Ball-jointed Catgirl

it’s not nudity if it’s tights

it’s like, beyond nudity and out the other side

working with kids and one of them says “you know you eat 8 spiders a night on average right?” and another goes “no no no those statistics are actually skewed by people who like eat spiders recreationally for fun and stuff” and my head snapped up like a fucking sleeper agent

age regresses into a MiG 15 and wobbles cutely from the recoil when i shoot my n-37 autocannon

liked... no its shocking how much it refuses to die though its like. in like 5-10 years people who dont play overwatch will be talking about it like its rwby

it also sort of did a lot for the idea of a game where you cant tell if you're good or bad at it because gameplay across all skill levels looks mostly indistinguishable, which is, interesting? but also kind of yucky to me due to the reasons behind that design?

i think it is the lootbox thing that makes overwatch notable as a cultural object to me because it demonstrated how despite near complete rhetorical alignment from everyone discussing the issue that the gambling is bad and exploitative, it ultimately paled in comparison to the rhetorical force of the object itself. it took no time at all for people to be like "well overwatch is really generous and not exploitative at all compared to other monetization" because its all normalized to the idea of the problem gambler or big spender we all have in our heads, and the fact that the hooks they designed into the game to keep people playing worked because they were designed to

in the slots manufacturer world there was a concerted shift away from large swingy all-or-nothing odds to a smaller, more frequent losses that could be presented as wins, which makes it harder for addicts to lose money in the short term, but made it more likely for the gambling addict to keep gambling in the long term, which is ultimately more profitable for the industry. i think that's the same thing to every gacha and lootbox dependent game becoming more perceptually "generous", or attempting to get ahead of gambling regulation by mitigating overspending risks when and where it doesnt hurt the bottom line

i would trust weird al with my drink at a party. granted he may put one of those capsules that expands into a sponge animal in it,

whatever man *walks outside of your render distance*

*thap thaps you*

not many know this, but girls can awawa for extra points

it's the only way

its the only way

u have bird

For thousands of years humanity has selectively bred chickens to have larger breasts and to have to lay eggs constantly. We did it to get more meat and per chicken, but from the perspective of the domesticated chickens they’re sorta living in a very specific fetish scenario

you truly can't have gimmicks as a transfem, huh.

like (and i know these aren't gimmick blogs but personal blogs with a particular focus), i-suggest-forcefem? plagiarized endlessly by tmras. yay-bunnies? plagiarized endlessly by tmras. they want our product but not us. tho like even blogs with pretty much zero gimmicks have impersonators, like sailatina for example.

of course only the original transfems are banned

checks out. our job is to generate "queer culture" for free and then get swapped out if we're considered uppity about anything