Howdy

congrats! Now you have a motif! A recurring theme! A focus for your art! Something to haunt you!

Seventeen still lives of dandelions? Three hundred poems about grief? A sketchbook dedicated to your grandmother’s house? Two books trying to unravel the complexities of familial relationships?

This is absolutely getting US citizens. There's no way it's not. They are not that careful. They're also almost definitely racially profiling...

How many homeless people lose ALL their stuff when cities & cops destroy their camps??? Yes! Including their IDs! Their medicine! Their HUSBAND'S ASHES.

There is NO WAY they're "only" scooping up people who moved here recently. It shouldn't be happening to ANYONE, but it's definitely happening to EVERYONE...

And they're targeting homeless people for the same reason that murderers do- because they assume no one cares.

See, ICE has been going after people in communities and tjose communities have been fighting back. Bullies fold when they meet resistance

Well, those homeless folks are part of your community.

They're somebody's auntie who couldn't make the rent one damn time. They're somebody's brother who fell on hard times because of an addiction.

Trump’s budget bill has many, many things in it, but buried amongst it is the MILLIONS OF ACRES OF PUBLIC LAND FOR SALE.

This is the entirety of the Arizona state forests, the entire Cascades mountain range. Swathes of pristine desert around the national parks in Utah. On the doorstep of Jackson Hole.

THIS BILL IS BIG, BUT IT CAN BE AMENDED AND ABSOLUTELY MUST NOT PASS AS IS please.

If you have ever enjoyed the wilderness, we stand to lose it all forever.

CALLING your senators - NOT JUST IN THE WEST. ALL SENATORS, is CRUCIAL.

Outdoor alliance has a great resource for reaching out.

I made this through tears last night in desperation, and I do want to shoutout to some EXCELLENT tags that I wish I'd had the bandwidth to add in the moment

@pinyonrice and @namira - you're absolutely right. The ENTIRETY of this land won't get sold, it's the fear that any of it could.

BLM manages 245 million acres of land. The forest service manages 193 million acres of land, for a total of 438 acres. The map shown is 300 million of that - 62% of the total area. The bill is only asking for 0.75% to actually be sold off, a FRACTIONAL value of the actual amount.

This is something that kept me awake wanting to understand better, to have some peace that maybe, some aspect of this would be okay.

I agree that this is the precedent, and that *which* lands they choose can have devastating repercussions for drilling, logging, etc. The fight for Bears Ear National Monument has told us this story again and again.

I definitely don't want to come across as fearmongering - there's just. No reason to be selling these lands, and most fundamentally the bill should have restrictions for the use cases, purposes, and actual locations rather than this blanket "free for all".

@fruity-basket-case also really put it well. In reality, individuals probably aren't getting more homes. Oil interests, resorts, mega-leases, the "highest bidder" is who is prioritized here.