion, or ultimatums that force women into inescapable circumstances. Wanting to legalize sexbuying, pimping, or brothel-owning is the advocacy of selling women for menâs sexual pleasure no matter the cost, and attempts to codify into law the types of situations that cause women to become prostitutes or trafficked individuals rather than eradicating the sociocultural, economic, political, and legislative plagues that commodify & objectify women, and force them into scenarios where they must submit to the sexual wills of men to survive.
Reblogging because not a whole lot of people were following me when I wrote this out
someone was looking for thisâŚhere it is.
I think part of why thereâs suddenly so much âconfusionâ about what a woman is, is that itâs much harder to argue philosophy than policy. Because, you know, whether the people saying âfemaleâ is such a nebulous concept really believe it or are just being disingenuous, they can certainly derail any conversation theyâd like.
You can spend years in a philosophy class debating about the metaphysics of a chair, but if your boss tells you to purchase 100 chairs and you purchase 100 couches, youâll both know youâve done something wrong.Â
But how do you argue something as basic as a definition with someone determined to ignore reality? If you hold up a pear and insist itâs an apple, insist the dictionary definition of âappleâ is incorrect, how do we advance in our discussion? If I relent and agree to pretend a pear is an apple, how do we discuss the differences between the two? If I hold fast, then youâve stymied the discussion; we cannot make decisions or share opinions if we each believe the same word has two different meanings. Youâve created a language barrier within a single language! Defeated wordsâ very purpose! Blocked communication before it began!
Just think: every word in this post has a precise definition. If it didnât, this post would have no meaning. And if this post made you angry, then know you already understand its basis. Just think: with no method of communication you could neither agree nor disagree with the ideas set forth, so, otherwise why would you be angry?Â
What is a pear? Itâs a fruit with small seeds that grows on a tree. It can be golden or green or even red. Itâs sweet when ripe. You can cook with it and there are a number of different varieties.Â
So this is a pear?
Oh, well pears have a distinct shape where theyâre narrower at the top than the bottom.
So this isnât a pear?
Pears have softer flesh than apples.
So this is no longer an apple? Is it a pear now?
Fruit is a social construct.Â
âApples are genetically distinct from pears. Apple species come from plants of the genus Malus, while pears come from trees of the genus Pyrusâ
âOh, so now youâre claiming that you can tell, by looking at a fruit, what its genetic sequence is?â
As soon as women start getting equal rights after much effort, the definition of woman changes. What a coinkidink