Goblin Energy

I love those who imagine Eridian culture with no relationship hierarchy.

I love those who imagine Eridian culture with no distinction between romantic and platonic love.

I love those who understand that Rocky's love for Adrian doesn't diminish his love for Grace.

I love those who see Rocky and Grace as a queerplatonic relationship.

I love you those who see Rocky and Grace as friends.

I love those who think Grace realized his aroaceness because of Rocky.

I love those who think Grace knew it long before meeting him.

I love those who see Stratt and Grace as queerplatonic.

I love those who see Stratt and Grace as friends.

I love those who see that Stratt betraying Grace was devastating and important even with no romantic strings attached.

I love those who see both Stratt and Grace as aroace.

I love those who think Grace is aroace but never finds the words to describe it.

I love those who think Grace finds the term and everything clicks into place.

I love those who think Grace is sex or romance repulsed

I love those who think Grace is sex or romance favourable

I love aspec people who project onto Grace.

I love allo people who find Grace aroace.

It's just that you would maybe sorta like to watch anything other than that.

1. A lot of dudes. Just a ton of fucking people from beginning to end of the process.

2. Ancient people weren't stupid, they just figured shit out the same way we do: fuck around until you find out.

3. We're gonna plan this out and it's gonna take ten fucking years, and you will cope.

4. Sticks and string are surprisingly versatile and can be used for a variety of purposes, like moving stuff and making sure things are even and go in the spot you wanted to put them in!

What happens when Grace doesn’t sleep for 48 hours.

Based on this panel from Dungeon Meshi:

AI industry groups are urging an appeals court to block what they say is the largest copyright class action ever certified. They’ve warned that a single lawsuit raised by three authors over Anthropic’s AI training now threatens to “financially ruin” the entire AI industry if up to 7 million claimants end up joining the litigation and forcing a settlement.

Authors have until March 30th, 2026 (That is just 9 days as of this reblog, which I am posting on March 21st, 2026) to file their claim against Anthropic to be reimbursed up to $3,000 per work found in the list.

Go ahead and do the individual likes/reblogs/replies on each comment.

But every single iteration of the post should have the master aggregate notes at the bottom, all of which are attributed to OP and go to OP's activity.

That way OP of a piece of art or writing can in fact open any single iteration of the post, including the root post, and see and receive the full aggregate notes at the very bottom. And any single person who wants to see the full notes/tags/comments/etc can all do the same.

If other people agree maybe you can submit the idea too. I’ll try to track down what’s the appropriate feedback form and link it to this post.

Overall, the support page is supposed to be the correct place to submit feedback. You could either use 'Feedback' or 'Social features' in the category dropdown for this. I might suggest Social Features, actually, since Feedback is getting floooodded. It might actually get fresh eyes like that. If not there, then staff has said they closely watch the Changes blog and use the feedback from there to make decisions. That's repeated in their current most popular post, which is explicitly reacting to the negative feedback and currently telling us to give it a few days to get used to it first.

That's also extremely flooded (and the replies are more angry), but staff has specifically stated they are using feedback from that post to make future calls, so it's guaranteed to have eyes.

Funny enough, I had issues finding these comments, which I SAW in my activity feed, because when I went to my root post none of these comments existed. I had to go to my root post, go to MY second comment in the chain on the post (by digging it out of the notes), and THEN open the comments on THAT post to come find this.

I submitted feedback. I'll probably pepper this suggestion on the other feedback avenues over the coming days. (They're flooded now. Polite persistence probably carries weight here.)

Here's what I said

------

"Hello! I have a suggestion that I think could be a reasonable middle ground on the Notes broken up by Reblog.

Just 2 modifications: 1] All iterations of a post continue to show an aggregate footer at the bottom with total replies, comments, and likes, from all chains. 2] All notes continue to go to the post's original author, as in show up in their activity, regardless of reblog chain.

With these two things, then the notes-per-reblog no longer cause problems!

All comments and replies would remain findable and engageable, via the aggregate footer at the bottom of the post. This is very important for ongoing engagement--people can only interact with replies if they can find them!

Users would NOT avoid commenting, because they can be assured in the knowledge their comment will no longer fracture the notes (aggregate footer covers that) and will no longer steal the post's engagement from the OP (OP receives all activity). I would not be afraid to comment "This art is amazing!" on someone's artwork, as I would not need to fear fracturing the reblog chain and taking their engagement. Avoiding commenting hesitance is so important as well, because engagement stands to plummet if users all hold their tongue to not "steal" a post.

Even right now, I'm struggling to find useful information on my own posts--posts which I know have comments and replies--because I cannot find which reblog has the replies. Finding comments means finding and stepping through all the comment chains of the entire post to even stand the chance to find what I remember seeing.

This is also making engagement look so small... Posts of mine with 50,000+ notes across different reblog chains and now so sparse and fractured and nearly impossible to sift through for information.

Please consider this suggestion!"