💓🐩

Women have better orgasms than men

We have no refractory period between orgasms

We have an entire organ dedicated to pleasure

Our orgasms have no other biological function - we orgasm for the pure joy of it rather than to impregnate/pass on DNA

Our arousal is hidden - I could be literally thinking of sex 24/7 and nobody would know. This is also why I think it should be men who are flaunting themselves sexually in public/all over media - women can experience arousal entirely privately and not be a public nuisance

Our arousal does not make us vulnerable. An erection steals bloodflow and sticks out awkwardly, making it vulnerable to being broken, as well as emotionally vulnerable - men should naturally feel self-conscious about their erections. I think this is part of the reason men are so obsessed with making their dicks out to be some sort of weapon and symbol of power - they are massively overcompensating for their inability to experience an incredibly powerful, intimate and vulnerable sensation privately and safely.

Men being ‘visual’ is a massive overcompensation for the fact that their orgasms just aren’t that good. They lack the sensation in the penis that women do in the clitoris, and so they ‘need’ visual stimulation to give them extra incentive to be sexual.

Examples of women desiring sex from their aging, disinterested husband are commonplace, but every time a woman loses interest in sex we can always point to a man who is uninterested in her pleasure. A lot of those disinterested aging husbands will suddenly find their libido again when they find a younger woman - which, once again, shows that their sex drive is fueled by external factors such as rape/exploitation and being ‘visual’

Men’s misogynistic movements (and I’m not saying this to praise them) often appear stronger because they don’t usually exclude other men from joining. Even when they disagree, they tend to keep them within the movement and place them into different categories rather than removing them entirely. They understand that collective power requires having more people involved. These groups aren’t free of internal conflicts either; they still divide over things like ideology, race, religion, class, leadership, and tactics. However, they often prioritize a shared goal over their differences, which can make them appear more unified.

Are they? Are they really "always busy" doing that?

Are any of these made-up married/feminine/mother-exclusive spaces in the room with us right now? You just made a bunch of shit up to get mad about. You know the internet is not actually "spaces". A discord is not a woman's space.

When we speak of "women's spaces" we are talking about real, physical spaces. Not some subcommunity of a few lesbian feminists online who just want to talk with other lesbians, not OSA women. Not some subcommunity of childfree women who don't want to talk about Mary Jo's three beautiful innocent sons everytime they bring up how motherhood can possibly contribute to enabling patriarchy. Not some radfem discussion post about how disabling the beauty industry for women and how obsessive hyperfemininity is a male-developed psyop to make women distracted, weaker, and lose resources they could otherwise be using for their own liberation.

Are you implying that lesbians should not have their own spaces... because feminism? Lesbian spaces should actually be inclusive to all women or else we are being divisive and ruining feminism's chances for success? You sound like a leftist man.

I'm surprised you didn't bring up race too, considering your clear hatred of lesbians having their own places to connect. How do you feel about Black women having their own feminist spaces? Korean women? Women from the global south in general? Should they open themselves up to white women or else they're destroying feminism?

You seem to be forgetting that males do absolutely hold judgements and prejudices against each other on small scales, just like these subspaces you hate women having so much. Race, sexuality, masculinity, fatherhood, all of these groups can perform exactly the same way. Just when they are in power it is "all men first".

Radical feminists are like that, just with women. You are just feeling butthurt because I am guessing some childfree or lesbian radical feminist said something mean about your Nigel or your adherence to beauty standards. I won't deny that women do a have a problem with maintaining class consciousness in the way men have succeeded, but it's the opposite reasons of what you claim. The division relies on feminine, male-centered women of all kinds refusing to critically examine anything about their way of life that is at all uncomfortable in any way. Choice feminism is the final product of this.

Instead, like you prove here so clearly, you would rather play victim to the mean radfems who are out to divide us! Instead of sitting with discomfort and joining us in awareness, you would rather point fingers at other women for not being the right sort of placid, inclusive feminists of your Hollywood-inspired fantasies.

Who is being divisive and judgemental now?

Men’s misogynistic movements (and I’m not saying this to praise them) often appear stronger because they don’t usually exclude other men from joining. Even when they disagree, they tend to keep them within the movement and place them into different categories rather than removing them entirely. They understand that collective power requires having more people involved. These groups aren’t free of internal conflicts either; they still divide over things like ideology, race, religion, class, leadership, and tactics. However, they often prioritize a shared goal over their differences, which can make them appear more unified.

This is a left wing antifeminist talking point. Feminist critics of the sex industry are making those criticisms because of how the industry treats the women and girls (children) in it, and the harshest critics tend to be those who have either survived it or have worked in a support role for survivors. The mainstream left pretends that feminist criticism of the industry is the same as conservative criticism (which does stigmatise the women) because that means left wing men get to keep paying to rape women and girls, and jerking off to videos of other men raping women and girls, and pretend that doing so is praxis.

As for the big meanie lesbians, febfems, and celibate straight women, you aren’t obligated to tolerate overt rudeness but you do need to understand that if you’re straight like me, you’ve been fed a narrative that if you pay your dues and tolerate enough horrible men in the straight dating scene, you’ll be rewarded with Prince Charming. By simple maths, if a chunk of straight men meet the legal definition of abusive (they do) and another chunk aren’t abusive in the eyes of the law but have unbridled contempt for women (they do), only some straight women will ever get to have a partner who will see them as human beings. That’s not something feminists made up to “exclude” you; it’s just how this shitty cookie crumbles, and you might as well think pragmatically about what your options are if Prince Charming doesn’t show up.