I'd say it is possible, yes -- especially if they occupied only a portion of Earth (particularly in the ocean, since you mention crustaceans) and their technology was very simple, or very unlike ours. On balance, though, I think an advanced, planet-spanning civilization would leave detectable traces for a long time, though it might not always be obvious that they weren't due to natural processes, especially if that's your default assumption.
If you were studying the human age from the vantage point of a distant posthuman future, you'd still be liable to find:
Artificially shaped bits of glass, terracotta, marble, gold, inox steel, etc. If exposed, these are going to be worn by erosion fairly quickly, but if buried soon enough they will endure pretty much forever. of course, this doesn't mean they're going to be excavated before the bit of crust that contains them is destroyed by tectonic events. Various plastics may survive, although they are close enough to organic matter that I expect eventually bacteria will evolve to eat it.
We're leaving behind a truly bizarre amount of skeletons, thanks to our habit to bury or embalm dead bodies. I'm not sure how much longer the burial itself will be recognizable -- perhaps we'll look just like the boom of Lystrosaurus just after the Permian Extinction. Cattle and chicken bones will also probably abund, and future paleontologists might wonder why these animals increased in size but shrunk their brains and horns/spurs. (Especially since the most abundant skeletons have massive braincases and dainty little jaws.)
Our epoch will be marked in the geological record by a thin layer full of all sorts of weird stuff -- jumbles of rare metals, exotic organic molecules. nuclear fission products -- that future chemists might still be able to recognize, even if any solid object is destroyed. The layer is global, like the iridium deposit left by the Chicxulub impact, so much of it should survive even if erosion and subduction destroy most of it.
It should also be possible to notice atmospheric carbon dioxide fuckery by checking leaf anatomy in plant fossils, composition of layers in ice sheets (if they have existed continuously!), and fossils of calcium carbonate-producing organisms such as bivalves and foraminifera, but it might not be obvious that it was an artificial event and not e.g. a supervolcanic eruption.
I see this rarely addressed in this sort of discussion, but we are absolutely wreaking havoc on biogeography. Paleontologists will see rabbits and camels suddenly appear in Australia, pigs and chicken in America, land mammals in New Zealand, and so on -- and that's not mentioning crop plants! The mysterious appearance of monkeys in South America 30 million years ago can be explained by rafting across a much narrower Atlantic, but this would be far too much all at once.
Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene (Zalasiewicz et al., 2011): properties of the geological layer of our times
The Silurian hypothesis (Schmidt & Frank, 2018): detecting industrial civilizations in Earth's past